Articles

NOVANEWS   Bloomberg   Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov discusses the outlook for the leadership of the International Monetary Fund. ...Read more

NOVANEWS   SAS Troops Believed to Be Used to Spot Targets for Air Strikes antiwar.com British Prime Minister David Cameron’s ...Read more

NOVANEWS   antiwar.com Despite growing doubts about the effectiveness of the conflict and international efforts to broker a ceasefire, NATO ...Read more

NOVANEWS   Boehner Concerned Vote Demanding End to War Might ‘Adversely Effect’ War antiwar.com For a nation in a state ...Read more

NOVANEWS   by Philip Giraldi   The recent visit of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu  was a personal triumph for ...Read more

NOVANEWS   Although Palestinian children endure lives of suffering, Obama's love for their Israeli counterparts knows no limit. http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/05/201152911579533291.html What ...Read more

NOVANEWS Dear Friends, 5 juicy items below. In item one Gideon Levy tells us something that many of us knew, ...Read more

NOVANEWS By Prof. Michel Chossudovsky A new phase of the war is unfolding leading to a process of military escalation as ...Read more

USA
NOVANEWS By Global Research The greatest depression in human history is still in its starting stages. What the media and ...Read more

NOVANEWS In its latest efforts towards Saudiazation Saudi Arabia’s Minister of Labor, Adel Faqih, announced that expatriates who have lived ...Read more

NOVANEWS Mustafa Barghouthi’s 2-state/1-state straddle Palestinians consider legal maneuver to overcome US veto of statehood in Security Council come September ...Read more

Saudi Arabia desperate to keep West addicted to its deadly oil Freedom for Palestine (with a cast of thousands) Latest ...Read more

Russia Warns NATO Not to Aid Syrian Protesters

NOVANEWS
 


Bloomberg
 

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov discusses the outlook for the leadership of the International Monetary Fund. Lavrov, speaking yesterday in Moscow with Bloomberg’s Henry Meyer, Brad Cook and Ilya Arkhipov, also talks about bilateral relations with the U.S., Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi and the political unrest in Syria. (Source: Bloomberg)
.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned the U.S. and European nations not to encourage anti-government protesters in Syria by holding out the prospect of military support like they provided in Libya.

“It is not in the interests of anyone to send messages to the opposition in Syria or elsewhere that if you reject all reasonable offers we will come and help you as we did in Libya,” Lavrov, 61, said yesterday during an interview in Moscow. “It’s a very dangerous position.”

Rallies against President Bashar al-Assad’s rule have swept Syria, inspired by the uprisings that ousted authoritarian rulers in Egypt and Tunisia. Syrian security forces have killed more than 1,100 people and detained at least 10,000, according to human-rights groups. The government blames the protests on Islamic militants and foreign provocateurs.

Russia abstained from the March 18 vote by the United Nations Security Council that authorized the use of force to protect civilians from Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi’s forces, saying the resolution might lead to a “large-scale military intervention.” Operations led by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization have stretched far beyond the stated goal of enforcing a no-fly zone, Lavrov said.

President Dmitry Medvedev expects to meet with U.S. Vice President Joe Biden and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi later today in Rome to discuss the situation in Libya and throughout the Middle East, the Russian president said.

UN Involvement Opposed

The U.K., France, Germany and Portugal asked the Security Council on May 25 to demand that Syria end attacks on peaceful protesters and address their grievances. The European Union last week imposed a travel ban and asset freeze on the “highest level of leadership,” a week after the U.S. froze the assets of Assad and six top officials.

Russia opposes Security Council involvement in Syria, Lavrov said.

“First of all, the situation doesn’t present a threat to international peace and security,” he said. “Second, Syria is a very important country in the Middle East and destabilizing Syria would have repercussions far beyond its borders.”

While Russia is opposed to international intervention, it supports the need for change in Syria and has encouraged Assad to implement promised reforms, Lavrov said.

Assad on April 21 ordered the lifting of a 48-year-old state of emergency, abolished the Supreme State Security Court and issued a decree allowing peaceful protests. This week he offered a “general amnesty” covering political detainees.

“We are gratified that our appeals have been heard,” Lavrov said. “Recently he published a draft of a new constitution, he declared an amnesty for political prisoners, and I think this should calm the situation.”

Syria Protests

Protests continued after the amnesty decree, issued late on May 31, as opposition leaders said it was a ploy to gain time.

Lavrov called for the Libyan resolution to be a unique one and said Russia will demand that any future UN mandates be more specific.

“If somebody would like to get authorization to use force to achieve a shared goal by all of us, they would have to specify in the resolution who this somebody is, who is going to use this authorization, what the rules of engagement are and the limits on the use of force,” Lavrov said.

Russia has stepped up diplomatic efforts to help forge a Libyan settlement that would persuade Qaddafi to step down and end NATO military action, Lavrov said.

‘Acceptable to All’

At the Group of Eight summit last week in France, U.S. President Barack Obama and French President Nicolas Sarkozy asked Medvedev to help negotiate a deal acceptable to coalition forces, the African Union and Libyan rebels, Lavrov said.

Medvedev spoke by phone with South African President Jacob Zuma before and after Zuma flew to Tripoli, Libya’s capital, on May 30, Lavrov said. The Russian president also told his special envoy for Libya, Mikhail Margelov, to go to the port city of Benghazi for talks with opposition leaders as soon as possible.

Any solution must “be acceptable to all Libyans,” Lavrov said, echoing comments Zuma made after returning from Tripoli in a trip backed by the African Union.

“I hope that the accumulated effort of all those who want to see an end to the hostilities and the beginning of the construction of a new Libya will bring results,” he said.

The U.S. and its partners, including France and the U.K., launched the first attacks against Qaddafi’s forces on March 19. NATO took command on March 31 and yesterday extended its mission for 90 days in what Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said was “a clear message” that “we are determined to continue our operation to protect the people of Libya.”

Bedouin or Trial

The air raids killed 718 civilians and wounded 4,067 from March 19 to May 26, Agence France Presse reported, citing a spokesman for Libya’s government.

Russia isn’t involved in negotiating “any deals of immunity or guarantees” for Qaddafi, though others are considering a range of options, he said.

“I can tell you without revealing too many secrets that the leaders of countries who can influence the situation are actively discussing the possibilities,” Lavrov said.

Officials at the G-8 summit discussed options for Qaddafi ranging “from a quiet life as a simple Bedouin in the Libyan desert to the fate of Milosevic in the Hague,” Margelov said in an interview yesterday, referring to the war crimes trial of former Yugoslav leader Slobodan Milosevic.

British PM Denies Ground Troops in Misrata

NOVANEWS
 

SAS Troops Believed to Be Used to Spot Targets for Air Strikes

antiwar.com

British Prime Minister David Cameron’s office today denied growing reports that British soldiers are on the ground in the Libyan city of Misrata, saying that all their actions were “in accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 1973.”

Cameron’s spokesman insisted the denial was not in any way related to photographs taking inside Misrata by media outlets which clearly showed Western troops in the city, working with rebel forces. The UN resolution explicitly forbids the use of ground troops in Libya.
The denial may be an attempt to create a distinction without a difference, however, as British newspaper The Guardian says it has confirmed that former members of the British SAS are indeed on the ground in Misrata, but operating as “private security firm employees.”
The troops are said to be operating as spotters, finding targets for NATO’s warplanes to bomb. They pass the details of targets through the Lt. Gen. Charles Bouchard in Naples before they are attacked.

NATO Extends Libya War Another 90 Days

NOVANEWS
 

antiwar.com

Despite growing doubts about the effectiveness of the conflict and international efforts to broker a ceasefire, NATO announced today that it is extending the war in Libya for an additional 90 days.

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said the move was important because it “sends a clear message to the Gadhafi regime: we are determined to continue our operation.” Officials justified the move as retaliation after South African President Jacob Zuma failed to negotiate Gadhafi’s departurefrom the country.
The announcement will also send a message to the rebels, however, that NATO intends to continue its ill-conceived war indefinitely. This may make efforts to negotiate a ceasefire in the conflict, which has been essentially stalemated since April, all but impossible.
It was also usher in a growing humanitarian disaster in western Libya, where the United Nations is reporting that food and medicine are in short supply. With NATO promising to continue bombing this half of the country for another 90 days, it seems that this will only get worse going forward.

House Postpones Vote Against Libya War Over Fear It Might Pass

NOVANEWS
 

Boehner Concerned Vote Demanding End to War Might ‘Adversely Effect’ War

antiwar.com

For a nation in a state of perpetual war, antiwar votes are a time honored tradition giving the antiwar Congressmen a chance to act like they’re accomplishing something and their more jingoistic brethren a chance to give flag-waving speeches denouncing the resolution as treason. All that changed last week when one of those run-of-the-mill Afghan votes came within 9 members of passing.
The House had also been promising a vote sometime this week on a resolution demanding the end of the Libya War. Today, however, the Republican leadership announced it is postponing the vote indefinitely because of growing concern that it might actually pass.
Rep. Kucinich’s (D – OH) bill is being further bolstered by an announcement today from the NATO leadership that they have extended the supposedly short-term war for another 90 days, saying they are “determined to continue our operation.” But with President Obama already well beyond his 60-day grace period, he is facing considerable opposition from both parties about his decision to launch the war.
And while the House Republican leadership remains, as ever, firmly behind all wars anywhere, the party’s backbenchers are angry at President Obama’s decision to start a war without consulting Congress.House Speaker John Boehner is said to be “concerned that if this were to come to the floor now, it would pass,” and that he believes this “could” adversely effect the war.
Still, since the resolution is based on the 1973 War Powers Act, Rep. Kucinich can still force a vote over leadership objections as soon as next week. The delay may buy the administration time to invent more justifications for a conflict that even Secretary of State Gates admitted was “not a vital American interest.” Whether this delay will be enough to swing the vote remains to be seen.

The Tie that Binds

NOVANEWS
 


by Philip Giraldi
 

The recent visit of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu  was a personal triumph for him and a disaster for the United States. Since the 1960s, if not before, Israel has sought to bind the United States to her by maintaining that the two countries have identical interests worldwide.  In reality, this has never been true, even during the cold war when the Soviets were actively engaged in a number of Arab states, but it is a lie that has been assiduously promoted by Israel’s friends in Washington.  The false narrative has been used to justify extraordinary levels of taxpayer-provided aid to Israel as well as unlimited political cover in international organizations like the United Nations, where the US Security Council veto has been regularly deployed to negate possible consequences whenever Israel attacks one of its neighbors.

The Bush Administration used to refer to “narrowing the playing field” to eliminate alternative strategies whenever it was planning something particularly nasty or illegal.  Israel’s latest initiatives are cut from the same cloth, the culmination of years of effort to reduce the options for independent action by the United States to such an extent that there would be no wiggle room over issues that Tel Aviv considers to be important.  For the past twenty years, for example, Washington has embraced the Israeli definition of terrorism, that all groups hostile to the State of Israel are terrorists and cannot be dealt with except by killing them.  That has meant that groups that do not threaten the United States including Hamas and Hezbollah have been declared terrorists even though they started out as resistance groups in Lebanon and Palestine opposing the respective Israeli occupations and have now morphed into political parties.  Israel, which actually helped create Hamas as a counter to Fatah, has piled on the confusion by regularly and inaccurately referring to al-Qaeda presence in Gaza and by conflating Hamas with al-Qaeda.  Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did so several times in his speeches last week.  The confusion has apparently worked judging by Congress’s serial standing ovations when Netanyahu piled lie on top of lie on top of lie.

A more nuanced approach to the terrorism issue would be for the United States to step back from entering into new quarrels on behalf of its friends and associates internationally.  Director of the Department of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano perfectly illustrated the perils of that kind of groupthink when she declared last week that the Pakistan based terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) is “as dangerous” as al-Qaeda.  Lashkar is active in Indian-occupied Kashmir and also was behind the 2008 Mumbai attacks, but it does not threaten the United States.  Napolitano’s singling out of the group was in front of an audience in New Delhi which might well lead one to question why she was over there and what homeland she was protecting. And her remarks could, of course, produce a bad result.  They could suggest to LeT’s leaders that some targeting of Americans might be desirable.

Overall, the adoption of an Israeli-influenced counter-terrorism policy was a great success that was cast in concrete by the events of 9/11, which Bibi Netanyahu welcomed, knowing that Washington would be bound even more tightly to Tel Aviv.  But there still remained that old nagging peace process to be dealt with.  The United States had sent off former Senator George Mitchell to the region in an attempt to promote negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, or at least take a couple of baby steps in that direction.  For Israel, peace would require fixed borders and it would also mean that the expansion of the illegal settlements would have to stop and might even be reversed.  That was not a good outcome in the view of Netanyahu, who relies on right wing extremist parties for his governing majority.

Completely frustrated by his experience as peace negotiator, George Mitchell resigned shortly before Netanyahu appeared in Washington to attend the AIPAC conference and also to lecture President Obama.  Obama’s eagerly awaited speech on the Middle East delivered the night before Netanyahu’s arrival was actually reviewed by the Israeli Prime Minister before it was given, demonstrating clearly whose foot was on whose neck.  Netanyahu reportedly responded angrily to any mention of the 1967 borders in a phone conversation with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the speech was delayed for forty minutes while the president and his staff worked in other rewrites demanded by the Israeli Prime Minister.  But it was not enough.  The Obama suggestion that the old lines between Israel and the West Bank might serve as a basis for negotiations to decide on respective territorial claims became the president’s “macaca” moment. “No to 1967″ emerged as the rallying cry for Netanyahu and his friends in Congress and the media, enabling them to completely humiliate the American president.

At the end of the week in Washington the process was complete.  Obama was forced to back away from his comments about the former borders.  Netanyahu was able to affirm without any challenge from the Administration that Israel would never return to something “indefensible,” a curious assertion given Israel’s lack of any evident vulnerability when it attacked and defeated three of its neighbors simultaneously from those borders back in June 1967. And all of that was before Tel Aviv had acquired a nuclear arsenal which further tipped the balance of power in its favor.

Netanyahu also stated the following: that the West Bank is not occupied because it is really Judea and Samaria and therefore the patrimony of the Jewish people, that Jerusalem will remain under complete Israeli control, that any Palestinian state would have to be demilitarized and not even control its own airspace, that there would be an Israeli military presence along the Jordan River, that Israel will never talk with any Palestinian government that includes Hamas, and that no Palestinian would ever be allowed to return to his former home in Israel.  Netanyahu knew full well that he was denying that the Palestinians have any rights at all and even suggesting that they do not exist as a people but rather as some sort of terrorist entity.  Netanyahu’s formulation would lead at best to the creation of a helot Arab state that could not possibly engage in any sustainable peace agreement unless compelled by brute force at the point of Israeli bayonets. Shouting and cheering congressmen endorsed every detail of the hateful Israeli program, supporting a foreign leader against their own president.  It was a shameful moment.

In return for considerably less than nothing, the Obama Administration committed itself to an “ironclad” guarantee of Israeli security, the precise details of which are apparently to be determined by Netanyahu.  It also rejected Palestinian plans to declare statehood at the United Nations in September and implied that it would veto any such attempt. The White House added that it would oppose any steps taken to isolate Israel in any other international fora.  Israel’s $3 billion-plus each year from the US taxpayer was also untouched.

So what does it all mean? It means that the Obama Administration has no leverage whatsoever against Netanyahu.  It has de facto accepted that there will be no peace process in the Middle East because Israel does not want there to be one.  It means that the United States will use its veto at the UN as well as other forms of suasion internationally to make sure that Israel is neither criticized nor isolated, no matter what Netanyahu and his colleagues do.  It means that largesse from the US taxpayer will continue, with plans afoot to budget the money out of the annual Pentagon appropriation so it will untouchable in any future debate over foreign aid packages.  It also means that the United States is part and parcel to the ongoing system of apartheid practiced by the Israelis.  To further punish the Palestinians there is even considerable talk in Congress about cutting US aid in response to the formation of a unity government between Fatah and Hamas.

