NOVANEWS
- Stand behind Wikileaks and against secret war
- Another prominent American Jew pronounces himself ‘disgusted’ with Israel
- Tom Shales takes more stupid swipes at Amanpour
- War of the hedges
- A tale of two very different droughts
- Israel’s PR war
- What Zionism has wrought
- Uribe appointment undermines U.N. flotilla investigation
- Israel lobby’s man on Iran keeps his job from Bush to Obama, no problem
- Today in Palestine: 3 14-year-old boys arrested while walking near wall
Stand behind Wikileaks and against secret warPosted: 03 Aug 2010I love the debate in the MSM about whether the great Julian Assange is as virtuous as Daniel Ellsberg. I bet they were trashing Ellsberg 40 years ago, too. Oh but this is so different! Yes, very true. Different times, different weapons. Ellsberg spent nights at a Xerox machine.Tom Hayden has sent out the following petition on behalf of Wikileaks. I missed the Rolling Stone bit. Good:
|
Another prominent American Jew pronounces himself ‘disgusted’ with Israel03 Aug 2010Earlier today I called for more Jewish apostates in the face of Israel’s repulsive conduct (please watch this video). Well a friend pointed this out to me:This Times piece on the ADL opposing the mosque near Ground Zero prompted a healthy rejoinder from Jay Rosen, the influential journalism prof at NYU (and a Jew), at twitter a few days ago:
|
Tom Shales takes more stupid swipes at Amanpour03 Aug 2010Tom Shales has repeatedly attacked Christiane Amanpour, on the most ad hominem grounds, in the Washington Post. He went after her for supposed anti-Israel bias last March. Lately he suggested that a prayer she offered on behalf of all the war dead was aimed at the fallen Taliban. Now ABC News has responded, reports Justin Elliott at Salon:
I wonder how much of this is about Israel policy… |
War of the hedges03 Aug 2010(Photo: Ronith Daher / AP)The Israelis dangled a soldier over the Lebanese border today, to trim the hedges, or so they say. And an officer was killed by a Lebanese “sniper,” say the Israelis. Reminiscent of the tractors in the Golan before the Six Day War… In his speech today, Nasrallah accuses Israel of killing former Prime Minister Rafic Hariri. Karon on the potential for catastrophe… Haaretz:
|
A tale of two very different droughts03 Aug 2010Haaretz contributor Nehemia Shtrasler writes:
I care, actually. But not for the same reasons.I took an environmental science class during my senior year of high school. My teacher was tremendously enthusiastic and through him, I was introduced to various environmental crises including the global water shortage. For this reason, Israel’s water crisis doesn’t shock me.But I wouldn’t be shocked anyways, and here’s why:
Water shortages are a daily occurrence for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and the dry spell isn’t limited to just the last five years. Even before the water-sharing agreements of the second round of Oslo Accords in 1995, Palestinians have been forced to endure an even more extreme drought – one that is politically- rather than environmentally-induced.I’ve experienced the dry spell first hand. In my last visit to the Gaza Strip in 2004, the faucets worked only half the time. I thought living without electricity or internet was hard, but water insecurity really puts a damper on one’s life. No bathroom, no laundry, no showers, and no homemade dinner. If I was thirsty, I had to travel to the nearest store for a warm juice box.Luckily, experiences like these were recognized by delegates at the Third World Water Conference in Kyoto in 2003. Of the 21 international water disputes analyzed and assessed by the conference’s attendees, 18 involved Israel’s control of Palestinian water resources.Although the underground reservoirs and surrounding river basins are to be shared equally by residents of the area, there exists a large disparity between the amount of water reaching Palestinian territory and the amount of water reaching Israeli territory. According to a United Nations press release:
