Pakistan Playing Key Role in the US-Taliban Talks

NOVANEWS

Image result for US-Taliban Talks CARTOON
By Sajjad Shaukat
Despite hurdles, the fifth round of peace talks which started between the US negotiators and the
Taliban in the Doha-the capital of Qatar on February 25, this year, is making progress gradually.
Hinting that US forces could leave Afghanistan within five years under a Pentagon plan offered
as part of a potential deal with the Taliban to end the nearly 18-year war, The New York Times
reported on March 7, 2019, “Nearly 11 days after peace negotiations between the United States
and the Taliban began with high hopes…it has become clear that any resolution to the 18-year
war could be frustratingly slow.
One of the most prominent issues thwarting progress is adisagreement over a fundamental question: What is terrorism, and who is a terrorist? The answeris so important because the two sides had already agreed in principle on a framework for twocrucial issues: the withdrawal of American troops, and a commitment that Afghan soil would not again be used to launch terrorist attacks against the United States and its allies…American negotiators have insisted on specifying that Afghanistan not be used by “terrorist” groups, but the Taliban have resisted, saying there was no universal definition of terrorism”.
However, the meetings between the interlocutors restarted over in Doha after a temporary halt to
allow for internal consideration. Conflicting reports are coming about the progress of the
dialogue, as these delicate talks are being conducted by both the sides with much care.
In this regard, Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said on March 4, 2019: “The current
round of talks in Doha is advancing on a step-by-step basis. As the issue at hand is immensely
crucial and delicate, it’s progression is taking place with much care and vigilance…the
negotiations continue to focus primarily on a potential US troop withdrawal from Afghanistan
and a pact to prevent Afghanistan from being used as a safe haven for terrorists…no
understanding has so far been reached about any agreement or document.”
The latest meetings follow marathon negotiations in January, this year, which saw the US and
the Taliban walk away with a draft framework on the two issues. America has insisted for a
ceasefire and the opening of a dialogue between the Taliban and the Afghan government whom
the former considered puppet regime of the US-led Western countries. However, the Taliban
repeatedly rejected the demands, while the continuation of the talks followed a major attack on a
joint US-Afghan base in southwestern Afghanistan’s Helmand province on March 1, this year
with at least 23 Afghan security forces killed.
Meanwhile, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani on February 10, 2019 offered the Taliban for
opening of an office in Afghanistan, but, the Taliban swiftly rejected the proposal.
In September 2018, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo named veteran diplomat Zalmay
Khalilzad as a newly-named State Department special envoy to Afghanistan. Khalilzad, Pompeo
said, would be “full time focused on developing the opportunities to get the Afghans and the
Taliban to come to reconciliation.”
Since Khalilzad started his efforts to convince the Taliban to have direct talks with the US,
Pakistan has been playing a key role in the US-Taliban talks, as Islamabad succeeded in bringing
the Taliban to the negotiating Table. Zalmay Khalilzad who repeatedly visited Pakistan and met
the civil and military leadership, including country’s Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Quershi
admired Pakistan’s role in the US-Taliban peace dialogue.
Although the US has not clearly released a statement regarding the status of the talks, yet it has
admitted Pakistan’s central role in the negotiations between America and the Taliban leaders.
In this connection, while giving briefing to the US Senate Armed Services Committee on March
8, this year, the head of the US Central Command (CENTCOM) General Joseph Votel has
lauded Pakistan’s role for maintaining peace and stability in the region. The General elaborated,
“We have had some success with Pakistan, they’ve been more helpful in terms of bringing the
Taliban to the [Peace negotiating] table…positive steps [Of Pakistan] to assist Ambassador
Zalmay Khalilzad in support of Afghanistan reconciliation by facilitating talks with the
Taliban. As we have requested [from] them, we have seen instances where they have taken
action against the safe haven areas of the militants”.
In a discourse in CBS programme-“Face the Nation” on February 3, 2019, US President Donald
Trump has made it clear that he is determined to get out of “endless wars” in Afghanistan and
Syria. President Trump stated: “I have been hitting very hard in Afghanistan and now we are
negotiating with the Taliban…If you look at Afghanistan we are going in very soon we will be
going into our 19th year spending $50 billion a year”.
American President Trump’s determination and gesturing has already manifested in the
diplomatic manuvours of Khalilzad, resulting in silver-lining for Afghan peace process in Doha.
It is notable that the war in Afghanistan is America’s longest military intervention which has cost
Washington nearly US $.1.7 trillion. Hence, positive shift in America’s policy towards
Islamabad, seeking cooperation and re-establishing the association, have raised hopes regarding
the probability of peace in the war-torn Afghanistan.
It is mentionable that in the aftermath of Pulwama terror attack in the Indian Occupied Kashmir
and escalation of tension between Pakistan and India, on February 28, this year, US President
Trump hoped that Pakistan-India tension will de-escalate soon—the United States has been
mediating between the two sides and trying to have them stop. Trump also acknowledged that
Washington has improved her relations with Islamabad shortly.
Particularly, Mike Pompeo, US Secretary of State stated that he has spoken with the leaders of
India and Pakistan and has urged them to avoid “any action that would escalate and greatly
increase risk”.
American State Department deputy spokesperson Robert Palladino said on March 5, 2019 that
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo played an essential role in de-escalating tensions between India
and Pakistan.
Nevertheless, President Donald Trump’s positive approach towards Islamabad endorsed the fact
that America needs Pakistan’s help to reach an agreement with the Taliban as soon as possible.
It is of particular attention that in his first interview to the NBC News on October 31, 2018,
indicating NATO defeat in Afghanistan, the US General Austin Miller-NATO’s head of
Resolute Support in Afghanistan had admitted by saying: “This is not going to be won
militarily…This is going to a political solution…My assessment is…if you realize you can’t win
militarily at some point…So you do not necessarily wait us out, but I think now is the time to
start working through the political piece of this conflict.”
Besides, in order to resolve the Afghan imbroglio, Russia is also facilitating approach towards
the Taliban. In this context, a two days conference ended in Moscow on February 6, 2019.
Former Afghan president Hamid Karzai who was among the most high profile attendees in
Moscow, pointed out Kabul’s role in negotiations was something for it to resolve with the
Taliban. He stated: “We understand that the government in Kabul needs to be part of these
negotiations, we wish that they would have been here today”. During the meeting with Afghan
politicians outside of government, senior Taliban leaders said that the US had agreed to draw
down half of its 14,000 force in Afghanistan by April, a claim later denied by officials in
Washington.
Afghan President Ashraf Ghani criticised the gathering in Moscow, saying they amounted to
“nothing more than a fantasy.”
The moot in Moscow also played some positive role and probably compelled Washington to
intensify efforts to reach an agreement with the Taliban in connection with Afghanistan. Besides,
the role of China to create stability and peace in Afghanistan has also been very positive.
It is analyzed that continued suicides by the US war veterans (Reportedly, 20 per day) also
exerted pressure on President Trump to make urgent overtures vis-à-vis Pakistan and Taliban to
implement the withdrawal strategy from Afghanistan and to improve relations with Islamabad.
It is noteworthy that these related developments seem to have increased the agony of Indian deep
state. Reportedly, an orchestrated Indian campaign to portray the talks with negative colours has
already been launched, focusing on human rights issues and plight of Afghan Women.
With the covert assistance of Kabul, India has also activated her proxies, including “Pashtoon
Tahfuz Movement (PTM) with new offensives to create disturbance and law and order situation
in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan and that of Baluchistan. Apart from other similar
incidents, recent terror attack on the DIG Police Loralai office in Balochistan, which killed nine
people, including eight policemen on January 29, this year is an indicator.
It worth-mentioning that security situation in Afghanistan is well beyond the control of Afghan
security forces and the National Unity Government of that country. For all its failure, New Delhi
and Kabul has been blaming Pakistan in accordance with their collective agenda which also
includes Israel.
In fact, since the occupation of Afghanistan by the US-led NATO forces, the country has become
center of American CIA, Indian RAW and Israeli Mossad which are in connivance to obtain the
covert designs of the their countries and some Western countries against Russia, China, Pakistan
and Iran. Under the cover of fighting terrorism, these foreign agencies which are also in
collaboration with the Afghanistan’s intelligence agency National Directorate of Security (NDS)
support the militants of ISIS and Afghanistan-based Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP),
including their linked outfits which have been conducting terror-assaults in Afghanistan and
Pakistan as part of the secret strategy of the US-led countries—double game of America. These
terrorist groups have also been destabilising Tibetan regions of China and Iranian Sistan-
Baluchistan through subversive activities.
Especially, India and Afghan government which want to prolong the stay of NATO forces in
Afghanistan are also playing double game against America. New Delhi knows that after the
withdrawal of the NATO forces, Taliban will eliminate the secret network of RAW, the NDS
and Mossad in that lawless country. Therefore, these intelligence agencies are particularly using
the terrorists of TTP and ISIS in wakening Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Regarding Indian activities in Afghanistan the then NATO commander, Gen. McChrystal had
pointed out: “Indian political and economic influence is increasing in Afghanistan…is likely to
exacerbate regional tensions.”
Similarly, while taking note of Indian role in Afghanistan, US Republican Senator John McCain
had reminded the Obama administration that encouraging India to take a more active role in
Afghanistan, while simultaneously criticising Pakistan could be a recipe for disaster.
It is also of particular attention that armed forces of Pakistan have successfully broken the
backbone of the foreign-backed terrorists by the successful military operations Zarb-e-Azb and
Radd-ul-Fasaad which have also been extended to other parts of the country, including
Balochistan province. And Pakistan’s primarily intelligence agency, ISI has broken the network
of these terrorist groups by capturing several militants, while thwarting a number of terror
attempts. But, in the recent past and during the election-campaign of 2019, blasts in Balochistan
and other regions of the country and failed attempt at the Chinese Consulate in Karachi showed
that the US-led India, Afghanistan and Israel have again started acts of sabotage especially to
weaken Pakistan and to damage the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) which is part of
China’s One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative or BRI. Washington and New Delhi have already
opposed this project.
Now, in backdrop of Afghan Taliban’s successes in maximizing the physical occupation of the
country and recent political/diplomatic gains and the US-led prolonged war forced America to
have a deal with the Taliban. As RAW and Mossad are in collaboration, therefore, it can be
predicted that Afghanistan in particular and Pakistan in general will witness a surge in the
activities of out-laws, terrorists and the Indian proxies.
Some analysts opine that Afghan elite class, comprising of businessmen, civil-military
bureaucracy and other rich people might opt to migrate from the country to adjacent areas in case
of the Taliban-USA agreement. However, till that time, usual anti-Pak rhetoric will remain the
common norm for most of the Afghan government officials, as evident from recent accusative
outbursts from Afghan President Ashraf Ghani during a meeting with the US peace negotiator
Zalmay Khalilzad.
In any case, Pakistan needs to make arrangements for another exodus of Afghan migrants
(Afghan elites) in the wake of success of Taliban-US peace talks. Resultant effect will be more
economic burden on Pakistan and socio-economic effects on the local trade and commerce and
influx of more Afghan refugees.
It is imperative for Pakistan to keep following the evolving meetings in Afghanistan to counter
the drastic aftermath on the region. Intense diplomatic activity, engaging Iran and other regional
countries such as China, Russia and the Middle East will help in containing the negative
spillover effects of the prospective US-Taliban deal and expected withdrawal of American
troops.
Nonetheless, now; President Trump has become lenient towards Pakistan. Instead of blaming
Islamabad for cross-border terrorism in Afghanistan and emphasizing to ‘do more’ against
terrorism, he is asking for its assistance to ‘help more’ to pull out the US-led NATO forces
from that war-torn country. Although Pakistan is playing a key role in the US-Taliban talks, yet
after obtaining its selfish aims after the withdrawal from Afghanistan, America can again leave
both Pakistan and Afghanistan to face the fallouts of the ongoing war, as it did after fulfilling its
interests against the former Soviet Union.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *