Articles

USA
NOVANEWS We might call what happened to America “the good cop, bad cop” syndrome. The skies are full of our ...Read more

NOVANEWS   Turkey’s vibrant democracy is an inspiration to Arab countries throwing off their autocratic yoke and their Western patrons. ...Read more

NOVANEWS   CIA Drone Strikes in Yemen US Kills 130 People In Yemen by Hakim Almasmari (The National” – -SANA’A) ...Read more

USA
NOVANEWS by Tom Valentine In my heart I know that seeking vengeance for evil done is not the Christian thing to ...Read more

NOVANEWS   In no particular order of importance, we thought we'd list some of the reasons why the opening of ...Read more

NOVANEWS   Hesham Sallam has a brilliant piece in Jadaliyya on the fate of workers under the Supreme Council of the ...Read more

NOVANEWS   Israel, and its supporters in the U.S., prepare for the Freedom Flotilla II After ‘Amina’: Thoughts from Cairo ...Read more

NOVANEWS   Salon.com In a now infamous column, the writer Eliana Benador argued this week that Anthony Weiner (who is a ...Read more

NOVANEWS   With Saudi, IsraHell and Turkish interests aligning against it, the Kremlin seems in deep water — could it ...Read more

NOVANEWS     AFP   Russia and China oppose outside interference in the unrest in the Arab world, the two ...Read more

NOVANEWS   Zionist ‘spy’ Ilan Grapel meets with US embassy representative. Cairo’s indictment expected soon Egyptian sources believe that Zionist ...Read more

NOVANEWS Zio-Nazi Peres says that IsraHell ‘doomed’ unless negotiations with the Palestinians leading to a peace agreement begin in the ...Read more

America: Once the Most Respected Nation in the World; What Happened?

NOVANEWS

We might call what happened to America “the good cop, bad cop” syndrome.

The skies are full of our air power; the seas teeming with our fleets; and a large part of the world is garrisoned with our military installations and troops. The America of today is largely being viewed as the bad cop after its invasions and occupations of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan over the past decade.

by Michael Payne


What happened? Well, that’s really not difficult to explain. America once was the most respected, and admired, nation in the world. But then, suddenly, things began to change quite radically and, over a period of several decades, America went from being the most respected nation in the world to the most feared. Going from the most respected to the most feared is quite a feat, so how did such a transformation evolve?

We might call what happened to America “the good cop, bad cop” syndrome. After World War II, the U.S. was highly respected and thought of as that good cop that had led the efforts to defeat the primary Axis powers of Germany and Japan. After that war, it had, more or less, assumed the role of protector of the world.

America is no longer viewed as a protector of the world but, rather, a mighty military force that is protecting its own national interests. Quite a reversal of roles, is it not? The skies are full of our air power; the seas teeming with our fleets; and a large part of the world is garrisoned with our military installations and troops. The America of today is largely being viewed as the bad cop after its invasions and occupations of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan over the past decade.

If I had to come up with one word to describe the dramatic change that has come over America during the last half of the 20th century and thus far in the 21st, it would be – rampant Militarism. It’s as if an obsessive-compulsive behavioral disorder had entered the body of America, one that is totally resistant to any known treatment. It’s a condition that is not improving over time but is continuing to grow with ever more intensity.

But let’s get back to determining why America has largely lost the respect of the world. When did all this unrestrained militarism really take shape? We could say it began when, in 1950, U.S. forces were deployed in South Korea to help that nation fend off the threats of invasion by North Korea’s armies. The stated reason for our involvement in that war that ended in 1953 was, supposedly, to stop the spread of communism. So let’s call that the beginning.

However, I believe that the large growth of U.S. militarism began after several hundred thousand of our troops were deployed in Vietnam, beginning in 1965 during the era of the Cold War. That horrific military conflict lasted until the U.S. was forced to exit that country in 1975, but not before we had lost the astounding number of 58,000 troops and more than 2 million Vietnamese had been killed. During that war the U.S. used napalm, white phosphorus, and Agent Orange toxic chemicals to subdue the enemy and that country; it didn’t work.

That was the point, in my estimation, at which the respect for America among the nations of the world began to erode. Sure there was a communist threat during that era, and it certainly had to be addressed, but the question was — did it necessitate such a massive, long war to deal with the threat, or was it one of the greatest military blunders in history? We will let historians make that judgment, but this we know: from that time on the U.S. went on to involve itself in a succession of military conflicts against supposed enemies, mostly in very small nations, all over the world. And, unfortunately, the trend continues to this day.

If Korea was the beginning of our militaristic machine, and Vietnam greatly escalated its scope, then the terrorist attack on 9/11 can be considered as the event that capped the entire process and locked America into its current agenda of perpetual war.

Our government always needs some kind of bogeymen in order to justify its wars; during World War II the bogeymen were Hitler, Mussolini and Tojo — and, yes, they were that and a whole lot more. More recently it was Saddam Hussein, then Osama Bin Laden, and now it’s Libya’s Gadhafi. Which country and which designated bogeyman within it will be the next target? Stay tuned because it could be Yemen, Syria, Iran or any nation in the Middle East, Central Asia or who knows where.

Currently the U.S. and NATO have about 150,000 troops caught up in a large quagmire in Afghanistan and Pakistan while, at the same time, the U.S. is trying to make deals with the governments of both Afghanistan and Iraq to maintain a military presence in those nations for many decades to come. We continue to spend massive amounts of taxpayer money on our military empire while these same taxpayers would like that money spent on domestic needs, including the repair of our rapidly deteriorating national infrastructure.

I think the nations of the world are looking at America and what it is doing and just shaking their heads in utter disbelief — and in fear. Is this the very same country for which they formerly had such great respect and admiration? They wonder how much longer all this aggressive U.S. military action will continue around the world, and if they could be next target on the list.

Remember when the “Acting” President Ronald Reagan said, ” America is a shining city upon a hill whose beacon light guides freedom-loving people everywhere.” Does anyone still think that this is the way that the world views America today?

A further question might be to ask: does America even care whether it is respected by the other nations of the world? Do we really care what they may think about us? Well, I’d answer that in two ways: I’d say that the majority of Americans would like to regain the respect of the world that this nation once had and that they don’t particularly like being viewed as hostile and belligerent.

In the case of our government that’s an entirely different matter. By all its aggressive military actions around the world it appears that it is not concerned about having the respect of the world; it has a set agenda that involves military control over specific regions of the world, and it simply wants the nations of the world to accept that fact and not to interfere with how its being carried out.

The leadership of our government may not be the least concerned about respect because, in this highly dangerous world, power is what counts and that it has. Respect, therefore, is not an important issue to our leaders. But things have a way of changing quite dramatically, as history tells us. The day is fast approaching when America’s vast military empire will have to be drastically scaled back because our failing economy and our financial instability will no longer be able to sustain it. All the meaningful indicators are telling us that a huge financial crisis is imminent.

When that happens we might just be looking for a few friends in the world to help us in our time of crisis, and the respect of other nations will, without a doubt, become extremely important. The question is; at that time, when we’re looking for and needing those friends and their respect and support, will America get it; will it even deserve it?

Turkey and the Arab Spring: Learning to Walk Again

NOVANEWS

 

Turkey’s vibrant democracy is an inspiration to Arab countries throwing off their autocratic yoke and their Western patrons.

by Eric Walberg

Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party’s (AKP) renewed mandate puts the electoral seal of approval on its shift towards the Middle East, even as its importance to Europe increases. Now Turkey itself is being courted by both NATO countries and, increasingly, the Arab world.
Turkey was for centuries the crossroads of East and West, but reduced to a shadow of itself in the twentieth century. A century of European and US inspired intrigue dismembered the Ottoman Caliphate, inserted a Western-inspired Jewish state into the heart of the Arab world, and cut Turkish political and social life off from its Arab roots. The end of the Cold War should have brought the Turkish and Arab peoples back to their “natural” relations, and Turkey to its geopolitical importance, but the West prevented this, supporting the Cold War dictatorial status quo in the region dominated by a combative Israel.
The revolutions in the Arab world have now vaulted Turkey into a key role in the region. But this is merely Turkey returning it to its natural roots. “The wave of revolutions in the Arab world was spontaneous. But it also had to happen to restore the natural flow of history,” said Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu at the Leaders of Change Summit in Istanbul in March.
Throughout the Arab spring, Turkey has shown that it is more in tune with regional needs than Europe and the US. The overthrow of Tunisia’s Zein Al-Abidine bin Ali and Egypt’s Mubarak, close US allies, was greeted with alarm in Washington but with joy in Ankara. Elsewhere, the “Arab spring” has been more complex, and Turkey’s response confirms its new assertiveness, independent of its NATO allies.

In all the Arab countries now experiencing unrest and change, the West is concerned first of all with maintaining its interests in the region — financial, economic and political. Having “lost” Mubarak, US President Barack Obama and the G8 “generously” offered to exchange the new Egypt’s debilitating debt — incurred under Mubarak — for greater Western control of Egyptian industry, surely a devil’s pact. The US has put great pressure on the Egyptian army to maintain the peace accord with Israel, despite a majority of Egyptians wanting it cancelled immediately.

The West’s goal in both Libya and Syria has been to get rid of the anti-empire pests and open the countries to Western influence, even at the risk of destabilising those countries. While the West did not call for the Tunisian and Egyptian dictators to flee the palace, it has loudly demanded that Gaddafi and Al-Assad resign, aggressively bombing the former and demanding sanctions against the latter. However, just as Western enthusiasm for Mubarak and Ben Ali helped seal their fates, active Western backing for the opposition in Syria and Libya has actually given rise to dissent within the opposition and helped to buttress support for the existing regimes. While repressive, they at least left their subjects with a sense of resisting imperial encroachment.

 
Without any imperial baggage, Turkey’s response to the new Egypt and Tunisia has been advice and assistance with no strings attached. Given the complexity of the uprisings in Libya and Syria, its response to the conflicts there has been more measured, calling for negotiations, reforms and de-escalation of violence, to allow the countries to maintain their territorial integrity and rebuild without outside interference.
Turkey’s membership in NATO places it in a key position to influence the West’s continued plans for the region. As it increasingly asserts its independence under the AKP, beginning with the refusal to condone the US invasion of Iraq and continuing with the refusal to condone Israel’s colonisation of Palestine, as a NATO member in good standing its voice of reason is not being heard from the sidelines, but from the very corridors of imperial power. This gives the more assertive Turkey a new prominence in Western strategic thinking, and puts great responsibility on the shoulders of the Turkish leadership. With the AKP’s popular mandate renewed, the world can expect a continuation of a reasoned and independent foreign policy from the AKP — one with clout.
There are complex and dangerous trials awaiting Turkey. The illegal war waged against Libya is bogged down; Turkish-Russian-African Union demands for negotiations will continue and hopefully bear fruit. The ongoing unrest in Syria is a worry which requires firmness, intelligence and patience.

Israeli intransigence and recklessness are great challenges to Turkey, with the second Freedom Flotilla to break the siege of Gaza departing from Turkey soon. Israel is desperately lobbying Western powers and Turkey to stop the flotilla, clearly worried that if the Israeli Defense Force repeats last year’s massacre on the high seas, it will merely hasten the demise of the country it purports to defend, as the world turns resolutely against it.

Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman has expressed fears about Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood “undermining the peace treaty” which 85 per cent of Israelis approve of. But he need not fear war. While Egyptians have no love for Israel, none contemplate yet another war against what is clearly a more powerful and ruthless neighbor.
What Lieberman needs to fear is Turkey’s calm, principled stance, buttressing the new Egypt as it learns how to walk again. Davutoglu says the US’s “one-sided” approach to the Middle East is not the path to solving the problems and easing the tensions, and that “Israel needs to be treated like any other ordinary country in the region.” These are welcomed words to Egyptians and allow the new Egypt to join Turkey in pressuring the Western interloper in their midst into joining the Middle East as an equal partner not as the region’s hegemony.
Turkey’s own democracy is a heated affair, as protests by and imprisonment of journalists in connection with the so-called Ergenekon military plot to overthrow the government continue. Whatever the outcome of this stand-off between the government and its civil society critics, the demonstrations and the openness of the Turkish press cannot be denied.
When the history of this period is written, imperial schemes in the region will require a chapter to be devoted to Turkey, just as chapters will be devoted to the Arab countries. To achieve a meaningful peace in the Middle East, there must be an end to foreign manipulation. Relations between countries must be based not on pressure, intrigues and invasion, but on dignity and respect. That was Erdogan’s subtext during his victory speech when he said, “The Middle East, the Caucasus and the Balkans have won, just as Turkey has won.”
Source: Middle East Online

US Makes a Drone Attack a Day in Yemen

NOVANEWS

 

CIA Drone Strikes in Yemen

US Kills 130 People In Yemen

by Hakim Almasmari

(The National” – -SANA’A) –The US has conducted more than 15 drone attacks in Yemen since the beginning of June, a Yemen defence ministry official said.

The increase of such attacks is part of a US strategy to employ more drones to curb what the US believes is a growing terror threat in Yemen, the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal reported on Monday. The US plans to begin supplementing US military drones with CIA drones because US officials say the political chaos in Yemen has compromised its efforts to contain terrorists in Yemen, the newspapers reported.