If the archeologists hired to dig through Jerusalem ever get an opportunity to dig elsewhere, they should come across an intricate underground pipe system that leads to various Israeli towns and settlements. Water use in Israel is unrestricted, and to keep up with demand, water is normally rerouted away from its intended Palestinian destination.The difference in water consumption is astounding but expected. The average Israeli uses between four and six times as much water as the average Palestinian. While Israelis frolic in 400-liter oceans, Palestinians are forced to ration water just to reach the 70-liters-a-day mark. Sad thing is, the World Health Organization recommends daily access to at least 100 liters of water a day.It is without a doubt that Israel is facing a five-year drought, if that’s what you want to call it. After all, it’s the Middle East, to which “arid” and “extremely hot” are synonyms. But it goes without say that Palestinians are experiencing a far worse and seemingly endless drought – one that involves petty politics as well.Before Israel’s Water Authority convinces the Knesset to siphon off even more Palestinian water as a solution to its alleged water deficit, I have two solutions. First, cut back on water consumption. Second, but more importantly, eliminate illegal water restrictions against the Palestinians. While the Water Authority complains about a drought that has yet to impact water accessibility in Israel, Palestine has been drying up since 1967.Sami Kishawi blogs at Sixteen Minutes to Palestine. |
Israel’s PR war03 Aug 2010Lia Tarachansky‘s latest:More at The Real News |
What Zionism has wrought03 Aug 2010The above video shows 5-year-old Khaled Jabari crying as the Israeli military takes his father away for stealing water. In fact, he was only trying to access water that had already been stolen by Kiryat Arba, a nearby Israeli settlement. Palestine Monitor reports:
(h/t Seham) |
Uribe appointment undermines U.N. flotilla investigation03 Aug 2010It was announced yesterday, August 2nd, that outgoing Colombian president Álvaro Uribe Vélez will be the Vice Chairman of the U.N.’s four-member international committee tasked with investigating the Israeli commando attack on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla. On May 31st, Israeli forces attacked the MV Mavi Marmara, a Turkish ship manned by international activists delivering aid supplies to the besieged Gaza Strip. The ensuing confrontation left nine activists dead and dozens wounded and sparked international criticism of Israel.Prior international investigations and condemnation have done little to change Israel’s colonial policies in occupied Palestinian territories. Appointing Uribe to this latest investigation preemptively undermines its credibility.It’s difficult to catalogue and summarize the various political scandals that have plagued Uribe’s 8-year presidency. Three days before the announcement of Uribe’s appointment to the U.N. committee, the Colombian press reported the outgoing president’s verbal attack against Colombian Supreme Court Magistrate Yesid Ramirez, after Ramirez asked the nation’s prosecutor general to open an investigation into allegations that the president’s son, Tomás Uribe, bribed congressmen to ensure his father’s re-election in 2006. The recent scandal is only the latest in one of many of Uribe’s public displays of contempt for the Colombian judiciary, the most famous of which was his outrage at the Court’s nixing of a referendum that would have allowed Uribe to run for a third presidential term.More significant than political tumult or charges of corruption is Uribe’s contempt for international law, demonstrated by his government’s illegal use of the International Red Cross emblem in a hostage rescue mission in July 2008. Uribe admitted using the Red Cross emblem in the mission – which successfully duped the guerrilla into releasing several high profile hostages, including three Americans and one former Colombian presidential candidate – but dismissed the violation as a “mistake” committed by a soldier in a “state of angst”. Immediately following the mission, the Red Cross released a statement urging all sides to respect the ICRC emblem, but did not pursue the issue further. The Geneva Conventions prohibit improper use of the Red Cross logo.As Uribe’s new appointment entrusts him with investigating the deaths of civilian activists, the most alarming aspect of his 8-year tenure is his government’s well-documented history of killing civilians and then presenting them as fallen guerrilla fighters or “terrorist sympathizers”. Starting in 2008, it was widely reported that the Colombian military had an established practice of luring poor young men from their homes with promises of employment, and subsequently killing them and presenting them as combat casualties. The practice not only served to stack battle statistics, but also financially benefited the soldiers involved, as Uribe’s government had, since 2005, awarded monetary and vacation bonuses for each insurgent killed. Human rights groups cite 3,000 or more of these so-called “false positives”. In response to the scandal, Uribe dismissed some of the military’s high command. But even when his critics are proven right, as was the case with the “false positives” scandal, Uribe steadfastly maintains a rhetoric that equates human rights defenders with armed terrorists. His attitude was most famously exemplified in a speech made in 2003:
Israeli claims that participants in the humanitarian aid flotilla, including those who lost their lives, were likely linked to “terrorist” organizations seem to echo Uribe’s vitriol. After the May 31st Israeli massacre in international waters, Fox News reported Israeli ambassador to Denmark, Arthur Avnon, as saying:
One might surmise that Israel bowed to international pressure to participate in the U.N. probe because it sees a kindred spirit in Uribe, hardly an impartial arbiter of international humanitarian law and human rights. While the eventual outcome of the probe is still uncertain, Álvaro Uribe’s participation as Vice Chairman calls into question the sincerity of the U.N.’s investigation.Carmen Andrea Rivera is an independent journalist and activist based in Berkeley, California. She is currently a producer on the weekly radio magazine La Raza Chronicles (KPFA, 94.1 FM). Nico Udu-gama is an activist based in Washington, DC. |
Israel lobby’s man on Iran keeps his job from Bush to Obama, no problem03 Aug 2010Obama got past Hillary in 2008 because his opposition to the Iraq war was a litmus test for much of the Democratic base. Then he won the last presidential election in part by opposing Bush’s foreign-policy agenda and promptly reached out to the “Muslim world.”So why is a Bushie with an ideological agenda hanging on into the Obama administration?Below are excerpts of an important piece on Obama’s Iran policy, a piece about Stuart Levey, under secretary of Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Security who is responsible for Iran sanctions (penned by JTA’s Ron Kampeas six weeks ago). Levey was appointed by Bush in 2001. Obama has kept this Bushie in a key policy position in Treasury. Why? Because he is beloved by the Israel lobby. For the same reason that Martin Indyk said that Obama has folded on settlements with Netanyahu: because of the “Jewish factor” in elections. Do you think the Democratic base would tolerate a high-level Bush appointee at HHS or in the Justice Department? No way. But this is how policy gets made in the Middle East; and you can’t seriously critique policy-making without factoring in the ethnic-religious component.
Notice the presence in this piece of David Harris of the American Jewish Committee, whose job is protecting Israel, and of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracy, a neoconservative shop, and of neocon Jonathan Schanzer, who lately in the Weekly Standard called it the terror flotilla.These are Obama’s friends? Yes. Note that Levey is a longtime admirer of AIPAC and attended Hebrew University in Jerusalem as an undergraduate: “I have been an admirer of the great work this organization does since my days on the one-year program at Hebrew University in 1983 and 1984.” |
Today in Palestine: 3 14-year-old boys arrested while walking near wall03 Aug 2010And other news from Today in Palestine:Land and Property Theft and Destruction/Ethnic CleansingIsrael demolishes more villages and housesJerusalem, August 3, (Pal Telegraph) A large force of Israeli army supported by bulldozers and special units raided today several unrecognized villages in the Negev region south of the occupied territories of 1948, and proceeded to demolish dozens of homes and the displacement of a large number of the families who own these homes. Israeli bulldozers began demolition of unrecognized villages of ‘Dimona’’, ‘Ser’, ‘Abu Salb’ and ‘Hawasheleh’. The Israeli bulldozers are scheduled to keep on invading many of the unrecognized villages in the Negev throughout the day and everyday according to sources in the Israeli Ministry of interior affairs, for the demolition of more houses and removal of the tents.
|
3 thoughts on “MONDOWEISS ONLINE NEWSLETTER”
Traffic Siphon Says -Beneficial post man, I literally like the look and additionally the feel of this kind of site. You write really well, you should certainly be a aware guy. Will surely come back
Fantastic submit. I just found your web page and would prefer to say that I’ve definitely cherished reading via your blog site posts. At any price I’m heading to be subscribing for your feed and i genuinely hope you create again soon.
my website is PRS Guitars .Also welcome you!
Thank you for that submit, i loved reading it. I don’t agree with it all however it was a nice post.