Articles

NOVANEWS   by rehmat1   Barack Obama who during the last two-year of his Presidency has rained on leaders of Egypt, ...Read more

NOVANEWS     Hama lights on fire. The internet is cut off. Syria witnesses the biggest day of the crackdown ...Read more

NOVANEWS   Two friends have given feedback on the second day of the Syrian Opposition meeting in Antalya.   Syria: ...Read more

NOVANEWS First impressions of the Opposition Meeting in Turkey sent by a friend” Syrian opposition activists walk past a poster ...Read more

USA
NOVANEWS   by PHILIP WEISS I'm late on everything, including a report from the Nakba Day protests in Lebanon on March ...Read more

NOVANEWS انتفاضة سوريا في نظر لبنا (أيّ لبنا     اعتصام لأطفال لبنانيين لاستنكار مقتل الطفل السوري حمزة الخطيب (جمال ...Read more

NOVANEWS   "So I was listening to AIPAC's roll call of attendees at their conference. I was surprised to hear ...Read more

NOVANEWS Settlement named in honour of the US president forms part of an initiative aiming to Judaise Jerusalem   The ...Read more

NOVANEWS   There has been so much flying around the internet about the UCU's rejection of the EUMC working definition ...Read more

NOVANEWS   American Bedu had the opportunity to dialogue with Roba,.  Roba is a professional Arab career woman.  She shares ...Read more

NOVANEWS BY URI DROMI DROMI@MISHKENOT.ORG.IL This week, tens of thousands of Israelis flocked to Jerusalem to celebrate the anniversary of ...Read more

Syria and US-Israel Chutzpah

NOVANEWS

 


 

Barack Obama who during the last two-year of his Presidency has rained on leaders of Egypt, Pakistan, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey, Tunisia and Libya – did not feel shame to bow to the demands of Benji Netanyahu, who beats every Muslim leader when it come to slaughter of innocent men, women and children. Benji has been involved in the genocide of Palestinian and Lebanese since 1967 when he joined Israel Occupation Force (IOF).

One just have to look at Jewish-controlled mass-media’s demonization of Bashar Assad to judge who is arming and supporting the anti-Bashar Syrian rebels. London-based Jewish Chatham House and Saban Center at Brookings Institute to name a few. Al-Jazeera (English), a pro-Israel network is airing baised reporting of events in Libya, Lebanon and Syria while ignoring brutal suppresion of anti-government protests in Bahrain and Yemen. As result, renowned Tunisian-born journalist and Beirut Bureau Chief Ghassan Ben Jeddo tendered his resignation earlier last month for a number of reasons, most importantly Al-Jazeera’s “lack of professionalism and objectivity” in covering the ongoing revolutions in Middle Eastern countries. Zeina Yazji, anchor for Al-Arabiya has also resigned on similar reasons.

Ankara, Tehran and Beirut have expressed support for Bashar Assad’s reform package which shows who the new emerging regional powers think is behind the disturbances in Syria.

The Voltaire Network (May 31, 2011) reported that Bashar Assad has succeeded in foiling US-Israel bid to topple his regime.

“All the signals seen on the Syrian street this past week, point to the fact that the security incidents that were provoked in several areas were retreating after the state was able to extinguish the armed rebellion and fight the gangs of Takfir and anarchy. The rebellion attempts, as well as the acts of violence and terrorism erupted in light of protests which were provoked by objective factors and incentives but were exploited by political opposition forces representing a minority to turn them into an opportunity to impose a military control that would lead to a foreign interference which was revealed by Abdul Halim Khaddam in his recent statements.

The opposition which is linked to the United States and the plan aiming at sabotaging Syria fell in the weapons trap, thus provoking an overwhelming popular insistence on the national centralized state and stability. In the meantime, this opposition had dangerously fell in sectarian instigation exposed by the presence of Takfiris fatwas and satellite channels airing form the Gulf and targeting Syria through mobilization and the instigation of civil war. This led the opposition towards failure and the exchange of accusations and would explain the presence of major disputes within its ranks despite the American, Turkish and Qatari efforts deployed to form a political entity that would combine all its elements. The retreat of the incidents and the emergence of new facts regarding the sabotage plans and the external and internal forces involved in it imposes the progress of the dialogue led by President Bashar al-Assad over reform in the next stage, in order to consecrate partisan and media plurality and instate new foundations for the parliamentary and local elections”.

‘Friday of the Children of Freedom’ – the Uprising Moves to Hama, Many Killed, Internet Cut

NOVANEWS

 


 

Hama lights on fire. The internet is cut off. Syria witnesses the biggest day of the crackdown as protests are animated by the death of Hamza Ali al-Khateeb. Many insist that no one will believe the Syrian government’s version of Hamza’s death unless there is an international investigation team allowed into the country. Syria will refuse such an idea; it will argue that to permit foreigners access will begin the country down the slippery slope of foreign investigative teams for every conflagration. But with the protest movement gathering renewed steam following the Antalya opposition meeting and gathering international outrage at brutality, the Syrian government finds itself increasingly isolate and with few options.

SYRIA: Many deaths reported as thousands march in ‘Friday of the children of freedom’ protests

June 3, 2011

Picture 2 Syrian activist accounts say dozens of people were killed in the central city of Hama on Friday when Syrian military forces and pro-regime loyalists opened fire at a large protest rally against the rule of President Bashar Assad and the Syrian regime’s continued crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators.

A member of the Syrian activist group the Local Coordination Committees in Syria (LCCSyria) told Babylon & Beyond that the group had names of 24 people killed in Friday’s protests in Hama. The Associated Press reported that 34 people were killed in the city on Friday. Snipers were positioned on the rooftops of buildings in various Hama neighborhoods and the death toll was expected to rise, according to activist reports.

Syria Blocks Internet Access Amid Unrest

BY CHRISTOPHER RHOADS

WSJournal

Syria shut down most of its Internet and mobile data connections early Friday, adopting a strategy used by other governments in the Middle East during critical points of the uprisings.

But the attempt to gain an advantage over the opposition groups by unplugging or partially blocking the Internet, which has played a key role in the protests, could backfire. In some cases, most notably in Egypt, the move appeared to prompt more angry protesters into the streets.

“You are reaching a point of no return when you do this kind of stuff,” said Earl Zmijewski, a vice president at Renesys …

Rights group calls for Syria sanctions

June 3 2011 Reuters

Syrian women living in Jordan adorn their faces and clothes with the national flag during a protest to demand that Syrian President Bashar Assad step down from power.

Human Rights Watch has called on the UN Security Council to impose sanction on Syria and to hold the government accountable to the International Criminal Court,

Haaretz: Assad regime will eventually succumb to protest pressure, IDF sources say
2011-06-03

The regime of Syrian leader Bashar Assad will not survive and will eventually collapse under the pressure of demonstrations in his country. This is the assessment of Israel’s military establishment – and this view is gaining strength. A senior …

Here a transcript ( edited for comprehension ) of  live Twitter messages posted by  @ProfKahf  who attended the Antalya conference (Thanks for posting in comment section)

http://twitter.com/#!/ProfKahf
Poet, Syrian American academic
http://english.uark.edu/Faculty/Mohja_Kahf.php

Start of transcript  ______________

Antalya conference is electing a 31-member working-group to continue coordination among the conference workshops.

Will the “Tribe List” or the “Kid List” win the vote – who [will] continue Antalya conference work?

Antalya conference :
List 1 includes  Ikhwan , Kurdish , Christian , Alawite , human rights organization chiefs
List 2: includes new names , emerging activists

It’s just a vote for a conference working-group, nothing more, but it was a thrill anyway.

Lists were compiled and you voted for the Whole Shebang ( one list or the other ).

total votes caste: 253
List1 :  203
List2:  50

Immediate breakdown, with color pie graphics projected on Antalya conference hall screen.

Oddly, some folks found out they were on a List just 5 minutes before the vote  (eg. me , Mariam Jalabi).
Antalya conference Sloppy process

Mariam & I were on (losing) Kid List.
Goodwill all’round . Khawla Yusef, Sondos Soleiman, Melhem Drooby, Ammar Qurabi, on winning list

Young activsts were promised 10 seats
List1 ended up with only 3 , including  @Mohammad_Syria who withdrew  to protest level of youth inclusion

AND again, it’s only a conference WORK group. The young gen’ers were saying “ we are who will end up doing the actual work anyway”

You know, people are always gonna say stuff like this when you have a conference, and If you don’t have it, you’re also damned.

Beauty vibes , solidarity (which is not the same as no diffs) predominate at this conference ,despite differences.

New blood @ Antalya #Syria conference, says
“ Regarding  List 1: Fine , let well-known “Opposition Faces” be the slap to the regime ; we will do the work.”

UN seeks probe after Syrian boy’s torture-killing
2011-05-31

The call came after a New York Times report that an online video showed a 13-year-old boy, arrested at a protest on April 29, who it said had been tortured, mutilated and killed. UN seeks probe after Syrian boy’s torture-killing Tue, 31 May 2011 19 …

Hamza Ali al-Khateeb’s death explained by to the Syrian government, which claims that damage to the body was consistent with decay of 5 weeks that it sat unidentified. Sana in English

Here is video of the government’s response to the claimed torture of 13 year old HamzaHere and here. Both are in Arabic.

The Depravity Factor

By DAVID BROOKS

June 2, 2011

By now you have probably heard about Hamza Ali al-Khateeb. He was the 13-year-old Syrian boy who tagged along at an antigovernment protest in the town of Saida on April 29. He was arrested that day, and the police returned his mutilated body to his family a month later. While in custody, he had apparently been burned, beaten, lacerated and given electroshocks. His jaw and kneecaps were shattered. He was shot in both arms. When his father saw the state of Hamza’s body, he passed out…..

All governments do bad things, and Middle East dictatorships do more than most. But the Syrian government is one of the world’s genuinely depraved regimes. Yet for all these years, Israel has been asked to negotiate with this regime, compromise with this regime and trust that this regime will someday occupy the heights over it in peace…..

That’s why it’s necessary, especially at this moment in history, to focus on the nature of regimes, not only the boundaries between them. To have a peaceful Middle East, it was necessary to get rid of Saddam’s depraved regime in Iraq. It will be necessary to try to get rid of Qaddafi’s depraved regime in Libya. It’s necessary, as everybody but the Obama administration publicly acknowledges, to see Assad toppled.  It will be necessary to marginalize Hamas. It was necessary to abandon the engagement strategy that Barack Obama campaigned on and embrace the cautious regime-change strategy that is his current doctrine.

