NOVANEWS
Western sponsored propaganda leads the news cycle as the U.S. and Britain plan to strike Syria under a false pretense.
(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
OpEd
By Shepard Ambellas
GHOUTA, DAMASCUS — Mainline media rhetoric echoes across most of the western world in the form of globalist sponsored propaganda designed to play games with the hearts and minds of the average citizen. Although lately there has been a shift in consciousness.
Many government sponsored false flag events are now being brought to the attention of the general public through large independent news organizations like Intellihub.com and others.
It is now pretty well-known that the Obama Administration has been desperately seeking a new war with Syria over the past few days. In fact, Britain even jumped on the bandwagon as warships armed with cruise missiles pre-position for a strategic strike on Syria later this week.
However, some wonder what the justification for this new emerging war with Syria would be.
According to the Obama Administration, the Syrian government is responsible for chemically attacking their own people last week killing hundreds and permanently injuring thousands.
Although none of this adds up.
Why would the Syrian leader allow a chemical attack on his own people?
It was also reported earlier in the week that the Russians weren’t buying the official story of the White House, as they believe likely more is at play. Furthermore, leaked emails came out casting doubt that the Syrian government attacked their own people in the first place, signifying that likely the U.S. sponsored a “false flag” event to constitute the technical war terms per United Nations “rules of engagement”.
In fact, it now looks like U.S. sponsored forces tried to either foil the U.N. inspection probe in a sniper attack earlier today, or make it look like Syrian forces did. CNN.com reported, “shortly before Monday’s inspection, unidentified snipers shot multiple times at a vehicle used by the U.N. team, the United Nations said. There were no reports of injuries.
The Syrian government accused “terrorists” of firing on the inspectors, Syrian state TV reported.
The United Nations has not said who may have been behind the shooting, which came after an explosion near the site the team planned to visit. Some witnesses said it was caused by incoming ordnance, perhaps a mortar shell.”[1]
All of this action is likely to reach a boiling point later this week when the U.N. announces the findings of the investigation. The Obama Administration is set to act swift and “very deliberately” according to reports out of Washington. While some, including the Russians, feel the U.S. was already predetermined to strike. The NYTimes reported, “On Sunday, a spokesman for Russia’s Foreign Ministry, Aleksandr K. Lukashevich, said that those who advocated an armed response to any chemical weapons attack — without citing the United States or other countries — were prejudging the results of the United Nations inspections.
“In these conditions, we again resolutely call on all those who are trying to impose the results of the U.N. investigations and who say that armed actions against Syria is possible to show common sense and avoid tragic mistakes,” Mr. Lukashevich said in a statement released on the ministry’s Web site.”[2]
So what’s not being reported?
According to reporter Ben Swann, 300 U.S. Marines now sit along the Syrian border as the situation intensifies. ”What’s happening in Syria is an enormous problem for the United States… the war in Syria is not a true civil war”, points out Swann in a video report.[3]
Ladies and Gentlemen, get ready to enter another war under a false pretense.
Sources:
[1] In Syria, U.N. chemical weapons inspectors reach alleged attack site – CNN.com
[2] Snipers Fire on Weapons Inspectors in Syria, U.N. Says – NYTimes.com
[3] What the Media Isn’t Telling You About the Syrian Chemical Attack –BenSwann.com
