NOVANEWS
![]() |
ZIONIST,NEOCON EAGLEN |
Mackenzie Eaglen began the discussion by laying out the implications of sequestration for American security interests. Eaglen’s assessment was that sequestration puts U.S. emergency response capabilities at risk. It also threatens budgets for embassy security, the missions in Afghanistan and Yemen, and counterterrorism operations. She also worries that the U.S. is projecting global weakness based on the possibility of sequestration, the looming “fiscal cliff,” a reduced global presence, and an already weak economy. She ended by warning that Western military budgets as a whole are declining, while Eastern budgets are rising.
![]() |
ZIO-CON FAVORS REGIME CHANGE DAMASCUS |
I’M C.I.A. ALL THE WAY |
Peter Brookes was alarmed that the “U.S. is unilaterally disarming.” The new Middle East is going to be difficult and is unlikely to favor U.S. interests, he said. In his opinion, Iran is the greatest threat to international security. Their nuclear program has caused great anxiety for Israeli leaders. Further, Iran’s ballistic missile capability allows the Iranian Revolutionary Guard to threaten retaliation on allied regional bases if Iran is preemptively attacked. Brookes was very critical of the Syrian civil war saying, “Syria is a mess and no one is talking about it. It is an international shame. It is highly unlikely that the Obama Administration will approve a military intervention.” Brookes suggested the possibility in Syria for a Libya-like operation to take place, but unlike Obama, he would “prefer to lead from the front.”