If America Had Laws Like I$raHell


I think that this piece below is a wonderful way to get across to people how the nation-state law that Israel’s PM and others wish to pass will impact on anyone not Jewish.

However, most of the comments disagree with Avital (the author of the comparison below).    One of these pointed out that no one is trying to take the land that the US is on as is happening in Israel.  Who took whose land?  The lady should educate herself!  Another comment compared the law to those of Muslim countries.   I have yet to hear anyone describe Jordan, Egypt, etc as being democratic.

Apparently people strongly pro-Israel will find all sorts of arguments to defend it, whether the arguments are valid or not.  A few of the comments that did not agree do make valid points, e.g. the United States in its early days did aim to be Protestant.  But Avital is not talking about the early days, but rather about the ideal, (as e.g., on the Statue of Liberty “Give me your hungry, your poor, etc) which in actuality is not perfect, but surely is better than an ideal that would turn the US legally into a country of WASPs (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants).





By Avital Burg

A new proposed bill, supported by senators on both sides of the aisle, will finally define and determine the United States of America as the land of the Protestant People, the largest religious constituency in the U.S. and the group out of which America’s founding fathers and ruling leadership emerged.

The new law aims to anchor Protestant values in the laws of the land, inspired by the spirit of the American Constitution. Furthermore, the bill proceeds to state that the U.S. will continue to uphold a fundamentally democratic character. According to the new law, the United States will be fully committed to the foundations of Freedom, Justice, and Peace, in light of our Lord Jesus Christ.

At the same time, the bill suggests, the right to implement a national self-definition will be exclusively reserved for the Protestant People. According to the new bill, Protestant values will serve as inspiration to lawmakers and judges at the different levels of the United States’ legislative and judicial branches. In cases where a court of justice encounters difficulties in ruling over issues that have no readily available answers in the Law, in the Christian Canon, or in logical reasoning, it will then rule according to the principles of freedom, justice, integrity and peace stemming from the Protestant heritage.

In addition, the national emblems of the United States, such as its flag and national anthem, will be drawn directly from the tradition of the Protestant Church, and the official calendar of the U.S. will follow the Protestant liturgical year. Finally, the United States will further act to preserve and entrench the Protestant historical and cultural tradition and to cultivate it in the U.S. and abroad.

Any reader who has gotten this far would probably note that such a law could not be passed or even seriously proposed by the United States legislature. In Israel, however, it could become a fundamental law, on a level equivalent to a constitutional amendment in the United States.

Related ◾ 4 Problems With Israel’s ‘Jewish Nation-State’ Law

The different clauses listed above are not a free interpretation of the bill or wild projections of what this bill could imply; they are the clauses of the original Hebrew bill, translated into the U.S. political context. I have simply replaced the phrase “the Jewish People” and its associated traits with the “Protestant People” and its associated traits, such as “Protestant values” and “the Christian Canon.”

There are currently close to 8 million people living in Israel, more than 20% of which are Palestinian citizens. After years of de facto discrimination against Palestinian citizens of Israel in various aspects of daily life, this new law, if passed, will make such discrimination official: Palestinians will become formally, legally, second-class citizens. And this is without even mentioning the Palestinians who still live under the Israeli occupation in the West Bank.

If you would oppose such a law had it been proposed in your own country, how can you support it when proposed in another country? If you would have objected to such a law because it would discriminate against you as a member of a religious or ethnic minority, how can you possibly support such a law when it is being put forward in your name, with you as the would-be member of Israel’s Jewish majority?

Avital Burg is a New York based artist and writer from Tel Aviv.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *