No Comparison between Aafia and Shakeel Cases

NOVANEWS

By Sajjad Shaukat
Since the present government of Pakistan has started its move to exchange Dr. Aafia
Siddiqui with Dr. Shakeel Afridi, some high officials and leaders of the ruling party have
been appreciating this illogical decision. Otherwise, no comparison can be made between
the cases of Aafia and Shakeel, which are quite different from each other.
Dr Afridi was arrested after US troops captured and killed the Al Qaeda leader bin Laden
by violating the sovereignty of Pakistan in May 2011. Shakeel Afridi was sentenced 33
years imprisonment by orders of the Assistant Political Agent Bara on May 23, 2012 in
accordance with the provision of Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR). The punishment was
based on his involvement in fake polio campaign in collusion with US forces and CIA
in hunting Osama bin Laden and his close association with the banned terrorist group
Lashkar-e-Islam led by Mangal Bagh. In this regard, solid evidence was produced by the
Joint Investigation Team before the court.
Despite the fact that it was proved that Dr Shakeel Afridi was CIA agent, but the US
top officials and law makers left no stone unturned in pressurizing Pakistan to release
him. In this connection, on May 24, 2012, the then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
condemned his imprisonment as “unjust and unwarranted” for helping CIA in the killing
of Osama. She continued duress on Islamabad for the release of Dr. Afridi.
In this respect, US State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland had stated that there
was no basis for the imprisonment of Dr. Shakeel Afridi. US Republican Congressman
Dana Rohrabacher who had also prepared a resolution by favouring the separation
of Balochistan province, called Afridi’s legal punishment as a decisive proof that
Pakistan “sees itself as being at war with the US.” In their joint statement, two key US
senators Carl Levin and John McCain had said that Afridi’s sentence was shocking and
outrageous; insisting upon Islamabad to pardon Dr. Afridi through warning, otherwise,
the decision could put American aid to Pakistan at risk. Defence Secretary Leon Panetta
had stated: “It is so disturbing that they would sentence this doctor to 33 years for helping
in the search for the most notorious terrorist of our time”.
On the other side, the case of a US-trained Pakistani neuroscientist, Dr Aafia Siddiqui is
quite different from that of Dr Shakeel Afridi. In September 2010, a federal court in New
York sentenced Dr. Aafia to 86 years of imprisonment for shooting at the US soldiers in
Afghanistan. Siddiqui was arrested in July 2008 by the Afghan police and handed over to
FBI and American forces. She did not shoot anyone, though she was tortured by the US
armed personal and shot at point blank range. The critically injured Pakistani Aafia was
then extradited to US for a trial.
Without any evidence, the FBI accused Dr. Aafia of supporting Al Qaeda, and she was
not charged with terrorism. Aafia’s family in Karachi pointed out that the US justice
system is biased against Muslims. Aafia’s sister Dr. Fouzia remarked, “This is the
beginning of the greatest travesty of justice,” and Aafia has targeted by the US soldiers
so mercilessly that she was in very critical condition. Fauzia furher added that Aafia was
being forced to make incorrect statements and it was evident (in published photographs)
that she had been tortured.
Dr. Aafia’s lawyers argued in court papers that their client’s outburst inside a cramped
Afghan outpost was a spontaneous “freak out,” born of mental illness not militancy.
While Aafia stated, “I do not want any bloodshed. I do not want any misunderstanding. I
really want to make peace and end the wars.”
Nevertheless, according to many international lawyers, the hearing of the US court was
judged to be illegal and out of US jurisdiction.
Earlier protesters took to the streets across Pakistan after the sentence of Dr. Aafia
Siddiqui, lighting fires and chanting anti-American slogans. The Jamaat-e-Islami
religious party announced a national strike. In Karachi, several persons of the Jamaate-Islami and its allied youth group, Pasban, gathered outside the Press Club carrying
pictures of Siddiqui and chanting slogans against the US government and justice
system—“Free Aafia,” “We want Aafia, not dollars” the activists chanted, a reference to
US aid funds.
The then opposition leader Nawaz Sharif had remarked that he was “saddened” by the
sentence, and his brother Shahbaz Sharif, the Chief Minister of Punjab province, called
the sentence a “crime against humanity.”
However, demands were made by all the segments of society in wake of rallies,
demonstrations for the release of Dr. Aafia who was innocent.
Although Aafia must be set free, yet the present government is likely to give a blow to
the national dignity and honour of the country by following shocking way in this respect.
In this context, in August, this year, the Federal Cabinet gave approval for signing
the ‘Council of Europe’s Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons.’ This could
pave the way for repatriation of Dr. Aafia Siddiqui. The cabinet was apprised that
Pakistani nationals sentenced by US courts could not be brought home due to absence
of any bilateral agreement or any convention signed between the two countries. Under
US law, a person sentenced under federal law may only be repatriated or transferred to
country of origin if the country in question is a signatory to a prisoner transfer treaty to
which the US is also a signatory.
Certain quarters, especially of the government high officials suggest that Aafia Siddiqui
be exchanged with Shakeel Afridi. Meanwhile, Commissioner FCR overturned jail
sentence of Shakeel Afridi just a day after the cabinet decision to sign the extradition
treaty with US. It is most disturbing for people that their rulers were considering
exchange of Aafia with Afridi under US pressure. Such a decision would certainly further
damage the reputation and credibility of Pakistan. In fact, in order to maintain respect and
honour of the country and the entire nation, many more individuals like Aafia Siddiqui
could be sacrificed. So, the exchange of Aafia Siddiqui with Shakeel Afridi who brought
embarrassment, dishonour and disrespect for the nation is not only regrettable, but should
also be condemned by the general masses and our media. Pakistan’s honour and respect
come first and individuals keep offering sacrifices for their country.
On the other hand, US Administration has also prepared ground for the release of Aafia
Siddiqui so that Shakeel Afridi can be set free. As already mentioned that, a person
sentenced, under US federal law may only be repatriated or transferred to country of
origin if the country in question is a signatory to a prisoner transfer treaty to which the
United States is also a signatory. However, this fact indicates that these moves are taking
place with the secret deal of Pak-US governments.
Pakistan Government needs to understand that under no circumstances, Dr Aafia must be
exchanged with Dr. Shakeel who is not American citizen, and who is traitor to Pakistan.
Therefore, he must undergo a fair retrial due to his contemptible role in Osama bin
Laden’s episode, which brought embarrassment and disgrace to Pakistan. No doubt,
Shakeel Afridi who sold himself for dollars and had concealed facts from Pakistan and its
institution was an arch agent of CIA.
In this context, other political and religious parties, especially media must educate
people about the damage done to the state of Pakistan by Afridi’s fake polio campaign,
suggesting to the government to refrain from exchanging Aafia with Shakeel Afridi. In
this regard, US duress must be resisted and Shakeel Afridi should not be extradited to
Besides, the US administration is not justified in seeking Dr. Afridi’s release, but by this
move; it seeks to encourage other US citizens and those Pakistanis who are vulnerable
to work for CIA. By setting aside solid evidence against Shakeel Afridi, American
government also wants to prove that it protects CIA agents; even then they are citizens of
other countries.
Nonetheless, no comparison can be made between the cases of Dr. Aafia and Dr. Shakeel.
Dr. Aafia is a national hero for Pakistan, while Dr. Shakeel brought shame to the country.
Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic
Militants, Invisible Balance of Power

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *