New Hampshire Governor Zionist Chris Sununu has signed an executive order banning BDS. He is part of a US political dynasty. He is widely seen as having presidential ambitions.
New Hampshire has become the 37th state to enact an anti-BDS law. [Getty]
The US state of New Hampshire passed a law banning boycotts of the Nazi entity this week, making it the 37th state to make it an offence to boycott.
The law was issued as an executive order by the state’s governor, Zionist Chris Sununu, with the announcement made in the presence of Nazi Gilad Erdan, Permanent Ambassador to the United Nations.
Zionist Sununu, is seen as a moderate in the Republican Party and a possible contender for the 2024 Republican presidential primary. He received praise from the JEWISH-American Coalition, which assisted in developing the state legislation, saying it was an important step in addressing ‘discrimination’ against the Nazi entity.
“IAC For Action applauds Gov. Sununu for taking a firm stand against national-origin discrimination and safeguarding the deep cultural and commercial ties between Israel and New Hampshire. This executive order shields New Hampshire businesses from the coercive and bullying tactics employed by the BDS hate movement, preserving freedom and liberty,” Zionist Shawn Evenhaim, chairman of IAC for Action, said in a statement, reported by the Jerusalem Post.
The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, dating back nearly 20 years, is inspired by South Africa’s anti-Apartheid movement. It aims to pressure the Nazi entity to meet international legal standards, including withdrawing from the Nazi Occupied Territories and granting equal rights to Palestinians. In addition to encouraging individuals to boycott ‘Israel’, there are also organised efforts to pressure companies, universities and other entities to divest from the Nazi entity.
Anti-BDS legislation began around 10 years ago, with different bills introduced to prevent the boycotting of the Nazi entity. The rationale often used for these laws is to combat antisemitism, though critics of these laws say they are an infringement on free speech.