US officials said the CIA would operate in coordination with the US Joint Special Operations Command, which has been flying Predators and other remotely piloted planes over Yemen for much of the past year. The new approach is a significant escalation of the clandestine American war in Yemen and a substantial expansion of the CIA’s drone war.

US officials say the Yemini government has approved the aggressive use of drones. The Yemeni government denies that. “The Yemeni government did not allow the US to conduct random attacks in the country, though it has agreed to cooperate in the fight against al Qa’eda,” said Tareq Shami, the ruling party’s spokesman.

US officials have testified repeatedly in recent months that Yemen’s arm of al Qa’eda – al Qa’eda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) – represents the most immediate terrorism threat to American targets. At a hearing before a Senate committee on Thursday, the director of the CIA, Leon Panetta confirmed that the agency had expanded its counterterrorism programs in Yemen, Somalia and North Africa.

“Our approach has been to develop operations in each of these areas that will contain al Qa’eda and go after them so they have no place to escape,” he said.

AQAP is responsible for plots that have included the unsuccessful attempt to bomb a Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas Day in 2009 and an effort to send packages packed with explosives to addresses in the United States last year.

Security officials in Shabwa province said the recent drone attacks in Yemen started during the first week of May when security forces were preoccupied by the escalation of the armed rebellion throughout the country.

Over the past month, there have been at least seven US drone attacks in Shabwa province, where the US believes terrorist Anwar Awlaqi is hiding, a security official in Shabwa said. The last attack was on Saturday when a drone missed its target and caused no casualties. Other drones fired on Shabwa allegedly killed civilians. A drone targeting Mr Awlaqi “killed two teenage brothers”, said the official.

Salem Sakheer, a Shabwa resident, said that with the Yemeni government in disarray, he expects more drone attacks. “We knew the Yemeni government would allow US to attack our areas after the death of [al Qa’eda leader Osama] Bin Laden,” he said. “We have a weak government now and the blood of Yemenis will be spilt without any questioning.”

The Yemen defense official, who requested anonymity, said he was worried that US strategy may backfire. “United States is turning Yemen into another Pakistan,” he said. He said relatives of innocent drone-attack victims will seek to avenge the deaths and resort to terror.

This week alone, Abyan province has seen at least six US drone attacks, witnesses confirmed. Last Friday, the Defence Ministry reported on its website that 30 terrorists were killed in attacks in two days in Abyan province.

Abdullah Luqman, the deputy governor of Abyan, said he is worried that the US is treating Abyan like a board game, where it continues playing, not worrying if the deaths are terrorists or civilians. “These are the lives of innocent people being killed. At least 130 people have been killed in the last two week by US drones.” Mr Luqman said.

In May, the majority of attacks were in Shabwa province, said Ali Abdul Jabbar, director of Dar Ashraf research centre. He said that the strategy changed in June, when 80 per cent of the drone attacks were in Abyan

“The attacks will increase and the US will help in turning Yemen into a terrorist stronghold, ” said Mr Abdul Jabbar. “The United States is going against international law and killing people because of suspicion.”

Leon Panetta

On Saturday, a drone targeting an al Qa’eda suspect missed and killed three civilians, when it targeted the residence of al Qa’eda fighter Nader Shadadi. His father, mother, and sister were all killed in the raid. Abdul Hadi Mohammed, a neighbour, said: “Was Shadadi’s mother and father terrorist? They were killed by the US drone. They are both over 60 years old.”

Mr Mohammed said that the killings will only increase the hatred locals have for the United States, and turn residents into al Qa’eda sympathizers.

Ahmad Khulani, head of the observation committee formed to help evacuating residents, said more than 40,000 people have left Abyan province because they feared drone strikes. Families are not planning to return to Abyan anytime soon. “Who can we complain to for the death of a relative? We will not come back to this city,” said Salma Ja’afar, a housewife who left the province last week and headed to Aden.

Yemen’s opposition Joint Meeting Parties have not condemned the US drone attacks in Shabwa and Abyan.

They fear that the US will not support them politically and will consider any criticism as sympathy for al Qa’eda.

Ahmed Bahri, the head of the political office at the opposition Haq party, said: “We are worried the Yemen government will turn into a puppet regime like the one in Pakistan today. The United States must honour the lives of Yemenis and stop drone attacks.”

Powerful poetry:
History Lesson

Vengeance is Mine, Sayeth…

NOVANEWS
by Tom Valentine

In my heart I know that seeking vengeance for evil done is not the Christian thing to do. However I find myself relishing thoughts of vengeance just about every day—in this case, it will not be sinful when it happens because the vengeance will likely not be violent or deadly. It should be unfathomable personal embarrassment, if these people are capable of shame.

In my mental picture, The realization that the 9-11 disaster was, indeed, a false-flag attack, and the Truthers are totally vindicated occurs suddenly under the inexorable weight of truth and the media dominated world is suddenly smacked in the kisser by undeniable facts. The remarks and the uh-uh-uh comments of the bombastic bastards who have assailed every thinking individual they could imagine for all these years choking on their irrational attitude will be sweet, indeed.

I want to relish watching Bill O’Reilly tapes of his arrogant beating down of a young veteran, whose father was killed in the towers or the tapes of the arrogant Glen Beck calling anyone who dared to question the party line as “insane.” How about watching video of foul mouthed Bill Maher charging the “Truthers” disrupting his show”

The only one of the know-it-all crowd who attempted to cover his ass was Geraldo Rivera in these latter years.

Forgive me, Lord—I often daydream of this sweet revenge with delicious exquisite warmth inside.

Don’t ask me to psychobabble why so many in the media were suddenly blinded and stupefied by the ongoing issue—The public is expected to be manipulated, I have no idea what happened to the reporters and pundits minds. To say that it was just too painful to imagine “our government” participating is so ludicrous, I cant squeeze out a thought.

The following rolled around over the Net, recently; Karen Kwiatkowsky, a well-known veteran said it:

I have been told by reporters that they will not report their own insights or contrary evaluations of the official 9/11 story, because to question the government story about 9/11 is to question the very foundations of our entire modern belief system regarding our government, our country, and our way of life. To be charged with questioning these foundations is far more serious than being labeled a disgruntled conspiracy nut or anti-government traitor, or even being sidelined or marginalized within an academic, government service, or literary career. To question the official 9/11 story is simply and fundamentally revolutionary. In this way, of course, questioning the official story is also simply and fundamentally American.

The top 10 reasons why the opening of Rafah Crossing just doesn't cut it

NOVANEWS

 

In no particular order of importance, we thought we’d list some of the reasons why the opening of Rafah, while significant and helpful, doesn’t meet all of Gaza’s needs for access and why, as some voices in Israel have recently suggested, it can’t serve as Gaza’s only access point. Despite four unanticipated days of closure last week, the crossing has been operating for the passage of travelers on a more regular but still semi-limited basis.

 

  1. Passage through the crossing remains limited: Egypt has indicated that it will operate the crossing six days per week during regular working hours, but it seems this won’t be enough: between 400 – 450 individuals have been able to travel through the crossing per day from Gaza to Egypt. From November 2005 to June 2006, approximately 660 passengers per day exited the Gaza Strip through Rafah and according to the Palestinian Crossings Authority, 10,000 people are currently waiting to travel.

  2. The situation is unstable: As last week’s closure of the crossing indicates, the situation on both sides of Rafah remains unstable, such that it’s not clear whether the crossing will remain open, nor exactly to what degree.

  3. Rafah doesn’t lead to the West Bank: Travel and movement of goods between Gaza and the West Bank remains severely limited, a problem which Rafah cannot address, as goods and Gaza ID holders are not allowed into the West Bank even via the Egypt-Jordan route. The West Bank and the Gaza Strip are part of the same customs envelope, and are recognized, including by Israel, as a single territorial unit, which, despite four years of tight closure, still shares one economy, one education system, one healthcare system and countless familial and social ties.

  4. Export is not moving and not through Rafah either: Export remains severely limited (about 2 truckloads per day, the last of which left Gaza on May 1, 2011, compared with a target of 400 per day in the Agreement on Movement and Access) and is currently not taking place through Rafah at all. This is impacting industries across Gaza which used to sell or export their wares in Israel, the West Bank and abroad. Before the closure, the vast majority of Gaza’s “exports” were sold in Israel and the West Bank.

  5. Construction materials do not enter through Rafah: Construction materials are being let into Gaza via Kerem Shalom only (between Israel and Gaza) for approved projects undertaken by international organizations and following exceedingly lengthy bureaucratic procedures. Each month since January 2011, about 10% of what entered monthly in the years prior to June 2007 has entered for these specific projects. At present, Egyptian authorities have not indicated if or when they will allow construction materials to pass at Rafah.

  6. Import of goods does not take place at Rafah: Imports to the Strip purchased by the private sector enter Gaza from Israel via Kerem Shalom Crossing. Even if Egypt were to allow goods to enter at Rafah (and there is no indication that they intend to do so nor when) the crossing and surrounding roadways are not currently equipped to handle the transfer of large quantities of goods, on the scale of the access needs of the Strip.

  7. Humanitarian aid does not regularly enter through Rafah: Aid enters Gaza via Kerem Shalom Crossing, between Gaza and Israel. At present, Egyptian authorities have not indicated if or when they will allow convoys of humanitarian aid to pass at Rafah.

  8. Medical patients in need of treatment not available in Gaza cannot always make the long journey to Egyptian hospitals. In any case, Palestinian hospitals in east Jerusalem and the West Bank, part of a common Palestinian health care system, are there to serve all residents of the Palestinian territory, including Gaza residents.

  9. Reports prove it: Restrictions on access at the crossings between Israel and Gaza (at Kerem Shalom for goods and Erez for people) continue to impact the well-being of residents of the Strip. Yesterday UNRWA published a study showing high rates of unemployment and the Association for International Development Agencies also reported recently on how limits on the entrance of construction materials primarily impacts the work of aid agencies and residents of Gaza.

  10. Rafah doesn’t lead to the West Bank: Oh wait, did we say that already? Well, we’re saying it again, because it’s very, very important.

Goods

Needs Vs. Supply

15/5/2011 – 11/6/2011

 

Building Materials

Needs Vs. Supply

2/2011 – 5/2011

עשר סיבות מדוע לפתוח את מעבר רפיח זה לא מספיק

פורסם: יום חמישי, 16 ביוני, 2011

בלי חשיבות לסדר, אנו מפרטים כמה מהסיבות לכך שפתיחתו של מעבר רפיח – בפני עצמה משמעותית וחיובית – אינה עונה על כל צרכי התנועה של רצועת עזה ואינה יכולה לשמש כנקודת הגישה היחידה של הרצועה, כמו שהציעו פוליטיקאים וכותבי מאמריםבישראל בשבועות האחרונים. למעט ארבעה ימים בשבוע שעבר בהם היה המעבר סגור מסיבות לא צפויות, מעבר האנשים דרכו מתנהל באופן רציף אך עדיין מוגבל.

  1. המעבר דרך רפיח אינו עונה על הצרכים: מצרים הודיעה שתפעיל את המעבר ששה ימים בשבוע, בשעות העבודה המקובלות, אולם עולה הרושם שאין בכך די: בימים האחרונים הצליחו בין 400 ל-450 אנשים לנוע דרך המעבר כל יום מעזה למצרים, בהשוואה לממוצע של 660 נוסעים ליום בין נובמבר 2005 ליוני 2006. לפי רשות המעברים הפלסטינית, 10,000 איש ממתינים כעת לצאת את עזה דרך רפיח.

  2. מצב בלתי יציב: כאמור, סגירת המעבר הפתאומית בסוף השבוע שעבר מצביעה על כך שהמצב בשני צדי רפיח נותר בלתי יציב. לכן לא ברור אם המעבר יישאר פתוח, ובאיזו מידה.

  3. מעבר רפיח אינו מוביל לגדה המערבית: מגבלות קשות עדיין מוטלות על תנועת אנשים וסחורות בין עזה לגדה המערבית – בעיה שרפיח אינו יכול לפתור, משום שהן סחורות והן מחזיקי תעודות זהות של עזה אינם מורשים להכנס לגדה דרך המסלול של מצרים-ירדן. הגדה המערבית ורצועת עזה נכללות באותה מעטפת מכס, ומוכרות, גם בידי ישראל, כיחידה טריטוריאלית אחת. גם אחרי ארבע שנים של סגר הדוק הן עדיין חולקות כלכלה אחת, מערכת חינוך אחת, מערכת בריאות אחת ואינספור קשרים משפחתיים וחברתיים.

  4. יצוא אינו מתאפשר, גם לא דרך רפיח: היצוא מעזה עדיין נתון למגבלות חמורות (כשתי משאיות ביום, אשר האחרונות בהן עזבו ב-1 למאי 2011, בהשוואה ליעד של 400 משאיות ביום לפי הסכם המעברים) וכרגע אינו מתבצע כלל דרך רפיח. הדבר פוגע במגזר התעשייה ברצועה, אשר נהג למכור או לייצא מוצרים לישראל, לגדה המערבית ולחו”ל. לפני הסגר, רוב ה”ייצוא” מעזה נמכר בישראל ובגדה המערבית.