The machinations of the Israeli and Palestinian negotiators are immaterial. The Arab reform process is the peace process.

Syrian Opposition Meeting in Antalya: Day Two

NOVANEWS

 

Two friends have given feedback on the second day of the Syrian Opposition meeting in Antalya.
 

Syria: Opposition Drafts Declaration in Antalya
 

 

Both were impressed by the constructive nature of the second day. George Washington was not born, they conceded, but hard decisions were made.

The Muslim Brothers and Islamists were under intense pressure to accept the notion of a secular government where religion and state would be separate. They resisted this most of the day but ultimately conceded at the eleventh hour. We do not have the statement or wording on this “secular” statement. But the MB accepted to not contest the separation of state and religion in the conference statement. I will publish as soon as I can get the wording of the conference statement.

According to some, Amr al-Azm (son of Sadiq) Amr Miqdad (presumably from the large Deraa family), and Muhammad al-Abdullah all played an important role in mediating and facilitating the discussion. They worked very hard to get the secular statement accepted.

The young guys were impressive. “Anyone in Damascus who doesn’t take these guys seriously is stupid,” my source explained. They are no where near where they should be, but for a first meeting this was impressive.” There were many arguments between the young, new leaders and the old, established leaders who have been in exile for decades. The young leaders had no patience for the committees and bureaucracy of the older generation. They are getting communication lines in place, developing networks between towns and did not have time for the endless haggling of the older generation.

About 70 Kurds showed up which surprised everyone. Also the number of tribal leaders was impressive. They were wearing heir dish dashers and kafiyyas.

“People have just had enough of being treated like shit. They want to be treated like real human beings – this was what it was all about,” one person explained. They have given up on talking with the regime. They don’t want the Assad family anymore.

Another important accomplishment was the establishment of an executive board and an election. They voted on a 31 member executive body, nine of whom will be full time. Two different lists of 31 people were presented, then they voted  on which of the two lists would be picked. There was a lot of argument about who would be on the lists. It looks like they have agree on the people.

When the National Salvation Front was constructed in 2006, ex-V.P. Abdal Halim Khaddam waltzed in and took charge without a proper election. It was not a democratic opposition. At the very least, this opposition effort is proceeding by some sort of democratic procedure and there are elections.

Another aspect of the meeting that people liked was that the organizers of the conference excluded Farid Ghadary, Abdal Halim Khaddam, and Rifaat al-Assad because they are too tainted.  The conference came out with a statement refusing foreign intervention and proclaiming the integrity and inviolability of Syria’s boarders. “Everything must be done to preserve Syria’s unity and territorial integrity,” their statement read.

“I want those people in Damascus to feel threatened,” said one friend. “This meeting is more impressive than anything the Baath has accomplished in the last 40 years. When have they ever had a real election? This is a start. There was a real young group of people working on the road to Damascus”

They issued a statement that Alawis should feel safe. No group would be targeted.

The Antalya group will start their own Facebook page tomorrow.

REBELS DEMAND HANDOVER OF POWER – Financial Times

Syria’s opposition has called on President Bashar al-Assad to resign immediately and hand over power to Farouk al-Sharaa, vice-president, to secure the country’s transition to democracy, writes Abigail Fielding-Smith in Beirut.

Opposition members meeting in Turkey rejected foreign intervention in the effort to end Mr Assad’s rule, and stressed the movement did not “aim to undermine any sect”.

“The delegates have committed to the demands of the Syrian people to bring down the regime and support the people’s revolution for freedom and dignity,” a statement issued by the conference said.

The conference – an unprecedented meeting of disparate activists from inside and outside Syria – also elected a 31-member consultative council to support the uprising, which started two and a half months ago.

Separately, Hillary Clinton, US secretary of state, on Thursday called on the international community to take tougher action on the Syrian authorities’ repression of the protests, urging countries to “get on the right side of history”.

Russia and China have objected to a draft UN Security Council resolution condemning the crackdown in Syria, which Human Rights Watch has said could have involved “crimes against humanity”.

Syrian opposition tell Assad to quit immediately

AFP,

June 02, 2011

Syrian opposition groups called Thursday for President Bashar al-Assad’s immediate resignation, in a joint declaration at the end of a two-day meeting in Turkey.

The statement, read out in the Mediterranean resort of Antalya, urged the “immediate resignation of President Bashar al-Assad from all functions he occupies.”

It urged the holding of “parliamentary and presidential elections within a period that will not exceed one year” following Assad’s resignation.

The dissidents vowed “to do whatever it is up to them to bring down the regime” in Syria, welcoming the declaration with applause.

Fears over crackdown

UN genocide prevention experts warned the Syrian authorities Thursday over “apparently systematic and deliberate attacks” on unarmed civilians.

Putting new UN pressure on President Bashar al-Assad’s regime over his crackdown, UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon’s special advisors on prevention of genocide and responsibility to protect civilian populations said they were “gravely concerned” at the growing death toll from the “violent suppression” of protests.

“We are particularly alarmed at the apparently systematic and deliberate attacks by police, military, and other security forces against unarmed civilians taking part in the last two months of protests,” said the advisors Francis Deng and Edward Luck.

“The systematic and widespread attacks that are alleged to have taken place in Syria appear primarily to have targeted the civilian population,” they said in a joint statement.

“This underscores the need for an independent, thorough, and objective investigation into all alleged violations of international human rights law,” the experts said.

Syria has refused to let a UN human rights mission into the country to investigate the crackdown which is said to have left hundreds dead. The UN Security Council is negotiating a resolution which would condemn the violence.

Syria: Opposition Drafts Declaration in Antalya

by Jillian York

Just a day after President Bashar Assad announced a general amnesty for political prisoners, a varied group of Syrian opposition members are meeting to create what one report referred to as a “‘roadmap’ for a peaceful and democratic transition in Syria.” The group is comprised mostly of exiles, including members of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Syrian-American academic Dr. Mohja Kahf, a professor at the University of Arkansas, is live-tweeting the event, which is taking place at a resort in Antalya, Turkey.

Syrians attend the Antalya conference, flanked by images of Syrian martyrs

Late Wednesday, she wrote of the event: “Antalya:This is not your daddy’s old opposition conference #Syria New groupings forming, young faces,fresh energies.”

Dr. Kahf also tweeted that the members of the meeting would be holding a day-long hunger strike in solidarity with their fellow Syrians.

Also on Twitter, @abulyas was quick to point out that the conference was not an “opposition conference,” noting:

“#Antalya conf isn’t “opposition” conf. It brought many independent Syrians from the world united in purpose to end Syrian regime #march15″

Though the conference attendees are united in their cause, the conference has not been without its disagreements. Dr. Kahf noted a conversation she witnessed in the hotel lobby:

“Younger generation that is carrying this rev:don’t care abt old lines of diffs:Ikhwan,secularists” -lobby conversation Antalya conf #Syria.”

An article in NOW! Lebanon notes a young/old divide as well. There have also been reports that some Syrian opposition members refused to attend the conference, as well as some expressions of disappointment on Twitter from Syrians in the country.

LA Times – — Molly Hennessy-Fiske in Cairo

Opposition leaders have been meeting for the past two days in Antalya, Turkey, to support the anti-government uprising in Syria. At the end of the conference Thursday, they issued their demands.

“The delegates have committed to the demands of the Syrian people to bring down the regime and support the people’s revolution for freedom and dignity,” said the statement issued by 300 pro-democracy activists and opposition leaders.

On Thursday, as activists conducted workshops on social networking and drafted their demands in a resort hotel, scores of Assad supporters gathered outside, some wearing T-shirts featuring a picture of the embattled president.

“We love Bashar,” they chanted on CNN.

Turkish police could be seen out in force in Antalya, ensuring that several hundred pro-government demonstrators could not reach the conference.

“What would post-Assad Syria look like? That’s the $50-million question,” Amr Al Azm, who helped draft the opposition statement, told CNN. “We’ve been able to begin to address what the alternative would like like … we’ve provided a road map,” said Al Azm, a Syrian American history professor at Shawnee State University in Ohio who was in Turkey on Thursday.

He is an unlikely opposition leader. Until March, he was a senior consultant on a project headed by Assad’s wife, Asma, that was supposed to reform Syria’s culture ministry.

“What changed for me was the violence, the unprecedented level of violence that seemed random and almost uncontrolled,” Al Azm told CNN. “There are people that I actually know that have had their fingernails pulled out.”

Large anti-government protests were expected again in Syria on Friday after prayers.

Protests close in on divided Damascus

By an FT reporter,

June 2 2011

Financial Times

In the affluent neighbourhoods of central Damascus, the crackdown on Syria’s anti-government protests feels far away.

Young Damascenes sit in western-style cafés in Shaalan, drink Italian coffee, smoke traditional water pipes and casually browse the internet on their laptops. “There is no problem here,” is a common refrain among locals. “It will all be over in one or two months.”

The centre of the Syrian capital has, along with the business city of Aleppo, remained relatively quiet in a more than two-month uprising against the regime of Bashar al-Assad, president.

Outside of Damascus, brutal attacks have escalated. Syrian forces killed at least 13 civilians in the town of Rastan on Thursday, human rights campaigners told Reuters, raising the death toll in the central province of Homs this week to at least 56 civilians.

Even within the relatively calm capital, signs of tension are everywhere.

Driving through the city’s central Merjeh Square on a Friday, the usual day of pro-democracy protests, security men loiter on the street corners, dressed in riot gear and carrying batons. Plain-clothed intelligence men – the Mukhabarat – wait in buses with clubs and guns.

Others, drawn from the state’s large civil service, are sent to the city’s mosques to mix with worshippers and shout pro-regime slogans at the end of Friday prayers. More wait outside, ready to disperse any demonstrations as soon as they begin.

The regime is anxious to make sure protests do not spread to the capital. The middle classes and business community have benefited from the limited economic reforms introduced by Mr Assad since he took over in 2000 and still prefer stability, even if under a repressive regime.

“The regime knows that if they lose Damascus they are finished,” says Samir, a 30-year-old protester in the capital, who speaks in hushed tones in a quiet café. Mobile phones are switched off in case they are bugged and suspicious glances are cast at men sitting on neighbouring tables.

But the regime may already be too late. Barely half a mile from the city centre, thousands of people have taken to the streets in the middle class district of Midan every Friday since early April. “People from all walks of life and from all parts of the city are coming to Midan to protest,” says Samir. Youths and middle class doctors mix with Midan locals, he says, and the crackdown elsewhere in the city means numbers in Midan are growing…..

