NOVANEWS
* when Israelis call their country “apartheid”, we’re in trouble
- MSM commentator prays for Iran attack
- Talking sense in the Sri Lankan media barely happens these days
- Al Jazeera’s Listening Post on Wikileaks Iraq documents
- Is the Times too worried about upsetting its mates in Washington?
- Prosecuting a child at Gitmo and calling it justice
- Pulling the troops out of Afghanistan
- How Stewart/Colbert mock Fox News America
- MSM commentator prays for Iran attack
- Talking sense in the Sri Lankan media barely happens these days
- Al Jazeera’s Listening Post on Wikileaks Iraq documents
- Is the Times too worried about upsetting its mates in Washington?
- Prosecuting a child at Gitmo and calling it justice
- Pulling the troops out of Afghanistan
- How Stewart/Colbert mock Fox News America
When Israelis call their country “apartheid”, we’re in trouble 31 Oct 2010
Zvi Bar’el in Haaretz:
|
MSM commentator prays for Iran attack 31 Oct 2010
This is what a Serious columnist for the Washington Post, David Broder, wrote yesterday:
What other response than ridicule to such ignorant bollocks? Perhaps Broder would like to kill Mahmoud Ahmadinejad himself. |
Talking sense in the Sri Lankan media barely happens these days 31 Oct 2010
Behold a true rarity. This article in Sri Lanka’s The Sunday Leader shows that there are still a few voices of reason in that authoritarian state:
|
Al Jazeera’s Listening Post on Wikileaks Iraq documents 31 Oct 2010
The Wikileaks Iraq files continue to cause robust discussion around the world.
Al-Jazeera’s weekly media show, Listening Post, examined the impact of the latest revelations and how some journalists preferred to focus on the personal life of Julian Assange rather than the fact that the US had turned a blind eye to Iraqi torture and murder. The show asked me to briefly comment on the Wikileaks story and it starts below at 8.03. (My previous Al-Jazeera appearance, regarding the Wikileaks documents on Afghanistan, is here): |
Is the Times too worried about upsetting its mates in Washington? 30 Oct 2010
New York Times‘ Public Editor looks at the ethical decisions made by the paper in accepting the Wikileaks documents over Afghanistan.
In the end, he argues that the paper made the right choice but there is one thing missing; the focus the paper took towards the US government. Was it too servile?
|
Prosecuting a child at Gitmo and calling it justice 30 Oct 2010
Obama’s America:
|
Pulling the troops out of Afghanistan 30 Oct 2010
Who says hip-hop isn’t political?
|
How Stewart/Colbert mock Fox News America 30 Oct 2010 |