NOVANEWS |
I am not the only one to notice that the Stop the War Coalition were not too happy at bin Laden’s death.
StWC’s latest tweet suggests they are decidedly grumpy on this issue.
Carl Packman, at Though Cowards Flinch, ably analyses the problem with the StWC’s approach:
“However many of us are quietly pleased that Bin Laden is history.
That is, of course, with the exception of the Stop the War Coalition, who today put out a statementwhich had the following to say (authored by Lindsey German):
The US and Britain should remind themselves of the grievances which bin Laden claimed in 2001: the presence of US troops in the Middle East; the treatment of the Palestinians; and the continued sanctions against Iraq. All of these grievances have worsened in the last ten years. There are now western troops in Iraq, Afghanistan, US bases all over the region, and an intervention including troops and airstrikes in Libya. The Palestinians suffer even more, and have been subject to aerial attack by Israel. Iraq suffers full scale occupation as a result of the war in 2003.
Why have they chosen to dignify the grievances of Bin Laden? Granted these include worthy grievances, but to put Bin Laden’s name next them, on this day of all days, comes dangerously close to saying “Bin Laden was right” – in the same way the National Front would say Enoch Powell was right.
The way they’ve juxtaposed the name of an evil terrorist with legitimate concerns is tasteless – and should be retracted, and reworded. “
One thought on “A Grumpy Stop the War Coalition And Bin Laden”
That is a very great page that u’ve posted. I can relate your site a lot.