Taken all together it means that the United States has absolutely no wiggle room in terms of its relationship with Israel.  Israel has tied the US Congress and media so tightly to it that President Obama could do little but agree.  When Israel attacks Gaza or Iran or Syria, as it surely will, Washington will be the accomplice to the act both factually and in the eyes of the world.  Hillary Clinton should resign in shame, but she appears to have no self respect in her, having spent last week again threatening the hapless Pakistanis.  Someone should remind her that Secretaries of State once represented Americans around the world in an honorable and forthright fashion.  Hillary and her boss have demonstrated clearly that Israel’s all-embracing and constantly expanding “security concerns” trump the United States’ interests every time.

Joseph Massad: Are Palestinian children less worthy?

NOVANEWS

 

Although Palestinian children endure lives of suffering, Obama’s love for their Israeli counterparts knows no limit.

http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/05/201152911579533291.html

What is it about Jewish and Arab children that privileges the first and spurns the second in the speeches of President Barack Obama, let alone in the Western media more generally? Are Jewish children smarter, prettier, whiter? Are they deserving of sympathy and solidarity, denied to Arab children, because they are innocent and unsullied by the guilt of their parents, themselves often referred to as “the children of Israel”? Or, is it that Arab children are dangerous, threatening, guilty, even dark and ugly, a situation that can only lead to Arabopaedophobia – the Western fear of Arab children?

Innocence and childhood are common themes in Western political discourse, official and unofficial. While it is a truism to state that since the end of European colonialism the US and Europe have been, at the official and unofficial levels, friendly to and supportive of the Zionist colonial project and hostile to Palestinians and Arabs in their resistance to Zionism, the expectation would be that a West that insists rhetorically on the “universalism” of its values would show at least a rhetorical commitment to the equality of Arab and Jewish children as victims of the violence visited on the region by Zionist colonialism and the resistance to it. Yet, the only Western sympathy manifest is to Jewish children as symbols of Zionist and Israeli innocence. This Western sympathy is deployed primarily to denounce Arab guilt, including the guilt of Arab children.

Indeed, the only time Arab children received any sympathy at all in the West was a few years ago when Israeli and US propaganda outlets, official and unofficial alike, mounted a major propaganda campaign to save these children from their barbaric Arab and Palestinian parents, who allegedly trained them to commit violent acts, or who unlovingly placed them in the middle of danger, sacrificing them for their violent political goals. It was not Israel who was to blame for killing Palestinian children, but the children’s own uncaring and cruel parents who placed them in the path of Israeli Jewish bullets, which left Israeli Jews no choice but to kill them. This of course is an old Israeli casuistry used to justify Israel’s carnage of Palestinians. Golda Meir had famously articulated the workings of Israel’s Jewish conscience thus: “We can forgive you for killing our sons. But we will never forgive you for making us kill yours.”

In the official discourse of post-World War II US power, Jewish children have been often invoked to illustrate the innocence of Israel, a tradition carried faithfully by Barack Obama’s rhetoric. Refusing to even acknowledge Arab children as victims of Israel, on June 4, 2009, Obama told Arabs in his Cairo speech: “It is a sign of neither courage nor power to shoot rockets at sleeping children, or to blow up old women on a bus. That is not how moral authority is claimed; that is how it is surrendered.” He reiterated this in his May 19, 2011 “winds of change” speech, declaring: “For decades, the conflict between Israelis and Arabs has cast a shadow over the region. For Israelis, it has meant living with the fear that their children could get blown up on a bus or by rockets fired at their homes, as well as the pain of knowing that other children in the region are taught to hate them.”

Later that week, in his speech to the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) on May 22, Obama expressed sympathy with the hardship colonising Jews experience while appropriating the lands of the Palestinians: “I saw the daily struggle to survive in the eyes of an eight-year old [Jewish] boy who lost his leg to a Hamas rocket.” He averred that the US and Israel, presumably unlike Palestinians or Arabs more generally, “both seek a region where families and their children can live free from the threat of violence”.

Endorsing Israel’s illegal occupation of East Jerusalem, he asserted: “We also know how difficult that search for security can be, especially for a small nation like Israel in a tough neighbourhood. I’ve seen it firsthand. When I touched my hand against the Western Wall and placed my prayer between its ancient stones, I thought of all the centuries that the children of Israel had longed to return to their ancient homeland.” Aside from borrowing anti-Black American white racism with the use of terms like “tough neighbourhood” – a term first borrowed by Binyamin Netanyahu to refer to the Middle East over a decade ago – wherein Arabs are the “violent blacks” of the Middle East and Jews are the “peaceful white folks”, Obama’s endorsement of the Israeli claim that East Jerusalem is part of the Jewish homeland is the first such official US endorsement of Israel’s illegal occupation of the city.

Nonetheless, Obama’s attention lay elsewhere, in the fear he expresses of Arab children. He first articulated this fear in his May 19 speech: “The fact is, a growing number of Palestinians live west of the Jordan River.” In his speech to AIPAC three days later, Obama reiterated his fear once more, as the first “fact” and threat that Israel, Jews, and the US must face: “Here are the facts we all must confront. First, the number of Palestinians living west of the Jordan River is growing rapidly and fundamentally reshaping the demographic realities of both Israel and the Palestinian territories.” This is hardly a new fear, as Israelis have annual conferences, and have developed all kinds of political and military strategies, to deal with their fear of Palestinian children, whom Israel’s President Shimon Peres calls a “demographic bomb” that he wants to defuse. Golda Meir herself once revealed in the early seventies that she could not sleep worrying about the number of Palestinian children being conceived every night. If children are the future – except that Arab children are a negation of it – then the crux of the argument is simple: Israel can only have a future with more Jewish children and fewer Arab children.

Murdering Arab children

The story of Arab children, and especially Palestinian ones, is not only tragic in the context of Israeli violence, but one that also remains ignored, deliberately marginalised, and purposely suppressed in the US and Western media – and in Western political discourse. When Zionist terrorists began to attack Palestinian civilians in the 1930s and 1940s, Palestinian children fell victims. The most famous of these attacks include the Zionist blowing up of Palestinian cafes with grenades (such as occurred in Jerusalem on March 17, 1937) and placing electrically timed mines in crowded market places (first used against Palestinians in Haifa on July 6, 1938).

While the violence of the 1930s was the first introduction to the Middle East of such horrific terrorist violence, it is in the 1947-48 Zionist invasion of Palestinian villages and towns that Palestinian children were deliberately not spared. In December 1947, one of the first attacks by the Haganah (the pre-Israel Zionist paramilitary army) first attacks – which would become typical in this period – targeted the Palestinian village of Khisas in the Galilee and killed four Palestinian children. This proved to be a small number compared with the subsequent mass murders awaiting the Palestinians. In the village of Al-Dawayimah, where the Haganah committed a massacre in October 1948, an Israeli army soldier, quoted by Israeli historian Benny Morris, described the scene as such:

The first [wave] of conquerors killed about 80 to 100 [male] Arabs, women, and children. The children they killed by breaking their heads with sticks. There was not a house without dead… One commander ordered a sapper to put two old women in a certain house… and to blow up the house with them. The sapper refused… The commander then ordered his men to put in the old women and the evil deed was done. One soldier boasted that he had raped a woman and then shot her. One woman, with a newborn baby in her arms, was employed to clean the courtyard where the soldiers ate. She worked a day or two. In the end they shot her and her baby.

Palestinian children were murdered along with adults in April 1948 in the Deir Yassin massacre, to name the most well known slaughter of 1948. This would continue not only during Israel’s wars against Arabs in 1956, 1967, 1973, 1978, 1982, 1996, 2006, and 2008, when thousands of children fell victim to indiscriminate Israeli bombardment, but also in more outright massacres: in Qibya in 1953 where even the school was not spared Israel’s destruction; in Kafr Kassem in 1956 where the Israeli army massacred 46 unarmed Palestinian citizens of Israel, 23 of whom were children. This trend would continue. In April 1970, during the War of Attrition with Egypt, Israel bombed an Egyptian elementary school in Bahr al-Baqar. Of the 130 school children in attendance, 46 were killed, and over 50 wounded, many of them maimed for life. The school was completely demolished. The first Israeli massacre at Qana in Lebanon in 1996 spared no child or adult, and the second massacre in the same village in 2006 did the same – adults aside, 16 children were killed that year.

The number of Palestinian children killed by Israeli soldiers in the first intifada (1987-1993) was 213, not counting the hundreds of induced miscarriages from tear gas grenades thrown inside closed areas targeting pregnant women, and aside from the number of the injured. The Swedish branch of Save the Children estimated that “23,600 to 29,900 children required medical treatment for their beating injuries in the first two years of the intifada”, one third of whom were children under the age of ten years old. In the same period, Palestinian attacks resulted in the death of five Israeli children. In the second intifada (2000-2004), Israeli soldiers killed more than 500 children with at least 10,000 injured, and 2,200 children arrested. The televised murder of the Palestinian child Muhammad al-Durra shook the world – but not Israeli Jews, whose government concocted the most outrageous and criminal of stories to exonerate Israel. In the Israeli attack on Gaza in December 2008, 1,400 Palestinians were killed, of whom 313 were children.

This exhibition of atrocity is not simply about regurgitating the history and present of Israel’s murder of Arab children for the past six decades and beyond – a history well-known across the Arab world – but to demonstrate how obscene Obama’s references to Jewish children are when he insists to Arabs that they must show sympathy with Jewish children, without ever enjoining Jews to show sympathy with the far larger number of Arab children killed by Jews. But Obama himself shows no sympathy with Arab children. Had he attempted to mourn the Arab children who fell and fall victim to Israeli violence at the rate of hundreds, if not thousands, of Arab children to one Jewish child, Arabs might have forgiven him this indiscretion.

Alas, Obama has no place in his heart for Arab children, only for Jewish ones. He even manages to infantilise Israeli Jewish soldiers who kill Palestinians, as nothing short of innocent children whose families miss them. In his AIPAC speech, Obama calls on Hamas “to release Gilad Shalit, who has been kept from his family for five long years”, but not on Israel to release the 6,000 Palestinian political prisoners, who include 300 Palestinian children, languishing in Israel’s dungeons for many more years. Perhaps Obama could have at least mentioned the reports of Israeli soldiers’ torture of detained Palestinian children issued in late 2010 by Israeli human rights groups. In the case of detained Palestinian sixth graders, in addition to being beaten up and deprived of sleep by Israeli soldiers, two thirteen-year old children testified that “the most awful thing that happened, was when the soldiers went to the bathroom, they peed on us and did not use the toilet. One of them videotaped it.” But Obama was not moved by their plight, for they were not Jewish children.

Zionism and Jewish children

Interestingly and unlike Obama, Zionism did not always show similar love towards Jewish children, whom it never flinched from sacrificing for its colonial goals. In the Nazi period, Zionist leaders, for example, protested strongly against granting European Jews refuge in any country other than Palestine. In December 1938, David Ben-Gurion responded to a British offer, in the aftermath of Kristallnacht, to take thousands of German Jewish children directly to Britain by saying: “If I knew it would be possible to save all the children in Germany by bringing them to England, and only half of them by transporting them to Eretz Yisrael (the land of Israel), then I would opt for the second alternative, for we must weigh not only the life of these children but also the history of the people of Israel.” In November 1940, the Zionists responded to the British-imposed restrictions on Jewish immigration to Palestine, long demanded by the Palestinian people, by blowing up a ship with Jewish civilian passengers in Haifa – killing 242 Jews, including scores of children. For Zionism, Jewish children are as expendable as Palestinian and Arab children, unless they serve its colonial goals. In light of this, it becomes clear that it is not simply the Jewishness or Arabness of children that makes them expendable or not, but their insertion into a political project as figures that can advance its goals or constitute obstacles to them.

Israel’s recruitment of Jewish children in paramilitary organisations, which began in 1948, continues apace, and is perhaps best exemplified in itsGadna [“Youth Battalions”] programme, where young Jewish boys and girls are prepared early for their future military service in the most militarised state on earth. The most outrageous use of Jewish children, however, would be illustrated when the Israeli army invited them to write messages of hate on the missiles about to be launched against Lebanese children during Israel’s July 2006 invasion of Lebanon. Captured by an Associated Press cameraman, the picture of blond Jewish girls near the Israeli town of Kiryat Shmona writing messages of death to Lebanese children circulated the globe – though it remains unclear if they ever made their way to Obama’s desk. It is important to note that Obama might have met these same blond girls when he visited Kiryat Shmona a few months earlier, in January 2006. He recalled later that the town resembled an ordinary suburb in the US, where he could imagine the sounds of Israeli children “at joyful play just like my own daughters”.

Teaching children to hate

Given this history, not only are Palestinian children guilty of hating Israeli Jews, but also, Obama insists, they have no reason to hate Jews unless their evil elders indoctrinate them to do so. Binyamin Netanyahu himself, in his speech before Congress last week, reiterated Obama’s condemnation of Palestinians who allegedly “continue to educate their children to hate”. But what about Israeli Jewish children’s hatred of Arabs? A March 2010 poll by Tel Aviv University found that 49.5 per cent of Israeli Jewish high school students believe Palestinian citizens of Israel should not be entitled to the same rights as Jews in Israel; 56 per cent believe they should not be eligible for election to the Knesset, the Israeli parliament. According to a report in January 2011 in the largest Israeli daily Yediot Aharonot, Jewish teachers in Israel stated that anti-Arab racism among Jewish students reached alarming levels, advocating killing Palestinians. The teachers found graffiti written on school walls and even on exam papers stating “Death To Arabs”. According to the report, a student at a school in Tel Aviv told his teacher during class that his dream is to become a soldier so he can exterminate all Arabs; several students in his class applauded in support of him. This, in no small amount, is the direct result of the racist Israeli school curricula with which Jewish children are regularly indoctrinated.

In his speech to Congress, Prime Minister Netanyahu correctly diagnosed the situation on the ground. He declared: “Our conflict has never been about the establishment of a Palestinian state. It has always been about the existence of the Jewish state.” It is the establishment of a Jewish settler colony that the Palestinians must accept to ensure a future for Jewish children and terminate a future for Palestinian children. Indeed it is precisely the refusal of Arabs to adopt Arabopedophobia that is the biggest impediment to peace in the region. Obama hopes that a Palestinian bantustan could limit the threat that Palestinian children constitute to the nightmare that is “the Jewish and democratic state”. He recognises that the world can no longer claim to support universalism while endorsing Israel’s right to discriminate against non-Jews. In his AIPAC speech, he said as much when he told Israel’s lobby that the entire world, including Asia, Latin America, Europe (and he could have added Africa, which he inexplicably excluded) and the Arab World can no longer tolerate Israel’s institutionalised racism; that America in fact stands alone with Israel today. Clearly, Obama’s love for Jewish children knows no limits. His Arabopaedophobic views, however, are not accidental, but are motivated by his great love for the “children of Israel”, a love that can only be realised through continued hatred and containment of all Arabs, children and adults alike.

Joseph Massad is Associate Professor of Modern Arab Politics and Intellectual History at Columbia University. He is author of The Persistence of the Palestinian Question (Routledge, 2006).

Dorothy Online Newsletter

NOVANEWS

Dear Friends,

5 juicy items below.

In item one Gideon Levy tells us something that many of us knew, and it really is not new news, but perhaps it is for some of you: many Israelis either have or want to have a foreign passport.  Why?  Well for a country that has seen 12 wars/military campaigns in less than 62 yrs  no wonder (Israel celebrated its 63 this year, but not much to celebrate).  Here life is under constant threat, real or imagined.  So just in case you have had enough when the next war comes, nice to have elsewhere to go to.

Item 2 reveals some of the comments Israel’s fascists have towards Muslims and leftists.  These home-grown Nazis are Jews!