  5. חומרי בנייה אינם נכנסים דרך רפיח: ישראל מתירה להכניס חומרי בנייה לרצועה רק דרך מעבר כרם שלום שבין עזה לישראל. גם הם מורשים רק עבור פרויקטים שאושרו בידי הרשות הפלסטינית, מבוצעים בידי ארגונים בינלאומיים ונתונים להליכים ביורוקרטיים ממושכים ביותר. מאז ינואר 2011 נכנסה מדי חודש עבור פרויקטים אלה כעשירית מכמות חומרי הבנייה שנכנסה מדי חודש בשנים שלפני יוני 2007. נכון לעכשיו, רשויות מצרים לא מסרו אם או מתי הן יתירו מעבר חומרי בניין דרך רפיח.

  6. ייבוא סחורות אינו מתבצע דרך רפיח: מוצרי ייבוא שנרכשו בידי המגזר הפרטי ברצועה נכנסים לעזה מישראל דרך מעבר כרם שלום. גם אם המצרים יחליטו לאפשר הכנסת סחורות דרך רפיח (דבר שהם לא הודיעו שבכוונתם לעשות), המעבר והדרכים שסביבו אינם מותאמים למעבר כמויות גדולות של סחורות, בקנה המידה שמכתיבים הצרכים ברצועה.

  7. סיוע הומניטרי אינו נכנס דרך רפיח באופן סדיר: סיוע נכנס לעזה רק דרך מעבר כרם שלום שבין עזה לישראל. גם לגבי משלוחי סיוע הומניטרי, רשויות מצרים לא מסרו אם או מתי הם יתירו את המעבר לתוך הרצועה.

  8. חולים לא תמיד מסוגלים לנסוע בדרך הארוכה לבתי החולים במצרים ובכלל, בתי החולים במזרח ירושלים ובגדה המערבית, שהם חלק ממערכת הבריאות הפלסטינית, יועדו לשרת את כל תושבי הטריטוריה הפלסטינית, כולל תושבי עזה.

  9. מחקרים מוכיחים זאת: הגבלות תנועה במעברים שבין ישראל לעזה (בכרם שלום עבור סחורות, ובארז עבור אנשים) מוסיפות לפגוע ברווחת חייהם של תושבי הרצועה. אתמול פרסם UNRWA מחקר שמציג שיעורים גבוהים של אבטלה ברצועה וסוכנויות הסיוע דיווחו לאחרונה כיצד המגבלות המוטלות על הכנסת חומרי בניין פוגעות בראש ובראשונה בפעילות שלהן, ודרכן גם בתושבי עזה.

  10. רפיח אינו מוביל לגדה המערבית: רגע, לא אמרנו את זה כבר? טוב, אנחנו חוזרים ואומרים זאת, מפני שזה מאוד, מאוד חשוב.

לקריאת הפוסט בבלוג Gaza Gateway לחצו כאן.

סחורות

צרכים מול אספקה

15/5/2011 – 11/6/2011

חומרי בנייה

צרכים מול אספקה

2/2011 – 5/2011

the Muslim Brotherhood understands the army’s position on strikes

NOVANEWS

 

Hesham Sallam has a brilliant piece in Jadaliyya on the fate of workers under the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces. Small strikes and demonstrations have been ongoing. But any insurrectionary actions calling for economic redistribution – christened fi’awi – are considered illegitimate by the government. Three months ago, on March 23, Prime Minister ‘Isam Sharaf issued a law banning strikes, assemblies, and protect that obstruct public and private businesses.

The worthless Muslim Brotherhood, the reactionaries’ ace-in-the-hole, has described the fi’awi as damaging the national consensus and expressed “understanding” for the army’s position. So much for the Muslim Brotherhood. The house organ of the “liberal” Wafd part has agreed, claiming that calls for economic change could roll back the revolution’s gains. The petty bourgeoisie wants the country to get back to business. However, I don’t like the rhetoric of “crony capitalism” that Sallam uses. Capitalism has always been rife with cronies.

What the rhetoric unintentionally invokes or suggests is a return to a pre-lapsarian age when capitalism worked for the common folk, when people gathered in the souk and exchanged what they needed with each other, perhaps under the umbrella of a custodial state. It works by recalling an imaginary, never-existent capitalism unblemished by massive corporations that have captured state power and use it to increase their own accumulation. Such a conceptualization gets capitalism backwards. Not only are concepts like the “free market” and the “economy” mythical, capitalism itself is an anti-market. As Braudel wrote, “capitalism only triumphs when it becomes identified with the state, when it is the state.”

 

Mondoweiss Online Newsletter

NOVANEWS

 

Israel, and its supporters in the U.S., prepare for the Freedom Flotilla II

Jun 16, 2011

Kate

Watch: Video shows IDF preparing for next Gaza flotilla
Haaretz 16 June — The naval exercise includes intercepting ships of various sizes and handling both non-violent and violent passengers.
Organizers: Flotilla no threat to Israel
Ynet 16 June — Free Gaza ‘determined to sail to Gaza’; meanwhile, Israel allows Turkish aid into Strip … “We do not present an imminent threat to Israel nor do we aim to contribute to a war effort against Israel, thus eliminating any claim by Israel to self-defense, we invite the HRC or any other UN or international agency to come on board and inspect our vessels at their point of departure, on the high seas, and/or on their arrival in the Gaza port,” the group said in a statement Thursday.
Senator wants US Navy to help block flotillas to Gaza / Alex Kane
16 June — Senator Mark Kirk of Illinois sure is earning the hundreds of thousands of dollars theIsrael lobby dumps into his coffers.  In a report based on a recent “fact-finding” trip to the Middle East, Kirk calls for U.S. naval and special operations forces to support Israel in combating the upcoming flotilla to Gaza.

And more news from Today in Palestine:

Israel won’t investigate IDF soldier photographed next to bound Palestinians
Haaretz 16 June — Deputy State Prosecutor Shai Nitzan decided Thursday not to launch a criminal investigation against former Israel Defense Forces soldier Eden Aberjil, who in 2010 photographed herself standing next to tied-up Palestinian detainees. Instead, he ordered an investigation against another two soldiers. The first of the IDF soldiers to be investigated was pictured pointing a rifle at a bound and blindfolded detainee who stood beside him. The other soldier to be investigated filmed a video of himself dancing to music around a tied-up and blindfolded Palestinian woman. Both photographs and the video were posted on Facebook.

Land, property, resources theft & destruction / Ethnic cleansing / Settlers
Silwan inhabitants fear confiscation of their land in court ruling
OCCUPIED JERUSALEM, (PIC) 1 June — Silwan town committee has called for a sit-in before the Jerusalem court of construction and planning on Thursday which is supposed to issue a ruling on confiscation of 550 dunums of land in Silwan, Jabl Mukabir, and Wad Yasul in occupied Jerusalem. The committee described the scheme as the most serious over the past few years as it covers vast area of land and is close to the Old City gates.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2bc
Israeli court dismisses petitions to reopen Hebron road
HEBRON (Ma‘an) 16 June — Israel’s High Court threw out a petition seeking the re-opening of a market street in Hebron’s city center, which would have overturned 21 military orders mandating the closure of the area for “security reasons.” … Ash-Shuhada Street, once the main shopping area in the city’s ancient downtown, is now divided down the center with concrete blocks, one side for Palestinian residents who can prove that they live down the street, and the other for settlers who have taken over homes in the area. Most Palestinians are prohibited from walking on the street, which resembles a ghost town dotted with soldiers who patrol the area … The 21 military orders, which according to reports from the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem have closed 440 shops in the area, are renewed by the army every six months. “This policy led to the economic collapse of the center of Hebron and drove many Palestinians out of the area,” B’Telem said in a report on conditions in the city.
link to www.maannews.net
Jerusalem court rejects settlers’ bid to evict Palestinian family from Sheikh Jarrah
16 June — In a surprise ruling, the Jerusalem Magistrate’s Court yesterday rejected a request from Jewish settlers in Sheikh Jarrah to evict another Palestinian family from its home. Judge Yitzhak Shimoni also ordered the settlers to pay NIS 20,000 legal expenses to the family. The Farhan family lives in a small house over the burial cave of Simon the Just in Sheikh Jarrah, where they moved after leaving their village of Lifta in 1948. The settlement of Shimon the Just developed around their home over the years, and they are now surrounded by Jewish families.
link to www.haaretz.com
Factions say ‘no way’ to settler visits in Nablus
NABLUS (Ma‘an) 16 June — A committee in Nablus have said they “refuse and condemn” Palestinian Authority dialogue with settler groups who wish to visit Joseph’s Tomb, a holy site in the city where biblical figure Joseph is thought to be buried. In a statement released on Thursday, the Factional Coordination Committee, including six leftist groups, addressed a Tuesday night event which saw PA police facilitate a visit to the shrine by eight right-wing members of Israel’s parliament. The group called the move a “dangerous indication,” saying PA police should “protect our people from occupation forces and settler aggression instead of protecting the settler leaders.”
link to www.maannews.net
PA official: Settlers burn farmland near Nablus
NABLUS (Ma‘an) 16 June — Israeli settlers set fire to Palestinian farmland south of the West Bank city of Nablus on Thursday, a Palestinian official said.  Ghassan Doughlas, a Palestinian Authority official who monitors settlement affairs in the northern West Bank, said the incident occurred near the illegal settlement of Itamar, south of Nablus. The settlers burned 15 dunums of farmland of olive trees in an area known as Berkat Al-Marah, which belongs to residents from Roujeeb in the southeast of Nablus, Doughlas said.
link to www.maannews.net
Jewish settlers burn olive trees west of Ramallah
RAMALLAH, (PIC) 16 June — Jewish settlers torched tens of Palestinian olive trees in Bilin village land behind the separation wall west of Ramallah city, the popular anti wall committee said in a statement on Thursday. The statement said that the fire started last night near a Jewish settlement, which was established on Bil‘in village land. It pointed out that the Israeli occupation forces stationed at the wall’s gate blocked entry of fire brigades to extinguish the blaze, which led to the spread of fire.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2
Violence
Palestinian worker seriously injured after being stabbed by Israeli assailant
IMEMC 16 June — A Palestinian worker was seriously injured on Thursday after being attacked and stabbed by an Israeli man in Netanya, north of the country. The injured worker was identified as Raslan Daoud, 37, from Beta village, south of the northern West Bank city of Nablus. He was repeatedly stabbed in his chest and back directly after he exited a supermarket in the city. Israeli medics arrived at the scene and took him to a nearby hospital.
link to www.imemc.org
Court actions against soldiers, settlers
Settler placed under house arrest in Palestinian murder case
[includes video] Ynet 16 June — A Jewish man arrested on suspicion of shooting and killing a 19-year old Palestinian, who threw stones at him in January, was remanded to a three-day house arrest Thursday, which he is to spend at his parents’ home in the West Bank settlement of Alon Shvut. The Jerusalem Magistrates’ Court released the suspect after he posted bail at a sum of NIS 2,000 ($586). Police suspect the 26-year old shot Udai Qadous and neglected to report the case after returning home. He was arrested on Wednesday, some five months later.
link to www.ynetnews.com
Detention
Israeli medical resident arrested for Naksa Day violence
Haaretz 16 June — A medical resident from the Druze town of Majdal Shams on the Israel-Syria border was charged Thursday with aggravated assault for attacking a public servant and disorderly conduct as part of his involvement in the Naksa Day events last week. Dr. Mahmoud Mahmoud, a 28-year-old who works at Rebecca Sieff Hospital in Safed, was indicted along with two other men for hurling rocks at Israel Defense Forces soldiers on Naksa Day, which marked the anniversary of the 1967 Six Day War … The Ministry of Health said Wednesday it will reconsider Mahmoud’s employment in the hospital.
link to www.haaretz.com
IOF soldiers renew detention of MP Qadi
AL-KHALIL (PIC) 16 June — Israeli occupation forces (IOF) arrested Hamas MP Dr. Samir Al-Qadi from his home in Sourif village north of Al-Khalil at dawn Thursday. Sources close to Dr. Qadi, 55, said that IOF troops encircled the lawmaker’s home then ordered him out before arresting him. The Israeli occupation authority is currently detaining 17 Palestinian lawmakers, nine of them from Al-Khalil with all of them held under administrative detention for six months. The IOA returned to the policy of kidnapping MPs seven months ago with some of them held on three occasions during the past few years.
The IOA has separately forced the isolation of all Jerusalemite deputies who were threatened with deportation from their city and sought refuge in the Red Cross premises where they have been there for the past year with the exception of one, Mohammed Abu Tir, who was captured and deported to the West Bank after revoking his Jerusalemite residence.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%
IOA holds former minister in administrative custody
JENIN, (PIC) 16 June — Salem military court on Wednesday ordered the administrative detention of former minister of prisoners’ affairs and Hamas leader Wasfi Qabaha and extended the detention of former public works minister Abdul Rahman Zeidan for 14 days. The wife of Qabaha, 47, told the PIC reporter that Israeli intelligence recommended the administrative custody of Qabaha without leveling any charge against him.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2
IOA holds 72-year-old MP in administrative detention
RAMALLAH, (PIC) 15 June — The Israeli court of Ofer, near Ramallah, ordered the administrative detention of Palestinian MP Ahmed Al-Haj for six months, without any charge. Ahmed Al-Beitawi, a researcher with the international Tadamun foundation, said that the same court also ordered the administrative custody of lecturer Mustafa Al-Shinawi for four months. Both would appear in court next Sunday where the verdicts would be pronounced … Both Haj and Shinar were taken from their homes on 7/6/2011 in a campaign of arrests aimed at foiling the reconciliation process between Fatah and Hamas.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2bc
Palestinian prisoners torch mattresses in protest at detaining old mother
RAMALLAH (PIC) 15 June — Palestinian prisoners in the Israeli Eshel jail set their mattresses on fire after the administration detained the mother of one of them at the pretext she was carrying unpermitted luggage with her. The administration cancelled the visit and returned prisoners to their wards and forced visiting relatives out of the jail and of visiting halls.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2
Hamas detains Fatah official in Gaza
IMEMC 16 June — Fatah have complained that one of its officials in Gaza, Abu A’itah, was detained in Gaza by Hamas security forces, according to Maan. Fatah officials have complained that the detention of Abu A’itah by Hamas makes Fatah’s effort to rebuild the party in Gaza impossible. The party also complains that it breaks the spirit of the recent unity deal between the two rival parties and puts it in jeopardy. Under a unity deal signed by Fatah and Hamas in April both parties were to desist from arresting opposing party activists. Additionally, both sides agreed to mutually release each other’s political prisoners. Hamas has complained that its activists in the West Bank continue to be extensively targeted for arrest by Fatah and PA security forces.
link to www.imemc.org
Reprisal
Lull ends, rocket fired from Gaza
Ynet 15 June — A Qassam rocket exploded Thursday evening in an open field in the Eshkol Regional Council. No injuries or damage were reported in the strike, the first of its kind in southern Israel in recent weeks … “From the eve of Passover until today we had a calm period that we are not familiar with by any standard,” Eshkol Regional Council head Haim Yalin told Ynet. “We are not surprised that the lull ended, we’re surprised by a month an a half of quiet. Qassam fire is not an unusual thing, because we know who’s living on the other side,”  [Oh these one-sided lulls, if only the Palestinians had them too….]
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4083323,00.html

