NOVANEWS
Nadia Ismael
Right of return-is the expulsion or walked out of his home for any reason in 1948 or at any time thereafter, return to one’s home, land or a House that was live normal life before 1948, this right applies to all Palestinians, whether a man or a woman, and also applies to any offspring, however their number and whereabouts and place of birth and their political, social and economic.
It is the result of the presence in historic Palestine since time immemorial and their homeland, and that their legitimate right in the land, and that legal right, and the right of Palestinians to their homeland Palestine Thumper deep in history, the roots of the roots of the British in Britain and, of course, older Americans in America.
Despite more than half a century of wars and raids, persecution and diaspora, starvation and siege, the Palestinians stuck to their right to return home, because human entity and identity are linked to his homeland, his birthplace and burial site of his ancestors and the repository history and livelihood and source of dignity, and the right of return is sacred to all Palestinians, even the child who was born in exile, the right of return is an inalienable right, derived from the universally recognized international law.
The right of return is guaranteed by articles of the Universal Declaration of human rights adopted on 10 December 1948, the second paragraph of article 13:? everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country? This was repeated in the regional human rights conventions such as the European, American, African, Arabic, on the day following the issuance of the Universal Declaration of human rights on 10 December 1948 the famous Decree No. 194 of the United Nations General Assembly, the Palestinian refugees ‘ right of return and compensation (not: or compensation) and insisted the international community to reaffirm resolution 194 in 1948 more than 135 times and did not oppose it, but (Israel) and after the Oslo agreement was vetoed by America.
Also, the right of return of the inviolability of private property that do not go away or change the sovereignty of the country.
This right of return does not fall by prescription, which with the passage of time, however the longer duration that deprived Palestinians from returning to their homes, to an inalienable right.
It is the inalienable rights, like other human rights do not expire over time and are not subject to negotiation or compromise, and do not drop or modify or change their concept in any political treaty or agreement of any kind, even if signed by the Palestinians and others claiming to represent them.
Because it is a personal right, never does not fall, but if every person himself and willfully to drop this right for himself only. This is of course a national crime, but also a collective right, right of return by meeting individual and personal rights on the right to self-determination which was confirmed by the United Nations for all peoples in 1946, and summarized by the Palestinians in 1969 and made it an inalienable right of the Palestinians in resolution 3236 1974.
Therefore, each agreement by Palestinian representatives to drop the right of return? Legally invalid, as he plopped in the conscience and moral world, article II of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 that any agreement between the occupying power and the occupied people legally void or his representatives, if dropped.
Applies the right of return for all Palestinians, whether natural or not land owns King of the expulsion of a refugee or leaving his native Palestinian citizenship and denied him the right to citizenship, the right to return is also linked to the right to identity and belonging to a lost homeland that was denied him.
Refugee return is only to return to the same place to expel him or left for any reason he or his parents or grandparents, the explanatory memorandum to the resolution 194 on it clearly. Otherwise, keep refugee under international law to return home. Therefore, a refugee from Fallujah did not consider returning if he was allowed to settle in Hebron, a refugee from Haifa if returned to Nablus, refugee from Nazareth if returned to Jenin, and it is well known that in occupied Palestine in 1948, about a quarter of a million refugees (Israeli) nationality and they legally have the right to return refugees to their homes, although some now lives a mile from his home, the amount of space between a refugee and the original homeland does not trump the right of return, whether Refugees in Palestine 1948 or in historic Palestine, one of the country’s Arabic and foreign.
Resolution 194 paragraph 11 of resolution important 194 of the third session of the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1948, provides as follows: decides should be allowed to return as soon as possible of the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors, and that the payment of compensation for the property who decide not to return to their homes as well as for loss or loss or damage to property which returns the thing to its origin in accordance with the principles of international law and justice, so as to make up for that loss or Loss or damage by the Governments or authorities responsible.
Either are the most important paragraphs of the resolution, calling for the application of the right of return as an integral part of international law, and emphasizes that allowing the refugees wishing to return to their homes of origin, the choice here is due to the right holder in the back and not for others to decide for him or stop him, if prevented from returning by force, this is considered an act of aggression.
