NOVANEWS
Posted by: Sammi Ibrahem, Sr
Ukraines President Petro Poroshenko requests the supreme court of Ukraine to declare that his predecessor, Viktor Yanukovych, was overthrown by an illegal operation; in other words, that the post-Yanukovych government, including Poroshenkos own Presidency, came into power from a coup, not from something democratic, not from any authentic constitutional process at all.
In a remarkable document, which is not posted at the English version of the website of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, but which is widely reported outside the United States, including Russia, Poroshenko, in Ukrainian (not in English), has petitioned the Constitutional Court of Ukraine (as it is being widely quoted in English):
“I ask the court to acknowledge that the law on the removal of the presidential title from Viktor Yanukovych’ as unconstitutional.
I had previously reported, and here will excerpt, Poroshenkos having himself admitted prior to 26 February 2014, to the EUs investigator, and right after the February 22nd overthrow of Yanukovych, that the overthrow was a coup, and that it was even a false-flag operation, in which the snipers, who were dressed as if they were Ukrainian Security Bureau troops, were actually not, and that, as the EUs investigator put his finding to the EUs chief of foreign affairs Catherine Ashton [and with my explanatory annotations here]:
“the same oligarch [Poroshenko and so when he became President he already knew this] told that well, all the evidence shows that the people who were killed by snipers, from both sides, among policemen and people from the streets, [this will shock Ashton, who had just said that Yanukovych had masterminded the killings] that they were the same snipers, killing people from both sides [so, Poroshenko himself knows that his regime is based on a false-flag U.S.-controlled coup detat against his predecessor]. … Behind the snipers, it was not Yanukovych, but it was somebody from the new coalition.
This was when Ashton first learned that the myth that Yanukovych had been overthrown as a result of public outrage at his having rejected the EUs offer of membership to Ukraine was just a hoax. (Actually, the planning for this coup was already under way in the U.S. Embassy by at least early 2013, well prior to Yanukovychs EU decision. Furthermore, the Ukrainian publics approval of the government peaked right after Yanukovych announced his rejection of the EUs offer, but then the U.S.-engineered Maidan riots caused that approval to plunge.)
If the Court grants Poroshenkos petition, then the appointment of Arseniy Yatsenyuk by the U.S. State Departments Victoria Nuland on 4 February 2014, which was confirmed by the Ukrainian parliament (or Rada) at the end of the coup on February 26th, and the other appointments which were made, including that of Oleksandr Turchynov to fill in for Yanukovych as caretaker President until one of the juntas chosen candidates would be elected on May 25th of 2014, which election Poroshenko won all of this was illegal.
However, this illegality had already been known. It was already explained in detail on 28 February 2014, that, Yanukovychs removal was unconstitutional. Thats for lawyers; but, now, finally, Ukraines Constitutional Court is faced with the shocking predicament of Ukraines own President, who won his post as a result of this coup, requesting them to acknowledge that it was a coup, much as the founder of the “private CIA” firm Stratfor had even called it, the most blatant coup in history. (It was that because the authentic video and other evidence of its having been a Washington job was so massive.)
Also in the news now is that Dmitriy Yarosh‘s Right Sector the same group that Washington had hired for the coup and for the ethnic cleansing campaign in Ukraines former Donbass region have announced that they will assemble in Kiev on July 3rd to overthrow Petroshenko unless he restarts right now the war against Donbass. The people whom Washington paid to oust Yanukovych are planning to do the same to Poroshenko. There is a struggle inside the Obama Administration about how far they can successfully go with their Ukrainian Nazis not formally leading the country.
Washington is having a hard time keeping in line the Ukrainian nazis upon whom Washingtons plan for Ukraine has been based. Ukraines nazis are thirsting for Russian blood, and want to slake their thirst faster than the Obama Administration is willing to go along with. Washingtons previous Fk the EU! hasnt worked as well as they had hoped. There is thus increasingly bad blood between the Obama Administration and the Ukrainian enforcers upon whom Obama has been relying.
Basically, Poroshenko now is torn between the EU, on one side, and Ukraines well-armed Nazis, on the other; and, thus far, the ultimate decider, U.S. President Obama, who has needed cooperation both from Ukraines Nazis and from the EU, in order for his Ukrainian gambit against Russia to work, is on the fence between those two sides. John Kerry sides with the EU; Victoria Nuland sides with the Nazis. But Obama himself hasnt yet played his hand.