Business reluctant to cut loose from Assad

By Najmeh Bozorgmehr in Beirut June 2 2011

Financial Times

The Syrian business community’s passive approach to the popular protest movement against the ruling Ba’ath party is depriving the uprising of crucial support that could help secure the overthrow of the regime, analysts say.

Many assert that as long as businessmen in Aleppo and Damascus, the industrial and commercial hubs, do not join the opposition the regime will continue to believe it will survive with a brutal crackdown.

“The . . . business community has long been attached to the regime because there aren’t lots of economic opportunities outside the government,” said Marcus Marktanner, a professor of economics at the American University of Beirut.

The limited economic reforms introduced since Bashar al-Assad inherited power from his father in 2000 have not radically changed the socialist-style economy, burdened by a complex bureaucracy and laws unfriendly to foreign investment.

But businesses involved in textiles – the country’s leading industry, two-thirds of which is based in Aleppo – food processing, car trading and electronics have benefited from government credits and trade privileges in recent years.

Lahcen Achy, a scholar at Carnegie Middle East Center, said the textile and garment sector had received government assistance. “They are now waiting to see what will happen and do not want to lose the regime support,” he added.

Analysts say the reforms have created an imbalance, leaving out rural areas and urban suburbs while a new wealthy class directly or indirectly linked to the regime has benefited.

The sense of deprivation has been exacerbated by an increase in global food prices and the country’s severe drought which has shrunk the share of agriculture in gross domestic product from 24.2 per cent in 2006 to 17.1 per cent in 2010, according to the Economist Intelligence Unit.

Some of the towns most hit by the drought have been bastions of pro- democracy protests, including Deraa in the south, Deir Ezzor in the east and Banias and Al-Hasakah in the north-east.

“With the increase in food prices, the Syrian emperor was seen naked,” said Mr Marktanner. “People who have serious problems in feeding their families know food prices won’t go down and the regime cannot do anything about it.”

Syrians have watched more overt signs of wealth appear in the capital and in Aleppo in the form of luxury cars and international clothing brands.

The business community has also been frustrated by the regime’s intervention in economic activities and the Assad family’s growing monopoly on big projects. One of the first places that protesters in Deraa, the flashpoint of unrest, burnt down was SyriaTel, the country’s leading mobile telecommunications company run by Rami Makhlouf, a tycoon and cousin of the president.

But businessmen still appear to value the political stability that the Assad family has brought since the 1970s. The regime’s argument that the alternative to secular rule will be Salafists, radical Sunni Muslims, seems to have worked well so far in keeping business in check.

“Syrian businessmen think a fall of the regime in Syria is closer to the Libyan or Iraq scenarios than Tunisian or Egyptian scenarios while alternatives to the status quo remain unclear,” said one analyst.

Clinton: World should toughen up on Syria

By BRADLEY KLAPPER,

Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States implored hesitant Arab countries and U.N. powers Russia and China to join the international condemnation of Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime, saying Thursday that they would be better off “on the right side of history.”

Repeating the president’s ultimatum of last month that Assad should either lead a reform process or leave power, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said the Syrian leader was clearly blowing his chance by pressing on with a brutal crackdown on demonstrators and political opponents.

Expectations that his government can change are “if not gone, nearly run out,” she said in Washington.

Egypt’s Christians Fear Violence as Changes Embolden Islamists

The New York Times,

By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK,

May 30, 2011

A surge of sectarian violence in Cairo — 24 dead, more than 200 wounded and three churches in flames since President Hosni Mubarak’s downfall — has turned Christian-Muslim tensions into one of the gravest threats to the revolution’s stability. But it is also a pivotal test of Egypt’s tolerance, pluralism and the rule of law. The revolution has empowered the majority but also opened new questions about the protection of minority rights like freedom of religion or expression as Islamist groups step forward to lay out their agendas and test their political might.

Around the region, Christians are also closely watching events in Syria, where as in Egypt Christians and other minorities received the protection of a secular dictator, Bashar al-Assad, now facing his own popular uprising.

“The Copts are the crucial test case,” said Heba Morayef, a researcher with Human Rights Watch here, adding that facing off against “societal pressures” may in some ways be ever harder than criticizing a dictator. “It is the next big battle.”

But so far, there is little encouragement in the debate over how to address the sectarian strife. Instead of searching for common ground, all sides are pointing fingers of blame while almost no one is addressing the underlying reasons for the strife, including a legal framework that treats Muslims and Christians differently.

Christians, who make up about 10 percent of the 80 million Egyptians, say the revolution has plunged them into uncharted territory. Suppressed or marginalized for six decades here, Islamists entering politics have rushed to defend an article of the Egyptian Constitution that declares Egypt a Muslim country that derives its laws from Islam. Christians and liberals say privately they abhor the provision, which was first added as a populist gesture by President Anwar el-Sadat. But the article is so popular among Muslims — and the meaning so vague — that even many liberals and Christians entering politics are reluctant to speak out against it, asking at most for slight modifications.

“Our position is that it should stay, but a clause should be added so that in personal issues non-Muslims are subject to the rules of their own religion,”….

many liberals argue the sectarian conflicts prove Egypt should establish a permanent “bill of rights” to protect religious and personal freedoms before holding elections that could give power to an Islamist majority. It would “remove the sense of angst that exists today in Egypt,” said a spokeswoman for Mohamed ElBaradei, a liberal presidential contender.

The Opposition Meeting in Antalya (1 June 2011) First Impressions

NOVANEWS

First impressions of the Opposition Meeting in Turkey sent by a friend”

Syrian opposition activists walk past a poster of President Bashar al-Assad with his face crossed off during the opening session of a three-day meeting in Turkey to discuss democratic change.The writing on poster reads: ‘The blood of the martyrs will make this throne unbearable for you. Get out!’

1- logistics were very poor. Little if any organization. no clear written agenda.
2- they all realized that the first objective must be to push ahead and save time.
3- Kurds and Islamists made up over half of the total. Tribal leaders were also present.
4- By far the most impressive were the young activists. They were connected to the demonstration movement on the ground in Syria. They had contacts.
5- There was little infighting. Most members of the opposition were rather guarded.
6- While one can accuse the attendees of being politically immature, it would be a huge mistake to underestimate them.
7- The events in Daraa and elsewhere are not driven by Salafists as the government claims.
8- When some were asked about the possible large loss of lives should the regime fight back, the response was to point to Algeria which gave up one million people to get rid of the French. In other words, they are mentally prepared.
9- While Damascus may not take this group seriously enough, their determination is very strong. They will not go away easily.
10- To many, Bashar al-Assad’s first speech was the moment that he lost a huge number of the young activists.

Syrian Opposition Meets in Turkey

By NOUR MALAS

Wall Street Journal

ANTALYA, Turkey—Syrian opposition activists meeting here offered a glimpse of the challenges ahead, trying to pave a political future as Syrian President Bashar al-Assad relies increasingly on violence in order to cling to power. The meeting represented a first instance of cooperation among historically disparate opposition groups and personalities since Syria’s protests began in mid-March.

But common histories of exile among Syrians living in Europe, the U.S., Australia, New Zealand, as well as elsewhere in the Middle East, were overwhelmed by differing visions on how to push the opposition movement forward…..

Syrian security officials also tried to disrupt the conference taking place in this Turkish city some 280 miles from the Syrian border. In Antalya, activists said a handful of pro-regime supporters flown in from Syria harassed people as they arrived at the airport. The pro-regime group tried to enter the conference hotel on Wednesday, activists said, but were held back by Turkish police.

Molham al-Drobi, a representative for Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood at the conference, said a general amnesty for political prisoners announced Tuesday that would apparently lead to the release of thousands of imprisoned Brotherhood members was meant to “intercept and overshadow” the conference.

One area of agreement among the 200 opposition members in attendance was the need to improve logistical support for street protesters—and pressure for greater international diplomatic support—which could eventually oust Mr. Assad.

But there was no consensus on a political process to start to plan for a transition away from Mr. Assad’s authoritarian rule.

Syrian opposition activists walk past a poster of President Bashar al-Assad with his face crossed off during the opening session of a three-day meeting in Turkey to discuss democratic change.The writing on poster reads: ‘The blood of the martyrs will make this throne unbearable for you. Get out!’

Several young activists said they almost pulled out of the conference late Tuesday because they weren’t consulted on the formation of a 31-person committee to eventually lead the implementation of a support strategy for the protest movement. But others said it was significant enough that so many opposition activists were meeting face-to-face for the first time in this uprising, with one activist calling it a “getting-acquainted party.”

“The platform for us is agreed upon: to bring down the regime,” said Ammar Abdulhamid, a Washington-based activist. “Every single person here is in consensus on this,” he said, sitting in the corner of a hotel lobby where men huddled, women planned a fast in solidarity with their relatives in Syria, and children ran around wearing “Free Syria” caps and pins. Chiefs of Syria’s large Bedouin tribes roamed in traditional robes. “We know it’s a logistical nightmare,” Mr. Abdulhamid said. “But there seems to be a consensus.”

Those who flew in from Syria are risking permanent exile to ensure that the catalysts of the uprising take part in the dialogue on how to break the three-month stalemate between protesters and the regime.

“There are broad parameters we have—anything [opposition groups abroad] organize in terms of support along those lines is OK, anything that violates it is not,” said Ahmad al-Raad, one of two young men at the meeting who helped to administer the Syrian Revolution group on Facebook. Those include that the demonstrations remain peaceful; a rejection of external military intervention; and rejection of any political dialogue before violence against protesters halts and tens of thousands of detainees are released.

Human Rights Watch on Wednesday released a report on Deraa, the southern cradle of Syria’s protests, in which it condemned Syria for “crimes against humanity” and urged the United Nations Security Council to take responsibility for holding accountable people involved in the crackdown.

Activists in touch with Western diplomats here say they received assurances the U.N. Security Council will meet Thursday to pass a resolution condemning the regime’s violence and urging it to allow human-rights inspectors. They said they expect Russia to abstain from using its veto.

A more complicated scene developed overnight at the hotel as both Kurds and members of the exiled Muslim Brotherhood turned up in larger numbers than expected after an earlier decision by both groups not to join the conference. Some 65 Kurds at the meeting made Syria’s ethnic Kurdish community, the largest anti-regime constituency currently in Syria, the best-represented here. There appeared to be divisions among the Kurds on their positions, while Syria’s Brotherhood—about 40 of its members attended—deliberated all day on whether its members in attendance officially represented the party.