In item 3 Netanyahu promises that on Sunday when Palestinians plan to repeat what they did on May 15, that ‘Israel will defend its sovereignty.’  Of course!  All that Israel knows is the use of force, and it has often in the past used it over and over again on innocent unarmed people.  I can only hope that my fears are unfounded.

Item 4 relates that the Rafah crossing that all waited for in anticipation ain’t what we thought or hoped it would be.  It has not changed the situation for most Gazans.  Seems as if those in power are still playing tootsie with Israel to keep the Gazans locked up.

I’ve saved the best for last.  In item 5 Richard Falk, who never minces words, expresses my feelings exactly, but so much better than I could, and with authority, to boot.  When I heard that Ban ki-Moon was working to stop the upcoming flotilla, arguing that humanitarian aid should be by land, I could hardly believe my ears.  And when I copied the article and distributed it, I said something to the effect that it’s not the aid but the blockade that is the main purpose of the flotilla.  Falk does not speak gently to Ban ki-Moon.  Thanks Richard Falk.  I hope that Ban ki-Moon takes your words to heart!

All the best,
Dorothy
_______________________


1. Haaretz,
 
June 02, 2011



Fear is driving Israelis to obtain foreign passports
More and more Israelis apply for a foreign passport, not for easier travel but because something has gone terribly wrong here.

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/fear-is-driving-israelis-to-obtain-foreign-passports-1.365454

By Gideon Levy

The numbers are climbing rapidly and the phenomenon is intriguing: Many Israelis are longing for a second passport. If Shimon Peres (now president ) once promised “a car for every worker,” a second passport is now becoming the object of desire. If our forefathers dreamt of an Israeli passport, there are those among us who are now dreaming of a foreign passport.

A Bar-Ilan University study published in the journal Eretz Acheret has found that roughly 100,000 Israelis already hold a German passport. Over the past decade, the trend has strengthened and some 7,000 more Israelis join them every year. To these should be added the thousands of Israelis who hold foreign passports, mostly European countries. The excuses are strange and diverse, but at the base of them all are unease and anxiety, both personal and national. The foreign passport has become an insurance policy against a rainy day. It turns out there are more and more Israelis who are thinking that day may eventually come.

In recent years the Israeli passport has become useful and effective. It opens the gates of most countries of the world, except for parts of the Arab and Muslim world. It is hard to believe that those applying for a second passport are doing so in order to vacation in Tehran, tour Benghazi or take in the sights of San’a. The alibi that a European passport makes entering the United States easier cannot fully explain the phenomenon, which has no equivalent in other developed countries.

It should not be condemned, though. It reflects a mood, a natural and understandable consequence of the real and imagined fears that have been sown here. When Avrum Burg boasted of his French passport several years ago, a public outcry arose, but in vain. Presumably some of those who cried out did so because they do not have the option, like he does, of obtaining an additional passport for themselves. The others may have since crowded onto the line at one embassy or another.

The fact that Germany, of all places, is the passport provider of preference should also no longer touch off feelings of anger or shame. For many Israelis, Germany has long since become a country like any other: Our cabinet ministers ride in Audis, and the washing machines we import from there excel in their German quality. The scare campaigns have been effective, and the passport applicants are responding in an intelligent and sensible way. It turns out that they are far more rational than their leaders: If the leaders so want to scare us of the Iranian bomb, the Muslim Brothers in Egypt and the hooligans from Gaza, if everything threatens to become a “Holocaust,” then it really does make sense to equip oneself with suitable means of protection. An additional passport, for example.

Anyone who believes an additional passport is a national shame and a social disgrace is invited to have a look at why Israelis desire them. If we had a leadership worthy of the name, one that instead of sowing anxieties did something to reduce them, and instead of terrifying us instilled hopes in us, then the lines at the German Embassy would have become shorter long ago. Instead of condemning the passport seekers, let us ask honestly and courageously: Why are they doing this? They are doing this because someone is scaring them, and no less so, because there is someone endangering our future here.

Passports? If the Palestinian people already had one real passport, maybe the Israelis wouldn’t need two. If Israel were to try at long last to be accepted in its region, with all that entails, then maybe the region would open to it by means of a single, blue and white passport. If Israel were also to take the advice of its friends in the world, especially in the countries of Europe, then perhaps we wouldn’t need their passports.

Israel is strong and established and ostensibly its passport should be sufficient for its citizens. The fact that it is not sufficient for many of them testifies, more than a thousand passports, that something has gone deeply wrong here. Israel, after all, arose to become a haven for the Jewish people, mainly from the horrors of Europe, yet in an irony of history, Europe is in fact becoming a haven for Israelis.

Anyone who can obtain an additional passport is of course invited to do so, but on the way back from the embassy he should ask whether his country has done everything in its power to ensure he will not need it. The answer to this is a resounding no. Still, I personally have no intention of applying for a second passport.
============================
2.    Ynetnews,
June 02, 2011


Jerusalem Day  [Wednesday, June 1, 2011]

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4077292,00.html
[to see the video, use the link]
Rightist arrested in Jerusalem Photo: Reuters
Rightists in Jerusalem: Muhammad is dead, butcher Arabs
Right-wing activists marching in Old City to celebrate Jerusalem Day Wednesday filmed chanting ‘Death to leftists,’ singing ‘Muhammad is dead’; police detain at least 15 people, both Jewish and Arab, during tense day in capital

Yair Altman Published:  06.02.11, 08:14 / Israel News
share

Dozens of right-wing activists marching through Jerusalem Wednesday were filmed chanting inflammatory messages and singing provocative songs in the capital, including “Muhammad is dead,” “May your village burn,” “Death to leftists,” and “Butcher the Arabs.”

The disturbing utterances were made during the traditional “Flag Dance” on the occasion of Jerusalem Day, which drew tens of thousands of Israelis to the capital to celebrate its unification following the 1967 Six-Day War.   צילום: תנועת סולידריות

World criticism: Netanyahu’s ‘PR process’

Commentators from news publications around world slam Congress’s rapturous approval for Netanyahu address. ‘US Jews don’t like finding themselves in position of choosing between their president and Israeli PM,’ says one

========================
3.  Haaretz,
 
June 02, 2011



Netanyahu: Israel will defend its sovereignty during planned border protests
Prime Minister says Syria, Iran behind Nakba Day mass protests earlier this month, adding that the same elements were pushing for riots in rallies scheduled for Sunday.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/netanyahu-israel-will-defend-its-sovereignty-during-planned-border-protests-1.365571

By Barak Ravid
Tags: Syria Iran Benjamin Netanyahu Lebanon

Israel will be decisive in protecting its borders against infiltrating protesters, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Thursday, warning Syria and Lebanon ahead of upcoming Naksa Day border protests.

“Like any country in the world, Israel has the right and duty to guard and defend its borders. Therefore my instructions are clear, to act with restraint, but with the necessary decisiveness to protect our borders, our communities and our citizens,” Netanyahu said in a speech.

The prime minister added that Iran, Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas were behind last month’s deadly demonstrations, saying “in the next few days those groups will retry to challenge Israel’s sovereignty.”

The IDF ha already accused Iran of orchestrating two waves of fighting along its northern borders, as Palestinian protesters tried to infiltrate from Syria and Lebanon during demonstrations to mark Nakba Day, which commemorates the “catastrophe” of the creation of the State of Israel.

Palestinians are planning to stage a similar protest on Sunday, which comes in response to another call on Facebook to cross Israel’s borders on the 44th anniversary of the start of 1967 Middle East War in which Israel captured East Jerusalem, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and Golan Heights.

Earlier Thursday, it was reported that the Lebanese Army declared the area around the country’s border with Israel a closed military zone, a move aimed at preventing Palestinian protesters from demonstrating in the area this weekend, a Lebanese army source said.

“The Lebanese Army declared the area a closed military zone to stop any escalation at the Lebanese border with Israel that could take place on Naksa Day,” a source said.

============================
4.  Washington Post Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Egypt limits crossings at Gaza border

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle-east/egypt-limits-crossings-at-gaza-border/2011/06/01/AGQKieGH_story.html

By Joel Greenberg,

JERUSALEM — Egypt reimposed restrictions Wednesday on the number of Palestinians allowed to enter from the Gaza Strip at the Rafah crossing, days after permanently opening the border point in a move to ease Israel’s blockade of the Hamas-ruled territory.

Hatem Aweidah, who is in charge of border crossings for the Hamas government in Gaza, said that Egyptian officials had set a limit of 350 to 400 travelers who would be granted entry each day, on the grounds that border personnel could not handle more.

A similar daily limit had been imposed in the months before the permanent opening on Saturday.

Hamas officials said that the number of people crossing into Egypt had dropped sharply Tuesday and that there were further delays Wednesday before differences over other proposed restrictions, such as submission of travelers’ names a day in advance, were resolved.

Under its blockade of Gaza, Israel allows in limited quantities of goods and bars the movement of people except for a restricted number of Palestinians receiving medical treatment or doing business in Israel.

Sari Bashi, executive director of Gisha, an Israeli rights group that monitors freedom of movement in Gaza, said that the latest restrictions at Rafah showed that Saturday’s reopening did not adequately offset the blockade.

“Rafah is an important but partial solution for Palestinians seeking to travel abroad, but it does not resolve the need for allowing passage through the Israeli-controlled crossings, especially to the West Bank,” Bashi said.
======================
5.  Al Jazeera,
 
June 02, 2011


A UN Secretary General vs Freedom Flotilla 2
Humanitarian ships to sail to Gaza again, despite current UN disapproval and a previous attempt that turned deadly.



Richard Falk

Freedom Flotilla 1 ships were intercepted by the Israeli navy, thereby denying Gaza of much-needed humanitarian aid following Operation Cast Lead in December 2008 to January 2009 [GALLO/GETTY]

It is expected that at the end of June, Freedom Flotilla 2 will set sail for Gaza, carrying various forms of humanitarian aid, including medical, school, and construction materials. This second flotilla will consist of 15 ships – including the Mavi Marmara from the first flotilla – sailing from Istanbul, but also vessels departing from several European countries, and carrying as many as 1,500 humanitarian activists as passengers. If these plans are carried out, as seems likely, it means that the second flotilla is about double the size of the first that was so violently intercepted by Israeli commandos in international waters on May 31, 2010, resulting in nine deaths on the Turkish lead ship.

Since that shocking incident of a year ago, the Arab Spring has changed the regional atmosphere, but it has not ended the unlawful blockade of Gaza, or the suffering inflicted on the Gazan population over the four-year period of coerced confinement. Such imprisonment of an occupied people has been punctuated by periodic violence, including the sustained all-out Israeli attack for three weeks at the end of 2008, during which even women, children, and the disabled were not allowed to leave the deadly killing fields of Gaza.

It is an extraordinary narrative of Israeli cruelty and deafening international silence. The silence was broken only by the brave civil society initiatives in recent years that brought both the symbolic relief of empathy and human solidarity, as well as the token amounts of substantive assistance in the form of much needed food and medicine. It is true that the new Egypt has opened the Rafah crossing a few days ago, allowing several hundred Gazans to leave or return to Gaza on a daily basis, but Rafah is not currently equipped to handle goods, and is available only to people, and so the blockade of imports and exports continues in force, and may even be intensified as Israel vents its anger over the Fatah/Hamas unity agreement.

Secretary General: No Flotilla

As the Greek coordinator of Freedom Flotilla 2, Vangelis Pisias has expressed the motivation of this new effort to break the blockade: “We will not allow Israel to set up open prisons and concentration camps.” Connecting this Gazan ordeal to the wider regional struggles, Pisias added, “Palestine is in our heart and could be the symbol of a new era in the region.”

A highly credible assessment of the Israeli 2010 attack on Freedom Flotilla 1 by a fact finding mission appointed by the UN Human Rights Council concluded that the Israelis had violated international law in several respects: by using excessive force, by wrongfully attacking humanitarian vessels in international waters, and by an unacceptable claim to be enforcing a blockade that was itself unlawful. Such views have been widely endorsed by a variety of respected sources throughout the international community, although the panel appointed by the UN Secretary General to evaluate the same incident has not yet made public its report, and apparently its conclusions will be unacceptably muted by the need to accommodate its Israeli member.

In light of these surrounding circumstances, including the failure of Israel to live up to its announced promise after the attack in 2010 to lift the blockade, it shocks our moral and legal sensibilities that the UN Secretary General should be using the authority of his office to persuade member governments to do their best to prevent ships from joining Freedom Flotilla 2. Ban Ki-moon shamelessly does not even balance such a call, purportedly to prevent the recurrence of violence, by at least sending an equivalent message to Israel insisting that the blockade end and that no force be used in relation to humanitarian initiatives of the sort being planned.

Instead of protecting those who would act on behalf of unlawful Palestinian victimisation, the UN Secretary General disgraces the office by taking a one-sided stand in support of one of the most flagrant and long lasting instances of injustice that has been allowed to persist in the world. True, his spokesperson tries to soften the impact of such a message by vacuously stating that “the situation in the Gaza Strip must be changed, and Israel must conduct real measures to end the siege.” We must ask why were these thoughts not express by the Secretary General himself and directly to Israel? Public relations is part of his job, but it is not a cover for crassly taking the wrong side in the controversy over whether or not Freedom Flotilla 2 is a legitimate humanitarian initiative freely undertaken by civil society without the slightest credible threat to Israeli security.

Appropriately, and not unexpectedly, the Turkish Government refuses to bow to such abusive pressures even when backed by the UN at its highest level. Ahmet Davutoglu, the widely respected Turkish foreign minister, has said repeatedly in recent weeks when asked about Freedom Flotilla 2, that no democratic government should claim the authority to exercise control over the initiatives of civil society, as represented by NGOs. Davutoglu has been quoted as saying, “[N]obody should expect from Turkey… to forget that nine civilians were killed last year […] Therefore we are sending a clear message to all those concerned. The same tragedy should not be repeated again.” Underscoring the unresolved essential issue he asked rhetorically, “[D]o we think that one member state is beyond international law?” Noting that Israel has still not offered an apology to Turkey or compensation to the families of those killed, Davutoglu makes clear that until such reasonable preconditions are met, Israel cannot be accepted “to be a partner in the region”.

Liberating Palestine: Arab Spring’s second stage

We should not overlook that further in the background of this sordid effort to interfere with Freedom Flotilla 2 is the geopolitical muscle of the United States that blindly (and dumbly) backs Israel no matter how outrageous or criminal its behaviour. And undoubtedly, this geopolitical pressure helps explain this attempted interference with a courageous and needed humanitarian initiative that should have been affirmed by the UN rather than condemned. It needs to be kept in mind that despite the near universal verbal objections of world leaders, including even Ban Ki-moon, to the Israeli blockade, no meaningful action has been yet taken by either governments or the UN in the face of Israel’s undisguised refusal to respect the requirements of belligerent occupation of Gaza as set forth in the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, and the First Additional Protocol appended thereto in 1977.

Liberating Palestine from occupation and refugee regimes should be a core, unifying priority of this second stage of the Arab Spring. Nothing could do more to manifest the external as well as the internal turn to democracy, constitutional governance, and human rights than displays of solidarity by new and newly reformist leaders in Arab countries with this unendurably long Palestinian struggle for justice and sustainable peace. It would also offer the world a contrast with the subservience to Israel recently on display in Washington, highlighted by inviting Binyamin Netanyahu to address an adoring US Congress, a rarity in the country’s treatment of foreign leaders paralleling the pandering speech given by president Obama to AIPAC, the Israeli lobbying organisation. It is unprecedented in the history of diplomacy that a leading sovereign state would so jeopardise its interests and abandon its values so as to avoid offending a small allied partner. It is in the American interest, as well as in the interest of the peoples of the Arab world, particularly the Palestinians, to unravel this mystery, and if not, to move the resolution of the conflict from Washington to the more geopolitically trustworthy auspices of Brazil, Turkey, Nordic countries, and even possibly Russia or China.

