The specter of civil war is always looming over Lebanon, but, this time, the international community is not interested in investing time and money in it.
There are many reasons why nations go to war and even more why they go to civil war. The history of Lebanon in this respect is full of examples why this small Mediterranean nation is always perceived as vulnerable to civil strife.
Lebanon’s current economic and political collapse has unfortunately been a long time coming, as its archaic and medieval political system has struggled for decades to keep itself afloat. Corruption mixed with Iran’s Lebanon proxy Hezbollah have gradually detached Lebanon from the financial safety net which the Gulf Arab states and the international community has always provided.
While many have blamed the failure of the Lebanese political system and the tendency to go to war on sectarianism and international intervention, the crux of the problem lies in Lebanon’s 18 religious sects who have failed to recognize that updating the power-sharing formula, as they did in 1989 with the Taif Agreement, is insufficient if this change is not reflected in the constitution in a manner that provides stability and ultimately paves the way for a sustainable and functional state.
Relatives of the victims of Beirut Port blast gather in front of the house of Lebanon’s Interior Minister, Mohammad Fahmi during a protest demanding the fair conduct of the investigation for the explosion in the Port of Beirut on Aug 4th in 2020, in Beirut, Lebanon on July 13, 2021. Photo by Hussam Shbaro, Anadolu Images
Read: The Hezbollah Empire in Lebanon and the Assassination of Lokman Slim
As it seems, there are many indicators which lead one to assume that civil war is at the gates. But, in reality, Lebanon’s current predicament requires more than a civil war to be resolved as many of the elements needed for civil war are non-existent – if not to say meager, at least in the foreseeable future.
As it stands, the only heavily armed and militarized faction in Lebanon is Hezbollah whose involvement and fighting experience in Iran’s regional expansionist project makes it lethal if civil war were to break out in Lebanon. While the rest of Lebanon’s sects and political parties maintain their own version of Praetorian Guards, some of whom were part of the Lebanese Civil War (1975-1990), their small weapons and limited training does not qualify them to a face-off with Hezbollah.
Perhaps more importantly and for the time being, the regional and international appetite for strife is non-existent. The regional tensions between the Arab Gulf states and Iran have shifted the former’s attention to protecting their home front, especially in Yemen and Iraq, two areas which Iran and its proxies have infiltrated and used as bases to attack foreign and Arab interests.
Recommended
The Power Struggle between The Taliban and ISIS-K: What You Need to Know
Chad’s Withdrawal of Half of Its Soldiers from G5 Sahel: Will it Have Implications?
The Crimean Platform: Winners, Losers, and Bystanders