Gaza
Medications to arrive in Gaza Monday, PA says
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 16 June — Ten truckloads of medicine will enter the Gaza Strip on Sunday, officials in the coastal enclave told Ma‘an on Thursday. Nazmi Muhanna, head of the crossings committee in Gaza, said that instructions from President Mahmoud Abbas were handed down and necessary arrangements with Israel’s Civil Administration and crossings officials were made to ensure that the goods were permitted to enter. Israeli restrictions, poor coordination and the fragile status of the health care system in Gaza combined to create a medications shortage crisis, prompting the International Red Cross to open its warehouses earlier in the week and donate its stockpile to public hospitals. “The first of the ten trucks will arrive Sunday,” Muhanna said, with the remainder scheduled to arrive the following day.
link to www.maannews.net
Owners of destroyed homes close down UNRWA premises in protest
GAZA (PIC) 15 June — Owners of destroyed homes in Rafah and Khan Younis, in the south Gaza Strip, have decided to close down UNRWA main offices in protest at the latter’s delay in starting to re-build their homes, which were destroyed in the Israeli war on Gaza. A committee of those citizens charged UNRWA with not being sincere in its bid to re-build their homes, explaining that the agency had promised to start building in mid June, that is today but nothing happened.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2bcOd
Top ten reasons why the opening of Rafah Crossing just doesn’t cut it
GG 16 June — In no particular order of importance, we thought we’d list some of the reasons why the opening of Rafah, while significant and helpful, doesn’t meet all of Gaza’s needs for access and why, as some voices in Israel have recently suggested, it can’t serve as Gaza’s only access point. Despite four unanticipated days of closure last week, the crossing has been operating for the passage of travelers on a more regular but still semi-limited basis.
link to www.gazagateway.org
IOF troops infiltrate east of Breij refugee camp
GAZA (PIC) 15 June — Israeli occupation forces (IOF) advanced east of Breij refugee camp in central Gaza on afternoon Wednesday and bulldozed land lots, local sources said. They told the PIC reporter that IOF soldiers in army tanks escorted military bulldozers 400 meters into Gazan land amidst random firing.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2b
Al-Qassam member dies from electric shock
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 16 June — The militant wing of Hamas, the Al-Qassam Brigades, issued a statement Thursday saying one of its fighters had died in hospital after sustaining a life-threatening electric shock two days earlier. The group identified the man as Muhammad Al-Mahmoum, 20.  He sustained an electric shock while he was working with the brigades in the southern Gaza Strip city of Rafah … Tunnel workers often suffer electric shocks from faulty wiring in the underground passages leading between Egypt and the Gaza Strip.
link to www.maannews.net
Miles of Smiles convoy en route to Gaza convoy delivery
EL-ARISH, Egypt (Ma‘an) 16 June — Preparations to receive the humanitarian aid ship Miles of Smiles have been completed, head of the Red Crescent society in the Egyptian Sinai told Ma‘an on Thursday. The ship is set to arrive in the Egyptian coastal city of Alexandria on Friday, after leaving from Venice, the RC’s Jaber Al-Arabi explained. Al-Arabi told Ma‘an that Egyptian authorities in Alexandria will transfer the contents of Miles of Smiles to another ship before it arrives in the northern port city of El-Arish, south of Gaza, on Sunday. The convoy contains medicine, medical equipment, wheel chairs, and ambulances, the official said. Over 60 Arab and European activists from different countries are said to be traveling with the convoy,
link to www.maannews.net
Political / Diplomatic / International news
UN move is ‘for Palestinian membership not international recognition’
MEMO 16 June — A leading member of the PLO’s executive Committee has said that the Palestinian Authority’s plan to go to the United Nations in September is more about seeking UN membership for Palestine than international recognition of the state. According to Saeb Erekat, membership of the international body is being sought for a state of Palestine on the pre-June 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital. “We don’t seek to declare a Palestinian state unilaterally, as is being claimed,” said Dr. Erekat, “but we want the United Nations to recognise us as a state qualifying for membership of the organisation.” That, he added, will lead to international acceptance and recognition.
link to www.middleeastmonitor.org.uk
New Israel ambassador to UN still sees hope for September
Haaretz 16 June — Haaretz speaks with newly appointed Ambassador Ron Prosor, who views the possible unilateral recognition of Palestinian statehood in September as a challenge, but not an inevitability.
link to www.haaretz.com
Turkey to vote for PA recognition in UN
Ynet 16 June — Ankara’s Abdullah Gül tells Japanese publication his country will support unilateral Palestinian bid in September
link to www.ynetnews.com
PM: Israel aims to offset PA’s UN bid
Ynet 15 June — Netanyahu meets with EU Chair Buzek, says Israel wants to create 30-nation block in UN to balance out support garnered by unilateral Palestinian bid
link to www.ynetnews.com
Official: Netanyahu fears third intifada
Ynet 16 June — Israel preparing for worst-case scenarios ahead of Palestinian declaration of state, says official, including loss of legitimacy for Jews to reside in Jerusalem neighborhoods
link to www.ynetnews.com
Conference to offer alternative to 2-state solution
Ynet 16 June — A mini-conference next week on the subject of Israeli sovereignty in Judea and Samaria is the first step in an effort to present an alternative to the two-state solution, event organizers told Ynetnews Thursday. The event, titled “The Preferred Option: Israeli Sovereignty over Judea and Samaria,” will be held at the OU-Israel Center in Jerusalem on Monday night, June 20th at 7:30 pm.
link to www.ynetnews.com
Israel warns Lebanon against violating 1701
BEIRUT (DS) 16 June — Israel warned Lebanon’s new Cabinet Wednesday to respect its international legal and border agreements, including the cessation of hostilities between the two one-time belligerents … Israel routinely violates Lebanese airspace with near daily reconnaissance flights and mock air raids and has been accused by the Lebanese Army countless times of crossing the Blue Line into southern territory. The Blue Line is not the border between Lebanon and Israel. Rather, it is the U.N. delineated boundary of Israeli military withdrawal from south Lebanon.
link to www.dailystar.com.lb
Report: Egypt’s al-Karama party wants to cancel peace treaty with Israel
Haaretz 16 June — The Egyptian al-Karama party, whose leader plans to run in the upcoming presidential elections, has said the cancellation of the Camp David Accords is its top priority, according to a report by the Egyptian newspaper Al-Masry Al-Youm on Thursday. Al-Karama party representative Amin Iskander said the party wishes to cancel the agreement “immediately because it’s not in Egypt’s interest.”
link to www.haaretz.com
Multilateral cooperation between the United States and Israel: Fighting delegimitization, moving forward together
15 June — Remarks by Esther Brimmer, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of International Organization Affairs, Washington Institute for Near East Policy …Today I am going to focus on the Administration’s far-reaching efforts to normalize Israel’s status in and across the UN and broader multilateral system, and to counter head-on efforts of delegitimization and continued structural bias. As you can imagine, we spend a considerable amount of time in my bureau, in the seven U.S Missions to the UN, the State Department and across the Administration on these very issues. In particular, our Missions to the UN have close cooperation with their Israeli counterparts in New York, Geneva, Vienna, Paris, Rome, Nairobi and Montreal and across the full range of UN and multilateral fora. In fact, there are only a handful of other countries where our level of cooperation at the UN is so deep.
http://www.state.gov/p/io/rm/2011/166223.htm

MK Herzog: Deep hostility to Bibi in US
Ynet 16 June — Labor Party Knesset member visiting US says Netanyahu slammed by top Democrats for leaving behind ‘scorched earth’; PM’s style insulted President Obama and his people, MK Herzog says
link to www.ynetnews.com
Other news
Archbishop comments on Christians criticized
LONDON (Ma‘an) 16 June — The Palestine Solidarity Campaign issued a statement Wednesday criticizing the Archbishop of Canterbury calling Bethlehem Christians a “marginalized minority.” … He noted an increase in attacks against Christian populations in Egypt and Iraq, and extended concern to Palestinian Christians, citing encroaching Muslim communities, and making no mention of Israel’s occupation of Bethlehem as part of the Palestinian West Bank.  The oversight prompted angry responses from some Palestinian Christians, who felt that the Archbishop had overlooked the Israeli occupation as the principal reason for Christian emigration.
link to www.maannews.net
Egypt: Bedouins begin to demand equal citizenship rights
SINAI (IRIN) 16 June – Moussa Al Dalah, a 35-year-old tribal leader from Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, knew it would be a risky step to try and take his employer to court over alleged discrimination: He could easily end up in prison … Egypt’s Bedouins who inhabit the triangular Sinai Peninsula which links Africa with Asia and covers an area of 23,500 square miles, say they do not enjoy full citizenship rights and are treated as second class citizens. They say they are not allowed to join the army, study in police or military colleges, hold key government positions or form their own political parties. Locked in this arid expanse, the Bedouins claim they have have been left to fend for themselves. Mistrust between the government and the Bedouins, some of whom allegedly collaborated with the Israeli military when it occupied Sinai in 1967, continues to fuel negative stereotypes about them.
link to www.irinnews.org
Israeli arms companies report $7,2 billion in exports for 2010t
IMEMC 16 June — JPost reports that Israeli military companies sold a total of $7.2 billion worth of military hardware abroad and a further $2.4 billion to the IDF in 2010, according to the Israeli Defense Ministry. With total sales of $9.6 billion in 2010 Israel is said to be in the top four producers of armaments globally.
link to www.imemc.org
Dog sentenced to death by stoning
Ynet 16 June — Rabbinical court rules spirit of secular lawyer who insulted judges 20 years ago transferred into wandering dog’s body
link to www.ynetnews.com
PETA urges rabbis to overturn dog’s death sentence
BETHLEHEM (Ma‘an) 16 June — A leading US animal rights organization is urging rabbinical authorities in Jerusalem to overturn a “death sentence” by stoning of a dog alleged to be a reincarnated lawyer. Head of the court Rabbi Avraham Dov Levin reportedly denied calling for the dog’s stoning. But one of the court’s managers confirmed the sentence, the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth reported. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals has called the sentence “absurd.” “By sentencing an innocent animal to a painful death for such an absurd reason, this rabbinical court has not only completely discredited itself but also violated tza’ar ba’alei chayim (“the suffering of living creatures”) — one of the most important principles in Judaism,” PETA said in a statement Thursday.
link to www.maannews.net
Analysis / Opinion
Haaretz editorial: Israel needs to keep religion out of the army
16 June — It’s time for IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz to bring back the original version of the Yizkor memorial prayer, featuring the words, ‘the nation of Israel,’ to IDF ceremonies, after it was changed during the Six Day War … At first glance, this change seems to affect just one phrase. However, it is indicative of the major transformation taking place in the army and the entire country, which is turning from a secular country into a theocracy in which the rabbis set the rules. 
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/israel-needs-to-keep-religion-out-of-the-army-1.367988

Operation Birthright
Nation 16 June — How a small group of wealthy American Jews and Israeli politicians set out to create the next generation of Zionists.
link to www.theinvestigativefund.org
groups.yahoo.com/group/f_shadi (listserv)
www.theheadlines.org (archive)

After ‘Amina’: Thoughts from Cairo

Jun 16, 2011

Scott Long

Amina Arraf fooled me. I share this with plenty of others, but it’s still embarrassing. Now, as other straight men start to appear from behind their lesbian masks (“Oh, but I’m a very goodmanI’m just a very bad wizard,” they’ll all say), we’re going to have a Debate, one of those moral media Debates the U.S. specializes in, about what the Internet is doing to our souls and sexes and sanities.