Richard Falk is Albert G. Milbank Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University and Visiting Distinguished Professor in Global and International Studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara. He has authored and edited numerous publications spanning a period of five decades, most recently editing the volume International Law and the Third World: Reshaping Justice (Routledge, 2008).

He is currently serving his third year of a six year term as a United Nations Special Rapporteur on Palestinian human rights.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial policy.

 

Military Escalation: "Phase Two" of the War on Libya

NOVANEWS
By Prof. Michel Chossudovsky

A new phase of the war is unfolding leading to a process of military escalation as well the eventual landing of US-NATO commandos on Libya’s shores.

An unprecedented deployment of naval power in the Mediterranean is occurring.

The USS George H W Bush supercarrier, the most advanced vessel in the US naval arsenal, together with its strike and carrier group has entered the Mediterranean, to join up with the Sixth Fleet in Naples.

Aircraft supercarrier USS George H W Bush (CVN77) is the World’s largest naval vessel: with “four-and-a-half acres of space on its flight deck, making it capable of housing 90 jets and helicopters. It is home to 5,500 crew”. Equipped with sophisticated electronic warfare systems, it is the World’s largest “mobile military base” (Manlio Dinucci, “Boots on the Ground”: Sarkozy and Cameron Prepare to Land in Libya, Global Research, May 31, 2011).

The USS George H.W. Bush Carrier Strike Group was sent on its “maiden voyage” to the Sixth Fleet area of naval operations, namely the Mediterranean.  It was “certified ready for combat operations” a month before the onset of the war on Libya. USS George H.W. Bush Strike Group Certified Combat Ready, February 21, 2011)

Subduing the Enemy into Total Submission

“Freedom at Work” is the USS GHWB’s “humanitarian logo”
CVN-77 insignia.png

The sheer size of the USS supercarrier George H. W. Bush, its advanced weapons systems, its destructive capabilities, not to mention its cost, are the outright expression of America’s imperial ambitions run amok. Under the “Shock and Awe” doctrine, the USS George H. W Bush is intended to astound and subdue the enemy into total submission.

Military Escalation

Since the beginning of the war on March 19, approximately 10,000 sorties have been conducted. NATO acknowledges a total of 9036 sorties, including 3443 strike sorties over a two month period, (March 31, 2011-May 31, 2011).

With the deployment of the USS George H. W. Bush and its Strike Carrier Group together with other allied warships, a new stage of the war is unfolding.

Military operations are no longer limited to a high altitude bombing campaign, where strike targets are “pre-approved” and planned in advance. The deployment of helicopters and low altitude air operations are envisaged. The latter are to support the deployment of US-NATO commandos and rebel forces on the ground.

Britain’s HMS Ocean deployed out of Cyprus, is equipped as a Helicopter Carrier, for Apache helicopters.

The Apaches would be dispatched from HMS Ocean, Britain’s largest warship. In mid-May, naval exercises were held off the coast of Cyprus involving British and Dutch navy warships with HMS Ocean playing a central role as a helicopter carrier.  “The exercise included air defence practice and live firing at sea with amphibious exercises in coastal waters”.

In turn, France confirmed that it would be deploying its Tiger attack helicopters.

We can therefore expect in the weeks to come a major shift in the nature of military operations; the sending in of commandos in support of land operations, with helicopters and low altitude air deployments playing an important role. (These low altitude flights would not be limited to predator drones).

The nature of air operations will, therefore, become more focussed. The stated objective is “to bring the air campaign closer to the ground”. The USS GNWB supercarrier and strike group will play a key role in the implementation of the next phase of the war.

Video: USS H. W. Bush (CVN77) together with its Carrier Strike Group 2 (Source US Navy)

See also video at http://bfbs.com/news/uk/military-giant-seas-calls-port-48131.html

File:HMS Ocean, in parade formation.jpg

HMS Ocean Helicopter Carrier

Apache Helicopters

Simulating the Mediterranean War Theater: The “Saxon Warrior” War Games

In the week prior to its “maiden voyage” to the Mediterranean, the USS H. W. Bush (CVN77) together with its Carrier Strike Group 2, took part in extensive war games off the coast of Cornwall (UK) under the auspices of HM Royal Navy (19-26 May 2011).

Dubbed “Exercise Saxon Warrior”, the war games were carried out in a maritime environment, with the participation of British, US, French, German, Swedish and Spanish war ships. All in all, the war games involved the participation of 26 separate naval units. (EGFE Movements » Exercise Saxon Warrior).

Of significance, the “Saxon Warrior” is among the largest war games conducted by the Royal Navy, in close liaison with the US Navy, NATO and the Pentagon:

“[They are] intended to hone the skills of the Bush Carrier Strike Group… so it can work smoothly with European forces during its current deployment. [in the Mediterranean against Libya ((M.C.)]

“The George H W Bush Strike Group is well prepared for this deployment,” said Rear Admiral Nora Tyson, the task group commander – and the first female admiral of a US carrier force.

“We’re delighted to be participants in Saxon Warrior. It provides an ideal opportunity for all the ships in the group to enhance our ability to operate seamlessly and effectively with other NATO units.” ( George Bush bound for Portsmouth after war games with Royal Navy navynews.co.uk, emphasis added)

The war games bear a direct relationship to the “real war”. The Saxon Warrior simulated both the multi-national command structure as well as the naval configuration of the NATO led war in the Mediterranean, i.e. in terms of naval, air force, helicopter deployment and possible ground force operations. The 5500 sailors on board the USS George H. W. Bush are intended to be used in the case of commando landings on enemy territory:

[The Saxon Warrior is] “an exercise designed to develop theater-specific combat skills as well as enhancecooperation between multi-national forces and government agencies. … Saxon Warrior presents a myriad of challenges to the multi-national and multi-platform force by creating a diverse and unpredictable war environment based on fictional geo-political and military scenarios.” (George H.W. Bush Strike Group Participates in Saxon Warrior, http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=60543, emphasis added)

While conducted under the auspices of the British Navy, low flying military aircraft and helicopter exercises were also undertaken in South West England and parts of Wales, simulating conditions in a fictitious enemy country. The focus on helicopter and low altitude air operations is fully consistent with the next stage of the war on Libya (as discussed above).

The “Saxon Warrior” war games are viewed by the US military as providing “an opportunity, as a deployed force, to integrate coalition partners into our command structure and that is happening for the first time,” (Capt. Patrick. O. Shea, USS Gettysburg commanding officer, .Military News: Gettysburg Participates in Saxon Warrior, May 24, 2011).

While The Royal Navy coordinated the war games, the US naval force, in terms of military deployments and “simulated command structures” was by far the key player.

The eight-day exercise involved “single-mission” stand-alone scenarios “encompassing surface, submarine, and air combat”. The last day on May 26 culminated “with a simulated war” in a maritime environment.

While based on “fictional” geopolitical and military scenarios, the participants in “Saxon Warrior” were acutely aware that they were training for the war on Libya:

“We are training in a deployed operation, so it improves our readiness should we become involved in any real world operations.” (Ibid, emphasis added)

Saxon Warrior presents an opportunity to face a variety of geopolitical situations that change from day to day, …

“Saxon Warrior gives us a challenging environment in which to use our war fighting skills,” “We have to think quickly outside the box. The more agile we are, the more prepared we’ll be for any mission that comes up during deployment. That’s the beauty of Saxon Warrior.”

“The beauty of operating with coalition partners is that we practice with them, learn their strengths and then blend those strengths together to make the most potent coalition force possible.” George H.W. Bush Strike Group participates in Saxon Warrior 11 .norfolknavyflagship.com, May 26, 2011, emphasis added)

The Anglo-American Military Axis

These war games are part of a framework of advanced military co-operation between London and Washington, involving the de facto integration of British and US command structures. The war games had been scheduled to coincide with President Barack Obama’s official State visit to the UK, highlighted as a “Special Relationship” between Britain and America.

Of significance, the high level meetings between President Barack Obama and Prime Minister David Cameron were conducive to the formal establishment of a joint National Security Board, with an mandate to coordinate military decision-making as well as foreign policy. Headed by the U.S. and British national security advisers, the joint National Security Board seeks to further consolidate the Anglo-American military axis.

The Next Phase of the War on Libya

What is unfolding is an escalation of military operations, which at the same time is leading to a protracted war.

This shift in the direction of military operations geared towards aerial and helicopter support to “boots on the ground” commandos will not necessarily lead to an all out invasion, at least in the foreseeable future.

The USS H. W. Bush and its joint carrier group will be playing a key role in supporting ground operations through helicopter and low altitude air sorties.

“The Aircraft Carrier George H.W. Bush is flanked by a battle group consisting of the guided missile destroyers Truxtun and Mitscher, the missile cruiser Gettysburg and Anzio and eight squadrons of aircraft. It’s going to strengthen the Sixth Fleet, whose command is in Naples, alongside other units, including the nuclear submarines Providence, Florida and Scranton. Also added to the Sixth Fleet was one of the most powerful amphibious strike groups, led by the USS Bataan, which alone can land more than 2,000 marines, equipped with helicopters and vertical takeoff planes, artillery and tanks. It is flanked by two other amphibious assault ships, the Mesa Verde and the Whidbey Island, which from May 13-18 visited Taranto in Italy. The Whidbey Island has four huge air cushion landing crafts that, within a radius of 300 miles, can deliver 200 men at a time very quickly to the coast of a country without the ship being visible from land. (Manlio Dinucci, “Boots on the Ground”: Sarkozy and Cameron Prepare to Land in Libya, Global Research, May 31, 2011)

Special Forces have been on the ground in Libya since the onset of the air campaign.

Mercenary forces on contract to NATO are also being deployed. (See Manlio Dinucci, A Secret Army of Mercenaries for the Middle East and North Africa, Global Research, May 24, 2011).

“Shock and Awe”

As part of a “Shock and Awe” strategy, bunker buster BLU 109 2000 pounds bombs are to be dropped on Libya using Britain’s RAF tornado fighter jets. Shock and Awe is part of the “doctrine of rapid dominance” or “decisive force”, used to intimidate the adversary into submission, as well terrify the civilian population. (see video clip below)

Royal Air Force Tornado GR4A

Nuclear Weapons against Libya

It is worth noting that the use of  Shock and Awe tactical nuclear weapons against Libya has been contemplated as part of this “humanitarian war”.  In 1996, Libya was the “chosen country” in the Middle East and North Africa to be targeted with a B61-11 tactical nuclear weapon. The latter is a bunker buster bomb equipped with a nuclear warhead.

The plan to nuke Libya was never scrapped.  Of utmost significance, shortly after the commencement of the bombing campaign on March 19, the Pentagon ordered the testing of the functionality of B61-11 nuclear bomb. These tests were conducted  using the same B2 Stealth Bombers, out of the same US military base in Missouri, which were used to coordinate the B2 Stealth bombing raids on Libya at the outset of the war on March 19. (See Michel Chossudovsky, Dangerous Crossroads: Is America Considering the Use of Nuclear Weapons against Libya? Global Research, April 7, 2011)

These various developments point to a dangerous process of military escalation, which could potentially extend beyond Libya’s borders. The broader economic and geo-strategic implications of this war are far-reaching.

NOTE

The George H.W. Bush Strike Group is made up of
Carrier Strike Group (CSG) 2,
USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77),
Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 8,
Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 22 staff,
guided-missile cruisers USS Gettysburg (CG 64) and
USS Anzio (CG 68),
and guided-missile destroyers USS Truxtun (DDG 103)
and USS Mitscher (DDG 57).

The Greatest Depression Has Only Begun

NOVANEWS
By Global Research

The greatest depression in human history is still in its starting stages. What the media and many officials often refer to as the “hangover” from the global financial crisis is in fact the end of the beginning. Originating in 2008, the global economic crisis took the world by storm: banks collapsed, the “too big to fail” became bigger by consolidating the rest, governments bailed out their financial industries, masses of people lost their jobs, the ‘developing’ world was plunged into a deep systemic crisis, food prices rose, which in time spurred social unrest; and the Western nations that took on the bad debts of the big banks are on the precipice of a great global debt crisis, originating in Europe, hitting Greece and Spain, but destined to consume the industrialized world itself. Though many claim that we are in a “recovery,” things could not be further from the truth.
As the mainstream media is finally catching on to the reality of the mirage of the so-called “recovery”, reports are surfacing about a dire global economic situation:

“Evidence of a deterioration of global manufacturing growth and renewed weakness in job creation in the United States emerged Wednesday, two reversals that have markets bracing for an economic pause, or worse… Add to that a daunting list of aggravating factors: the continued implosion of the U.S. housing market, an outbreak of worldwide risk aversion, high crude-oil and gas prices pinching consumer demand, further tightening in China and other emerging-market economies, stock market losses, lack of credit growth, the looming end to the Fed’s monetary stimulus, weak business capital spending, and the still-unfolding sovereign debt crisis in Europe.”
And now top financial experts are warning of a new financial crisis altogether, since the monstrous derivatives market that played such a nefarious role in the preceding crisis has not been altered, nor have its systemic risks been addressed. The derivatives market – essentially a fictional electronic market of high-stakes gambling – has a value ten times that of the entire global gross national product of the world’s countries combined. This market is dominated by hedge funds and the “too big to fail” banks, who in fact created the derivatives trading schemes. As one leading hedge fund manager recently stated, “There is definitely going to be another financial crisis around the corner… because we haven’t solved any of the things that caused the previous crisis.” The market for derivatives is somewhere in the realm of $600 trillion.
The most recent publication by Global Research, “The Global Economic Crisis: The Great Depression of the XXI Century,” (Michel Chossudovsky and Andrew Gavni Marshall, editors) examines the true nature of the crisis the world faces; not only its historical origins, but its depth and future repercussions. No other book on the subject takes such a nuanced and multi-faceted approach to examining the global economic crisis. Over a dozen different authors, researchers, economists, academics and former policy-makers contributed to this important book. Included within are: an examination of the history of the central banking system, the emergence and role of neoliberalism, the myth of the “free market”, the role of war and empire, the National Security State, the relationship between economic crisis and the militarization of domestic society, global poverty, the food crisis, the roles played by major think tanks such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group, the nature of the derivatives market, the uses of the crisis as an “opportunity” to forge ahead with long-held plans for a global central bank, a global currency, and a global government, and much much more.
This book is not merely a history, it is a warning, and its message should be heeded now more than ever. As the crisis continues and deepens, as the wars exapand and multiply, as the very institutions that created the crisis are given more power, and as governments become more repressive and people become more resistant, it is vital for all to know the true nature of the crisis we face, the reality of who caused it, and where it is taking the world.

“This important collection offers the reader a most comprehensive analysis of the various facets – especially the financial, social and military ramifications – from an outstanding list of world-class social thinkers.” -Mario Seccareccia, Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa
“In-depth investigations of the inner workings of the plutocracy in crisis, presented by some of our best politico-economic analysts. This book should help put to rest the hallucinations of ‘free market’ ideology.” -Michael Parenti, author of God and His Demons and Contrary Notions

“Provides a very readable exposé of a global economic system, manipulated by a handful of extremely powerful economic actors for their own benefit, to enrich a few at the expense of an ever-growing majority.” -David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor Revisited

Saudi Arabia: Saudiazation and Expatriates

NOVANEWS



In its latest efforts towards Saudiazation Saudi Arabia’s Minister of Labor, Adel Faqih, announced that expatriates who have lived in the Kingdom for six years (or longer – sic) will be prohibited from renewing their work permit.  According to Faqih, in an article which appears in Al Watan newspaper, companies will be given five months to adjust and comply with this ruling. This decision is to further combat rising unemployment among Saudi nationals. It is estimated that half a million Saudis of working age are currently employed as compared to eight million employed expatriates who send an estimated 100 billion riyals (US$26.6) back to their respective home countries annually.

The decision announced by Faqih has far reaching implications.  A large number of Saudi’s expatriates are from the poorer Asian countries of Pakistan, India, Philippines and Indonesia where the expatriate worker is often the primary support system of a large and extended family back home. Other GCC nationals working in Saudi Arabia can be impacted by this decision as well.

At the same time the ‘coming to age’ of the Kingdom’s next generation which make up the majority of the population should have viable opportunities to contribute and work in their home country.  While there will likely be ripples during the latest decree of Saudiazation in the longer term this is a necessary action for stability within Saudi Arabia.

Mondoweiss Online Newsletter

NOVANEWS

Mustafa Barghouthi’s 2-state/1-state straddle

Jun 01, 2011

Philip Weiss

Yesterday the Atlanta Journal Constitution ran a fine piece by Mustafa Barghouthi, the Palestinian leader, saying that he could support a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders– but forget about this land-swaps business. As he explains:

Our best West Bank land and aquifers would go to Israeli settlements in exchange for sub-standard land elsewhere. Already, Israel uses 80 percent of West Bank water resources and on a per capita basis Israeli settlers use approximately 48 times more water than Palestinians. The current unjust water distribution is likely to be made permanent if Israel keeps settlements, all of which are illegal under international law.

Israel’s retention of settlement blocs and a military presence in the Jordan Valley will make our state noncontiguous and nonviable. Our state would be little more than disconnected Bantustans.

Barghouthi is on an American swing and I saw him last Thursday at the Nation. He’s a very impressive statesman– tough, thoughtful, seasoned, charming, goodlooking. The sort of person you hope will help to lead a country before long.

During that session Barghouthi said that Netanyahu’s speech to Congress was the “death sentence of the two-state solution” because it promised Bantustans and ghettoes. And if Netanyahu really believes that life for Palestinians inside Israel is such a paradise– Israel offers the best political conditions for Arabs anywhere in the region, Netanyahu said– then why not extend those freedoms to all the other Palestinians, in a one-state solution?

I found Barghouthi’s position a little too clever, and during the Q-and-A, I asked this question: Two years ago I heard you speak in Palestine, outside the Ofer prison, and say that if Israel can’t give Palestinians a viable state, why can’t we try living in one democratic state. Well now it’s two years later, there are tons more settlers, and I hear you saying the same thing. Why don’t you tell us what your vision is of the future?

To his credit, Barghouthi didn’t pause. I think the one state solution is the best idea, he said. (This isn’t an exact quote; I was taking occasional notes, the session was recorded but has not yet been posted at the Nation site).

I said, Well why not make that your program?

He said, “We will not fall into the same trap [as we did in the past]… of allowing them to accuse us of destroying the two state solution.” If Israel really does leave the occupied territories, then we can talk about a two-state solution and talk about a federated agreement between states. But that, he said, would be a “miracle.”

So isn’t it just rhetoric, I said, when you talk about the two-state solution?

Barghouthi said, “The first day we declare that we are giving up on a two-state solution… they will say, you are the ones who want to destroy Israel.”

I left the meeting with enormous sympathy for Barghouthi. He knows what happened to Arafat after Camp David. Clinton blamed the failure of the talks on him, and even today Eliot Spitzer echoes that theme on his cable show. (Yes and when will a Palestinian have a cable show?) Barghouthi knows how slanted the American discourse is in favor of the Jewish state, so he can’t be seen to oppose it, and yet he surely doesn’t believe in a Jewish state– as a man born in Jerusalem who can’t even go to his birthplace!

As always, I thought about American Jews. Barghouthi cannot be clear about his program, I believe, because American Jews are wed to the idea of the need for a Jewish state. If they were not wed to this idea– if they accepted the possibility that they might not need a second state to run to when things get hot here– it would liberate Barghouthi to discuss these issues frankly in the U.S., and surely lead to more flexible American policymaking overseas.

But maybe that’s another miracle?

Palestinians consider legal maneuver to overcome US veto of statehood in Security Council come September

Jun 01, 2011

Kate

and other news from Today in Palestine:

Land, property, resource theft & destruction / Ethnic cleansing / Apartheid / Settlers
Jerusalem
Hundreds of Israelis march through East Jerusalem under heavy security
Haaretz 1 June — Police arrest 15 people in clashes following a flag procession marking 44 years since Jerusalem’s reunification in the 1967 Six-Day War … About 30,000 Israelis were expected to take part in the march through Sheikh Jarrah, past a contentious Jewish enclave there … Two of the left-wing activists protesting the march were reportedly arrested. Five residents of East Jerusalem were arrested after hurling stone at the march. Near Jerusalem’s Damascus Gate, five Jewish men were arrested after uttering nationalistic calls at nearby Israeli Arabs and reportedly attempting to strike them. In the city’s Hanevi’im Street, two marchers were arrested after hurling objects at Israeli Arabs passing nearby. No injuries were reported in any of the incidents. In a separate incident, One man was arrested after entering a Sheikh Jarrah mosque, waving a flag.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/hundreds-of-israelis-march-through-east-jerusalem-under-heavy-security-1.365356
Police arrest Palestinian journalists outside Al-Aqsa
Silwan, Jerusalem (SILWANIC) 1 June — Israeli forces arrested two Palestinian journalists in the Al-Aqsa courtyard today at 1pm. Muna Qawasmi of Al-Quds newspaper and Maisa Abu-Ghazaleh were seized by Israeli police, who alleged that the two had been following Jewish groups in the Old City and photographing them. Witnesses state the police confiscated the journalists’ mobile phones and cameras on the spot. Qawasmi and Abu-Ghazaleh were then transferred first to Bab Alsilsila police station then Alqishla in Jaffa Gate.
http://silwanic.net/?p=17625
$8.4 million European-Palestinian agreement to support Jerusalem projects
MEMO 1 June — On Tuesday, May 31, the Palestinian Authority and the European Union signed a €6 million agreement (approximately $8.4 million) to support developmental, cultural, educational, health, humanitarian, and human law projects in Jerusalem.  The head of the Palestinian Authority President’s office, Hussein Al Araj, who signed the agreement on behalf of the Palestinian side, was quoted by official PA media sources as saying that he hoped that the plan would receive Arab and Muslim support in combating Israeli schemes to Judaize Jerusalem.
http://www.middleeastmonitor.org.uk/news/middle-east/2419-84-million-european-palestinian-agreement-to-support-jerusalem-projects
Israeli forces arrest five children while playing
Silwan, Jerusalem (SILWANIC) 1 June — Five Palestinian children were arrested by Israeli forces in Silwan at 3:45pm today. Amer Walid Siyam (7), Tamer Walid Siyam (11), Ahmed Khaled Rajaby (11), Mohammed Ibrahim Riwadi (10) and Rawnaq Zaki Zaytun (8) were playing when they were seized by Israeli forces from Alwar Hill between Bir Ayyub and Alabasya districts. Residents state that the situation had been quiet in the region at the time of the arrests. The Israeli forces were seen leaving an Elad settlement in the area to close in on the children. As yet the children’s families have not been notified as to where they are being held.
http://silwanic.net/?p=17623
Israeli forces storm Bir Ayyub
Silwan, Jerusalem (SILWANIC) 1 June — A convoy of Israeli military vehicles stormed Bir Ayyub district last night at 7pm, kidnapping two children. Tamer, 10, and an unknown youth were taken by Israeli troops. Tamer’s mother told Silwanic that his father is already imprisoned, on a double life sentence, while his eldest brother Tha‘er, 19, has been serving a house arrest sentence for the last two weeks. “I’m afraid for my son,” she said.”“I am powerless in the fact of this repression and systematic targeting of our children.” A spate of child arrests has gripped Silwan in recent days, despite an otherwise calm atmosphere in the area.
http://silwanic.net/?p=17577
Israeli forces raid Ein Aluza house, one arrested
Silwan, Jerusalem (SILWANIC) 1 June — A large force of Israeli troops stormed a Palestinian home in Ein Aluza district last night at 11pm. No explanation was given by troops to Ibrahim Odeh, the house owner, for the kidnapping of his son, Fadi Odeh, 16.
http://silwanic.net/?p=17575
Youths seized by Israeli special forces
Silwan, Jerusalem (SILWANIC) 1 June — Israeli special forces kidnapped two Palestinian boys from Wadi Hilweh district of Silwan late last night. Murad al-Banna, 18, and an unknown youth were seized by troops last night on the pretext of stone-throwing and involvement in local protests. Al-Banna had been on his way home from a gathering to mourn the death of a relative in the Al-Bustan region when he was arrested. Al-Banna’s brother told Silwanic that the allegations of stone-throwing are clearly falsified, given that his hand is currently broken. “How could Murad throw a stone with a broken hand?” he asked. “Moreover, Silwan was quiet last night – no protests!”
http://silwanic.net/?p=17570
Report: Israel has rounded up 1,200 minors [in Jerusalem] since start of 2010
OCCUPIED JERUSALEM, (PIC) 31 May — A report released Tuesday reveals a drastic escalation in friction between Israeli police and the Palestinian citizens of Jerusalem, especially those in the Silwan and Al-Issawiyya districts. Issued by the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, the report documents that police since the beginning of 2010 rounded up 1,200 Palestinians suspected of throwing stones and kept some 760 of them in custody. About a third of those arrested were indicted and imprisoned until the end of the legal proceedings, the ACRI said. “The large numerical gap between the youth who were questioned and arrested and those who were actually indicted speaks to the suspicions of Palestinians, who believe that most of these arrests and interrogations are intended solely to intimidate the minors,” the report says.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7
Celebrating United Jerusalem – in Sheikh Jarrah / Adam Keller
28 May — On June 7, 1967 IDF soldiers entered the Old City of Jerusalem. This historic event left the famous photos, shown at any Israeli history book, of paratroopers crying with joy at the Wailing Wall. Three days later, in the early evening hours of June 10, the paratroopers were followed by the State of Israel’s bulldozers, making an impressive debut appearance in East Jerusalem. All residents of the Mughrabi Quarter, which was founded in 1193 and had been part of the Jerusalem landscape for nearly eight centuries, were ordered to evacuate their homes immediately. The entire quarter – 135 houses were destroyed and completely razed within hours. All traces were removed and the large, impressive Wailing Wall Plaza came into being. It is likely that during this historic event, too, some tears were shed, but the photographers were no longer present. To commemorate these exciting events, the State of Israel set up the annual Jerusalem Day
http://adam-keller2.blogspot.com/2011/05/celebrating-united-jerusalem-in-sheikh.html
PM: Jerusalem being abandoned
Ynet 1 June — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lamented the fact that Jerusalem’s youth are “abandoning” the city but vowed to make infrastructure changes that would change this. Speaking at a special Knesset hearing held in honor of Jerusalem Day, Netanyahu promised to build more schools and improve transportation to and within the city … On Tuesday Netanyahu defied pressure from the United States and Europe to share Jerusalem, saying that he will not stand for the division of the capital and insinuating that he plans to authorize more construction there.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4076836,00.html
Netanyahu: Arabs and Jews alike benefit from united Jerusalem
Haaretz 1 June —  … Knesset speaker Reuven Rivlin delivered a political message of his own at the Knesset session, highlighting the disparities between the western and eastern parts of the city. “We promised a united Jerusalem but we failed to deliver,” he said. “We built the City of David, established Ma’ale Hazeytim, salvaged the Hurva Synagogue from ruin – but what have we done for Ras al-Amud? What have we done for the children living in East Jerusalem who can’t find a school that will have them?” Rivlin went on to describe the “barely functioning” postal services in East Jerusalem.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/netanyahu-arabs-and-jews-alike-benefit-from-unified-jerusalem-1.365328
Peres: Jerusalem will see peace in our time
Haaretz 1 June — President Shimon Peres said Wednesday that peace could be achieved in Jerusalem in “our time”, declaring that Israel has replaced the divisions that once wracked the holy city by offering freedom to all faiths and creeds.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/peres-jerusalem-will-see-peace-in-our-time-1.365361
Elsewhere
Vote on Bedouin housing postponed
Ynet 31 May — The Prime Minister’s Office has decided to postpone the presentation of a report reviewing the status of Bedouin settlements in the Negev, as well as the subsequent government vote on its conclusions, Ynet learned Tuesday. The decision followed what was described as extensive pressure by the various parties, most notably over the report’s recommendation to allot Bedouins in the Negev hundreds of thousands of acres of land, in favor of future towns. Both the Right and the Left have reportedly claimed that the Bedouins’ persistent refusal to settle in regulated townships — as offered by various governments over decades – has rendered them ineligible to receive the scopes of land recommended in the report.The Bedouin settlement plan, put together by a special unit in the Prime Minister’s Office, aims to regulate the land issue, and prevent Bedouin tribes from illegally squatting across the Negev.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4076737,00.html
2 hurt in attack in Bethlehem village
BETHLEHEM (Ma‘an) 31 May — Israeli settlers injured two Palestinians in the Sinjil village Tuesday, residents said. The settlers filmed an attack on one of the Palestinians, according to onlookers in the Ramallah village. The mayor called the Palestinian Authority, which coordinated with Israel the settlers’ evacuation.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=392545
Settler arson attack on the village of Madama
ISM 1 June — On Monday 30 May at 4pm, the villagers of Madama reported that a fire had been started by seven to eight settlers in one of the village’s wheat fields. The field was close to the place where less than a week ago, Hamad Jaber Qut – a 66 year old shepherd, was attacked by 15 settler youths with knives and sticks whilst tending his sheep and getting ready for prayer. Mohammed, a resident of Madama, witnessed the arson attack which came at the hands of settlers who reside in the illegal settlement, Yizhar which is 1.5km away on top of one of the hills overlooking the Palestinian village. Mohammed saw them throw petrol and light the wheat. On seeing the smoke, the residents of Madama called the fire brigade to put the fire out, by which time the settlers had retreated back into the settlement. The fire was put out in due course.
http://palsolidarity.org/2011/06/18642/
Bethlehem: Checkpoint at dawn with Palestinian workers
AIC 1 June — 2410 people crossed the Bethlehem checkpoint the other day in two hours and forty five minutes, from 3.55AM to 6.40AM. “A good average if compared to a regular day,” related a volunteer of the Ecumenical Accompaniment Programme in Palestine and Israel (EAPPI), an association that monitors the Bethlehem check point twice weekly. Sometimes we stay here until 7.45-8 AM for the same number of people.” … Every morning the workers wait at least one hour in an iron cage, outside. The cage’s broken roof doesn’t spare them from the cold of winter, the terrible heat of summer and the rain. This cage is more than 100 metres long but once inside it feels never ending … This is only the first step, a sort of people flow control before the real checkpoint.
http://www.alternativenews.org/english/index.php/topics/news/3638-bethlehem-checkpoint-at-dawn-with-palestinian-workers-
Gaza
Hamas: Rafah border is paralyzed
Ahram 1 June — Palestinian officials told Ahram Online that Rafah Crossing is paralysed after Egyptian authorities restored restrictions on the border with Gaza Wednesday. Only two buses crossed from Egypt to Gaza during Wednesday, according to Ghazy Hamad, a senior official to the Hamas foreign minister in Gaza. He added that there is disagreement between Hamas and Egypt over the number of travellers to be permitted to cross every day, and the criteria under which people can gain entry visas, whether to Gaza or Egypt…  “Ninety five per cent of the people on this blacklist do not have security problems with Egypt; the list also includes old women in their seventieth year,” Hamad said.http://english.ahram.org.eg/~/NewsContent/2/8/13439/World/Region/Rafah-crossing-is-paralysed-Hamas.aspx
PA ambassador to address Egypt’s Rafah blacklist
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 1 June — Officials at the Palestinian embassy to Egypt said Wednesday that contacts were being made with Egyptian authorities over the publication of a list of 5,000 blacklisted from travel through the newly opened Rafah crossing. Sources said there were already promises from Cairo to review the names on the list, which were principally Gaza residents currently inside the coastal enclave. If on the blacklist, a Palestinian cannot receive permission to travel via the crossing with Egypt. Representative of Palestine in Cairo Mohammad Arafat said the situation was being handled delicately, following Egyptian insistence that all efforts already made came in the face of immense pressure from Israel and the United States. “Egypt is under Israeli and US pressure to close Rafah and to keep the situation as it was after June 2007,” Arafat told Ma‘an
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=392817
Scores at Rafah spark tension with Egypt
RAFAH (Ma‘an) 1 June — An escalated crisis between Egypt and the Hamas government of the Gaza Strip was dampened Tuesday night, as officials met over ways to handle the flood of Palestinians seeking to cross the Rafah border terminal … On the first day of full operations, 530 Palestinians used the terminal crossing both ways, while the second day saw 845 Palestinians pass through the terminal. On Monday, the third day of operations, 722 Palestinians entered or exited Gaza. The slow process and long lines frustrated officials, while a list of more than 5,000 Palestinians blacklisted from using the terminal sparked anger from Hamas. Officials traded increasingly headed accusations over who failed in the creation of a mechanism to allow Palestinians to use Rafah, culminating in a late-night meeting between security personnel from both sides. Following the meeting, the officials announced that a cap of 400 travelers per day would be set on the crossing, and the names of the permitted passengers would be posted one day ahead of travel … Hamas officials in Gaza have accused Egyptians of failing to meet their pledge to fully open the crossing. In Cairo, however, officials say they are doing more than enough, noting the move is already a challenge to Israel.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=392780
Egypt: Consulate may open in Gaza after govt formed
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 1 June — Egypt is seriously considering the possibility of opening a consulate in Gaza City, a top official was quoted Wednesday, saying the office would oversee travel coordination for those not permitted to travel freely through the newly opened Rafah crossing. The office, Egyptian ambassador to the Palestinian Authority Yaser Othman told Arabic-language newspaper Al-Hal, would be a branch of the consular seat in Ramallah, and could be opened shortly after the new unified Palestinian cabinet is announced. According to the paper, released by Birzeit University’s Center for Media Development based in Ramallah, Othman said the principal task of the office would be to coordinate travel permits for men between 18-40, who are currently the only group not permitted free passage via the Rafah border crossing
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=392937
Gaza’s third generator to resume operations
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 1 June — The Gaza Energy Authority announced Wednesday that the power station’s third generator would resume operations as of 2 p.m. Since 2007, Israel’s closure of the Gaza Strip has led to severely restricted fuel supply, causing power shortages. Restrictions on the import of equipment saw the power station’s four generators reduced to three, only two of which have been working since 2009. A plant official said a strategic reserve had been tapped, in order to provide the necessary fuel for the third generator, but cited a lack of funds to purchase fuel for the regular operations. In 2011, the restricted Israeli supply was supplemented by fuel smuggled in through the underground tunnels connecting Egypt and Gaza, used in electricity generation for the first time after a local engineer developed a refining process. The engineer was later abducted by Israeli intelligence agents during a trip to the Ukraine. Kanan Obeid, president of the Energy Authority, decided to re-launch a near-capacity generation schedule in time for high school students to study for their final exams, set for June 15. The set of tests, known locally as the Tawjihi, determine which programs at Palestinian universities students can apply to. Before the third generator began operating, Gaza residents had eight hours of rolling blackouts a day.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=392919
Video: Gaza Reels
A timely and slick video from Gisha on how Israel controls Gaza, along with a “cheat sheet” on the closure policy
http://www.maxajl.com/?p=5387
Israeli forces  — violence / attacks / incursions
ISFSR: Attacks aimed at striking Palestinian survival
NABLUS (PIC) 1 June — The International Solidarity Foundation for Human Rights said Israel’s attacks on the Al-Bara Muslim girls association and the office of the Islamic orphan relief fund on Tuesday morning in Jenin were only the last in a long series of violations targeting organizations operating in the occupied Palestinian territories. Altogether ISFHR researcher Ahmed al-Beitawi documented 21 attacks on institutions and associations in the Palestinian territories since the onset of 2010. The attacks targeted charities, centers of culture, art, and the media, and village councils. Most notably, the Israeli occupation forces raided the Al-Maqasid charity society in Jerusalem and the international solidarity movement in Ramallah in late January and early February of 2010. In the operation, the IOF arrested foreign activists and deported them. Later in February, the IOF raided the headquarters of the Hope cancer patient fund … Beitawi said that the attacks were aimed at striking Palestinian organizations designed to relieve disadvantaged Palestinians under occupation and help them survive on their land. 
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2b

Israeli gunboat fires on fishermen in Gazan waters
ISM 1 June — Ramadan Zidan, 51, and his son Mohamed, 20 set sail from the harbor in Gaza at seven in the morning, they didn’t plan to go far, only to fish outside of the harbor. For an hour and half everything went well, it was a beautiful morning and they still hoped to have a successful day of fishing. When the Israeli gunboat first started to approach them at eight thirty a.m. they thought nothing of it, they were close to the port, nowhere near the Israeli imposed three mile limit on Palestinian fisherman. Unexpectedly the gunboat started to shoot around their boat.
http://palsolidarity.org/2011/06/18647/
Short video: Night raid / Haitham Khatib
29 May — One o’clock after midnight, two Israeli Jeeps Invaded the center of Bil’in village, and the soldiers became throwing sound bombs randomly causing a panic and inconvenience to the citizens when they are asleep.
http://www.bilin-village.org/english/videos/8633-Night-raid-:-29-05-2011
PA to cover treatment of journalist injured on Nakba Day
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 1 June — Palestinian journalist Muhammad Othman will be transferred to Jordan for medical treatment at the expense of the Palestinian Authority, President Mahmoud Abbas ordered on Wednesday. Othman was shot in the chest by Israeli soldiers while covering a rally commemorating the Nakba Day on May 15, near the Erez crossing in the northern Gaza Strip. Sources told Ma’an that Othman has hemiplegia, and is unable to move the left side of his body as a result of the wound, which doctors said damaged his spinal cord.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=392986
Aid flotillas
Photoessay: Undefeated, freedom flotillas expand
GAZA CITY 31 May  (IPS) – A gleaming new memorial towers in the centre of Gaza City’s battered port. Flanked by flags of various nations whose citizens have sailed to the Gaza Strip to highlight the all-out siege on Gaza, the memorial’s inscription bears the names of the Turkish solidarity activists who died one year ago when Israeli commandos firing machine guns air-dropped onto the Freedom Flotilla, killing nine and injuring over 50 of the civilians on board.
http://ingaza.wordpress.com/2011/06/01/undefeated-freedom-flotillas-expand/
MV Finch: Three Malaysian on Gaza aid mission arrive home
KUALA LUMPUR (Bernama) 1 June — Three of the six Malaysians who were on board the MV Finch to send humanitarian aid to Gaza, arrived at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport Wednesday evening … The three were among 12 passengers on board the vessel which left Malaysia on May 3 to send 7.5 kilometres of PVC pipes in an effort to restore the sewage system in Gaza … MV Finch has been stranded in Egyptian waters and until yesterday had yet to receive consent from the Egyptian government to dock at El-Arish Port.
http://www.bernama.com.my/bernama/v5/newsindex.php?id=590851
Haniyeh surprised by UN chief’s opposition to flotilla
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 31 May — The head of the Hamas government in Gaza said Tuesday he was surprised to hear the UN chief Ban Ki-moon’s statements calling on organizers to cancel an aid flotilla. Ismail Haniyeh urged Ban to backtrack on his call and support the Palestinian cause – not to “ignore Israeli massacres against the Palestinian people, especially in Gaza.”
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=392639
Activism / Solidarity / BDS
Soldiers disperse protest in north Gaza
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 31 May — Israeli forces opened fire during a protest in Gaza early Tuesday, activists said. There were no injuries in the incident in Beit Hanoun, along the border with Israel, the coordinator for the demonstration against Israel’s no-go zone, Saber Za‘anin, explained. Residents walk toward the no-go zone each Tuesday demanding access to their farmland. Israel’s army says it considers the area a combat zone and frequently opens fire.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=392583
Israel warns Syria, Lebanon ahead of ‘Naksa Day’
Ynet 1 June — Israel issued a harsh warning to Syria and Lebanon ahead of ‘Naksa Day’ – the 44th anniversary of the Six Day War. “We shall use all means to prevent an attack on our sovereignty. You will be held accountable,” the message said. Israel is raising its alert level ahead of Sunday’s events, which may involve marches on Israel’s borders similar to those held on ‘Nakba Day.’ Israel has also informed the United Nations it will not tolerate any attack on its sovereignty. The Hezbollah-affiliated Al-Akhbar newspaper reported that Sunday’s events may be canceled in light of enormous pressure on Hezbollah and the Lebanese Army which may hurt their ability to secure the marches.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4077203,00.html
Christians plan mass at Bethlehem checkpoint
BETHLEHEM (Ma‘an) 1 June– Churches and community groups from Bethlehem and Jerusalem will hold a church service on Saturday next to the checkpoint dividing the cities, a statement said Monday. After the service, at the Benedictine Church abutting the checkpoint, congregants will process by candlelight along the separation wall, and gather to watch presentations and films projected on the wall about the restrictions on Palestinians’ access to Jerusalem, according to organizers. [End]
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=392353
Deheishe Camp refugees speak, prepare for return on 5 June
AIC 1 June — Between the narrow streets in the Deheishe Refugee Camp, the 1948 refugees get ready for 5 June. After the Nakba commemoration of 15 of May, the Palestinian refugees killed and injured on the borders with Lebanon and the Israeli soldiers’ violence in West Bank, Palestinian refugees will march again. Rumors run rampant amongst the 15,000 refugees in Deheishe, who promise to take part in the commemoration. “On 5 June we won’t go back to our homes — Khalil, a 23 years old man says — but it will be the beginning of our struggle. We won’t free Palestine with a demonstration, but we will regain our lost unity.
http://www.alternativenews.org/english/index.php/topics/news/3639-deheishe-camp-refugees-speak-prepare-for-return-on-5-june
Photos: Lebanon Nakba march
25 black-and-white photos of the May 15 march
http://yashruti.photoshelter.com/gallery/Lebanon-Nakba-March/G0000LuF1YyeeY5M/
Coldplay endorses Freedom for Palestine single on Facebook page
Haaretz 1 June — British music giant Coldplay have endorsed an upcoming musical collaboration called “Freedom for Palestine,” released as a single by the War on Want and One World foundations. Writing on their official Facebook page on Wednesday, Coldplay referred fans to the “Freedom for Palestine” page, saying: Some of our friends are involved in OneWorld’s new ‘Freedom for Palestine’ single,” providing a link to the official “‘Freedom for Palestine”
websitehttp://www.haaretz.com/culture/coldplay-endorses-freedom-for-palestine-single-on-facebook-page-1.365351
VIDEO: Greek BDS activists plant trees in Estee Lauder store
EI 31 May — … According to a press release from an activist performance group calling itself the Land Annexation Society, six participants dressed in suits as members of the Jewish National Fund (JNF) and “proceeded to ‘plant’ trees over the Estee Lauder shop space [in Thessaloniki, Greece] … flyers were distributed to shoppers and staff informing them that ‘this Estee Lauder space is currently being rezoned.'” The JNF is an Israeli quasi-governmental institution which has facilitated ethnic cleansing operations since 1948 and continues to administer land-grabs for Jewish-only use in illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank, and in places like al-Araqib in the Naqab (Negev) desert. It was tasked with literally covering up the destruction of approximately 500 Palestinian villages beginning in the late 1940s by planting trees and forests over the ruins of Palestinian homes. The JNF has currently re-branded itself as an environmental charity organization, and has implemented its land confiscation policies as ones under a benign-sounding ‘re-greening’ project in the Naqab.
http://electronicintifada.net/blog/nora/greek-bds-activists-plant-trees-estee-lauder-store
Detention
Administrative detention of Hamas lawmaker extended
HEBRON (Ma‘an) 1 June — Israeli authorities extended Tuesday the administrative detention of former minister and legislator Nayef Rajoub for an additional six months, two days ahead of the end of his current term … Under a 1979 Israeli military law, Palestinians can be detained without charge for a period of up to six months, a period of administrative detention that can be renewed indefinitely. At last count there were 222 Palestinians being held under the law, two of whom have been detained without charge for more than 43 consecutive months.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=392779
Change and Reform Bloc denounces extension of MP’s detention
MEMO 1 June — The Change and Reform Bloc of the Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC) has denounced the Occupation Authority’s decision to extend the detention of one of its members, Nayef Rajoub, for another six months. The bloc considered the decision to be part of an Israeli strategy to eliminate the symbols of Palestinian legitimacy. In a press statement released on Tuesday, May 31, the bloc stated that the verdict reflected Israel’s insistence on violating the immunity of Palestinian members of parliament
http://www.middleeastmonitor.org.uk/news/middle-east/2420-change-and-reform-bloc-denounces-extension-of-mps-detention
Group: 26 from Bethlehem arrested in May
RAMALLAH (Ma‘an) 1 June — Israel arrested 26 residents of Bethlehem last month, the Palestinian Prisoners Society said Wednesday. Abed Khalil, the head of the rights group, said arrests increased in May among minors. The army destroyed property and used jeeps during the raids that arrested many schoolchildren, he said.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=392956
Israel detains 5 in West Bank overnight
QALQILIYA (Ma‘an) 1 June — Israeli forces detained five Palestinians from areas of the West Bank overnight, a military statement said, with Palestinian officials identifying a young man and two minors taken from the Qalqiliya area … Local sources told Ma‘an that several Israeli military jeeps entered the neighborhood, breaking street lights and plunging the area in to darkness as soldiers carried out home raids. Relatives said the homes of the three detained were ransacked.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=392835
Sheikh Salah charged with obstructing officer
Ynet 1 June — Islamic Movement leader charged with violently refusing security checks on Jordanian border
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4077009,00.html
Israel to release detainee suffering from cancer
HEBRON (Ma‘an) 1 June — The Israeli military prosecutor at Ofer detention center has endorsed an appeal to release a Palestinian prisoner in administrative detention since Jan. 17, because he has cancer. Lawyer Tariq Barghouth, who works for the Palestinian Authority’s Ministry of Prisoners Affairs, said Wednesday that the prosecutor agreed to release 58-year-old Yasser Rajoub from Hebron in the southern West Bank after his condition worsened.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=393033
Political / Diplomatic / International news
Palestinians may try to sidestep US veto in UN statehood push, official says
AP 1 June — …Security Council approval is needed to gain acceptance as a UN member. But President Barack Obama has signaled the U.S. will use its veto power in the council. The Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki said Wednesday that the Palestinians will seek an emergency session of the General Assembly known as “Uniting for Peace” to override any veto. The move is certain to set off legal wrangling. And Malki acknowledged the Palestinians still do not have the required two-thirds support in the assembly. http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/palestinians-may-try-to-sidestep-u-s-veto-in-un-statehood-push-official-says-1.365376
Other news
Israel-Iran trade ties thriving
Ynet 31 May — Under American radar, dozens of Israeli companies secretly engage in relations with Islamic Republic through third parties —  Iranian money appears to be stronger than the Iranian threat, as dozens of Israeli companies have been holding secret trade relations with the Islamic Republic in recent years.
http://www.shalomlife.com/eng/15312/Israel-Iran_trade_ties_thriving/
TA rampage driver receives threat letters
Ynet 31 May — Lawyer of driver suspected [by some] of carrying out deadly rampage in Tel Aviv on ‘Nakba Day’ gets letter with suspect’s photo with swastikas on through forehead … The letter contained racist slurs, calling the driver “a pig son of a pig”, “Palestinazi,” and other debasing statements. The author of the letter also write “the terrorist will never leave jail,” and that “the sea is the same sea, and Arabs are the same Arabs — garbage.”
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4076704,00.html
Magic Wand defense system slated for test run
Ynet 31 May — Defense establishment says mid-range anti-missile system to become operational sooner than expected
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4076672,00.html
TV anchor under fire for Arab discrimination comment during Netanyahu’s US Congress speech
Haaretz 1 June — Dozens of viewers complain about comment added by Yonit Levy of Channel 2 television about the status of Arabs in Israel – said during the prime minister’s speech to Congress.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/tv-anchor-under-fire-for-arab-discrimination-comment-during-netanyahu-s-congress-speech-1.365215
Gaza man sentenced to death on collaboration charge
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 1 June — A military court in the Hamas-run Gaza Strip sentenced a man from Rafah to death Tuesday after he was found guilty of collaboration with enemy entities. Fadel Msallam Shallouf, 26, was sentenced to death by hanging, the Palestinian Center for Human Rights reported. The court convicted Shallouf of spying for an enemy state.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=393081
Even Hamas leaders don’t know where Shalit is
Haaretz 1 June — Home Front Defense Minister says most of the militants involved in the soldier’s capture from Gaza five years ago ‘are no longer with us … Most of the members of Hamas who know where Shalit is being held died “in unfortunate accidents,” Vilnai said. “Anyone involved in the abduction does not need to worry about the day that he will end up in an old-age home, because he will not get there,” added the minister.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/even-hamas-leaders-don-t-know-where-shalit-is-1.365350
Analysis / Opinion
What about defensible borders for Palestine? / Yousef Munayyer
31 May — Let’s recap a few basic points: 1. Israel occupies Palestine and not the other way around. 2. Israel has peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan, the states on its longest borders. 3. Israel has one of the most advanced armies in the world with a vast arsenal of offensive weapons. 4. Israel has hundreds of Nuclear Weapons. 5. Per U.S. and Israeli demands, the proposed Palestinian state would have no military. . Israel has actively and aggressively colonized Palestinian territory through the use of force, not the other way around. 7. Israeli settlers have a history of aggressive violence against Palestinians and zealously covet Palestinian territory. And yet, despite all of this, the debate continues to be about whether the ’67 lines are defensible for Israel?
http://blog.thejerusalemfund.org/2011/05/what-about-defensible-borders-for.html
Jerusalem Day celebrations will not cover up the city’s rot and discrimination / Yossi Sarid
Haaretz 1 June — Jerusalem Day is an artificial celebration, which only the religious Zionist movement, settlers, workers on an organized outing, the president, the mayor and Channel 1 bother celebrating in a big way. Most people in Israel don’t even know, and don’t care, why it even exists.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/jerusalem-day-celebrations-will-not-cover-up-the-city-s-rot-and-discrimination-1.365222
Foundation myths / Joseph Dana
Tablet 1 June — On May 15, five days after Israel’s Independence Day, Palestinians rallied around the Nakba — the Arabic word for catastrophe, used to mark the displacement of as many as 750,000 Palestinians in 1948. It was a bid to reiterate their opposition to Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and control of the Gaza Strip. For the first time in years, every Israeli newspaper carried the word ‘Nakba’ on its front page, albeit not in reference to the historical event but to demonstrations that consumed the West Bank and Israel’s border towns. The episode highlighted an important truth: Sooner or later, Israel will be forced to incorporate the Palestinian Nakba narrative into the larger Israeli societal discourse. There can be a Zionist narrative of 1948 that includes the tragic and violent Palestinian experience of displacement — but it must be predicated on the acceptance of the Nakba in Israeli society.
http://www.tabletmag.com/news-and-politics/68304/foundation-myths/
The US-Israeli train wreck / Jeff Gates
Dissident Voice 31 May — President Obama hopes to head off a train wreck in September at the U.N. General Assembly. That’s when member nations plan to press for an independent Palestine. The Israel lobby is furious. Critics doubt that the General Assembly has the authority to recognize Palestine. Yet protection of member sovereignty has been a goal of the U.N. since its founding. Thus the priority that Israel placed on U.N. recognition after President Harry Truman acknowledged Israel on May 14, 1948, eleven minutes after the Zionist enclave declared itself a state. Truman refused to recognize this enclave as “the Jewish state.” Despite Barack Obama’s reference to the Jewish state in a recent speech on the Middle East, during the final days before granting recognition and thereby “legitimacy,” Truman was consumed with the fear that Zionist aspirations would lead to a racist or a theocratic state.Those concerns led Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann to lobby Truman with a seven-page letter reassuring him that Jewish settlers envisioned a thoroughly secular state similar to the U.S. and Great Britain.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2011/05/the-u-s-israeli-train-wreck/

groups.yahoo.com/group/f_shadi (listserv)
www.theheadlines.org (archive)

Most American Jews would consider it a ‘major tragedy’ if Israel ceased to exist (but only 1/4 say ‘biggest tragedy of my lifetime’)

Jun 01, 2011

Philip Weiss

JTA report on a poll of 1000 American Jews conducted by the rightwing group CAMERA. Supports my view that the Jewish community is very conservative on these questions, including dividing Jerusalem, but maybe there’s light at the end of the tunnel?

More than 75 percent of those polled said the biggest obstacle to peace in the region is the Palestinians’ “culture of hatred” and promotion of anti-Israel sentiment.

Seventy-eight percent said it was essential for the Palestinian Authority to recognize Israel as a Jewish state and 62 percent did not believe that Israelis would be free from Palestinian terror attacks even if a Palestinian state were created in the West Bank and Gaza.

Nearly one in four said they would consider it “the biggest tragedy of my lifetime” if Israel were to no longer exist, and 58 percent said they would call it “a major tragedy that personally concerned me.”

Major New Weblog Features: The Anti Hypocrite Tools

Jun 01, 2011

alec

Back in January we promised everyone some major features.

And some of them came to pass, like editing comments after the fact. Or even more importantly, cleaning up badly formatted URLs.

But we we’ve had a major feature almost finished but giving us a bit of trouble so the launch was delayed and delayed.

In celebration of the arrival of summer, we are offering all of our beloved readers a new set of Anti Hypocrite Tools.

Linked to every name now is a full list of all the past comments of that commenter.

So if you are trying to find false flags and duplicity, it’s much, much easier.

An even more powerful tool is searching any commenter’s past comments.

If you’d like to see everything any given commentator has said about BDS, you just have to go to his profile page and search. Here is a sample profile page: http://mondoweiss.net/profile/richard-wittyHere is a sample search query: http://mondoweiss.net/profile/richard-witty?keyword=bds

From here it’s straightforward to find comments which contradict one another and would indicate bad faith from the commenter.

These tools are not just great for catching hypocrites at their dirty work. You can also include a larger bio, a home page and a profile photo (go to http://gravatar.com to get a photo).

To add your own bio and your own home page go to your profile, here: http://mondoweiss.net/site/wp-admin/profile.php

These tools are also great for enjoying the comments of those commenters who are particularly interesting and less prolific for example Eva.

Let us know if there is any way we can improve these tools for you. Keep in mind, these tools are powerful queries spanning 300k comments and the pages may load a little more slowly than a normal page.

An open letter to Fouad Ajami on his misrepresentation of the Arab revolutions

Jun 01, 2011

Khelil

Neocon Fouad Ajami lately published an attack on the Palestinians in the Wall Street Journal— an unfiltered anthology of Israeli myths and lies, revisionist history, misrepresentation of the Arab revolution, and so forth; dismissing the UN statehood effort. I wrote out a letter, an e-mail really, to Ajami only to find that he does not have a listed e-mail. Odd, considering he’s an academic who frequently publishes. I guess he does not want to hear any rebuttals.

I kind of felt like kicking myself after I had written so lengthy a letter and now without anything to do with it. Then I thought maybe it could be an open letter.

Fouad,

I have read your books and try to read all your WSJ contributions, but this is the first time I have decided to reply in a (open) letter. I hope you’ll do the same, a simple courtesy, and fully read this letter.

I never truly appreciated your callousness and proclivity to pander to American Zionists until I read your recent op-ed in the WSJ dismissing the forthcoming Palestinian statehood declaration. Even for a page that features the likes of Bret Stephens, it was filled with casual lies and distortion of history, and adopted so uncritically the Israeli narrative, in a pathetic effort to cater to the “White Man”.

You say the Palestinians and Arabs rejected partition and chose war with the Zionists, but I know you know that the Zionists were working with the Hashemite kingdom to sabotage any truncated Palestinian state. Even if the Palestinians accepted the principle that they should attend to Western hearts and guilt by sacrificing their own land and accepted a partition plan whereby the one-third population of Jews, overwhelmingly recent immigrants, nay colonizers, should receive 55% of Palestine while the two-thirds population of indigenous Palestinians should redraw their borders to solely 41% of their homeland (I am sure it is superfluous to remind you that Jerusalem was proscribed an international zone on 4% of the land), an absurd partition plan, unprecedented in history where colonization is bestowed not just with recognition but with an even more favorable condition than the natives (it is not as if the Palestinians were accorded even a majority of the land, how did they the actual majority of the people get less than half? and they are supposed to be the bad guy and ingrates for not accepting this handed down injustice?!). But even if the Palestinians accepted this cruelty, the Zionists and Hashemites were in agreement that no Palestinian state should come into being. The Zionists – then and now – believe that Zionism cannot survive unless the natives are denied their rights. It was not the Palestinians who sought to deny the Jews, since Palestinian nationalism does not deny Jews their rights as individuals, but the Zionists who were not content to deny simply Palestinian statehood but the very idea of a Palestinian people, to quote your inspirer Golda Meir.

And your nonsense about combined Arab armies, meant to convey a massive Arab force seeking to overrun a underdog Jewish force, is further disinformation when you know that the Arab forces were 1) late to the game 2) 1/3 of the combined force of the Zionists 3) poorly armed as opposed to the Zionists who had superior weapons, procured weapons, including bombers from sympathetic Americans, and even violated the ceasefire agreement to purchase weapons and 4) the Arabs were so poorly organized that they were at times shooting at one another and 5) most of the Arab armies never even crossed into the territory allocated for the colonial Jewish state. And besides, the Zionists had ethnically cleansed hundreds of thousands of Palestinians even before a single Arab army declared war, whatever the merit of that declaration.

Contrary to your Zionist propaganda, the Palestinians did not flee on their own accord, but were massacred and compelled to flee under threat of further violence. You cite Jaffa, the Palestinians in Jaffa, then Palestine’s greatest city and so important that it was carved out by the United Nations as part of the Arab state, an Arab island of 70,000 citizens, enveloped by the Jewish state next to Tel Aviv in the partition. In Jaffa, the people were pushed into the sea by the Zionists who later posed as victims of Arabs who were allegedly seeking to do unto them what they had cruelly did to the Palestinians. Jaffa was the victim of a barrage of rockets, you know the ones Israel whines about today, by Menachem Begin’s Stern gang, leading to tens of thousands to escape (what they thought temporary) via ferry to Beirut. But the Zionists made sure there was no return. And Begin used Jaffa as a way to prove his Zionist bona fides. For it was the Zionists who refused to accept an Arab city in their generous 55% allocation. (who has the sense of entitlement? forgive the Palestinians for actually believing they have a right to their country).

It is fallacious that you seek to position Arab Jews as comparable to Palestinian refugees, a Zionist gimmick. In no way to lessen their plight, but their tragedy is not the same: it was a migration or forced exodus over decades, greatly encouraged by the Zionists, and many were allowed to sell their property, and they deserve compensation and return, but that is a separate issue for which the Palestinians do not need to answer. Your statement about the Beirut of your dreams and the Jewish quarter being a Hezbollah enclave, what further fabrication! The Jewish quarter is in Beirut’s Sunni dominated central district and the Maghen synagogue has been recently renovated, that entire area is as much a Hezbollah stronghold as the Wall Street Journal’s editorial board is dominated by leftists. Hezbollah wouldn’t dare to even step foot next to Lebanese Sunnis who detest it. And are you ever reminiscent about the lost quarters of the Palestinians? I am sure you know this but I guess without such nonsense and pandering you would not be part of the club, and not get published. Sell your soul to be treated like a human being by America’s fanatical pro-Israel elites.

One last point: Nothing was more egregious than your patently false statement that the Arabs in Tunis, Cairo, et al have not raised the banner of Palestine since the revolution began. Of course, if you read Arabic newspapers, and I am sure you do, you know that many Egyptians have been open about their disdain for Israel, a wish to end the shameful bought “peace” of Sadat, attacking Mubarak-Suleiman as stooges, and proudly raising the flag of Palestine. But if you choose to adopt the Tom Friedman nonsense that the revolutions have no foreign policy implications, that’s your wish to ignore reality. Palestine is there, it is always there for Arabs.

Let me conclude by stating that I am a Tunisian living in America and I watched every moment of my birth nation and its revolution in exhilarating and tearful excitement. Do not use the rising up of the Arab people as a fig leaf in your silly and inferiority-minded polemics. No Tunisian would ever dignify you, for you readily humiliate yourself. An Arab like yourself, so eager to cast aspersions on the Palestinians people, who have suffered so much and so unfairly, no, this moment is not for you. You do not share it with us. We do not wish to have you. Please, no longer wish us Arabs goodwill for we do not seek it from such a hand. On the day of the Tunisian revolution, an al Jazeera screen grab casually captured a Palestinian flag hanging from a Tunisian apartment balcony. Palestine always waves high for the Arabs, it is always there, Tunisians have not forgotten it and have shouted, in an amendment, “The people want the liberation of Palestine”.

Nothing is more vulgar than to use the Arab revolution to advance your anti-Palestinian cause, the revolution does not vindicate you, it refutes you. Palestine will only rise in a free Arab world. It is your tyrants Ben Ali, Mubarak and al-Saud who sought to deny Palestine in the Arab conscience. Every Arab knows that the Arab revolution will not be complete until Palestine is free. A cursory run through a Tunisian Facebook page will show that Palestine is still the heart of the Arab people. So, please, at least have the decency to acknowledge that you are not part of the Arab moment, rejected by the Arab people and further pulling yourself away, and that you may never awake from your slumber to recognize the justice of the Palestinian cause and call yourself an Arab, head held high.

Are Palestinians standing up for an inclusive national identity?

Jun 01, 2011

Clenchner

Editor’s note: Clenchner, a commenter at this site, is an American Israeli living in New York. He was a founder of the Shministim group in 1987 and spent time in prison as a refusenik. And oh, we try and have some bandwidth on this site.

The New York Times has a story the other day about one of the difficulties emerging out of the Arab Spring. It turns out that secular citizenship and modern, state based nationhood are still very difficult concepts for many in the Arab world. In Egypt, conflict between Muslims and Copts still represents a major unresolved tension. In Lebanon, well, it’s Lebanon. Syria’s ruling structure is often expressed in sectarian terms as an Allawite regime. Jordan’s history is intertwined with the tensions between a Palestinian majority and the Hashemite monarchy that enjoys strongest support from Bedouin tribes. Bahrain? Sudan? Western Sahara? Berbers? Where exactly is the secular ‘state of all citizens’ in existence in the Arab world?

This isn’t to say that there isn’t strong support for the idea of the secular nation state or Arab nationalism. There is, and it has often come from the region’s Christians and other minorities. The Muslim religion, some would say, does a good job of articulating the need for a stronger, community wide sense of identity that trumps loyalty to a tribe or clan. The competition between religious, ethnic, tribal, linguistic, racial and geographic identities isn’t a historical blip in the Middle East. Some say it defines the region. The cultural emphasis on ‘unity’ has complex roots in religion and history. Among other things, it is a response to a legacy of divisions, internal and imposed from the outside.

These kinds of observations shouldn’t translate easily into facile comments that encompass ‘Arab culture’ or ‘Muslim civilization.’ But it’s fair and useful to take these observations and connect them to the conversation around one or two states in Palestine. What I want to understand is – what is the current base of support for a redefinition of ‘Palestinian’ to refer to a secular, multi-ethnic and multi-national identity that includes Arabic, Hebrew and Russian speaking individuals?

