9/11 Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out


Does Corporate Media’s 10 Year Cover-up of 911 and Blocking of a Criminal Investigation Establish Grounds for Accessory to Murder Indictments?

Intelligence Briefing

9/11: 10 Years Later
9/11: 10 Years Later

by Avalon

14,000 Architects to be Challenged by the 9/11 WTC Evidence in Denver, CO
AIA National Convention, June 20–22, 2013
Speaker – Richard Gage, AIA – Friday June 21
Muhammad Ali Center,
Louisville, KY

Screens Another Challenger:
9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out, June 20

Tuesday, June 18, 2013
San Francisco Bay Area architect Richard Gage, AIA, will present in Denver on Friday, June 21, 2013, 7:00 PM, at the Colorado Convention Center (700 14th Street, Denver, CO, Room 110).
Over 14,000 architecture professionals are expected at the National Convention of the American Institute of Architects. Volunteers staffing the AE911Truth evidence booth will be inviting them to attend the dynamic multimedia presentation on Friday night. Send your Denver friends and colleagues to the events!
If you are in Colorado, please come and bring a skeptical or uninformed friend – especially an architect, engineer, or scientist. There will be an opportunity for questions after the presentation – the toughest questions are welcomed the most!
This classic multimedia presentation provides overwhelming evidence that shows that the official World Trade Center account provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) cannot possibly be true. Gage will provide evidence of the explosive controlled demolition of all three WTC high-rise buildings that occurred on September 11, 2001. It includes up-to-date graphics and video and the latest forensic evidence on World Trade Center Building #7 (WTC 7) and the Twin Towers. The examination of the catastrophic destruction of these three skyscrapers will include:
Sudden onset of destruction Symmetrical collapse & progression Isolated explosive ejections Lateral ejection of steel Sounds/flashes and explosions Pyroclastic-like clouds Iron spheres in the WTC dust Molten iron/steel Nano-thermite discovered in the WTC dust ASCE, FEMA & NIST reports Whistle-blowers Destruction of evidence Expert corroboration Foreknowledge of destruction
n 2009, about 50 attendees signed the AE911Truth petition at the San Francisco AIA National Convention over a 3-day period. According to Gage, “This time around, we hope to double that number – we’re going to be more efficient about it.”
Two large screens will also be used to present the evidence to the architects. One of the screens will be showing a looped video of WTC7, alerting viewers to the third worst structural failure in modern history.

Now, let’s get back to the mainstream corporate media’s 10 plus year cover-up of 9/11. As a Primer, it’s important to understand the Legal definition ofAccessory. Wikipedia has a decent article on Accessory, which reads:

An accessory is a person who assists in the commission of a crime, but who does not actually participate in the commission of the crime as a joint principal. The distinction between an accessory and a principal is a question of fact and degree:

  • The principal is the one whose acts or omissions, accompanied by the relevantmens rea (Latin for “guilty mind”), are the most immediate cause of the actus reus (Latin for “guilty act”).
  • If two or more people are directly responsible for the actus reus, they can be charged as joint principals (see common purpose). The test to distinguish a joint principal from an accessory is whether the defendant independently contributed to causing the actus reus rather than merely giving generalised and/or limited help and encouragement.

In some jurisdictions, an accessory is distinguished from anaccomplice, who normally is present at the crime and participates in some way. An accessory must generally have knowledge that a crime is being, or will be committed. A person with such knowledge may become an accessory by helping or encouraging the criminal in some way, or simply by failing to report the crime to proper authority. The assistance to the criminal may be of any type, including emotional or financial assistance as well as physical assistance or concealment.
Relative severity of penalties
The punishment tariff for accessories varies in different jurisdictions, and has varied at different periods of history. In some times and places accessories have been subject to lesser penalties than principals (the persons who actually commit the crime). In others accessories are considered the same as principals in theory, although in a particular case an accessory may be treated less severely than a principal. In some times and places accessories before the fact (i.e., with knowledge of the crime before it is committed) have been treated differently from accessories after the fact (e.g., those who aid a principal after a crime has been committed, but had no role in the crime itself). Common lawtraditionally considers an accessory just as guilty as the principal(s) in a crime, and subject to the same penalties. Separate and lesser punishments exist by statute in many jurisdictions.
In some situations, a charge of conspiracy can be made even if the primary offense is never committed, so long as the plan has been made, and at least one overt act towards the crime has been committed by at least one of the conspirators. Thus, an accessory before the fact will often, but not always, also be considered a conspirator. A conspirator must have been a party to the planning of the crime, rather than merely becoming aware of the plan to commit it and then helping in some way.
A person who incites another to a crime will become a member of aconspiracy if agreement is reached, and may then be considered an accessory or a joint principal if the crime is eventually committed.
In the United States, a person who learns of the crime and gives some form of assistance before the crime is committed is known as an “accessory before the fact”. A person who learns of the crime after it is committed and helps the criminal to conceal it, or aids the criminal in escaping, or simply fails to report the crime, is known as an “accessory after the fact”. A person who does both is sometimes referred to as an “accessory before and after the fact”, but this usage is less common.

The legal implication here is that the entire corporate media machine could be brought down if it could be established that they had any knowledge of facts, or conspired to cover–up known facts or evidence to 9/11 criminality, as is fundamentally believed by millions worldwide. The past 10 plus years bears this out and demonstrates at least obstruction Vis-à-vis, a cover–up. Does this explain why many people have been ‘taken out’ because of the threat a real 9/11 Criminal Investigation and what that investigation will now reveal?
Interestingly, the Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School describesAccessory after the fact as:

Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years. Source: 18 USC § 3 – Accessory after the fact

Further, any knowledge of 9/11 being a false–flag, as many in the intelligence community will attest to, and then conspiring to orchestrate a ‘Propaganda Campaign of Terrorism’ as the corporate media has done over the past 10 years plus, would be criminal in and of itself, and could even result in Civil Lawsuits for Damages and Injury to millions of Americans being led to believe a lie and encouraged to live in fear.
Let’s not forget the ‘Killing of Bin Laden’ and subsequent death of Navy Seals who ‘knew too much’ and were assassinated under extremely questionable circumstances. Reference: Death of Osama bin Laden
There is ample evidence to support the Assassination Theory of the Navy Sealsinvolved in the made for Prime Time  Osama bin Laden Raid, including the Intellihub.com article Osama Bin Laden Death Myth Continues to Crumble as Seal Team Six Speaks Out posted March 27, 2013 by Derrick Broze.
9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out
Published on Sep 6, 2012
299,061 views on July 2, 2013 at 9:00 AM EST
This is the 1-hour version of our 1 ½ hour groundbreaking documentary 9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out which is available for purchase as a DVD in our online store at http://www.AE911Truth.org or as a download or video-on-demand at http://www.911ExpertsSpeakOut.org

See also the video of the Pledge Breaks by Shari Bernson and AE911Truth’s Richard Gage, AIA – interviewed on air in Denver, CO during this historic TV premiere of 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out”.http://www.youtube.com?watch?v=sksg5w…
Colorado Public Television (cpt12.org), has courageously thrust themselves at the forefront of our nation’s public service media network. CPT12 recently aired this powerful and controversial film as a featured premium during their Summer fundraising campaign. The PBS national website then posted the re-broadcast which quickly became one of their “Most Watched” as well as “Most Shared” programs on PBS.
As millions of people are becoming aware that they haven’t gotten the whole story on 9/11, over 1700 architects & engineers are leading the way at AE911TRUTH, with dozens of these professionals giving testimonials in this documentary, putting their careers on the line in their demand for a new independent investigation. High-rise architects, structural engineers, scientists, physicists, chemists, scholars, educators, firefighters, forensic fire engineers, demolition experts and others also testify in this ground-breaking scientific assessment of the events at the World Trade Center.

The sudden, complete collapse of the third skyscraper, WTC Building 7 at 5:20pm on 9/11 at free-fall acceleration, is now being seen around the world as “the smoking gun” which disproves the official story about 9/11. These experts also introduce additional “overwhelming evidence” for a controlled demolition hypothesis of the three World Trade Center highrises – which raises many disturbing questions.
Please support the organization that made this program possible.
Purchase the full length DVD at http://www.AE911TRUTH.org

This is the shorter 58.5 minute version for promotional use. Please also support AE911Truth by downloading the full length DVD and watch it later or watch it now at http://www.911ExpertsSpeakOut.org

Today, it is infinitely easier to kill a million people

than to control a million people.