Not here. I am in hot, dust-devilled Cairo at the moment. I’m speaking to people about how opportunities for raising issues of sexual and bodily rights have changed since the Revolution. Here, l’affaire Arraf seems both remote and very near. People worry about the persistence of torture, and the virginity tests that the ruling Supreme Council of the Armed Forces forced on women protesters after they were arrested. They worry about the ex-dictator’s rushed trial, the junta’s attempts to discredit the democratic movement. But it’s not just the fake Amina, Tom MacMaster, who turned out to live across the Atlantic; most of the controversy has played out there too. It’s been a perfect distraction for Western audiences, drowning out the Syrian regime’s brutality and killings—so perfect that if it turned out Bashar al-Assad himself had watched some pirated DVDs of The L Word and sat down at his MacBook to fantasy-blog, no one here would be surprised.

But the story does have echoes here, and consequences. The Syrian government, like others, claims that dissident movements are Western fronts, illegitimate and alien. The scandal is ready-made for their propaganda. Iran’s press says, “The story of Amina is part of the campaign of lies carried on by Western media against independent nations in the Middle East.” The argument that dissident sexualities are also derived from the West has long been ubiquitous here. It can only be so long before someone takes up the Amina tale to contend that all indigenous discussions of sexual diversity are merely imperialism in high-tech drag. Meanwhile, activists for lesbian and gay rights in the region who once read Amina’s concocted blog, and felt solidarity and some similarity with her position, now feel personally dispossessed. The place reserved for “Middle Eastern lesbian” in the parade of identities that interest the West is gone. One lesbian friend of mine here told me, “It’s like I go to my seat in the theater and it’s already taken. My life is double-booked.”

It’s worth wondering, then, what underlies the reception of Amina’s story. That individual disappointment may be the point to start. It has a long resonance. The sense of double-booking—that some Western travel agent resold your ticket on the train of History to himself—is part of the story of contemporary liberation movements in the Middle East, as elsewhere. Imperialism expropriates and assimilates what it can, before discarding the rest. T. E. Lawrence (another masked man, hiding his homosexuality behind heroic myth) charged out of Cairo into the collective European imagination, taking credit for the Arab Revolt while derailing the dream of independence. Bush claimed Lebanon’s Cedar Revolution as the result of—what? His tax cuts? Facebook and Twitter try to trademark the protests on Midan Tahrir. And so on.

Erasing Middle Eastern independence has always had been an erotic, not just political, business. Lawrence’s homoerotic fantasies of adopting nubile boys away from their culture and tradition were certainly one version. The notion, persistent among some governments and some Western feminists, that somebody has to save all Muslim women from subjection—the burqa justifies the bomb—is another.

And queers have always been easy marks for this Orientalist juncture of sex and salvation. This isn’t the first time that the figure of the “Middle Eastern gay” or “lesbian” has been enlisted in somebody’s ideological campaign. 2005 saw a viral wave of indignation over horrific photos of two young men hanged in Iran. There was never any strong evidence they were “gay,” or were executed for their sexualities. But the international panic—coinciding suspiciously with Ahmadinejad’s election, and with U.S. and Israeli military threats against Iran—has been widely exploited by Geert Wilders and other European Islamophobes to spread their propaganda in Europe. Israel has also seized on the issue of “gays” in Iran to promote its own foreign policy ends.

Consider, too, an apparently benign website such as the blog “Gay Middle East,” which proffers up news from the region to a Western, English-speaking audience. The blog has been widely cited as an authoritative source, from CNN to Al-Jazeera. Never mind the bias in its name, which suggests that gay men are its subject and target to the exclusion of lesbians and others. It also carries subtler slants.

Its London-based editor was born in Tel Aviv, and reportedly still carries an Israeli passport. The problem is that he doesn’t seem to feel bound to reveal this to the dozen or so sources in Arab countries who convey local news to him—and in many states, sending information to someone affiliated with Israel could lead to charges of treason. (That he is a friend of Michael Lucas, the rabidly racist Islamophobe, is an equally peculiar factor.) The site consistently portrays gay life in most Arab countries as a parade of horrors, while showing Israel as a paradise of equality and pride. You wouldn’t learn from it about the Palestinian queer movement to support BDS, about the upsurge of sexuality activism in Egypt, or about the hardships LGBT Gazans have suffered from the Israeli blockade. In another curious twist, the same editor—who is not a Muslim—doubles as “Human Rights and Press Relations Coordinator” for an enigmatic organization called the “Association of British Muslims,” which despite its name seems to have little membership in UK Muslim communities. The group serves instead to release media statements supporting gay rights, opposing so-called “extremists,” and urging denial of visas to certain preachers. Some of these are admirable goals, some possibly not. But the context suggests that the organization may in fact be an agent provocateur, aiming to divide British Muslims for some other cause.

Associating “gay rights” with Israel will do nothing good for most LGBT people in the Arab and Muslim Middle East—just as unnecessary internal splits will hardly help UK Muslim communities. But advancing rights is not really these groups’ agenda. “Gay Middle East” aspires not so much to promote freedom and diversity in the region (a website written even partly in Arabic would far better serve that goal) as to spread a certain version and vision of the region to the rest of the world.

It’s a vision where queer Arabs suffer, and others save. It’s neither true nor complimentary to those on the front lines, but it’s comforting to those outside. It’s not one that allows for the agency or activism of Arab LGBT people in defining their own identities, determining their own lives.

Think, too, about identity politics that a title like “Gay Middle East” implies, and how it might actually play out in the region. I’m not going to recapitulate the arguments of Maya Mikdashi and R.M. in their essay published on Jadaliyya and excerpted here. Enough to say that the democratic explosion in the region means profusions of new voices as well as old and suppressed ones, with desires and demands and styles of self proliferating. In response, Western media and many Western activists charge in to simplify–they seize social actors by the shoulders and demand, “Freeze! Who are you?” As Mikdashi notes, this has in many cases meant pitting “Islamists” and “secularists” against each other as incompatible foes. It’s meant treating “gays” as both barometers of secularism and standard-bearers for its cause. This is hardly helpful either to secularism or to LGBT rights.

Paranoia about Islamism infects almost all perspectives on the region that come out of the U.S. and U.K. Things look differently here. “The Salafists have always been here, the Islamists have always been here,” a lesbian friend in Cairo told me. “There’s nothing new about it. The difference is that now they can preach and organize on the street, and the task is on us to find ways to organize too, and oppose them.”

The obvious fact is that there can be no democratic space in the Middle East that doesn’t make room for Islam, and include Islamists. The only alternative is a return to a semi-secular authoritarianism that shuts down opponents with tanks and torture. Gays and governments in the West are already voicing quiet nostalgia for the military regimes. Few here share it. The problem secularists and progressives (they are by no means the same thing) face isn’t how to keep Islamists out of politics: it’s is how to bring them in, by articulating a limited set of shared values and commitments that can make their participation make sense.

Meanwhile, progressives also need to claim as much political space as possible. For LGBT people, that doesn’t mean the idiotic idea of hosting pride parades in Cairo or Damascus. Rather, it means finding terms and language—which may range from privacy to personal freedom to resisting torture—in which their claims can be intelligibly voiced to a larger public. There are as many visions of how these aims can be pursued as there are activists. But, as a militant young gay man in Cairo said: “Why should I listen to people telling me that my enemy is the Islamists? We may despise each other, but we are part of the same society now. My enemy right now is the military and its grip on society. Get rid of that, and we can open up a democratic politics. And I will conduct my battles with the Islamists there.”

A politics like this is a balancing act, complicated and giddy. The present moment and the coming years will be full of fine-knit strategies, sudden choices, and unraveling uncertainties for Middle Eastern progressives, queers among them. I think part of the appeal of “A Gay Girl in Damascus” for some in the region was that she actually seemed to inhabit those questions and contradictions. She spoke in a way to the highwire walk many queers across the Middle East perform daily.

In truth, she only lived out the paradoxes so easily because she wasn’t real. That she made it seem easy should have been the giveaway. The fact that she was a fiction, though, doesn’t make the paradoxes go away. Others still live them. Their voices and experiences are the ones that count.

Which means, if you want to know more about any of this, don’t listen to me. Listen to those in the region who are real, and talking about it. Go to Bekhsoos.com, or Jadaliyya.com, for a start, and read the voices of progressives, feminists, and queers on the front lines. They are working, talking, and thinking through one of the great revolutions of our time: one transforming people’s lives and bodies as they labor and worship, desire and love.

Scott Long, who served as founding director of Human Rights Watch’s LGBT Rights Program, has worked extensively on sexual rights issues in the Middle East.

Matan Ofan – in Israeli military uniform – threatens mutiny, indiscriminate shooting to prevent ‘Sudanis or Syrians’ from reaching Tel Aviv

Jun 16, 2011

Seham

The man in the video is Matanya Ofan, co-founder of Hakol Hayehudi, a Jewish-supremacist hate-speech radio station based in Izhar (recently investigated by Israel’s police due to suspicions of being involved in making the military look stupid – and not due to their explicit involvement in “pricetag” porgroms). That book he’s holding is Torat Hamelech, the one with the halacha (Jewish law) discussion about how it’s permissible to kill non-Jews. The book recommends killing Arab babies, so they won’t grow up and kill Jews.

Here’s the full text:

[Military Seal or Insignia of Israel’s army]

The purpose of the army is to defend the lives of Jews and act decisively against the enemy.

The situation today is that field officers do not comprehend this simple things, and that the border remains unrestrained – enemies from Syria or Sudan cross the border and enter into to Israel.

This is all done under the cover of “morality”.

When I come at the border, with God’s grace, I will not listen to the nonsense that the commanders will tell me, and if I see an enemy coming towards the border I will do anything to stop him from passing and I will try and harm him – because this is how we can save the live of the Jews.

Only this way no Sudani or Syrian will get to Tel Aviv.

[Caption:] Jews, let’s win

Via Dena Bugel-Shunra, a Hebrew<>English legal translator based in Washington and can be contacted via http://hebrew.shunra.net/

Bahraini blogger on State Dep’t tour says Hillary Clinton ‘betrayed’ and ‘crushed’ Bahrain democracy movement

Jun 16, 2011

Philip Weiss

I came to Netroots Nation with a keen sense that I’d be disappointed by what the progressive base of the Democratic Party has to say about the Middle East, but a Bahraini writer who is on a State Department-sponsored tour and is afraid to publish in her own country has already stolen the show here with her declaration that Obama and Hillary Clinton have “betrayed” the Arab spring by not supporting the uprising in Bahrain– even as a State Department minder stood at the side of the room.

Lamees Dhaif said, “We expected that Americans would stand by us. We thought that when five armies came into our country, America would give a definite No No No, this should not happen. We were shocked by Hillary Clinton’s statement. She gave the green light for the people who are crushing us. If Iran was coming to Bahrain, we wouldn’t mind [the Saudi and Emirates armies entering Bahrain]. But nobody is there but us.”

Dhaif, who is on an American tour with 20 other bloggers sponsored by the Washington Foreign Press Center, a branch of the State Department, said she had confronted State Department officials in Washington with details of human rights violations, but these officials already knew the information and said they couldn’t come out against Bahrain.

Dhaif worked as a columnist for four newspapers, including a Saudi one, but when the democracy movement began in Bahrain she had no choice but to support people who were speaking out for economic reform and human rights. As soon as she did so, “I had to be punished.” She lost three jobs on one day, and the other soon after.

She continued blogging but the regime persecuted her own family. “My brothers were hunted in their jobs, they were punished because of their sister.” Government thugs broke into the family house and tried to burn it. Dhaif’s reputation was savaged on the internet. “It was like a witchhunt in the 16th century.” Her sister was imprisoned for 50 days, and tortured. And similar punishments have befallen student bloggers. Even for tweeting or posting on facebook, the government finds their IP addresses, arrests them, tortures them, tosses them back on the street at night, publishes their phone numbers and libels about their social activities.

“They are kidnapped in the middle of night and tortured, no one knows about them, and of course they cant tweet any more. Some of the girls’ brothers, they couldn’t even go out of the house, because they are so ashamed of what is said about their sisters.

“We are in a very conservative society, it’s not something easily taken, that this girl has a relationship with a man, or she has many boyfriends. And they don’t have to give a proof, they just have to say it, and 90 percent of people will believe.”

These punishments have worked. Bloggers and tweeters shut up. And Dhaif is now afraid to write.

“I’m so terrified, yet I’ve been asking myself this question every day for the last 2 months. I can speak for the people who can’t speak for themselves. I know that I will pay for it with a very high price. But if I keep quiet, more and more people are paying every day. You know, this is the conflict between what you believe in and what you should do [to protect] yourself.”