The narrative I observe among the one state and BDS community is that a) the Zionist state does not deserve to exist as an ethnocracy (or at all) and that b) a secular state of Palestine in which all ethnic and religious identities are equal represents a superior alternative. In South Africa, the explicit goal of the liberation movement was a multiracial democracy in which white, black, Indian and other groups would enjoy equal rights. For a time, this was the explicit goal of Fatah and the Palestinian national movement, between the phase of seeking to drive most Jews out of Palestine, and the current phase of seeking a state over part of Palestine. Are we able to say that there is a consensus among Palestinians for this vision right now?

Most of words I’ve seen about the one state solution focus on the injustice of the status quo, and the attachment of various groups to the ideal of secular, equal citizenship. But very little seems to address the challenges of a citizenship-based secular state in the Arab world. Were I a defender of the status quo or a shill for an unequal Israeli state, I might drive my points further, and argue that a one state solution can’t possibly work. But that’s not my position.

Instead, I thought I’d just ask some questions and see what the community has to say about certain, largely unexplored points. Specifically:

1. Why have efforts to make the Palestinian liberation movement a joint enterprise of both Arabs and Jews largely failed? The only ideological tendency that has included Jews and Palestinians as equals is Communism, as reflected in the history of the Israeli Communist Party, Maki, and in the Trotskyist background of those who founded Matzpen and the Alternative Information Center. The South African experience is that the ANC was constituted as a multiracial movement from the very start. Affirming this wasn’t only a political position expressed pro forma, but a central element of the resistance culture itself. Compare the Freedom Charter to the Palestinian National Charter. (And no, I’m not making a statement about the Charter’s contemporary relevance.)

2. What is the likelihood of a Palestinian political tendency that explicitly includes Israeli Jews as equal members/participants to become prominent in Palestinian political culture? Are we going to see resistance struggles in which Israeli Jews are not relegated to the role of ‘solidarity activists’ as though they were internationals, but instead to roles like that played by whites in the South African struggle, whites like Joe Slovo?

3. Is there a program or organization that is taking on the transformation of Palestinian society and politics to reflect the Arabic/Hebrew/Russian speaking parts of the future Palestinian state that may one day come about? Will it be standing for election? Accepting members on a mass basis, including Hebrew speaking Israelis?

4. When can we expect the Palestinian liberation movement – in the hearts and minds of Palestinians – to reflect the non-sectarian, non-nationalist mindset of a citizenship based state? Before or after the transformation of Israeli Jewish society? What are the formulations that will come to replace ethnic Arab Palestinian nationalism?

These aren’t questions about ‘proving’ one thing or another. They aren’t presented as any kind of defense of the status quo. But if we are talking about the existence of an ideological tendency that strives to establish a certain kind of state in Palestine, we have a duty to ask: how is this being manifested today, in the Palestinian national movement? Where does it stand in relation to the genuine mass movements in Palestinian political culture, the one around Fatah and the one around Hamas?

This isn’t to deny the intellectual output of folks like Ali Abunimah or Uri Davis. I’m well aware of the One Democratic State Group. It’s only that these eminent personalities, for all the work they do, don’t have a mass base. The last Palestinian elections, the ones that brought Hamas into power, were widely seen as fair. Can we point to any elected Palestinian leaders that represent voters (in Israel, Gaza, or the West Bank) or members (trade unions, professional associations, etc.) who are on record articulating a vision of Palestinian national identity that includes Hebrew and Russsian speakers?

My position is that I would like Israeli nationality to include Arabic speaking Israelis as full and equal citizens, which they are not. I support ongoing efforts to push Israel in the direction of a secular state. There are some political parties in the Knesset that support this, including Hadash and Balad. It feels quite wrong though, to impose this view on Palestinians living under occupation, who seem to prefer, by large margins, an ethnic, Arab-Palestinian identity that does not include Hebrew speakers like myself. But a Palestinian mass movement to redefine Palestinian identity would be very persuasive. How likely is that?

‘Tablet’ says peace is only possible if Israelis study the Nakba

Jun 01, 2011

Philip Weiss

Oh my. Tablet has a superb piece by Joseph Dana on the necessity of discussing the Nakba. In the Israeli discourse, the piece says. Well what about the Amurkan discourse? But since when has an American Jewish publication run such a frontal discussion of Israeli foundational myths? Dana excerpts:

In the late 1980s, a group of Israeli “new” historians began rewriting the foundation myths of the country. Through recently declassified Israeli and British state documents, the new historians uncovered a different version of events, which was much closer to Palestinian accounts of partial ethnic cleansing that took place in 1948. Led by [Benny] Morris, a devoted archive historian, they were able to confirm that roughly 750,000 Palestinians fled from their homes, in part due to Israeli military force, small-scale massacre, episodic cases of rape, and violent intimidation. The new historians proved that Israel had planned to expel thousands of Arabs regardless of the success of the U.N. partition plan. As the 1990s dawned, Israeli society was no longer able to easily dismiss the Palestinian narrative of the Nakba as mere propaganda….

Including the Nakba in Israeli public discourse, newspapers, and textbooks hardly means the unqualified embrace of one version of history over another. But open discussion of competing narratives with reference to the historical record is clearly a precondition for any wider kind of social and political understanding between Israeli Jews and Palestinian citizens of Israel and between Israelis and Palestinians. Repressive attempts to criminalize narratives of the Nakba—however partial or wrong-headed its opponents may believe those narratives to be—block any possibility of mutual understanding and weaken critical discourse inside Zionist circles and within Israeli society as a whole. The most likely victim of such misguided attempts to shore up Zionism through attacks on free speech and the historical record is Zionism itself.

Writing on the wall: ‘Coldplay’ endorses ‘Freedom for Palestine’ song

Jun 01, 2011

Philip Weiss

Annie got on this video for us yesterday (she has an amazing nose for news) and lo, Coldplay is into it too. Coldplay, wow, what a band; this is huge, folks.

British music giants Coldplay have endorsed an upcoming musical collaboration called “Freedom for Palestine,” released as a single by the War on Want and One World foundations.

Palestinians once weren’t smart and inventive, Walzer says, but now they are

Jun 01, 2011

Philip Weiss

At Dissent, Michael Walzer says that Netanyahu is walking with his eyes shut toward disaster. And he has this analysis of the Palestinians. Reads like free association, and that’s interesting.

Palestinian leaders would be happy to accept an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank, but they are in no way ready to end the conflict; no Palestinian leader has even hinted at a willingness to give up the right of return. None of them are strong enough to do that, but I suspect that none of them want to do that. Their strategic goal is what I am afraid it has always been: the creation of a Palestinian state alongside a Jewish state that they don’t recognize and with which they are not reconciled. But tactically they are newly inventive. They worked backward: their first resort was violence and terror; their last resort is peaceful protest. Had they reversed the order, they would have a state by now. There have been small nonviolent protests in the past, and these protests continue today in villages along the Wall, but they have been and still are marginal to the Palestinian struggle, never endorsed by Fatah or the PLO—and certainly not by Hamas. Now Israel faces the prospect of something radically new. How can it resist masses of men and women, children too, just walking across the ceasefire lines?

Actually, if the Palestinians are smart, as they are these days, they won’t walk across the lines, for that raises the specter of return, and the right of return doesn’t (yet) have sufficient international support. Come September, after the UN recognizes their state, they will march inside the 1967 lines, thousands of them—from Nablus, say, into the nearby settlements and army bases, asserting their own sovereignty and territorial integrity. And what will Israel do then? Many Israeli rightists would, almost certainly, prefer a new terrorist campaign, which would put the Palestinians once again in the wrong. That is certainly possible, but it is, suddenly, less likely than peaceful protest.

Then the song changed

Jun 01, 2011

Alexandra Hartmann

Alexandra Hartmann is a participant in an Interfaith Peace-Builders delegation to Israel and Palestine that is being co-led by Anna Baltzer and Adam Horowitz.

As we drove into Bethlehem from the West Bank, the Israeli separation wall did not loom over our tour bus as much as it sat squat and unchanging in front of us; not so much a shouting declaration of its presence as a constant reminder. As I stood at the base of the wall, I was not moved; I was not in awe. I have been in this country for five days and the occupation already feels like an unflinching reality. What did put a flicker of feeling in my heart was the art, writing, and graffiti painted on the wall by the Palestinians—the words and colors layers deep and overlapping up to varying heights along the six-meter tall cement slab of canvas.

It’s not how I expected to feel about the wall and not how I expected to feel in the occupied regions of Palestine. I didn’t feel defiant or resistant. I didn’t feel a want to beat the wall or tear it down with my bare hands. I felt the need to examine it and look at it and read it and listen to it. The wall itself has a complicated story with many hands and actors, which is separate from and bigger than my story about the wall. Now that I have seen it—touched it—now that members of our delegation have written on it in bright pink paint, we are part of its story. But still, what I’ve contributed is a tiny moment in the wall’s unfurling story and seems minuscule compared to the role it plays in my story of my time within the West Bank.

Similarly to how our drive within the gates of the Israeli settlement of Ma’ale Adumim felt different from our time in East Jerusalem, being within the wall and then, further, within the Dheisheh refugee camp felt truly different than sitting in classrooms or coffee shops, talking about the conflict and the plight of the people. Whereas the settlement felt cushioned from the conflict, the camp felt seeped and heavy with it in a way that is hard to describe. Walls are meant to separate, just the same as iron gates, just the same as elective fences. And not only did it seem like our friends in Dheisheh were far separated from the heady academic talks of border agreements and mass amounts of paper-pushing happening in offices in Jerusalem, but they seemed very much trapped within a cage made for them by the wall. One young man told us how he and his friends would drive around the perimeter of the town for entertainment, which takes a mere ten minutes.

Still the people in Dheisheh are warm and resilient. We stayed at the Phoenix Center, an organization started to address growing needs of the camp through service, cultural, and educational programs and so named because of its on-going reconstruction due to multiple demolition orders issued by the Israeli government. The center receives many international volunteers and so as we toured the winding, graffiti-covered streets of the camp, children approached us happily. often offering us greetings in English and colloquial Arabic. Our guide, Aysar, led us through the neighborhood, stopping to tell us about the artwork on the walls and to explain how the Israeli army would do nightly raids in the neighborhood, just to train their troops. He talked of many hardships, but he had such a natural ease about him as he paused his talks to light a cigarette then continued, sauntering through the streets, greeting friends along the way. In fact, as we walked through the camp, I was put quite at ease. In appearance, it was not unlike areas in Morocco, Malawi, or Guatemala where I have traveled before and the projects of the Phoenix Center reminded me of NGO work around the globe. Some people insist that the Palestinian conflict is not unique. In many ways they are right;  history repeats itself. But the fact that finding a bittersweet familiarity in poverty and struggle makes one more comfortable amongst  their manifestations—as I felt walking through the camp—is a sick phenomenon that needs addressing.

I felt these waves of familiarity throughout the day as Naji, the director of the Phoenix Center, and his wife shared their stories. I felt them still as Aysar and his friend Ahmad smoked with us on the roof of the center after dinner and then led us through the now-unlit streets to another cultural center in the camp to smoke hookah. As we sat around a small table in a dining area on the top floor, passing the hookah pipe and listening to Ahmad play al-‘ud, I felt that I could be anywhere in the world at that moment and that I was truly among friends. I let the sweet smoke and warm summer breeze brush my face and felt an intense calm.

Then the song changed. “We often traveled and played concerts with another friend. One day we were crossing through the checkpoint back into the West Bank and he was shot and killed. We wrote this song for him.”

Ahmad plucked the strings of his instrument with purpose, his back curved so that his cheek could rest wearily on the smooth curve of its body. A cigarette dangled from his lips and his friends gently took  it from him when the ash accumulated, replacing it after taking a drag from it themselves. I stared out the window as one of the two large, bright nearby rooftop lights meant to illuminate the pathways of the camp flickered and waned against the dark of the night.

Palestine is like no other place on earth; the Palestinians like no other people.

A. Loewenstein Online Newsletter

Saudi Arabia desperate to keep West addicted to its deadly oil

Posted: 01 Jun 2011

There’s nothing like continuing to fund, arm and support one of the most brutal regimes on earth so we can drive and fly and fight wars.

Freedom for Palestine (with a cast of thousands)

Posted: 01 Jun 2011

 
More here.

Latest BDS action; Estee Lauder complicit in dispossessing Palestinians

Posted: 31 May 2011

 

International activists today occupied a Greek branch of luxury cosmetics store Estee Lauder in protest against its chairman’s involvement with Israeli ethnic cleansing and occupation in Palestine.

 
Video One: Art Activists Plant Trees in Luxury Cosmetics Store linked to Israeli Land Grabs from LandAnnexation Society on Vimeo.
 

How Western firms helping repressive regimes monitor Skype

Posted: 31 May 2011

 
We have been warned:

 
When young dissidents in Egypt were organizing an election-monitoring project last fall, they discussed their plans over Skype, the popular Internet phone service, believing it to be secure.
But someone else was listening in—Egypt’s security service.

An internal memo from the “Electronic Penetration Department” even boasted it had intercepted one conversation in which an activist stressed the importance of using Skype “because it cannot be penetrated online by any security device.”

Skype, which Microsoft Corp. is acquiring for $8.5 billion, is best known as a cheap way to make international phone calls. But the Luxembourg-based service also is the communications tool of choice for dissidents around the world because its powerful encryption technology evades traditional wiretaps.

Throughout the recent Middle East uprisings, protesters have used Skype for confidential video conferences, phone calls, instant messages and file exchanges. In Iran, opposition leaders and dissidents used Skype to plot strategy and organize a February protest. Skype also is a favorite among activists in Saudi Arabia and Vietnam, according to State Department cables released by WikiLeaks.
In March, following the Egyptian revolution that toppled President Hosni Mubarak, some activists raided the headquarters of Amn Al Dowla, the state security agency, uncovering the secret memo about intercepting Skype calls. In addition, 26-year-old activist Basem Fathi says he found files describing his love life and trips to the beach, apparently gleaned from intercepted emails and phone calls.

“I believe that they were collecting every little detail they were hearing from our mouths and putting them in a file,” he says.

A cottage industry of U.S. and other companies is now designing and selling tools that can be used to block or eavesdrop on Skype conversations. One technique: Using special “spyware,” or software that intercepts an audio stream from a computer—thereby hearing what’s being said and effectively bypassing Skype’s encryption. Egypt’s spy service last year tested one product, FinSpy, made by Britain’s Gamma International UK Ltd., according to Egyptian government documents and Gamma’s local reseller.

America’s role in the Arab world should be finished

Posted: 31 May 2011

Robert Fisk is right:

 
This month, in the Middle East, has seen the unmaking of the President of the United States. More than that, it has witnessed the lowest prestige of America in the region since Roosevelt met King Abdul Aziz on the USS Quincy in the Great Bitter Lake in 1945.
While Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu played out their farce in Washington – Obama grovelling as usual – the Arabs got on with the serious business of changing their world, demonstrating and fighting and dying for freedoms they have never possessed. Obama waffled on about change in the Middle East – and about America’s new role in the region. It was pathetic. “What is this ‘role’ thing?” an Egyptian friend asked me at the weekend. “Do they still believe we care about what they think?”
And it is true. Obama’s failure to support the Arab revolutions until they were all but over lost the US most of its surviving credit in the region. Obama was silent on the overthrow of Ben Ali, only joined in the chorus of contempt for Mubarak two days before his flight, condemned the Syrian regime – which has killed more of its people than any other dynasty in this Arab “spring”, save for the frightful Gaddafi – but makes it clear that he would be happy to see Assad survive, waves his puny fist at puny Bahrain’s cruelty and remains absolutely, stunningly silent over Saudi Arabia. And he goes on his knees before Israel. Is it any wonder, then, that Arabs are turning their backs on America, not out of fury or anger, nor with threats or violence, but with contempt? It is the Arabs and their fellow Muslims of the Middle East who are themselves now making the decisions.