Zbigniew Brzezinski

9/11: 10 Years Later
Uploaded on Sep 10, 2011 –
6,734 views on July 2, 2013 at 13:45 PM EST
Eight months before the September 11, 2001 attacks, Lyndon LaRouche forecast that the United States was at high risk for a Reichstag Fire event, an event that would allow those in power to manage through dictatorial means an economic and social crisis that they were otherwise incompetent to handle. We are presently living in the unbroken wake of that history.
2013 NEW Loose Change 3rd Edition
Published on Oct 2, 2012 –
176,261 views on July 2, 2013


Bin Laden’s death: How the story unfolded
Over 20 SEALs Who “Killed Osama Bin Laden” Now Dead
US Navy Seal’s ‘apparent suicide’ in Afghanistan under investigation
Osama Bin Laden ‘blew himself up with suicide belt after Navy SEAL shot him in the thigh’ claims terror leader’s former bodyguard
The new story of the death of Osama bin Laden
9/11 Explosive Evidence Film & US Tour
9–11 The Simple Facts – Why the Official Story Can’t Possibly be True
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is pleased to announce the launch of the Remember Building 7 10th Anniversary Campaign – the most aggressive ad campaign yet. This season we are accelerating our strategic partnership with RememberBuilding7.org in order to make this 10th Anniversary a vital turning point in the pursuit of a new 9/11 investigation.
Remember Building 7 Campaign Cosponsors
NYC CAN is non-partisan organization representing over one-hundred 9/11 family members, dozens of first responders and survivors, and thousands of proud citizens committed to bringing about a new and independent investigation into the events of September 11, 2001.
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is a non-partisan association of architects, engineers, and affiliates whose work is dedicated to the victims, families and all others throughout the world affected by the tragic events of September 11, 2001 and its aftermath. Their mission is to research, compile, and disseminate scientific evidence relative to the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, calling for a truly open and independent investigation and supporting others in the pursuit of justice.
911Blogger is committed to covering 9/11-related news and serves as a forum for discussion among thousands of concerned citizens seeking the truth about the events of September 11, 2001.
The Journal of 9/11 Studies is a peer-reviewed, open-access, electronic-only journal, covering the whole of research related to the events of 11 September, 2001. Many fields of study are represented in the journal, including Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics and Psychology. All content is freely available online.
World for 9/11 Truth is a grassroots initiative to unify the world behind one single idea: a new 9/11 independent investigation.
Firefighters for 9/11 Truth is a non-partisan association of firefighters and affiliates created to increase awareness, provide public education, demand a real investigation that follows National Standards, and provide support to our Brothers and Sisters in need. Firefighters for 9/11 Truth call for: 1) A truly independent investigation with Subpoena and Contempt Powers to uncover the complete truth of the events related to 9/11/2001, specifically the collapse of WTC Building 7 and the possibility of explosive demolition, 2) For the investigation to follow the national standards so clearly outlined in the National Fire Protection Association guidelines, specifically, NFPA 921 to include thorough analysis of the steel for the presence of “exotic accelerants,” and 3) For Congress to honor the promises made to the rescue workers of 9/11 by passing the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act.
In addition to leading the way in educating the French public about 9/11, ReOpen911 members translate English materials into French and make it available for the global French community. They are currently co-producing the upcoming documentary film “One”, the follow up to the 9/11 film “Zero: An investigation into 9/11”.
Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth is an association of political leaders from around the world calling upon President Barack Obama to authorize a new, truly independent investigation to determine what happened on September 11, 2001.
Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth is a multi-faith association of religious leaders from around the world formed to address the significant moral challenge that has emerged from the discrepancies between the official account of 9/11 and the results of extensive independent research by individuals with relevant scientific or professional expertise. They call upon President Barack Obama to authorize a new, truly independent investigation into the 9/11 attacks.
Lawyers for 9/11 Truth is an association of lawyers who have concluded that the 9/11 Commission and other government examinations were wholly inadequate, and did not follow proper rules of evidence or procedure. They demand a full investigation by unbiased people with subpoena power and the courage to demand that the Constitution and rule of law are followed, and all guilty persons held accountable for their actions.
AE911Truth LA Press Conference w/ Ed Asner at Premiere of 9/11: Experts Speak Out; 5-22-12
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice
9/11: Blueprint for Truth
10 Years Later
Scholars for 9/11 truth
Pilots for 9/11 Truth 
9/11 Blogger
Center for Research on Globalization
Architects & Engineers – Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 – AE911Truth.org
Uploaded by ae911truth on Aug 16, 2011
670,951 views on August 16, 2013
1,081,112 views on July 2, 2013 at 13:20 PM EST
Additional Information & Research –
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *