NOVANEWS
That this House notes with concern reports that Sparkhill Jobcentre in Birmingham hands out unusually high levels of sanctions; further notes reports that people have inappropriately been given jobseeker’s directions, which are supposed to be only for people with a history of non-compliance;
further notes that the practice of making people attend 8:15 am appointments and then sanctioning them for a few minutes’ lateness was stopped after it generated negative publicity;
calls on the Government to fully investigate reports of unfair practices at this jobcentre;
draws to the Government’s attention cases from around the country of people being sanctioned, even though they informed their jobcentre that they needed to rearrange an appointment to attend a job interview, training appointment or family funeral;
urges the Government to consider how people who want to work are supposed to travel to job interviews, maintain a smart appearance or even feed themselves if the income they rely on to survive is removed for such reasons;
and calls on the Government to use all effective means possible to dramatically reduce the inappropriate use of an increasingly oppressive sanctions regime that seeks to penalise rather than encourage an effective route back into work.
Sponsors: Godsiff, Roger – House of Commons: 06.11.2013
Put your MP to work demand they sign EDM 686
Early Day Motions are very good ways of raising issues in parliament, which may not get debated in normal sittings of parliament.
You can contact your MP for free, through: WriteToThem.Com
http://www.writetothem.com/
EDM 680: Implementation Reform Section 57 of Public Order Act 1986
That this House is greatly disappointed by the Government’s delay in bringing into force section 57 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013 which removes insulting words or behaviour from the scope of section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 and which received Royal Assent on 25 April 2013; observes that there have been further reports of the misuse of section 5 by the police which would not have occurred if the provision had been implemented; expresses concern that section 5 will continue to be used to limit freedom of expression until this important reform is brought into force; and therefore calls on the Government to bring section 57 into force immediately.
Sponsors: Leigh, Edward / Davis, David / Bottomley, Peter / Huppert, Julian / Durkan, Mark