Dhaif’s testimony was so inspiring that she got repeated applause from the Netroots audience, and all four panelists on the Arab Spring panel (more to come) got a standing ovation at the end.

I wonder whether the platform that Dhaif has commanded at a progressive forum– with a tall blonde State Department official who is leading the bloggers’ tour standing at the side of the room — will have any effect on American policy.

Dhaif said that she had brought her charges to the State Department the other day, and the officials she spoke to knew the story.

“They actually know about it, they know all the details, about the doctors and writers, but they say that the Bahrain governmet– we have layers of relationship with them, we cant conflict with them…. But because they are loking the other way from us, we are being crushed every day.”

Dhaif was just as judgmental of American policy toward Iran.

“Iran turned into a phobia. For 30 years they’ve been terrifying us and terrifying the world– Iran is going to take on Gulf countries. But Iran is a loud country, they talk a lot. For 30 years I haven’t seen them do anything. But on the ground, what did they actually do? And they are taken as an excuse to make us pay more for armies, for not having equal rights…”

When the Obama administration seeks to establish its pro-Israel bona fides, it’s no critics allowed

Jun 16, 2011

Josh Ruebner

Assistant Secretary of State Esther Brimmer, who heads the department’s Bureau of International Organization Affairs, delivered a humdinger of a speech yesterday to the AIPAC derivative “think tank” Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP).

During her speech, Brimmer recounted the Obama Administration’s multi-pronged efforts to increase Israeli participation in multilateral forums, bragged about its quest to undermine UN efforts to hold Israel accountable for its illegal actions, and equated Palestinian efforts to seek their long-denied rights at the UN with the “delegitimization” of Israel.

Missing from her speech completely was any reference to the many UN resolutions or provisions of the 4th Geneva Convention that Israel so regularly violates with abandon with the diplomatic support of the United States.  Presumably with a straight face, she told the assembled crowd that “Our human rights efforts across the UN System have focused on defending the oppressed against oppressive governments.”

Had I been there, I would have challenged Brimmer on the hypocrisy of her claim that the Obama Administration defends the oppressed while it openly acknowledges propping up Israel’s oppression of Palestinians.
Alas, that was not the case, as WINEP denied my registration for the event.  Forget your civic lessons—this is how Washington really works. In an effort to shed some light on the rarified, self-contained, and sanitized-of-dissent policy circles of DC, here’s how a public challenge to the Obama Administration’s policies was thwarted.

On Tuesday, the State Department invited me to attend the event.  The invitation arrived in my inbox at 5:21PM.

Here’s the email I received back from WINEP confirming that I had registered online for the event by 5:57PM.  Notice that it is “pending approval.”
 
At 10:03AM yesterday morning, I received this email from WINEP:
 
So apparently within the 36 minutes it took for the State Department to invite me to this event, WINEP had already filled their spacious conference room. After having my “registration denied,” I called WINEP and asked an employee there why they were taking online registrations if the event was already full.  Oops, it must have been a “database error,” I was reassured to find out.
I’m sure that Brimmer’s speech enjoyed hale and hearty applause from the self-selected Israel lobby crowd at WINEP.  Happily stuck inside their inside-the-Beltway bubble, both the Israel lobby and the Obama Administration fail to realize how little their rhetoric resonates anymore and how much the discourse has shifted. It’s only a matter of time until the façade crashes down.
Josh Ruebner is the National Advocacy Director of the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation and a former Analyst in Middle East Affairs at Congressional Research Service.

UC Santa Cruz students denounce anti-Palestinian hate message posted on pro-Israel student group Facebook page

Jun 16, 2011

Adam Horowitz

We’ve been following the story of the U.S. Department of Education’s investigation into charges of anti-Semitism at UC Santa Cruz following a series of events critical of the Israeli occupation. The issue has been contentious on campus, and Rebecca Pierce, a Jewish student at UC Santa Cruz who has been involved in a student-led Palestinian awareness group, sent us a post in March responding to the investigation, saying:

I cannot express how wrong and offensive I find this assessment of our work to be, especially given my identity as a Jewish student with my own unique relationship with and feelings towards the state of Israel. I also know that some of the Palestinian members of our organization are very upset that their desire to share the experiences of their families and people has resulted in their being labeled as anti-Semitic. Those who actually come to our meetings or interact with us face-to-face can see that spreading hatred towards the Jewish people has never been the goal of our organization, and I would like to note that we are not accused of anything other than putting on events that some people disagreed with on a political basis.

Rebecca has now sent us the video above, which she made to respond to a hateful statement posted on the Santa Cruz Israel Action Committee‘s Facebook page. The Israel Action Committee is a student group at UC Santa Cruz, and students leading the group have beenvocal supporters of the Department of Education case. The statement in question has since been scrubbed from the Action Committee’s Facebook page, but there are screenshots below. From the video, it seems that the threat of a governmental investigation hasn’t intimated Rebecca, and other UC Santa Cruz students, from speaking out.

Here are the screenshots:

‘Permanent’ despair: Did Egypt really open the Rafah crossing?

Jun 16, 2011

Ramzy Baroud

For most Palestinians, leaving Gaza through Egypt is as exasperating a process as entering it. Governed by political and cultural sensitivities, most Palestinian officials and public figures refrain from criticizing the way Palestinians are treated at the Rafah border. However, there is really no diplomatic language to describe the relationship between desperate Palestinians – some literally fighting for their lives – and Egyptian officials at the crossing which separates Gaza from Egypt.

“Gazans are treated like animals at the border,” a friend of mine told me. She was afraid that her fiancé would not be allowed to leave Gaza, despite the fact that his papers were in order. Having crossed the border myself just a few days ago, I could not disagree with her statement.

The New York Times reported on June 8: “After days of acrimony between Hamas and Egypt over limitations on who could pass through the Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt, Hamas said Egypt had agreed to allow 550 people a day to leave Gaza and to lengthen the operating hours of the crossing.”

And so the saga continues.

A few weeks after an official Egyptian announcement to ‘permanently’ open the border – thus extending a lifeline for trapped Palestinians under siege in Gaza – the Rafah border was opened for two days of conditional operation in late May, and then closed again for four days. Now it has once more ‘reopened’.

All the announcements are proving to be no more than rhetoric. The latest ‘permanent’ reopening has come with its own conditions and limitations, involving such factors as gender, age, purpose of visit, and so on.

“Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country,” states Article 13 (2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This universal principle, however, continues to evade most Palestinians in Gaza.

I was one of the very first Palestinians who stood at Rafah following the announcement of a ‘permanent’ opening. Our bus waited at the gate for a long time. I watched a father repeatedly try to reassure his crying six-year-old child, who displayed obvious signs of a terrible bone disease.

“Get the children out or they will die,” shouted an older passenger as he gasped for air. The heat in the bus, combined with the smell of trapped sweat was unbearable.

Passengers took it upon themselves to leave the bus and stand outside, enduring disapproving looks from the Egyptian officials. Our next task was finding clean water and a shady spot in the arid zone separating the Egypt and Palestinian sides. There were no restrooms.

A tangible feeling of despair and humiliation could be read on the faces of the Gaza passengers.

No one seemed to be in the mood to speak of the Egyptian revolution, a favorite topic of conversation among most Palestinians. This zone is governed by an odd relationship, one that goes back many years – well before Egypt, under Hosni Mubarak, decided to shut down the border in 2006 in order to aid in the political demise of Hamas.

The issue actually has nothing to do with gender, age or logistics. All Palestinians are treated very poorly at the Rafah crossing, and they continue to endure even after the toppling of Mubarak, his family and the dismissal of the corrupt security apparatus. The Egyptian revolution is yet to reach Gaza.

When the bus was finally allowed to enter about five hours later, Palestinians dashed into the gate, desperately hoping to be among the lucky ones allowed to go in. The anxiety of the travellers usually makes them vulnerable to workers at the border who promise them help in exchange for negotiated amounts of money. All of this is actually a con, as the decision is made by a single man, referred to as al-Mukhabarat, the ‘intelligence’.

Some are sent back while others are allowed entry. Everyone is forced to wait for many hours – sometimes even days – with no clear explanation as to what they are waiting for, or why they are being sent back.

The very ill six-year-old held on his dad’s jacket as they walked about, frantically trying to fulfill all the requirements. Both seemed like they were about to collapse.

The Mukhabarat determined that three Gaza students on their way to their universities in Russia were to be sent back. They had jumped through many hoops already to make it so far. Their hearts sank when they heard the verdict. I protested on their behalf, and the decision was as arbitrarily reversed as it was originally made.

Those who are sent back to Gaza are escorted by unsympathetic officers to the same open spot, to wait for the same haggard bus. Some of those who are allowed entry are escorted by security personnel across the Sinai desert, all the way to Cairo International Airport to be ‘deported’ to their final destinations. They are all treated like common criminals.

“I can’t watch my son die in front of my eyes,” screamed the father of 11-year-old Mohammed Ali Saleh, according to Mohammed Omer for IPS (June 10). He was addressing Egyptian troops days after the border was supposedly ‘permanently’ reopened – for the second time in less than a week.

Such compelling needs as medical treatment, education and freedom keep bringing Palestinians back. The Israeli siege has chocked Gaza to the point of near complete strangulation. Egypt is Gaza’s only hope.

“I beg you to open the crossing…You brothers of Egypt have humiliated us for so long. Isn’t it time we had our dignity back?” said Naziha Al-Sebakhi, 63, one of the many distressed faces at the Rafah border, according to Mohammed Omer.

As they crossed into Egypt, some of the passengers seemed euphoric. The three Russian students and I shared a taxi to Cairo. A tape of Umm Kulthum’s ‘Amal Hyati’ – Hope of my Life – played over and over again. Despite everything, the young men seemed to hold no resentment whatsoever towards Egypt.

“I just love Egypt…I don’t know why,” said Majid pensively, before falling asleep from sheer exhaustion.

I thought of the six-year-old boy and his dad. I wonder if they made it to the hospital on time.

Ramzy Baroud is an internationally-syndicated columnist and the editor of PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza’s Untold Story (Pluto Press, London), available on Amazon.com.

‘NYT’ report uncovers Bush plot to torpedo Juan Cole, but ignores some crucial questions

Jun 16, 2011

Hugh Sansom

James Risen of The New York Times reports today on a former C.I.A. official’s charges that the Bush administration sought to torpedo world-renowned Middle East scholar and blogger Juan Cole, professor at the University of Michigan and author of the blog Informed Comment. The story is notable for several reasons, including at least two the Times entirely omits or severely downplays.

According to Risen, Bush people were unhappy with a prominent academic voicing — and getting a wide hearing for — deep criticism of and opposition to the Iraq war. Former C.I.A. intelligence officer Glenn Carle, “a top counterterrorism official during the administration of President George W. Bush, said the White House at least twice asked intelligence officials to gather sensitive information on Juan Cole.”

This could be a serious violation of American law; the C.I.A. is barred from domestic spying (though lets remember we have seen a lot of attacks on protections against domestic spying in recent years, including by Democrat and champion of ‘transparency, Barack Obama). Had Carle leveled his charges while Bush while still in office and if Bush himself had played a role, such actions would arguably have risen to the level of impeachable offenses (among many Bush committed).

I find the story interesting for points Risen effectively ignores. In 2006, Yale University’s departments of sociology and history both approved Cole for appointment. Cole’s hiring was scuttled by the Yale administration. There is ample reason to believe the Israel Lobby went to bat against Cole. Certainly, right-wingers and Israel-idealogues were railing against him. There were reports of leading, wealthy Israel-idolaters and Yale donors were threatening to pull their funding. Any skeptical about the tactics of Israel extremists should recall wealthy Israel-supporter Michael Lucas’s March 2011 threats against Manhattan’s LGBT Community Center and the center’s cancellation of a fundraiser by critics of Israeli policy . Or the Alan Dershowitz tirade against Norman Finkelstein taking a post at DePaul University. Or the campaign against the play I Am Rachel Corrie in New York. This list could go for pages (attacks on academics, cultural programs, journalists, human rights institutions, etc.)

The Yale connection is also interesting. I believe that the role of a very small number of very elite universities in securing American oligarchy is being downplayed (and the issue of American oligarchy is downplayed to begin with). George W. Bush went to Yale. Leading Israel fanatic Joseph Lieberman did, too. For many years, Yale was a key source for C.I.A. recruits. Dubya’s daddy, President George H. W. Bush went to Yale and was head of the C.I.A. from 1976 to 1977. It is my contention (certainly not original) that universities like Yale serve as factories of “received opinion.” That is, they provide the intellectual foundations (to the extent that the United States embraces intellect at all) for power. You need an excuse for bombing civilians in Iraq? Line someone up from Harvard. The history of leading schools barring or even ousting great minds that offered threatening views is very long. (To provide a little grist without milling, look for stories of Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis and Harvard, Chomsky and M.I.T., Gabriel Kolko, William James and Nathaniel Shaler. Several public universities developed great departments in a variety of disciplines because the faculty could and were safely booted from private schools but not could not be from public ones without Bill of Rights protections.)

Some questions remain unanswered (and unasked by the Times). If the Bush administration sought dope on Juan Cole, was it asking for information already in the C.I.A.’s possession, in which case the C.I.A. was already doing domestic work? Or was it directing the C.I.A. to nose about domestically? How does this fit into a larger pattern of expansion of presidential power (an expansion Obama aggressively pursues, arguably more aggressively than Bush)? Will Glenn Carle be treated as Barack Obama has treated other whistleblowers — maliciously and ruthlessly?

All of this will earn me a charge of “conspiracy theorist.” Have a made any such claim? No. I am describing the lines of force in American power relations.

Hugh Sansom is an independent scholar of economics, justice, and journalism, a Thomas Paine wannabe, and a photographer. He lives in Brooklyn, NY. This post originally appeared on his blogApocalypse Road.

And now for something completely different . . .

Jun 16, 2011

Adam Horowitz

From the Ynet article “Dog sentenced to death by stoning“:

A Jerusalem rabbinical court recently sentenced a wandering dog to death by stoning. The cruel sentence stemmed from the suspicion that the spirit of a famous secular lawyer, who insulted the court’s judges 20 years ago, had been transferred into the dog’s body.
Several weeks ago, according to the Behadrei Hadarim website, a large dog entered the Monetary Affairs Court near the ultra-Orthodox neighborhood of Mea Shearim. The dog scared the court’s visitors and, to their surprise, refused to leave even after they attempted to drive him away.
One of the judges suddenly recalled that about 20 years ago, a famous secular lawyer who insulted the court was cursed by the panel of judges, who wished that his spirit would move on to the body of a dog (considered an impure animal by Halacha). The lawyer passed away several years ago.
Still offended, one of the judges sentenced the poor animal to death by stoning, recruiting the neighborhood’s children to carry out the order. Luckily, the dog managed to escape.

Cobban to young Gazan writers: The internet is your Tahrir Square

Jun 16, 2011

Yousef M. Aljamal


Helena Cobban addressing an audience at The Center for Political and Development Studies. (Photo: Yousef M. Aljamal)

On Wednesday, June 15th The Center for Political and Development Studies (CPDS) in Gaza invited Helena Cobban, a well-known veteran journalist and author, who owns and publishes Just World Books, to talk about her experience in writing, and to raise Gaza’s academics and journalists’ awareness of the best way to get published in the West. Cobban talked about her experience in blogging and writing before dozens of academics, journalists and students who attended the event.

The seminar began with an opening speech by Iman Abu Issa, who welcomed the visitor and the audiences. Cobban thanked the audience for coming and CPDS for organizing the event. She talked about her experience in the field of journalism and the importance of writing as a weapon to fight with.

“One of the most powerful things is to have public voice. It’s stronger than weapons, Because it allows you to talk to other people”, She stressed. “I published my first book in 1984 and it was entitled “Palestinian Liberation Organization: People, Power and Politics” by conducting a lot of interviews and research.” She added, “The most powerful thing is that it’s still read until now.”


Cobban awarding Mohammed Rabah Suliman with a copy of Laila El-Haddad’s book Gaza Mom: Palestine, Politics, Parenting, and Everything In Between

Realizing the powerful effect of new technology, Cobban had the idea of working with good bloggers, putting their posts in order, organizing them coherently and making a book out of them. Recalling the significant role of social media, she listened to her son’s advice and started her own blog. She added, “Two of the best blogs from Iraq During the US invasion were ‘Baghdad Burning’ and ‘A family in Baghdad’”.

Blogging and the anti-war movement

Blogging has helped the Anti-war Movement in the US. It explained to Americans why it’s wrong and clarified its consequences. It crosses the borders easily and reaches to peoples’ minds and hearts. The first person testimony can do what all others can’t.

“The power of firsthand testimony that is well-written, direct, fresh and honest is great. It can cross the borders easily. If you write in English, that’s wonderful. But the question is how to get this published and distributed. English is important to talk to all people all over the world, not only English speakers”, She assured.

How to get published

Many people write perfectly, but some of them they don’t follow the best way to get their works published out. Publishing one’s work is as important as writing it. “You should create a blog that attracts the community around. Twitter is a very powerful, especially when you talk about current events. If you are proud of your work, you need to sell it. The Internet is your Tahrir Square” Cobban said.

US Misadventures in Palestine

The American policy toward Palestine has been characterized by bias to Israel. This is clear in the US more than any other place else. Though, some changes have happened recently, particularly after the US has invaded Iraq.

“I found that the culture in the US is more Zionist than it is in Britain. Some important changes happened recently in the US regarding Palestine and Iraq. Americans didn’t know what occupation is until they invaded Iraq. There is anti-war movement. Some important people started raising these matters”, Cobban said.

“A large part of the society is outside the beltway. There are people who are ready to listen to Palestinians as mainstream Churches such as the Quakers. The churches played an important role in anti-war movement in Iraq and Vietnam. Those who criticize Israel are called anti-Semitic and Jews are called self-hatred. This accusation is used to refute any discussion about Israel”, She added.

Jews for Free Palestine

The Jewish community in the US has recently witnessed the activism and creation of organizations of young people, who support Palestinians’ rights and condemn Israel’s violations of human rights, its atrocities against civilians and its suffocating siege imposed on Gaza, especially after the Gaza-23 day war that took the lives of more than 1400 Palestinians, most of them civilians and one-third of them children, and the murder of 9 Turkish activists on The Freedom Flotilla a year ago in the international waters.

“There are many Jewish groups in the US that observe what’s going on and stand in solidarity with Palestinians such as “Jewish Voice for Peace”, she stressed. “There are a lot of young people in the Jewish community who are supporters of Palestine. Jewish People are not the main supporter of Israel. The main supporter is the Evangelical Christians”, She mentioned

The role of donors in US elections

Donors determine who and how long a congressman shall stay in his/her office. Raising money to finance the election campaign plays an important role in the process of decision-making. This vividly explains why congress men stood for 30 standing ovations to Netanyahu, while he was addressing them.

“Congressmen thinking of re-running the election once more and they look for money. That’s why they stood up many times while Netanyahu were talking to the Congress. The President needs to be elected once every 4 years and he has better chance to be a leader more than congressmen”, Cobban said referring to how money plays a great role in the election.

US Power Waning

The US has recently suffered from budget deficit and crisis. This pushed thinkers to question its role in supporting Israel and its war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“The US power is waning for many reasons: the financial collapse in 2008, people started to understand that our ability to govern the world is waning and there are new raising economies such as Brazil, India, Turkey, and Russia”.

Palestinian Reconciliation

Hamas and Fateh have recently signed a pact in Cairo ending the four-year rift among the Palestinians. At the end of her speech, Helena cobban asked the audience” what are your hopes and expectations about Palestinian Unity?”

Dr. Hani Albasous, CPDS vice chairman and a political analyst from Gaza, answered: “There has been hope here after Hamas and Fateh signed the unity pact. Most people were happy and thought that implementation will come soon within 1 year. Some Palestinians have a lack of hope and they felt that this would not be implemented on the ground. Now, and after rounds of talks, both parties have reached an agreement on some points; we are going to see most likely the announcement of Palestinian Government next week. It’s not an easy thing to fix the rift. I hope things will be completely fine, unless we have pressure from Israel and the US … this will take more time.”

Meanwhile, some analysts believe that the pact provides an opportunity to reach a real peace agreement. Others see that Israel is not ready to take the risk of accepting the Palestinian unity pact. “Israel prefers a weak side more than a stronger one. Unity disturbs the US and Israel”, added Dr. Esam Adwan, well-know figure in Gaza.

Mondoweiss.net

At the end of the seminar, Helena Cobban introduced Mondoweiss.net to the audience and talked briefly about its role and directors: Phil Weiss and Adam Horowitz. Cobban cheeringly handed the Mondo Awards winners in Gaza their singed copies of Laila El-Haddad’s book: Gaza Mom: Palestine, Politics, Parenting, and Everything In Between.

Arabic for right-wingers

NOVANEWS
 

Salon.com

In a now infamous column, the writer Eliana Benador argued this week that Anthony Weiner (who is a Jew) may have converted to Islam but was hiding it from the world in accordance with the practice of “taqiyya.”

“It is also important, when looking at this situation, to remember that observant Muslims practice taqiyya, an element of sharia that states there is a legal right and duty to distort the truth to promote the cause of Islam,” Benador wrote.
In invoking the Arabic term “taqiyya,” Benador exemplified a practice we’ve noticed in the past few years. It’s become common for right-wing writers and even politicians to matter-of-factly toss around Arabic terminology when warning of the Muslim threat to America. These references, often made in ominous tones, are almost always without context.
So we thought it would be useful to hear explanations of terms like “taqiyya” from an expert. John Esposito, university professor at Georgetown and author of “What Everyone Needs to Know about Islam,” was kind enough to explain six of the more common Islamic terms we’ve been hearing. Esposito wrote the “What it actually means” items below, following my introductions.
– – – – – – – – – –
The term: dhimmi
How it’s used: As a pejorative for non-Muslims who fail to understand — and unwittingly aid, or even appease — the Islamic menace
Example: “These dhimmi effetes at the Times think their toe licking will save them. They will be the first ones with their heads on the chopping block.” — the blogger Pamela Geller
What it actually means: “Protected people.” The dhimmi were non-Muslims living under Muslim rule who paid a special tax and in return were permitted to practice their own religion, be led by their religious leaders and be guided by their own religious laws and customs. This treatment was very advanced at the time. No such tolerance existed in Christendom where Jews, Muslims and Christians who did not accept the authority of the pope were persecuted, forced to convert or expelled.
However progressive this policy may have been in the past, it would amount to second-class citizenship for non-Muslims today. Therefore, some insist that non-Muslims must be given full citizenship rights because of the Quran’s emphasis on the equality of all humanity. This need for reinterpretation can be seen in the increased incidents of discrimination and violence against non-Muslims in countries like Egypt, Iraq, Nigeria, Pakistan, Malaysia and Indonesia.
– – – – – – – – – –
The term: jihad
How it’s used: As casual shorthand for Muslims’ war against the West
Example: “Stealth jihadis use political, cultural, societal, religious, intellectual tools; violent jihadis use violence. But in fact they’re both engaged in jihad and they’re both seeking to impose the same end state which is to replace Western civilization with a radical imposition of Sharia.” — Newt Gingrich
What it actually means: Literally, “struggle” or “exertion” in the path of God, following God’s Will. It is a concept with multiple meanings, used and abused throughout Islamic history. The importance of jihad is rooted in the Quran’s command to struggle in the path of God and in the example of the Prophet Muhammad and his early Companions. The two broad meanings of jihad, nonviolent and violent, are contrasted in a well-known Prophetic tradition. “Greater” jihad is the struggle within oneself to live a righteous life and submit oneself to God’s will. “Lesser” jihad is the defense of Islam and the Muslim community.
Jihad as struggle pertains to the difficulty and complexity of living a good life: struggling against the evil in oneself — to be virtuous and moral, making a serious effort to do good works and help to reform society. Depending on the circumstances in which one lives, it also can mean fighting injustice and oppression, spreading and defending Islam, and creating a just society through preaching, teaching and, if necessary, armed struggle or holy war. A radicalized violent minority combines militancy with messianic visions to inspire and mobilize an army of God whose jihad they believe will liberate Muslims at home and abroad.
– – – – – – – – – –
The term: taqiyya
How it’s used: As an explanation for why Muslims cannot be trusted — because their religion allows them to ethically practice deception
Example: “Thus it is reasonable to conclude that Keith Ellison’s deceitful pronouncements at Thursday’s Homeland Security Hearings, this past Thursday, and one day later on ‘Real Time With Bill Maher,’ are consistent with the Koranic doctrine of taqiyya, Islamic religious dissimulation.” — writer on Andrew Breitbart’s Big Peace site
What it actually means: Precautionary dissimulation of religious belief and practice in the face of persecution. Muslims recognize the personal duty of affirming right and forbidding wrong, but when confronted by an overwhelming injustice that threatens the well-being of an individual, this obligation can be fulfilled secretly in the heart rather than overtly. Among Shia Muslims, who from the death of the Prophet onward considered themselves subject to persistent religious persecution by the Sunni majority and the holders of political power, taqiyya permits not only passive or silent resistance, but also an active dissimulation of true beliefs when required to protect life, property and religion itself.
– – – – – – – – – –
The term: Shariah
How it’s used: To refer to a rigid set of Muslim laws that prescribe stoning for adulterous women, execution for homosexuals, etc.
Example: “We all know what shariah law does to women — women must wear burqas, women are subject to humiliation and into controlled marriages under Sharia law. We want to prevent it from ever happening in Texas.” — Texas state Rep. Leo Berman
What it actually means: Historically, many Muslims and non-Muslims have come to confuse and use the terms “Shariah” and “Islamic law” interchangeably. Because the Quran is not a law book, early jurists used revelation as well as reason to create a body of laws to govern their societies. But, over time, these man-made laws came to be viewed as sacred and unchangeable. Muslims who want to see Shariah as a source of law in constitutions therefore have very different visions of how that would manifest. Though the definition of Shariah refers to the principles in the Quran and prophetic tradition, some expect full implementation of classical or medieval Islamic law; others want a more restricted approach, like prohibiting alcohol, requiring the head of state to be a Muslim, or creating Shariah courts to hear cases involving Muslim family law (marriage, divorce and inheritance). Still others simply want to ensure that no constitutional law violates the principles and values of Islam, as found in the Quran.
– – – – – – – – – –
The term: madrassa
How it’s used: To refer to a place where Muslim youth are indoctrinated into radicalism and, often, terror
Example: “I am very concerned that the school will be a madrassa, funded by taxpayer dollars. We will in effect be supporting the training of future terrorist cells.” — Opponent of a proposed Arabic-themed New York school
What it actually means: A place where teaching, studying and learning take place. In early centuries, “madrassa” came to refer to a school of higher studies (college or university) where Islamic sciences were taught. Today, the term is also often used more broadly. Like the term “school” in American English, it can refer, for example, to a university, seminary, college as well as primary or secondary school. In recent years, the term has taken on a negative connotation, and for some simplistically equated with militant madrassas or schools in Pakistan and elsewhere. While they certainly exist and are dangerous training grounds, they represent a relatively small number of the institutions/schools that are referred to as madrassas.
– – – – – – – – – –
The term: Allah
How it’s used: As a negatively charged byword for a special Islamic deity
Example: “The animals of Allah for whom any day is a great day for a massacre are drooling over the positive response that they are getting from New York City officials over a proposal to build a 13 story monument to the 9/11 Muslims who hijacked those 4 airliners.” –Tea Party activist Mark Williams