Syrian opposition unites in exile

By Liz Sly,

June 1 2011

ANTALYA, Turkey — …On Wednesday… about 300 Assad opponents gathered at a hotel to try to give structure and voice to a movement that has been leaderless and disparate. Because most activists in Syria were prevented from attending the conference by security concerns, and given the history of squabbling within the exiled Syrian community, it was unclear whether the effort would succeed….

“These are people who could never have met in 100 years without pulling guns and knives,” said Amr Al-Azm, a Middle Eastern history professor and Syrian exile who was among the attendees. “That they are sitting in the same room talking in a civilized way is huge. If nothing else comes of this conference, that’s an important thing.”

For several days, the staging of the conference seemed in doubt as several leading figures — including activists in Syria — questioned its goals and motives. But as a consensus emerged over the goals, organizers expressed satisfaction that a diverse array of the forces opposing the government had showed up.

Lending credibility to the proceedings were several young protest organizers — including one still limping from a bullet wound — who managed to sneak into Turkey from Syria. The cyber­activists who distribute videos of the protests to the world were there, hunched over laptops and tweeting furiously. So too were members of the older generation of exiles, an eclectic assortment of academics, businessmen, leftists and liberals who have spent most of their lives abroad.

And finally, the graying veterans of the Muslim Brotherhood — who fled Syria after the last major uprising against the government three decades ago — turned up in force. They made sure their presence was noted by arriving late for the opening ceremony, noisily chanting “God is great.”

A high priority for attendees is the creation of a committee, to be elected Thursday, that can serve as the voice of the opposition in dealings with world powers, especially the United States. Despite more than 1,000 deaths resulting from the government’s campaign to suppress the protests, no world leaders have called for Assad’s departure. Activists say they are aware that fear of the unknown may be holding leaders back in Washington and elsewhere from criticizing Assad.

President Obama has condemned the Syrian government’s use of violence and has called for Assad to embrace reforms or step aside. That stance differs from the one the United States has taken in Libya, where the U.S. military has participated in a NATO-led bombing campaign and provided critical support to rebel forces.

“We have to show the world that the Syrian opposition is organized and is ready to present an alternative,” said Molham al-Drobi, head of the Muslim Brotherhood delegation.

Not on the agenda for the conference is the formation of any kind of structure that will resemble a government in exile.

Nor do the delegates want the committee to assume leadership of the revolt on behalf of those protesting inside Syria. “This uprising is leaderless. No one can speak on behalf of the revolution,” said Radwan Ziadeh, one of the organizers and director of the Washington-based Syrian Center for Political and Strategic Studies.

A road map for change

One top priority for the conference is to formulate a road map for the departure of Assad, a goal everyone can agree on. Most delegates seem to pin their hopes on a split within the army, but they are vague about how to bring that about.

Activists in Syria were suspicious at first that some of the opposition exiles would advocate negotiations with Assad, something protesters long ago rejected. But after delegates jumped on chairs and chanted, “The people want to topple the regime!” during the welcoming reception, those concerns apparently dissipated.

The conference does not aim to offer prescriptions for what a post-Assad Syria would look like.

Many secular activists expressed concerns at the strong showing of the Muslim Brotherhood, even though Brotherhood leaders said they would not seek a prominent role on the committee.

Some Kurdish groups boycotted, and a scuffle in the hallway between an Arab and a Kurdish delegate highlighted the tensions that could erupt among Syria’s diverse religious and ethnic constituencies if the minority Allawite-led government falls. Some delegates pointed fingers and whispered that others were beholden to the government, or perhaps affiliated with the loathed former vice president Abdul Halim Khaddam, who fell out with Assad in 2005 but was not invited to attend.

With expectations set low, some were declaring the event a success. Osama al-Samman, 25, a cyberactivist who runs an operation set up to disseminate protest videos, said he originally attended only to send reports on the conference back to the activist network inside Syria. But he ultimately decided to join as a delegate.

“My two criteria for success are that the conference supports the revolutionaries inside Syria and that it calls for the fall of Assad,” he said. “That has been achieved. Anything else is a bonus.”

Russia asked NATO countries not to promise military intervention to Syrian activists: “It is not in the interests of anyone to send messages to the opposition in Syria or elsewhere that if you reject all reasonable offers we will come and help you as we did in Libya,” Lavrov, 61, said yesterday during an interview in Moscow. “It’s a very dangerous position.” Bloomberg

Time: Syria’s Embattled Dissidents Grapple with Government Hackers, Wiretappers and Imposters
2011-06-02

The protesters declare that they will not be cowed but as the regime tightens is repressive policies, there is often no other choice but to shrink into the shadows  Syria’s Embattled Dissidents Grapple with Government Hackers, Wiretappers and …

Eight people were shot dead in Hirak, a city in the south which is under siege, including an 11-year-old girl. Rights groups estimate the death toll from Syria’s uprising at near 1,000.

Here is video of the government’s response to the claimed torture of the 13 year old boyHere and here. Both are in Arabic and have not been translated or subtitled.

Where is Congress/Obama on Israel’s crippling of American citizen Munib Masri?

NOVANEWS

 

by PHILIP WEISS

I’m late on everything, including a report from the Nakba Day protests in Lebanon on March 15th that one of those struck by Israeli bullets– and maimed– is an American member of a prominent Palestinian family, Munib Masri, 22. Apparently he was paralyzed. And again I wonder, what are the consequences when Israelis strike American citizens who are protesting nonviolently? Nothing. Ask Emily Chloe Henochowicz.

Matt Lee of AP (I think that’s him) asks State Department spokesman Mark Tonerabout the case on June 1:

QUESTION: Just one briefly on the Middle East. Are you aware of the case of an American citizen named Munib Rashid Masri who was shot – allegedly shot in the back by Israeli troops during the Nakba?
MR. TONER: I’m not.
QUESTION: Okay. Apparently, he’s paralyzed now. He’s in a hospital in Beirut. His family has spoken to —
MR. TONER: When did this happen? I’m sorry.
QUESTION: It happened during the – two weeks ago during the Nakba day protests.
MR. TONER: Right.
QUESTION: Apparently, they’ve been in touch with the American Embassy in Beirut and have not gotten – not been happy with what they have heard —
MR. TONER: And just to clarify, he’s an American citizen?
QUESTION: I wouldn’t be raising it if he wasn’t.
MR. TONER: Okay. I’m sorry, I just didn’t hear that.
QUESTION: Yes, he is. So —
MR. TONER: I’ll look into it.
QUESTION: — if you don’t know, can you ask around on that?
MR. TONER: Yeah. I’ll look into it, Matt.
QUESTION: Thank you.
MR. TONER: Sure. Okay. Is that it?

His family describes the ordeal here. And here is young Masri’s facebook page. Here is Robert Fisk reporting on a visit to Masri in his hospital bed:

“I was angry, mad — I’d just seen a small child hit by the Israelis,” Munib said to me. “I walked nearer the border fence. The Israelis were shooting so many people. When I got hit, I was paralyzed. My legs gave way. Then I realized what had happened. My friends carried me away.” I asked Munib if he thought he was part of the Arab Spring. No, he said, he was just protesting at the loss of his land. “I liked what happened to Egypt and Tunisia. I am glad I went to the Lebanese border, but I also regret it.” …
He is, of course, lucky to be alive.
And I guess lucky to be an American citizen, much good did it do him. The U.S. embassy sent a female diplomat to see his parents at the hospital, Munib’s mother Mouna told me. “I am devastated, sad, angry — and I don’t wish this to happen to any Israeli mother. The American diplomats came here to the hospital and I explained the situation of Munib. I said: ‘I would like you to give a message to your government — to put pressure on them to change their policies here. If this had happened to an Israeli mother, the world would have gone upside down.’ But she said to me: ‘I’m not here to discuss politics. We’re here for social support, to evacuate you if you want, to help with payments.’ I said that I don’t need any of these things — I need you to explain the situation.”
Any U.S. diplomat is free to pass on a citizen’s views to the American government but this woman’s response was all too familiar. Munib, though an American, had been hit by the wrong sort of bullet. Not a Syrian bullet or an Egyptian bullet but an Israeli bullet, a bad kind to discuss, certainly the wrong kind to persuade an American diplomat to do anything about it. After all, when Benjamin Netanyahu gets 55 ovations in Congress… why should Munib’s government care about him?

Angry Arab is on the story, with an angle about the American University of Beirut:

An inside source at AUB tells me about a brewing political scandal.  Here is the story from my source:  “Munib Masri Jr., 22, grandson of Munib Masri, was shot in Maroon El Rass, lost his spleen and left kidney and injured his spine which might render him paralyzed for all his life! Prior to the incident, he was suspended for one year at AUB because of an incident that took place on campus. A few days ago, AUB President proposed to the University Disciplinary Committee  to cut down on the one year suspension and to readmit him if he will soon recover from his serious wounds. One of the committee members, P. Lewtas (my guess is that he is…), sent the email below to the Committee members including the President and Provost. It is nauseating and the strange thing, no one to my knowledge has responded to his email!”

Seymour Hersh on Iran’s non-existent nukes and the Arab Spring

NOVANEWS
 

 
 

 

Syrian uprising in the eyes of Lebanon

NOVANEWS

انتفاضة سوريا في نظر لبنا (أيّ لبنا

 

 

اعتصام لأطفال لبنانيين لاستنكار مقتل الطفل السوري حمزة الخطيب (جمال السعيدي ــ رويترز)

