PALESTINIAN DEMOCRACY

In her recent post A true Democracy; if Israel would only let it, Audrey Farber
paints a very rosy picture of Palestinian democracy, both present and future.
Other commentators and human rights organizations paint a quite different
picture, at least of the present.
In this New York Review of Books article, Nathan Thrall asserts,

A year into Fayyad’s first term, Mamdouh al-Aker, then head of the
PA’s human rights organization, spoke of the government’s “militarization”
and asserted that “a state of lawlessness had shifted to a sort of a security
state, a police state.”
Charges of authoritarianism have intensified since. Abbas, whose term
expired during the war in Gaza, has been ruling by presidential decree.
There has been no legislature since June 2007, and judicial rulings are
frequently ignored by the security services. Fayyad, for all his commitment
to accountability and transparency, has repeatedly been found in polls to
have less legitimacy than the Hamas prime minister in Gaza, Ismail Haniyeh,
and oversees a government that in a recent Global Integrity Index tied with
Iraq as the sixth most corrupt in the world.
In other respects, too, the PA’s practices have come under severe criticism.
According to Sha’wan Jabarin, the director of the Palestinian human rights
 group al-Haq, torture has in recent months again become routine. In polls
taken since Fayyad took office, West Bank residents have consistently reported
feeling less safe than Gazans, whose lives under Hamas rule are in many
respects worse. The Ministry of Religious Affairs has dictated Friday sermons
to be read by imams.
Palestinian journalists, according to Amnesty International, were
detained and threatened during the Gaza war for reporting on government
suppression. The Palestinian Authority, since Fayyad became prime minister,
has twice ranked lower in the Reporters Without Borders Press Freedom Index
than any other Arab government. And Freedom House now gives the PA the
same rating for political rights that it does for civil liberties—”not free.” 

Unfortunately, police forces in virtually all Middle-Eastern countries are up to
more sinister activities than “standing around in the shade of armored trucks,”
the two Palestinian governments being no exception.
Human Rights Watch has documented cases of torture under PA detention
while accusing the Hamas government in Gaza of
capricious imprisonments, torture and arrests for ‘morality offenses’, while
Amnesty International has leveled similar charges against the PA. and has called
Hamas executions of suspected collaborators deplorable.”
Thrall argues that it is US interference, training and pressure that are producing
the human rights abuses in the West Bank, something I don’t think would be likely
to cease if Palestine does indeed become a country. The U.S. seems to be trying to turn
Abbas’ Palestinian Authority in to yet another Middle Eastern U.S. client state, a
project that will necessarily require severe repression of a population that may have
other plans for its future.
While it is important for progressives to respond to and correct the demonization
of Palestinians all too common in the US and Israel, it is equally important the we
not fall into the trap of idealizing them, their leaders or their governments. 
 The fact that Palestinians have a religiously diverse society has not prevented
fundamentalist Islamist movements from becoming powerful forces in that society,
and, as documented by Human Rights Watch, attempting to impose “Islamic morals”
on others. Rather, we progressives need to continue to support those fighting for a
democratic, egalitarian and peaceful future, be they religious, secular, Israeli,
Palestinian, Jewish, Christian, Druze or Muslim.
 

More Recent Articles

• Hebrew Lessons at the Learning and Creativity Center in Susiya
• Historic BDS debate in Zeek
• New resource in the fight for Israeli Democracy
• The mathematics of strangulation of Gaza
• Association for Civil Rights in Israel on democracy’s heart attack (Long)