NOVANEWS
-
Supporting Palestinian rights makes you “anti-Israel”
-
What the US and the West isn’t helping in Yemen
-
Palestinian rights barely exist for Australian politicians
-
Assad associate warns of chaos if he goes
-
Reminding the establishment why Wikileaks enables us all
-
How did Serco end up convincing Australian government of its brilliance?
-
Bush really killed Bin Laden, haven’t you heard?
-
Israel cancels Palestinian lives and world offers more love
Supporting Palestinian rights makes you “anti-Israel”Posted: 11 May 2011 05:58 PM PDTThis weekend I’m speaking at the Sydney Palestine conference organised by the Coalition for Justice and Peace in Palestine. I’m talking about the Arab revolutions and their effect on Palestine, the myopic Australian Jewish community and the media’s inability to speak honestly about Palestinians (I’m looking at you, Murdoch press, who seem to believe that they have to wear a mask before speaking to Palestinians). |
What the US and the West isn’t helping in YemenPosted: 11 May 2011 06:13 AM PDT
|
Palestinian rights barely exist for Australian politiciansPosted: 11 May 2011 06:07 AM PDTIt takes a certain kind of chutzpah for corporatised leaders to continue praising “democratic” Israel. |
Assad associate warns of chaos if he goesPosted: 11 May 2011 05:27 AM PDTOf course they would say this but note the warning to Israel. The essential Anthony Shadid in the New York Times:
Syria’s ruling elite, a tight-knit circle at the nexus of absolute power, loyalty to family and a visceral instinct for survival, will fight to the end in a struggle that could cast the Middle East into turmoil and even war, warned Syria’s most powerful businessman, a confidant and cousin of President Bashar al-Assad.
|
Reminding the establishment why Wikileaks enables us allPosted: 11 May 2011 01:20 AM PDTLast night in Britain Julian Assange won the Sydney Peace Foundation award for his commitment to democracy and human rights: |
How did Serco end up convincing Australian government of its brilliance?Posted: 10 May 2011 11:15 PM PDTPeter Chambers gives a convincing argument:
By all accounts, Serco probably was the least worst choice; what we are dealing with here is the political equivalent of Steven Bradbury’s win in the 2002 Winter Olympics. It’s not so much that Serco won the contract, it’s that there were no other viable contenders. This connects to the de facto situation in Canberra surrounding tender processes like this one. In practice, the leading contenders are those corporations large and wealthy enough to afford highly skilled, well-connected lobbyists capable of gaining access to and maintaining good relationships with their key counterparts in the government.
|
Bush really killed Bin Laden, haven’t you heard?Posted: 10 May 2011 10:18 PM PDT |
Israel cancels Palestinian lives and world offers more lovePosted: 10 May 2011 10:15 PM PDTWelcome to Zionist “democracy”: |