أسعد أبو خليل

تقابل حركة الاحتجاجات في سوريا جوقات الدعاية السياسيّة من فريقيْن يتعاطيان مع سوريا في سياق ثقافة عنصريّة ضد الشعب السوري برمّته. فريق 14 آذار يتصنّع التعاطف مع شعب عمد إلى التحريض العنصري ضدّه على مدى أعوام. وفريق 8 آذار يريدنا أن نصدّق أن تأييده للانتفاضات العربيّة باستثناء سوريا هو موقف منسجم، وأنّ ما يجري في سوريا هو نتاج مؤامرة فقط. لكنّ للتعاطي اللبناني السياسي مع حركة الانتفاضة الشعبيّة في سوريا تاريخاً طويلاً من الأزمات والتشعّبات. 
إنّ الانقسام اللبناني السياسي الشهير يجد تعبيره في كلّ مفصل وفي كلّ حدث، قريباً كان أو بعيداً. والانتفاضة السوريّة جاءت لتعمّق الانشطار اللبناني، ولتظهر مدى اختلاف الرؤى بين الحركات السياسيّة، وبين اللبنانيّين واللبنانيّات. فريق يتصنّع بأبشع الطرق والوسائل والأنماط التعاطف مع الشعب السوري، وآخر يريد أن ينكر ما تراه العيْن المُجرّدة. كيف نصدّق أنّ العنصري ضد «السوري» يأبه لمصير الشعب السوري، وكيف تنكر ما تستطيع أن تراه، وكيف تنسى دماءً سوريّة مسفوكة في لبنان؟
لا شك أنّ الأزمة بين لبنان وسوريا لها أكثر من جانب ومن بعد. هناك الجانب الرسمي بين الدولتين وطوائفهما وعصبيّاتهما وشعابهما. وهناك الجانب الشعبي المرتبط بعلاقة بين الشعبين، وهناك جانب العلاقة بين النظام السوري من جهة والشعب اللبناني في سنوات التدخّل السوري العسكري في لبنان. ولكلّ جانب في العلاقة ـــــ أو العلاقات المذكورة ـــــ أحكام وسمات وطبائع، وهي تتأثّر بعضها ببعض، كما أنّها تتأثّر بحالة اللحظة السياسيّة الراهنة.
طبعاً، البداية تتعلّق بتكوين الكيان اللبناني ودوره في المنطقة العربيّة، نصيراً إلى جانب إسرائيل في تحالف الشوفينيّات الطائفيّة والقبليّة (حتى لا ننسى المملكة الهاشميّة). لم يرتح الكيان اللبناني في علاقاته العربيّة. على العكس، زادها توتّراً. كان دوماً يزعم أنّه مُناصر للقضيّة العربيّة (بشكلها الرسمي الهزيل، مثلما يقول فريق الحريري اليوم إنّه يؤيّد الإجماع العربي، فيما هو يرمي إلى الإشادة ضمناً بالتحالف السعودي ـــــ الإسرائيلي) مع أنّه كان في الحقيقة منذ ما قبل الاستقلال، حتى ما بعد الحرب الأهليّة مُناصراً للمحور الغربي ـــــ الإسرائيلي. لهذا، فإنّ لبنان، بالرغم من كلّ مزاعم بيار الجميّل ومحسن إبراهيم، لم يتجشّم عناء تحمّل مسؤوليّات (لا أوزار) القضيّة الفلسطينيّة ومترتّبات الصراع العربي ـــــ الإسرائيلي. والجيوش الأردنيّة والمصريّة والسوريّة خسرت الآلاف من خيرة جنودها وضبّاطها في حروب أدّت إلى أشنع الهزائم بسبب تقاعس وتقصير، وفي كثير من الحالات، الارتهان الخارجي للعدوّ (مثل حالتيْ نظام السادات ونظام الهاشميّين).
أما الجيش اللبناني، فقد بدأ بخوض مباريات كرة القدم مع جنود العدوّ على الحدود اللبنانيّة ـــــ الفلسطينيّة ابتداءً من عام 1949 (أوردت جريدة «بالستيْن بوست» في عدد 8 حزيران 1949 خبر مباراة كرة قدم ودّيّة بين جنود لبنانيّين وجنود إسرائيليّين ـــــ سمّها هذه عقيدة فؤاد شهاب العسكريّة). وعقيدة فؤاد شهاب تلك تضمّنت، بالإضافة إلى عبادة الرجل الأوروبي الذي اتخذه مستشاره في كلّ ما يتعلّق بلبنان وشؤونه الداخليّة والخارجيّة، النأي بلبنان عن كلّ قضايا الصراع العربي ـــــ الإسرائيلي، وجعله المُتفرِّج الطائفي على تطوّرات الصراع العربي ـــــ الإسرائيلي (لو تم تسريب وثائق «ويكيليكس» لحقبة ما قبل الحرب الأهليّة لتبيّن لشعب مسخ الوطن أنّ مسيرة إلياس المرّ ووليد جنبلاط وبطرس حرب في تعاطفهم مع العدوّ أثناء عدوانه بدأت قبل استقلال لبنان. لم يتفرّد إميل إدّه وألفرد نقّاش والمطران أغناطيوس مبارك بتأييد الصهيونيّة جهاراً في محافل دوليّة، في حالة الأوّل والثالث). والعلاقة بين لبنان وسوريا على مستوى الدولتيْن شابها منذ الاستقلال الشك والنفاق وتبييت العداء. النظام في سوريا منذ وصول البعث عمل على التأثير في النظام بلبنان وعلى رعاية مجموعات فلسطينيّة ولبنانيّة لكسب النفوذ (والنيّة على عهد صلاح جديد كانت مرتبطة بسياسة النظام نحو فلسطين، فيما تحوّلت النيّة في عهد حافظ الأسد إلى التأثير على الحكومة اللبنانيّة ومقارعة البعث العراقي ـــــ أي لم تكن ترمي إطلاقاً إلى تحرير فلسطين).
لكن الدولة اللبنانيّة لم تقصّر هي الأخرى. كانت تحتضن وتعزّز المحاولات الانقلابيّة ضد النظام في سوريا، بالتعاون مع الأجهزة الاستخباريّة الغربيّة والإسرائيليّة (الدولة اللبنانيّة قبل الحرب الأهليّة كانت ـــــ في أجهزتها العسكريّة والاستخباريّة ـــــ تتعامل مع إسرائيل مثلما تعامل معها نظام حسني مبارك على أنّها حليف. ينسى البعض أنّ إسرائيل جنّدت سعد حدّاد، وتعرّفت على أنطوان لحد في أوائل السبعينيات). يمكن القول إنّ كلّ المحاولات الانقلابيّة، الناجحة منها والفاشلة، ضد النظام القائم في سوريا حيكت من لبنان. ربما ظنّ لبنان أنّه يتذاكى، وأنّه يستطيع أن يهزّ ثقة النظام السوري بنفسه. لكن الأرجح أنّ لبنان ما كان يفعل ذلك إلا تلبية لرغبات أوصيائه الغربيّين الذين لم يتركوا شاردة ولا واردة لم يتدخّلوا فيها. أي أنّ الطرفيْن لم يكونا يحترمان سيادة كلا البلديْن (طبعاً، كلام السيادة بحدِّ ذاته ممجوج لأنّ تحرير فلسطين والثورات تتطلّب خرق سيادة كلّ الدول، وخصوصاً دولة الكيان الصهيوني على أرض فلسطين الغالية، لكن من خصوصيّات أنظمة القطريّة العربيّة ـــــ بما فيها لبنان سوريا ـــــ الاستفاضة في كلام السيادة من باب مضايقة الشعب الفلسطيني وثورته، ومن أجل تدعيم أنظمة فاقدة للشرعيّة).
وصعدت العلاقات بين سوريا ولبنان إلى مستوى الدولة، أو قل إنّها تحسّنت بعض الشيء في العلاقة الشخصيّة بين رئيسيْن. علاقات سليمان فرنجيّة الجدّ لم تكن حسنة على مرّ حكمه مع النظام السوري. فقد أدّت حرب الجيش اللبناني على المخيّمات الفلسطينيّة في 1973 (وقد صاحبت هذه الحرب، التي أُريد لها أن تقلّد حرب الجيش الهاشمي في الأردن ومجازره، هزائم شنيعة تلقّاها الجيش اللبناني على أيدي ثوّار فلسطين في لبنان) إلى إغلاق الحدود بين البلديْن، إلا أنّ تدخّل ريمون إدّه مع حافظ الأسد شخصيّاً، أدّى إلى إعادة فتح الحدود. لم تكن العلاقة بين دولتيْن فاسدتيْن غير ديموقراطيتيْن علاقة صحيّة: كانت تشوبها، من دون استثناءات تُذكر، شكوك وتآمر وتحريض وتدخّلات من الجانبيْن. النظام السوري لجأ إلى منظمة «الصاعقة» (السيّئة الذكر في تاريخ الحرب الأهليّة اللبنانيّة) ليفرض نفوذه على الساحتيْن اللبنانيّة والفلسطينيّة. العلاقة بين سليمان فرنجيّة وسوريا توثّقت فقط بعدما حزم النظام السوري أمره ليتدخّل عسكريّاً عام 1976 كي يمنع بالقوّة انتصاراً محتّماً ووشيكاً لفريق الحركة الوطنيّة اللبنانيّة ومنظمة التحرير الفلسطينيّة. استمرّ شهر العسل بين النظام السوري وسليمان فرنجيّة حتى وفاة الأخير (مع أنّ خلافاً نشأ بين الطرفيْن في اجتماعات جنيف ولوزان، حول صلاحيّات رئيس الجمهوريّة).
أما في حقبة ما بعد الطائف، فقد توطّدت العلاقة في الواقع (أكثر مما توطّدت في الاتفاقات التي انكشف بطلانها بمجرّد خروج الجيش السوري من لبنان). كان النظام السوري يتعامل مع أقطاب الطوائف كلّ على حدة، وكانت الأطراف تحلّ صراعاتها (الصغيرة والكبيرة) عبر المرور في سوريا ـــــ وأفرط رفيق الحريري أكثر من غيره في الاستعانة بالنظام السوري لحلّ كل شاردة وواردة، ولتدعيم مواقعه وتضخيم منافعه، وخصوصاً أنّه كان قد طلب من حافظ الأسد، صلاحيّات استثنائيّة بمجرّد أن تبوّأ منصب رئاسة الحكومة.
أما العلاقة بين الشعبيْن فلها شأن آخر. العلاقة بين الشعب اللبناني وأيّ من الشعوب المُجاورة (باستثناء صهاينة الكيان الذين عبّر الكثير من اللبنانيّين عن حبّهم وودّهم لهم قبل اجتياح 1982 وبعده) يجب أن تخضع للدرس، من خلال عقيدة الوطنيّة اللبنانيّة التي تعمّمت على مختلف الطوائف والأحزاب بعد الحرب الأهليّة، بعدما انحصرت العقيدة في أوساط أحزاب اليمين الطائفي في لبنان حتى عام 1975. (يتنافس أنصار كلّ الأحزاب اليوم على إعداد أطباق عملاقة من الطعام تدليلاً على عبقريّة العنصر اللبناني). وتحتوي الوطنيّة اللبنانيّة على عنصريّة أكيدة تتطلّع بإعجاب (وتقليد) إلى الرجل الأبيض، وتتطلّع باحتقار إلى العنصر العربي. وفي تراتبيّة الكراهية الغزيرة في الثقافة السياسيّة والشعبيّة اللبنانيّة، احتلّ «السوري» ـــــ والكلمة تُلفظ كما ترد على شفتي سولانج الجميّل، أي باحتقار شديد، كما أنّ المذكورة أعدّت أطباقاً محليّة بإعجاب شديد لأرييل شارون ـــــ موقعاً دونيّاً. وفي الدونيّة الاجتماعيّة عنصريّة طبقيّة: فالأكراد والشيعة والفلسطينيّون والسوريّون أمدّوا العائلات اللبنانيّة بالخادمات، ما زاد في النزعة الدونيّة ضدّهم. دخلوا من دون أن يخرجوا في أهداف الكراهية والاحتقار الشعبي.
وانعكست عقليّة التفوّق اللبناني الخياليّة (تكاد تصلح لحالة عصابيّة عياديّة خاصّة) على التعامل العنصري مع الشعب السوري. أصبح إطلاق النكتة عن السوري رياضة فولكلوريّة في مسخ الوطن. من الجانب السوري، لا شك أنّ الشعب السوري (الشعب، لا النظام، حتى لا يُساء الفهم) لم يقابل الشعب اللبناني إلا بالودّ وحسن الضيافة والكرم، وخصوصاً في الملمّات عندما تجتاح إسرائيل لبنان. (التعامل الشعبي السوري الودود مع الشعب اللبناني لا علاقة له بالفظاظة الكريهة التي تعامل من خلالها الكثير من جنود الجيش وضباطه وضباط الاستخبارات السوريّة مع الشعب اللبناني، على مرّ العقود، رغم مفتاح بيروت الذي أعطاه رفيق الحريري لغازي كنعان).
والعنصريّة اللبنانيّة تفسّر هذا التجاهل العام من 8 و14 آذار لاختفاء المئات من العمّال السوريّين في لبنان، ومقتل أو جرح المئات، منذ اغتيال رفيق الحريري. لكن المسؤوليّة الأساسيّة لقمع العمّال السوريّين وقتلهم وخطفهم تقع على الكاهل الرسمي لحركة 14 آذار (المتحالفة مع إسرائيل ـــــ لا تنفع التقيّة بعد «ويكيليكس») التي ذهبت بعيداً في إعلامها الرسمي في التحريض العنصري على كلّ الشعب السوري. وتتحمّل محطتا «إل.بي.سي» و«إم.تي.في» مسؤوليّة جمّة أيضاً في هذا الصدد، إذ إنّهما حوّلتا برامجهما «الكوميديّة» إلى حفلات تحريض عنصري فاضح ضد كلّ السوريّين، مثلما خدمت جريدة «النهار» المُحتضرة عقيدة الكراهية ضد الشعبيْن السوري والفلسطيني (كانت «النهار» بإمرة جبران تويني تنشر أرقاماً خياليّة عن أعداد العمّال السوريّين من أجل تعبئة الطبقة العاملة في لبنان ضدّهم). أما على المقلب الآخر من المروحة السياسيّة اللبنانيّة، فقد أدّى تشرّب العقيدة الوطنيّة اللبنانيّة إلى تجاهل حملات العنف المنظمة والعفويّة ضد العمّال السوريّين. (تجاهلت الحكومة السوريّة هي الأخرى معاناة السوريّين في لبنان، كما أنّ عدداً لا بأس به من الكتّاب المعارضين السوريّين «الليبراليّين» ـــــ بالتعريف الوهابي ـــــ اختار التعبير عن معارضة النظام في تلك الوسائل الإعلاميّة التي امتهنت تحقير الشعب السوري، أي «النهار» و«المستقبل»).
أما تعاطي الحكومة السوريّة مع الشعب اللبناني، على مرّ الأعوام، فقد كان مُستقى من تعاطي حكومة استبداديّة مع شعب واقع تحت حكمها. الفظاظة وحتى الوحشيّة كانتا سمة من سمات تعاطي الجيش والاستخبارات السوريّة في لبنان (ما سمّاه بشّار الأسد «الأخطاء»). وعلى طريقة الحكم العثماني، فضّلت الحكومة السوريّة التعاطي عبر زعماء الطوائف، الحقيقيّين والمُختارين بعناية عبد الحليم خدّام (أليس من الهزل ربط اسم خدّام بالمعارضة السوريّة التي شكّل مع الإخوان المسلمين عنوانها السعودي؟ من دون أن يعني ذلك أنّ كل المعارضة في سوريّا هي سعوديّة سلفيّة أو خدّاميّة، كما تزعم أجهزة إعلام النظام السوري).
في هذا السياق، أتى التعاطي اللبناني مع حركة الاحتجاج في سوريا. والمُلاحظ، أنّ إعلام 14 الحريري وأتباعه اتّبع سياسة التجاهل شبه التام لمجريات الأحداث في سوريا، في الأسابيع الأولى. وهذا الإعلام يتلقّى أوامره بحذافيرها من السيّد السعودي، والأخير ارتأى الحذر والخشية في البداية (واتصل الملك السعودي ببشّار الأسد للتضامن يومها). كانت الإشارة تلك كافية كي يلتزم إعلام الحريري الصمت المطبق، والتخفيف من وطأة القمع في سوريا. وكانت «السفير» و«الأخبار» الجريدتيْن الوحيدتيْن اللتيْن أعطتا الموضوع السوري حقّه في التغطية (اتّفقت مع وجهة التغطية أم اختلفت). الصحف الحريريّة ـــــ السعوديّة كادت أن تفضّل التجاهل التام تماشياً مع المسار السعودي. ولكن الأوامر أتت هكذا فجأة، وتكثّفت التغطية وزادت حماستها بعد أسابيع. يكفي متابعة الصفحة الأولى من نشرة عائلة الحريري («المستقبل») لتلمّس التغيير. والأمر نفسه كان ملحوظاً في مضارب آل سعود في الإعلام العربي. هكذا فجأة، قرّر معلّقو أمراء آل سعود (الليبراليّو الوهابيّة ـــــ إياكم وإيّاكنّ أن تنسوا وتنسين) أنّ الحدث السوري يتفوّق على أي حدث آخر، حتى لو زلزلت أرض مكّة. ومثل محطة «الجزيرة» (وإعلام الغرب) اعتمدت التغطية على رواة (وعلى شهادة «أبو محمّد» على محطة «الجزيرة») وعلى مواقع على الإنترنت (يتعامل الإعلام العربي مع الإنترنت كأنّه موقع واحد لا غير، وذو انسجام صلب في الصدقيّة).
طبعاً، توالت أيضاً هكذا فجأة تصريحات نوّاب كتلة الحريري: وحاولوا التذاكي، فمنهم من يقول (مثل عقاب صقر) إنّ موقفه نابع من حب عميق للديموقراطيّة (وصقر قال كلامه عند رجوعه من مهرجان «الجنادريّة» الشديد الديموقراطيّة في رقصاته)، ومنهم (أحمد فتفت) الذي كادت دموعه تنهمر وهو يعبّر عن تعاطف ديموقراطي مع الشعب السوري (وإن تزامن كلامه ومقابلة مع جريدة «الوطن» السعوديّة قال فيها: «الجميع يدرك مدى التقدم الذي أحرزته المملكة العربية السعودية بقيادة الملك عبد الله الذي جعل المبادرة العربية التي أطلقت من بيروت مقبولة في المجتمع الدولي وجعل الدولة الفلسطينية قابلة للتحقيق»، معتبراً ان «ذلك لم يكن ليتم لولا المبادرة السياسية والثقافية والاستراتيجية التي بناها الملك عبد الله». طبعاً، لم ينسَ فتفت شكر الملك عبد الله على موقفه في حرب تمّوز وما تلاها، والذي كان مؤازراً صراحةً للعدوان الإسرائيلي). حتى نديم الجميّل، خرّيح مدرسة عريقة في العنصريّة ضد الشعب السوري، أعلن وقوفه إلى جانب الشعب السوري. ولكن لم يقف كلّ الصف الطائفي العنصري في 14 آذار إلى جانب الشعب السوري، إذ إنّ ريمون جبارة (وهو صريح في العنصريّة ضد الشعبيْن السوري والفلسطيني على حدٍّ سواء) أعلن أنّه «كمسيحي» يقف مع بقاء النظام.
أما إعلام 8 آذار، فقد ردّد كل ترّهات الإعلام السوري الرسمي التي بلغت ذروتها في إعلان الأمين القطري المُساعد لحزب البعث، محمد سعيد بخيتان، أنّ الحركة الاحتجاجيّة في سوريا محدودة وصغيرة، وأنّ المتظاهرين «في سوريا لا يتعدّون بمجموعهم 100 ألف في كلّ المناطق، وهم أنفسهم يتظاهرون كلّ مرة». اعتمد البخيتان نفي ما لا يُنفى ـــــ أيّ الدليل القاطع. وحزب الله كان محرجاً أكثر من غيره، إذ إنّه جاهر بمناصرته للانتفاضات العربيّة مُبكِّراً. كما أنّ حسن نصر الله يتمتّع بما لا يتمتّع به غيره من الزعماء العرب من حيث الشعبيّة، وإن كانت قد تأثّرت سلباً بفعل الضخّ المذهبي السعودي المحموم (وإن كان الحزب يتجنّب بأي ثمن انتقاد النظام السعودي). لكن خطاب حسن نصر الله الأخير، قدّم دعماً غير مقصود للثورة العربيّة المضادة التي تصطاد طرائدها بسلاح العنف وسلاح المذهبيّة القاطع. لم يستطع نصر الله إقناعنا بالمنطق عن سبب تأييد ثورة البحرين ومصر وتونس، والامتناع عن دعم انتفاضة سوريا. الفوارق بين الحالات العربيّة؟ نيّة الحوار والإصلاح عند النظام السوري؟ أليس إعلان النيّتيْن سمة من خطاب كلّ الأنظمة العربيّة؟ قد تكون بعض الفوارق صحيحة سطحيّاً، لكن الصحيح أيضاً أنّ كلّ الأنظمة العربيّة هي أنظمة استبداديّة (بما فيها نظام المشير طنطاوي الجديد في مصر). إنّ القول بوجود مؤامرة خارجيّة ضد النظام في سوريا (وهي الرواية الرتيبة المُكرّرة في الإعلام الرسمي) يوحي بنجاح منقطع النظير لتلك المؤامرة، من حيث حجم التظاهرات ونطاقها، لكنّه لا يفسّر سبب اندلاع احتجاجات في مناطق مختلفة من سوريا، وبالتزامن مع احتجاجات العالم العربي. كما أنّ حزب الله يجاهر بدعوته، كما جاهر حسن نصر الله في خطاب أخير، للشعب السوري بدعم النظام الذي يمعن قتلاً بالترافق مع دعوات «الإصلاح». والحزب يسوّغ دعواته بالإشارة إلى موقف النظام من «الممانعة» ودعم المقاومة، ما يوحي التشكيك بنيّات الشعب السوري حول المقاومة. لا يتيح الحزب مجالاً لإمكان تخطّي نظام جديد في سوريا أفق الممانعة المحدود (أي باتجاه تطبيق ممارسة المقاومة لتحرير الجولان).
سقط الأطراف السياسيّون المختلفون في فخ التعامل مع الوضع في سوريا. ارتباط الطوائف وحركاتها السياسيّة بالخارج يمنع اتخاذ مواقف حرّة باتجاه المعارضة والاحتجاج في سوريا. وارتباط البعض في المعارضة السوريّة بالراعي الإقليمي نفسه الذي يرعى البعض في لبنان (أي الرعاية السعوديّة لفريق 14 آذار) يؤثّر على مواقف الفريقيْن في لبنان. لكن حزب الله وحلفاءه، يخطئون في اختزالهم لكلّ الشعب السوري ومعارضاته بأمثال مأمون الحمصي أو عبد الحليم خدّام. والموقف اللبناني الرسمي منقسم على نفسه، تبعاً لتنوّع الانتماءات والأهواء الطائفيّة والمذهبيّة.
ولكن مهما جرى ويجري في سوريا، فإنّ مشكلة لبنان عويصة في تعامله مع الشعوب العربيّة. تكمن المشكلة في حلّ الطائف نفسه، الذي أسسّ لاعتناق رسمي لعقيدة الفينيقيّة الشوفينيّة. يستطيع لبنان أن يتعاطف مع الشعب السوري ـــــ لا بل إنّه وجب عليه أن يتعاطف مع الشعب السوري في محنته ـــــ بعد أن يتعامل مع الضيوف السوريّين في لبنان بإنسانيّة وقانونيّة ورحمة. وينطبق هذا الأمر على التعامل اللبناني الشعبي مع الشعب الفلسطيني في لبنان. لكن 8 و14 آذار تكادان تعترفان بأنّهما لا تكترثان لوضع الشعب السوري وتطلّعاته. الفريقان يتطلّعان إلى خدمة مواقفهما الدعائيّة والسياسيّة، بصرف النظر عن مصلحة الشعب السوري.
إنّ الانتفاضات العربيّة حالة مرضيّة تصيب كلّ الأنظمة العربيّة الاستبداديّة من دون استثناء (كم تأتي مقابلة بشّار الأسد مع «وول ستريت جورنال» نافرة ومُتكبّرة بمقياس اليوم). والقول بمؤامرة خارجيّة على النظام في سوريا لا ينفي أبداً وجود حالة شعبيّة حقيقيّة في أوساط الشعب السوري. على العكس، تترافق الثورات العربيّة المضادة مع كلّ الانتفاضات العربيّة لوأدها، لكنّها لا تستطيع أن تنفي وجودها. والثورات المضادة على أنواع، منها المُطبّع مع العدوّ ومنها المُمانع بـ«ميوعة». أما حركة الشعب، فضدّ هذه وتلك.

