In the past few weeks, foreign newspapers, particularly those of the Zionist entity, were filled with the case of the killing of one of the Ethiopian Jews by a policeman, “Israeli” (in civilian clothes), which led to mass demonstrations in several places in the country. For many readers this was shocking, strange or new. The fact that Ethiopians described the state as racist on some of the followers of this issue had a special and surprising impact.
It is true that this young man was an ordinary citizen and posed no danger to anyone. If he were an original Palestinian citizen, we might say: “This is the Palestinian reality in the state of racist Zionism.” But what is the reality of the non-Ashkenazi Jews, ie the East Jews (the majority of whom are Arabs), and those with dark skin? In this article I will touch on some aspects of the reality of the East Jews, especially Ethiopians, both history and present, to shed light on their role in the colonial colonial state.
In the eighth and ninth decades of the last century (1986-1994) and after the deals with the Sudanese government at the time, the Zionist state had organized the deportation of tens of thousands of Ethiopian “Jews” from Ethiopia to Sudan and kept them for several years in refugee camps until their homeland in Palestine
Unlike hundreds of thousands of eastern Jews who were forcibly brought from Arab countries as part of colonial colonialism in the early 1960s, Ethiopian immigration, or rather brought Ethiopian settlers from their country to Palestine, began in the early 1920s. After the Balfour Declaration (1917) and the empowerment of Zionist gangs to occupy some of the Palestinian territories, the Zionist organization, which was later called the Jewish Organization, was quick to look for Jews as cheap labor to carry out physical activities such as agriculture and construction to compensate for the Arab hands in the emerging Jewish labor. The main items adopted by the Zionist Organization and its instruments, such as the Histadrut (the main operator of Zionist colonization in Palestine), were based on making Palestine a Jewish land inhabited and operated only by Jews. In this racist policy, Palestinian Arabs are excluded from their land and thrown out. Hence, about 20,000 Ethiopians came in 1924 for this purpose.
The deteriorating situation of the Ethiopians has remained the same as the occupying state was preoccupied with its colonial wars and the annexation of more Arab lands in general and Palestinian in particular. In the 1980s and decades of the last century (1986-1994), after transactions with the Sudanese government at the time, the Zionist state had organized the deportation of tens of thousands of Ethiopian “Jews” from Ethiopia to Sudan and kept them for several years in refugee camps until they were settled in Palestine. I would like to point out that I put the word Jews in double, not because I deny their Jews in their countries of origin, but to confirm that they are not accepted as Jews by the dominant Ashkenazi rabbis in the state of the racist Zionist entity. From the very first moments of their migration planning to Palestine to this day, their treatment of the state and its institutions was inhumane, immoral, and similar to the colonial West’s treatment of African blacks, and sometimes similar to their treatment of indigenous people.
Even in the refugee camps, the state sent doctors and medical staff to carry out tests that in many cases aimed at injecting women with serum Depo-Provera (injections containing long-term contraceptive chemicals) in order to reduce the black children of the state they wanted to a white Ashkenazi (Western-like). These policies have continued until recently. Some statistics in 2010 indicated that long-term use of contraceptive injections had increased exponentially and that 57% of its users were Ethiopian Jews, which accounted for only 2% of the population. It is worth mentioning here that this serum was used elsewhere under colonial colonialism, especially in the apartheid rule of South Africa. In addition to discriminating against Ethiopian Jews by work, housing, medicine and education as well as their use, as do other East Jews as rats in their medical laboratories to try their medicines, it appears that Jewish-Ethiopian blood was not accepted as Jewish. Tens of years ago it became clear that the Ethiopian was not entitled to donate blood, and that the blood taken from them was destroyed and not used. There are many clerics, especially Ashkenazi, as well as a small segment of the Zionist society who still believes that Ethiopian blood is tainted byHIV . Some of these cases began to unfold in 2008 when an official at a center nursery revealed that the number of children belonging had not changed for two years and when she inquired about it, she learned that 55 Ethiopian families in the town (Ras al-Ain colony) had been subjected to these contraceptive injections. But the Great Trouble emerged in 2013 when a Jewish member of Ethiopian descent applied to donate blood with several other Knesset members to meet her rejection. When she met the official, she was told, “These are the instructions of the Ministry of Health.”
Long ago, especially after the immigration / settlement of an estimated 90,000 Ethiopian immigrants / settlers to Palestine between the 1980s and 1990s, now numbering approximately 160,000, Zionist racism began to manifest itself, not to the original owners of the land. They know and know with their blood that they have opposed this racism and colonial colonialism and are still. What is new here, especially for the West European and Zionist White in Palestine, is that the real face of this entity and its policies and institutions are unfolding.
