NOVANEWS
- Dershowitz falsely suggests that Chomsky is against the existence of Israel
- Your Israel lobby at work: ZOA blasts Obama appointee for saying al-Quds
- Gaza extremists target children’s camp
- If Saban bought ‘LA Times,’ Americans wouldn’t hear Ahmad Tibi’s call for equality
- Is Chomsky getting religion on the lobby?
- Doorstop book by Texas scholar suggests New Historians are bustin out all over
- Finkelstein on Morris, on the root cause of the conflict
- Recovering from the special relationship is going to involve a lot of historical accusations/confessions
- Even Peter Beinart couldn’t say this here
- Boycott racial profiling in Arizona now
Dershowitz falsely suggests that Chomsky is against the existence of Israel Posted: 24 May 2010
In this interview with Jerusalem Post, Dershowitz says that the left wants to revolutionize 1948– end Israel/create one democracy in Israel/Palestine– and that makes his 80 percent case for Israel (80 percent good, that means!) easier. Notice below that he uses strawmen Norman Finkelstein and Noam Chomsky. But both men are for the two-state solution! Chomsky has vestiges of Zionist idealism… And I believe many on the left would accept the existence of Israel if it ceases to be an occupier practicing Jim Crow against an ethnic-religious minority. But Israel doesn’t seem to want to give up those practices; and, putting on my realist hat, the terrible reality is that it’s one state right now, how do you go about creating a viable Palestinian state? Dershowitz of course notions such a thing. The notions never end, and meanwhile the world gets Kosovo, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan– many other states. Excerpt begins with Dershowitz’s description of a hasbara corps on college campuses, something like Haim Saban’s scheme. Second question gets to his misrepresentations of Finkelstein and Chomsky.
|
Your Israel lobby at work: ZOA blasts Obama appointee for saying al-Quds Posted: 24 May 2010
The Chas Freeman treatment. Go after anyone who sounds like he thinks Arabs are people. I have to believe that this is a sign of unraveling. The Zionist Organization of American is going after a deputy Homeland Security adviser, John Brennan, for using the Arabic name of Jerusalem, al-Quds, in a speech to describe his favorite city. “In the same speech, Brennan also spoke of his time at the American University in Cairo in the 1970s, referring to the common aspirations of his former Egyptian, Jordanian and Palestinian classmates, including the freedom “to practice our faith freely…” Shocking.
Morton Klein, head of the ZOA:
|
Gaza extremists target children’s camp Posted: 24 May 2010
Yes I believe this has to do with occupation and siege, but still, there are intolerant elements inside Gazan society. The Times carries a report from Fares Akram of an attack on a UN children’s camp in Sunday, apparently by Islamic militants, torching property. John Ging blamed extremists. Hamas condemned the attack and says it will investigate.
|
If Saban bought ‘LA Times,’ Americans wouldn’t hear Ahmad Tibi’s call for equality Posted: 23 May 2010
The New Yorker’s profile of Haim Saban, the Israeli-American billionaire, quotes Saban as saying that he wanted to buy the Los Angeles Times (and still does) because he “thought it was time that it turn from a pro-Palestinian paper into a balanced paper. During the period of the second intifada, Jews were being killed every day over there, and this paper was publishing images of a Palestinian woman sitting with her dead child, and, on the Israeli side, a destroyed house. I got sick of it.”
From the perspective of Saban, a major donor to the Democratic Party whose greatest concern is protecting Israel, the focus on the LA Times makes sense. Remember, it was the LA Times that published Neve Gordon’s important Op-Ed calling for boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel. And now today the LA Times publishes an interview with Israeli-Palestinian Knesset Member Ahmad Tibi, who says that Avigdor Lieberman is a racist, Palestinian citizens of Israel are systematically discriminated against, and that he doesn’t accept Israel as a Jewish state. Americans need to be hearing voices like this. If Saban had his way and bought the LA Times, Tibi’s voice, calling for equality for Palestinian citizens of Israel, would most likely be squashed. Here’s an excerpt from the piece (the questions from reporter Edmund Sanders are in bold):
|
Is Chomsky getting religion on the lobby? Posted: 23 May 2010
International Middle East Media Center report:
|
Doorstop book by Texas scholar suggests New Historians are bustin out all over Posted: 23 May 2010
Check out Quicksand: America’s Pursuit of Power in the Middle East (Penguin) by Prof.Geoffrey Wawro of No. Texas State, just released last month. It is 700 pages of the most comprehensive look at US policy in the region going back to the beginning of the last century in which he devotes considerable space to the early Zionist movement, the birth of the state and the power of the lobby going back to Wilson. In his conclusion, Wawro writes that the US has to “break” a lance on behalf of the Palestinians expelled in 1948.
Break a lance? It seems to mean that the US must risk taking remedial action to make up for its “legitimizing”of Israel’s dispossession of the Palestinians in 1948. Wawro demonstrates an understanding of the history that motivates Israel’s actions and the reasoning behind them but does not excuse them. His both fresh and fair treatment of the subject may be be a harbinger of an onrushing wave of America’s own “new historians” and reflects the ground breaking work of Mearsheimer and Walt whose book is one of its many references. Wawro had access to a number of heretofore unknown British and US military archives which makes this book invaluable to anyone seriously concerned with understanding the Middle East. I will be interviewing him on my radio program this Wednesday. What is interesting is that there are supporting blurbs by both Mearsheimer and Newt Gingrich on the dust jacket. I am sure that Newt didn’t read it because it isn’t kind to those who brought us both wars with Iraq. It is also interesting, thus far, that it is being ignored by the lobby and its stable of book reviewers, no doubt hoping that it will go away. Here’s a sample of his viewpoints in this March 24 article questioning the Israel-US relationship, No Better Friend?” America, Israel and the Occupied Territories. |
Finkelstein on Morris, on the root cause of the conflict Posted: 23 May 2010
On Russian tv the other day, debaters Benny Morris and Norman Finkelstein were asked what the root of the conflict is in Israel/Palestine, and Morris said it was Arab resistance to Zionism. “The Arabs didn’t want the Jews to be here… didn’t want to share the land with them.” (As commenters have noted,) Finkelstein said that Morris was wrong, and that his own scholarship shows as much. He didn’t get a chance to go into it on air. And so:
Morris clearly misrepresented what he said in the past. Here are his words:
When you juxtapose this statement beside his other statements, it’s hard not to conclude from Morris’s books that the “root cause of the conflict” (the moderator’s question) was the rational fear of Palestinian Arabs that if Zionisms succeeded they would be made homeless:
Morris’s problem recalls Churchill’s. Churchill’s fellow Tory MP Eddie Winterton once said during a House of Commons debate on India that Churchill’s trouble was that he could not “shovel enough earth over his past to obliterate it from human view.” |
Recovering from the special relationship is going to involve a lot of historical accusations/confessions Posted: 23 May 2010
A lot of people are talking about this Chris McGreal piece in the Guardian on Israel’s sales of arms, including nuke materials, to South Africa during apartheid (notwithstanding the fact that a former South African PM they worked with, John Vorster, had been a Nazi sympathizer and fascist-party member during the war). The article is based on Sasha Polakow-Suransky’s new book.
Israel must feel like the walls are closing in these days. Everyone on the left is bashing them, everywhere, for stuff that happened a long time ago. Jeff Blankfort’s post on the big new Geoff Wawro book that says the US must redeem its own bad actions over decades, confirms that. My explanation of the trend is that the expression of long-pent-up negative feelings about the state is finally being licensed in part because of recent atrocities/conditions that are so blatant that only the U.S. establishment and lobby are willing now to ignore them. And the scales are falling from a lot of people’s eyes. I get emails about the refugee situation, the Peel Commission report, partition, etc. all the time. All historical issues. But they feel fresh. Even Jeffrey Goldberg is in the historical reframing mood, asking, Should the Zionists have gotten Bavaria? The west is in recovery from the special relationship and trying to figure out how we got here. Before long there will be investigative pieces about AIPAC in the New York Times. Well– give that a few years, anyway! |
Even Peter Beinart couldn’t say this here Posted: 23 May 2010
Haaretz is way ahead of the New York Review of Books. Gideon Levy in Haaretz:
And in a great column I have failed to cite, Bradley Burston said that Israel is slipping toward fascism, and dragging American Jews with it:
UPDATE: Second mistake I made today: I originally attributed to Levy a quote that did not appear in the piece, but a friend’s interpretation of the piece. Inexcusable. Sloppy. Poor impulse control. Apologies. |
Boycott racial profiling in Arizona now Posted: 23 May 2010
A number of students from Wayne State University in Michigan went out to Israel and Palestine to study the issue. This article doesn’t say how many, but one got turned back, guess who?
|
See: www.mondoweiss.net