A Jordanian official at AIPAC conference

NOVANEWS

 

“So I was listening to AIPAC’s roll call of attendees at their conference. I was surprised to hear a Jordanian representative in attendance. His name is Sufyan Qudah. So I emailed the Jordanian embassy and asked the Ambassador for a response. I did not get a response so I called the embassy a few moments ago and they told me Qudah no longer works there.

He’s a former employee and left 5-6 years ago and the lady on the phone doesn’t know where he works for now. This sounds fishy.  The night of the roll call event was the night Harry Reid, Zio-Nazi Netanyahu and others Zionist spoke where they claimed on a Jewish State, united Jerusalem and the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Qudah (as Jordan’s representative) gave a standing ovation.”

 

Embassy of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan
3504 International Drive, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20008
Telephone number: (202) 966 – 2664
Fax number: (202) 966 – 3110
E-mail: HKJEmbassyDC@jordanembassyus.org

Her Excellency Alia Bouran
Ambassador of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan to the US

Mr. Mahmoud Hmoud
Deputy Chief of Mission

Mr. Sufyan Qudah
Counselor
Political Affairs

Mr. Asem Ababneh
Consul

Mr. Abdurrahman Abu Laban
Third Secretary
Political Affairs 
back to top


Embassy of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan
Consular Office
For Visa, Passport, Power of Attorney, Legalization inquiries.
3504 International Drive, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20008
Telephone numbers:
(202) 966 – 2861
(202) 966 – 2887
(202) 966 – 2909
(202) 966 – 8757
Fax number: (202) 686 – 4491
E-mail: HKJConsular@jordanembassyus.org 
back to top


Press and Media Affairs
3504 International Drive, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20008
Telephone number:
(202) 265 – 1606
Fax number: (202) 667 – 0777
E-mail: JordanInfo@aol.com II JordanInfo1@aol.com

back to top


Economic and Commerce Bureau
3504 International Drive, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20008
Telephone numbers:
(202) 362 – 4436
(202) 362 – 5150
Fax number: (202) 244 – 0239
E-mail: Info@jordanecb.org

back to top


Office of the Military
(t) (202) 966 – 1009
(f) (202) 363 – 0196

North America Tourism Board
(t) (703) 243 – 7404
(f) (703) 243 – 7406
Website: www.seejordan.org

Zionist creates 'Obama' settlement, more obstacles for viable Palestinian state

NOVANEWS

Settlement named in honour of the US president forms part of an initiative aiming to Judaise Jerusalem

 

Settlements

The east Jerusalem neighborhood of Pisgat Zeev is seen behind a section of Zionist separation barrier (Photo: AP)

 

In a move that comes as gesture of deep gratitude, Zio-Nazi regime permitted an extreme rightwing Zionist association to name a new Zionist illegal settlement Obama. The building of illegal settlements makes the establishment of a connected Palestinian state an impossible task. 
Bulldozers started to pave the way for Zionist illegal settlement a day after Obama gave his speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) annual conference. The construction of the illegal settlement comes in the larger context of a Nazi-Judaisation project that aims to link Jerusalem to the illegal settlement of  Ma’ale Adumim, north east of Jerusalem.
The location of the Obama illegal settlement is along the main road that connects the West Bank’s northern and southern regions; a consequence of building Zionist illegal settlement would therefore be to separate those territories permanently.
In order to make concrete the reality of illegal settlement in these territories, the Zio-Nazi regime has decided to move its police headquarters next to the Obama illegal settlement.
Zionist radio reported that this step came to honour Obama’s positions in solidarity with Zionism which he disclosed to his audience at the AIPAC conference.
Zio-Nazi official sources mentioned that Zionist step comes in the framework of the strategy “Greater Jerusalem,” which aims to change the demographic nature of Jerusalem, raising the number of Zionist Jews to one million, a project put forth by former Nazi prime minister Ariel Sharon.

Zionists fight hard for their antisemitic definition of antisemitism

NOVANEWS

 

There has been so much flying around the internet about the UCU’s rejection of the EUMC working definition of antisemitism that it’s hard to know where to start but helpfully The Jewish Chronicle has a kind of round up in the form of an article by one of the rabid right wing loons who plays some role in editing the Jewish Chronicle.

The leaders of the Jewish community have recorded their outrage at the University and College Union, which has voted to distance itself from the European Union’s working definition of antisemitism, at its annual congress in Harrogate.

Delegates overwhelmingly supported the move on the part of the union’s executive, which believes the 2005 European definition prevents the full and open discussion of Israel and Palestine on campus.

Straight away there’s an issue here in that these people are not the leaders of the Jewish community, they are leaders of Jewish organisations. That is not the same thing. Still, at least he got the UCU’s beef with the working definition right. It is designed to prevent “full and open discussion of Israel and Palestine on campus” and elsewhere. But read on:

But Jeremy Newmark, chief executive of the Jewish Leadership Council, said: “After this weekend’s events, I believe the UCU is institutionally racist.”
Representatives of the JLC, the Board of Deputies and the Community Security Trust have now appealed to government ministers David Willetts and Eric Pickles to support a formal Equality and Human Rights Commission investigation into the decision.
Their calls were echoed by John Mann MP, chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group Against Antisemitism.
“These claims have been made and should be investigated independently, ideally by the EHRC,” he said.”’…
….Trevor Phillips, chair of the EHRC, said he was “surprised” at the failure of the UCU to introduce its motion on the definition of antisemitism “without consulting the EHRC” at all

Ok, he was surprised. But what the article doesn’t say is that EHRC chair, Trevor Phillips, also said, in his letter,

neither we (EHRC) nor the EUMC has ever considered the EUMC’s working definition to be wholly definitive; therefore its retention or abandonment should not be seen as an indication of what should be regarded as anti-racist [sic] or anti-semitic conduct.

Not quite the sacrosanct document these “leaders of the Jewish community” are making it out to be.
But check out the Board of Deputies on this:

The Board’s president, Vivian Wineman, also wrote to university vice chancellors asking them to consider whether maintaining a normal relationship with UCU could still be compatible with their requirement to “eliminate discrimination and foster good relations” with minorities.
“Business as usual should not be an option with an institutionally racist organisation,” he said.
He added that vice chancellors should put in place procedures to ensure that UCU’s institutional racism and perverse definitions were not allowed to “pollute your own processes for handling reports of antisemitism on campus”.
Mr Wineman said that if the UCU refused to address the issue, “we would ask that you reconsider whether formal union recognition of UCU is appropriate at all”.

Now this is a serious bit of brinkmanhip and Whine is sticking his neck out here. For a fairly thorough look at the EUMC working definition of antisemitism check out Richard Kuper’s article on Open Democracy or Ben White on Liberal Conspiracy where you will see that these Jewish leaders are having a hissy fit over a bogus definition of antisemitism that asserts that, “subject to overall context”, it “could be” antisemitic to “deny Jews their right of self-determination by claiming that Israel is a racist endeavour, to compare Israel to the nazis and to criticise Israel over issues that you have not criticised other “democratic nations” over.  It’s bonkers that anyone with any self-respect could support such a thing let alone intelligent people with high profiles in public. But the Board of Deputies could be heading for a showdown with the EHRC if Trevor Phillips fails to support them or even dismisses them as a bunch of disingenuous supporters of the last of the colonial settler states.
Phillips might note that it is not antisemitic to say that Israel simply has no right to exist, nor to say that Israel is racist nor to say that Jews are not an appropriate case for self-determination.  He might go further and ask for clarification of the assertion that Israel amounts to a “democratic nation”.  He might even dismiss the term as ludicrous since democratic is a description of an institution, not a nation or people unless one is essentialising a people as containing within them a political persuasion. And there is the main rub with this bogus definition, it essentialises Jews not as an identity in the usual sense of the term but as a political persuasion, and in the case of zionism, a racist political persuasion.  What if, horror or horrors, Phillips points out that the definition is itself antisemitic?  I doubt if he will do that but the working definition is so glaringly mischievous I don’t see how its critics can lose.  If it is accepted by an august body like the EHRC then it comes under scrutiny and is revealed for what it is, negative hasbara. If it is thrown out by the EHRC then its proponents are discredited even sooner.
I think the UCU has performed a wonderful service no matter what happens in the short term.