In addition to the above, new-old information on the extent of the racism and fascism of this Zionist regime has been shown in relation to the enforced disappearance and trafficking of Jewish children of Eastern / Arab origin, particularly Yemeni children (and others of Iraqi, Moroccan and other origins). The crimes of the state and its institutions began in the 1950s, after decades, commissions of inquiry, and protests by residents and armed sit-in in 1994 by an Eastern Jewish rabbi and some of his followers to detain an official building for 45 days, demanding a serious and official investigation to determine the reasons for the disappearance. He was forcibly repressed, one of his associates was killed and he and his accomplices were taken to prison. It is funny and weeping at the same time here is that the society “Israeli” has qualified this rabbi as they call the Palestinian “extremist terrorist adopts conspiracy theory.” However, in 1995 the Government decided to appoint an official commission of inquiry, which issued its statement in 2001, which provided for the previous commissions of inquiry. The acknowledgment that most of these disappeared children had died, and that only a small number of the 50 families included in the research, numbering 1,000, did not know the fate of their children.
However, the families of the abducted and disappeared were confused by the Commission’s decision that they had acknowledged not having access to all the required files / archives. To make matters worse in the same year (2001), the judicial decision to prohibit the publication or circulation of any details concerning the material in all these committees until 2066. However, with an estimated 1,500-5,000 families unconvinced, the families who lost their children continued to search. In recent years, this issue has taken on a media and academic dimension. The British journalist resident of Nazareth, Jonathan Cook, played an important role in exposing and analyzing this issue. Several interviews were conducted with “disappeared” women and men and their families, and the districts took on a global dimension. In her article in the New York Times on 20/2/2019, the writer, Malin Fehhal, addressed this issue in much detail through research conducted in the colony of Ras al-Ain (Ramle district), which is home to a large number of Yemeni Jews. This article is to prove all the previous data directly from the victims and their families. The reality of these victims is almost the same.
The case begins with the racist treatment of Arab Jews, whom the movement wanted, and the Zionist state to prove its Ashkenazi chauvinistic identity in the construction of the Jewish state. For several years. In these living conditions, the Yemeni mother was admitted to the clinic or hospital, if any, and left without her child. When asked, she answered that he / she had died. The mother asks for clarification of the death, the place of burial or even the death certificate, to meet the non-response and ask her to return home! There are cases of abduction directly from the house / tent or while the mother is still in bed after birth, under the pretext of medical examination to disappear the child and the girl disappear.
Who is responsible for the abduction of children? And what happened after the kidnapping? The evidence showed the responsibility of the medical system or the medical institution, especially the nurses, as a direct official, while the doctors overlooked and did not object. With the presence of Western / Ashkenazi culture of dominant white, the goal was to “assimilate” black people and integrate them into Ashkenazi society (to whiten them). The word absorbing here is neither positive nor even neutral, but is lined with Zionist ideology based on Western forward-looking racism, which sees the Arab and the dark-skinned as “less”, “backward”, “does not care for his children,” and the belief that “they have a lot of children and they can Compensation. ” These are not hypotheses, not mere allegations, but rather a few of the answers given by many of those responsible for these crimes as well as some adoptive parents / sponsors of these children. In obscuring the results of the committees, it was difficult to trace the path followed by the abducted person or his aftermath. It was found that some adoptive families / sponsors changed the name of the child and falsified the date of birth to make sure not to reach him / her. This gave Shlomo Hatoka the title of his article: “The Disappearance of the Yemeni Community: The Responsibility of the Adopter” (see article in Hawkets 2014). In this article, according to a Ministry of Interior worker:
“The Ministry of Interior had a role here, as the ministry prepared birth and death certificates in advance and prepared them when needed.” “The Ashkenazi families needed to adopt children of non-black skin, but they were forced to adopt these children,” she said. “That’s what was available.” As the author acknowledged, the disappearance of the relationship between the adoptor and his biological family made it difficult, and even impossible, to converge between the abducted and the original family.
The direct involvement of the Zionist state and its institutions in these criminal acts was reinforced by the Zionist judiciary. Trafficking in children in this usurper entity was not alien to the State, its institutions and many members of its racist society.
According to documented reports and research there are two main bodies involved in the deportation of children or even sold to the families of Ashkenazi want to adopt, namely, the WIZO ( World Zionist Women’s Organization) and another Zionist organization. Most of these abductees were handed over or even sold to Ashkenazi families for adoption.
Some wonder, and what is strange is that there are many cases of forced sterilization of women (what happened to African Americans), persecution, impoverishment and starvation of indigenous and other non-European white people in all countries of colonial colonialism. There are also thousands of Indigenous children, particularly in Canada (who were forcibly abducted from their parents and placed in residential schools to whiten them (ie to erase their language and culture), and were treated so severely as to abuse and rape. All these countries, like the Zionist entity, are on the list of progressive and democratic states!
The difference here in the propaganda and the global misinformation used by the Zionist state by declaring the sole representative and protector of all the Jews of the world. Using the Holocaust, which does not mean any of the victims of Zionism, Arab and non-Western Jews, this state was able to influence the governments of the world by its right to build a Jewish state on the Arab territories of Palestine. As the bearer of the name of the lawyer and defender of the world’s Jews, this country confuses the papers of many countries, which started to equate Judaism with Zionism and the state, unlike some colonial countries, which began to apologize for their hateful colonial history and launch policies and programs to reduce racism. The Zionist entity remains the only state in the world, based on openly and unequivocally discriminatory Jewish ethnicity. The result is the suppression of all attempts to criticize the state, to the extent of restricting freedom of expression in Western academies.