What it actually means: Arabic for “God” (the term is used by Muslims and Arab Christians for God but is also used in Arabic-influenced languages and thus by Turkish and Malaysian Christians and others). Muslims believe Allah is the same deity worshiped by Jews and Christians. The first verses of the Quran present the basic Muslim view of God: “Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the Worlds, the Merciful, the Compassionate, the Sovereign of the Day of Judgment. Truly, it is You we worship and You whose aid we seek.” He is creator, sustainer, judge and ruler of the universe; all-powerful and all-merciful. Allah is described as the Merciful and Compassionate; every verse of the Quran begins with “In the name of God, the merciful, the compassionate.” Believed to have revealed himself to a long line of prophets (including the biblical prophets), to Moses, Jews (Torah) and Jesus (Gospels). As in Judaism and Christianity, God is also seen as the Just Judge who is to be obeyed and feared as well as loved.

More to Syria Than Meets the Eye –Major Power Battle Between Kremlin and US Underway, And the Stakes Are High

NOVANEWS

 

With Saudi, IsraHell and Turkish interests aligning against it, the Kremlin seems in deep water — could it lose its last naval base in the Mediterranean?

By M.K. Bhadrakumar

June 15, 2011 “Asia Times” — Seldom it is that the Russian Foreign Ministry chooses a Sunday to issue a formal statement. Evidently, something of extreme gravity arose for Moscow to speak out urgently. The provocation was the appearance of a United States guided missile cruiser in the Black Sea for naval exercises with Ukraine. The USS Monterrey cruiser equipped with the AEGIS air defense system is taking part in joint Ukrainian-US exercises, Sea Breeze 2011.

There is nothing extraordinary about a US-Ukraine naval exercise. Last year, too, an exercise took place. But, as Moscow posed, “While leaving aside the unsettled issue of a possible European missile shield architecture, Russia would like to know, in compliance with the Russia-NATO [North Atlantic Treaty Organization] Lisbon summit decisions, what ‘aggravation’ the US command meant by moving the basic strike unit of the regional missile defense grouping being formed by NATO in the region, from the Mediterranean to the East?”

The Foreign Ministry statement then went on to give its own explanation that the Monterrey was sent to European waters as part of the US administration’s phased adaptive approach to building the European segment of the global missile shield. The program’s first stage envisages the deployment of a group of US warships in the Adriatic, Aegean and Mediterranean Seas to protect South Europe from possible missile strikes. The role of the US warship’s missiles in the Sea Breeze 2011 anti-piracy exercises is also unclear, the statement said.

“We have to state that our concerns continue to be ignored and under the guise of talks on European missile shield cooperation, efforts are under way to build the missile shield configuration whose consequences are dangerous and about which we have numerously informed our US and NATO partners,” the Russian statement added.

The US claims that this is a routine naval exercise. On the other hand, Moscow asks: “If this is an ordinary visit, then it is unclear why a warship with this type of armament was chosen to move to this quite sensitive region.”

Without doubt, the US is stepping up pressure on Russia’s Black Sea fleet. The US’s provocation is taking place against the backdrop of the turmoil in Syria. Russia is stubbornly blocking US attempts to drum up a case for Libya-style intervention in Syria. Moscow understands that a major reason for the US to push for regime change in Syria is to get the Russian naval base in that country wound up.

The Syrian base is the only toehold Russia has in the Mediterranean region. The Black Sea Fleet counts on the Syrian base for sustaining any effective Mediterranean presence by the Russian navy. With the establishment of US military bases in Romania and the appearance of the US warship in the Black Sea region, the arc of encirclement is tightening. It is a cat-and-mouse game, where the US is gaining the upper hand.

Ostensibly, the regime headed by Bashar al-Assad is repressive since almost everyday reports are coming out that more bloodshed has taken place. But the Western reports are completely silent as to the assistance that the Syrian opposition is getting from outside. No one is interested in probing or questioning, for instance, the circumstances in which 120 Syrian security personnel could have been shot and killed in one “incident”.

The Western, Saudi, Israeli and Turkish involvement in Syria’s unrest is almost crystal clear but that is beyond the zone of discussion when we speak of “Syria on the boil”. In short, Russia has lost the information war over Syria. Henceforth, its dilemma will be that it will be seen as being obstructionist and illogical when a laudable democratization process is unfolding in Syria and the “Arab Spring” is straining to make an appearance.

Moscow has made it clear that it will not brook a resolution at the United Nations Security Council over Syria, no matter its wording or contents. It also voted against the Western move at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) last week to open a Syria nuclear file – similar to the Iran file – at the UN Security Council.

Moscow’s dilemma is that it cannot openly explain its side of the US’s geopolitical agenda toward Syria. Any such explanation will expose the hollowness of the US-Russia reset, which the Kremlin under President Dmitry Medvedev assiduously worked for. But Washington is not going to let Russia off the hook either. It is certain to tighten the noose around Assad’s neck.

Put simply, the US wants Russia to leave Syria alone for the West to tackle. But Russia knows what follows will be that the Russian naval base there would get shut down by a pro-Western successor regime in Damascus that succeeds Assad.

The stakes are very high. Last year, the deputy head of Russian military intelligence was killed in mysterious circumstances while on an inspection tour of the naval base in Syria. His body was found floating on the Mediterranean off the Turkish coast. To be sure, many intelligence agencies are deeply embroiled in the Syrian broth.

First and foremost, a regime change in Syria has become absolutely critical for breaking Israel’s regional isolation. The US-Israeli hope is that the back of the Hezbollah can be broken only if the regime of Assad is overthrown in Damascus and the Syrian-Iranian alliance is ended. Again, a regime change in Syria will force the Hamas leadership to vacate Damascus. Hamas chief Khalid Meshaal has been living in Damascus under Assad’s protection for several years.

All in all, therefore, any movement on the Israel-Palestine peace process on Israeli terms will be possible only if the US and Israel crack the hard Syrian nut. Washington and Tel Aviv have been trying to persuade Russia to fall in line and accept “defeat” over Syria. But Moscow has stuck to its guns. And now by sending the warship to the Black Sea, US has signaled that it will make Russia pay a price for its obduracy and pretensions as a Mediterranean and Middle Eastern power.

The parliamentary election result in Turkey ensuring another term for the ruling “Islamist” party AKP (Justice and Development Party) significantly strengthens the US position on Syria. Ankara has hardened its stance on Assad and has begun openly criticizing him. A more obtrusive Turkish role in destabilizing Assad and forcing a regime change in Damascus can now be expected in the coming weeks. Ironically, Turkey also controls the Bosphorous Straits.

By improving ties with Turkey in the past decade, Moscow had been hoping that Ankara would gradually move toward an independent foreign policy. The Kremlin’s expectation was that the two countries could get together and form a condominium over the Black Sea. But as events unfold, it is becoming clear that Ankara is reverting to its earlier priorities as a NATO country and US’s pre-eminent partner in the region. Ankara cannot be faulted: it made a shrewd assessment and drew a balance sheet concluding that its interests are best served by identifying with the Western move to effect a regime change in Syria.

Additionally, Ankara finds it profitable that it identifies with the Saudi approach to the upheaval in the Middle East. The wealth Arabs in the oil-rich countries of the Persian Gulf are willing to send their “green money” to Turkey. Ankara also shares Saudi misgivings about Iran’s rise as regional power.

In sum, the US is slowly but steadily getting the upper hand over its agenda of a regime change in Syria. Whether Moscow will buckle under this immense pressure and accept a rollback of its influence in Syria is the big question. Moscow has threatened to cooperate with Beijing and adopt a common stance over Syria. But Moscow’s ability to counter the American juggernaut over Syria is weakening by the day.

The course of events over Syria will certainly impact profoundly on the US-Russia reset. The Obama administration seems to have done its homework and concluded that it is worth taking that risk for the sake of ensuring Israel’s security. The warship that sailed into the Black Sea carries a blunt message to Russia to accept that it is a mere pale shadow of the former Soviet Union.

Ambassador M K Bhadrakumar was a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service. His assignments included the Soviet Union, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Kuwait and Turkey.

Russia, China warn West against interference

NOVANEWS
 

 
AFP
 

Russia and China oppose outside interference in the unrest in the Arab world, the two presidents said yesterday in a declaration, as the West seeks their support for increasing pressure on Syria.

“The sides believe that the search for settling the situation in the countries of the Middle East and North Africa should take place in the legal field and through political means,” said the declaration signed by Presidents Dmitry Medvedev and Hu Jintao.

“Outside forces should not interfere in internal processes in the countries of the region.”

Rather, the conflicts should be solved by “launching broad national dialogue about rebuilding stability and social order and the promotion of democratic and economic reforms,” the statement said.

The two presidents also expressed concern over the situation in Libya, calling for an end to hostilities between the forces of Libyan leader Moamer Kadhafi and the rebels.

Russia has said it opposes the UN Security Council adopting any resolution on Syria, risking a major dispute with the West over the response to the crackdown on Syrian protestors.

US consul–Zionist Spy Grapel ‘in big trouble’

NOVANEWS
 

Zionist ‘spy’ Ilan Grapel meets with US embassy representative. Cairo’s indictment expected soon

Egyptian sources believe that Zionist “spy” Ilan Grapel will soon face formal charges.

In the meantime, Egypt’s al-Ahram newspaper reported Friday that he met with the US consul in Cairo the newspaper claims the consul told Grapel he was in “big trouble.”

The report further stated that during his stay in Egypt, Grapel sought to extend his visa writing on the request form that he was a Muslim who came to Egypt to study. The newspaper continues to claim that Grapel is a Mossad agent who was trying to recruit Egyptian citizens and to “incite a conflict between the Egyptian people and their armed forces.”

The newspaper also reported that Grapel “sent emails to Zio-Nazi Gestao ‘Mossad’ from a number of coffee shops”.

Earlier this week Egyptian media said that during his investigation Grapel had admitted to serving in Zio-Nazi army for two years and three months but firmly denied that he worked for Zio-Nazi Gestapo ‘Mossad’.

On Thursday Grapel met with the Zio-Nazi consul in Egypt and the Foreign Ministry said that the consul felt that the Zionist detainee was doing well. Zio-Nazi Embassy representatives in Cairo have spoken to the Egyptian prosecution saying that they would continue to act for Grapel’s release.

Zio-Nazi Peres warns: IsraHell in danger of ceasing to exist as Jewish state

NOVANEWS

Zio-Nazi Peres says that IsraHell ‘doomed’ unless negotiations with the Palestinians leading to a peace agreement begin in the immediate future.

Haaretz

President Shimon Peres is concerned that Israel might become a binational state, in which case, he warned, it would cease to exist as a Jewish state.

“I’m concerned about the continued freeze [in the peace talks],” Peres said to people who visited him this week. “I’m concerned that Israel will become a binational state. What is happening now is total foot-dragging. We’re about to crash into the wall. We’re galloping at full speed toward a situation where Israel will cease to exist as a Jewish state.”

Peres celebrated four years as president this week. He has three years to go until he decides on his next career move. But people who met him this week found the president’s mood far from festive. He prophesied that Israel would be doomed unless negotiations with the Palestinians leading to a peace agreement began in the immediate future.

“Whoever accepts the basic principle of the 1967 lines will receive international support from the world,” Peres said. “Whoever rejects it will lose the world.” He was referring to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s vehement objection to starting peace talks on the basis of the 1967 lines, which he called “indefensible” in both the Knesset and the U.S. Congress.

But Peres continues to reject the advice of friends and various political figures that he come out openly against Netanyahu’s positions. “I’m not the head of the opposition, I’m the state president,” he repeatedly tells them.

Peres also voiced fear that Israel might be subjected to economic boycotts and sanctions. There’s no need for boycotts,” he said. “It would suffice for ports in Europe or Canada to stop unloading Israeli merchandise. It’s already beginning.

“September is only a date,” he added, referring to Palestinian plans to seek UN recognition as a state then. “The question is what will happen before and after.”