Saudi Arabia: How can Saudi Women Benefit Through Femeo

NOVANEWS

 

American Bedu had the opportunity to dialogue with Roba,.  Roba is a professional Arab career woman.  She shares with American Bedu readers about her employer and provides a lot of useful information for Arab woman who are seeking professional opportunities.

What is it like to work for an entity whose goal is to create a bridge which connects employers and prospective employees together in the Middle East region?

I love working at Bayt.com. It is such a nice feeling when someone asks me where I work and I say “Bayt.com“, and they get all excited, saying “I found my job through Bayt!”. It is also rewarding to be working on projects that help improve people’s lives. The office is also fun, it’s such a diverse team and we’re always learning something new.

What have been some of the greatest challenges and accomplishments for the Middle East region?

The most amusing thing about the region I think is our love of forums. I’m a designer by training, and I almost get a heart attack when I see websites with lots of strobe effects, weird colors, and terrible structure, so I just can’t get myself to understand the forum affinity. I think that the terrible design and completely nonsensical structure of forums has completely ruined the Middle East’s ability to use a regular website.

Do you have any statistics on the ability to help empower women in the Middle East region such as percentages of women either as employers or employees who use the services of Bayt.com?

I love stats! Actually, we have a whole section on Femeo built to provide such numbers: the Femeo Career Analysis. We believe that research and knowledge are very important for women to land the job of their dreams.
Check out the goals of working women:
goals.PNG

What exactly is Femeo? How was it created? Who had the idea and concept?

Femeo is the second of the Bayt Communities, a series of professional, industry-specific communities that introduces a whole new way to empower professionals in the Middle East to build, enhance, and advance their careers. Femeo in particular is a community for working women in the Middle East to networkread daily tipsask for advice, and take career quizzes.

The first Bayt Community was MarketingHub.me, targeting marketing and mass communication professionals, and our upcoming one is Careeri, a place for fresh grads to learn how to write a great CV, ace a job interview, etc.

Where is Femeo “based?”

Bayt.com has offices all over the Arab world, so Femeo is a truly Middle Eastern website. The team currently working on the project is mainly based in Amman, Jordan and Dubai, UAE, but we get help from all over.

How can Femeo benefit women in the Middle East? What are the added advantages for a woman to use Femeo?

Working women can read localized tips and advice written by our editorial team on balancing home and work, career advancement, efficiency tips, and more. They can also network, ask each other for advice, and take career quizzes and assessments to see where they are in their career. You won’t find such resources tailored for our culture and our region elsewhere.

Femeo was created for us by us. The team is a diverse collection of working Arab women, and we are passionate about helping women advance in their careers and establish financial independence.

I see that Femeo is available in both English and Arabic. How big of a difference is there whether someone follows Femeo in Arabic or English? How does the information differ?

Great question, Carol! 🙂

We are currently providing the same content in Arabic and English, so it really doesn’t make a difference.

Let’s talk specifically about the Saudi market. What are challenges an Arab (Saudi) woman can face in finding that right job in Saudi Arabia and how can Femeo help her?

Let me share with you some stats we have come across during our research phase.

Education is improving very rapidly: Female literacy rates have reached 94 percent for those between 15 and 24 years of age, and 69 percent for those ages 15 and above ( World Bank Central Database, 2004). It is estimated that between 2004 and 2020, there will be twice as many female college graduates as male graduates.

According to 2003 statistics, at 52 percent, women form more than half of all college graduates in the Kingdom (Arab News, 3 June 2004). Saudi Arabia funds one of the world’s largest scholarship programs for women, and thousands of women have earned doctorates from Western universities (Nawaf Obaid, “Saudi women must get the vote in 2009,” Financial Times, 13 October 2004).

Employment: Women’s participation in total employment was estimated at 15 percent in 2004 (World Bank Central Database) Out of the
total number of employed women, an estimated 30 percent are nationals, while the rest are expatriate female workers (United Nations, “Millennium Development Goals” Report on the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Riyadh, 2002). The female labor force participation rate does not reflect the actual employment status of women as it does not include women’s traditional work such as herding and farming.

Women in the workforce are mainly concentrated in the education and health sectors. Saudi women account for 82.7 percent of the total female workforce in the education sector, and 7.5 percent in the health and social sectors (Saudi Arabia Human Development Report 2003).

Wealth: According to Amnesty International, approximately 16,390 businesses are owned by women and women own 40 percent of the nation’s private wealth. Aggregate investments made by women in Saudi Arabia in 2002 included US$ 1 million in industrial projects and US$ 1.77 million in service projects.

We aim to have tons of such research on Femeo, and we have tips and advice based on what we learn through numbers. Knowing where you stand is the single most important thing after capability.

What are the five best tips you have for a woman seeking a job in Saudi Arabia?

–  The Internet is a great place to look for jobs. Many of the employers who look for recruits online are more likely to be large (and thus have open positions for women) or less traditional. Check out Bayt.com, and nice sites like Femeo (we’re adding a jobs section soon) where recruiters are actively seeking candidates like you.

– Networking is essential! Make sure that you network with people in your desired field. Bring contact cards and come prepared to talk about yourself, your accomplishments, and your past work. Send a thank you email or a “nice to meet you” email when appropriate.

– Do lots of research about the industry or job of your dream. Being armed with market knowledge will give you edge.

– Make sure you know your strengths and talents, write them down, and make sure you can say them eloquently. After all, landing the job of your dreams is about selling your strengths.

– Don’t mention your personal issues in the job interview. Be completely focused on your professional side.

What are the top 3 Don’ts a woman should not do in a job interview?

– Come to an interview dressed inappropriately. Do some research of the office culture of the company you are interviewing at. Dress code and first impressions go hand in hand. Avoid perfumes and excessive make up.

– Be personal in a job interview.

– Make sure you watch your body language. Don’t fidget.  Try and remain calm and confident. Keep eye contact with the interviewer. Smile.

Jerusalem: A tale of three cities

NOVANEWS

BY URI DROMI
DROMI@MISHKENOT.ORG.IL
This week, tens of thousands of Israelis flocked to Jerusalem to celebrate the anniversary of the unification of the city in the Six-Day War. They gave us locals the usual traffic jams, they sang the praises of Jerusalem at the top of their lungs and then they went away, leaving us struggling with the realities of our city, which are becoming more complex every year.
Jerusalem has always invoked deep emotions, slogans and wishful thinking. When Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, at AIPAC’s conference in Washington two weeks ago, repeated the mantra that “Jerusalem will always be united’’, he received a standing ovation. I doubt whether those in the audience really knew what they were applauding for, and if in their short visits to Jerusalem they saw more than just the lobby of the King David Hotel.
Those of us who live here know that Jerusalem is actually divided into three cities: The Jewish nonreligious one; the Jewish religious one; and the Arab one.
Each of these is a big city in itself, with populations of some 250,000, the size of Haifa, the third biggest city in Israel. Theoretically, these three cities could have lived next to each other in harmony, under a joint metropolitan framework. The reality is different.
• Arab Jerusalem, on the east side, suffers from four decades of neglect of its infrastructure and services, and its population is poor.
• The inhabitants of the Jewish-religious (ultra-orthodox) city are poor as well. The number of people who actually go to work in these two cities of Jerusalem is relatively low — because of a lack of jobs available for the Arabs, or unwillingness of the Jewish ultra-orthodox to work, because of religious reasons.
• We are left, then, with the third city of Jerusalem, the Jewish nonreligious one, where the middle class (me included) is paying taxes and basically carrying the city on its shoulders. Since the populations of the Arab city and the Jewish religious city are growing, while the population of the non-religious Jewish city is stagnating, if not shrinking, the conclusion is clear: In the future, a relatively smaller middle class will have to take care of bigger and poorer Arab and ultra-orthodox Jewish populations of Jerusalem.
Arab Jerusalem carries major political significance. Netanyahu in his speech said that the Palestinians will have to base their capital somewhere else. I wish they would choose Helsinki, but I doubt they would. So let’s leave Arab Jerusalem aside for a moment, and focus on the two Jewish cities — the non-religious one and the religious (ultra-orthodox) one.
According to the Statistical Yearbook of Jerusalem for 2009-10, the average age in a nonreligious neighborhood is 40, while in a religious neighborhood it is 20 (in the ultra-orthodox neighborhood of Mea Shearim, the average age is 15!). In Jewish elementary schools in the city, the number of ultra-orthodox pupils is twice as big as the others. Again, it gives a clear idea of what the future holds for Jerusalem: more poor people leaning on a smaller middle class to support them.
The future, by the way, is already at our doorstep. Here is a small example from the area of leisure: Ultra-orthodox neighborhoods, which are densely populated, don’t have many public parks. Therefore, their residents tend to take their kids to play at the parks of nonreligious neighborhoods, like Beit HaKerem, where I live. There is nothing wrong with it, except that some ultra-orthodox parents don’t like the fact that our kids — or young mothers — are dressed in a liberal way, and they reprimand them for this. Our neighborhood paper already encouraged the local residents to stand up and answer that challenge “in a proper way.”
A culture war is the last thing the nonreligious middle class in Jerusalem needs. In another neighborhood, physical confrontations have occurred between nonreligious residents, who want to keep the liberal character of the neighborhood, and ultra-orthodox newcomers, who want to introduce their own way of life into the public sphere. Many non-religious middle classers have kids and friends who have already left Jerusalem and moved elsewhere. This feeling of siege will encourage them to leave as well.
The Jerusalem challenge is awesome. Mayor Nir Barkat means well and tries hard, and the Jerusalem Foundation has been helping the city for four decades through philanthropy. However, this is a task for the Israeli government, and up until now all governments have failed to fulfill it.
Here is my summing up for Jerusalem. I apologize if it spoils the party for those who just celebrated Jerusalem Day: Arab Jerusalem should be handed over to the Palestinians, and the sooner the better; ultra-orthodox residents should be encouraged to join the workforce and their neighborhoods should get better services; and besides caring for the poor, the middle class in Jerusalem should be regarded as no less than a national strategic asset. If it falls, Jerusalem will fall as well.