“The Akum (non-Jew) is like a dog. Yes, the scripture teaches to honor the the dog more than the non-Jew.”
JEWISH TALNUD Ereget Raschi Erod. 22 30
NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE – whatever is going to come out of your mouth is a lie. I can tell by your face.
There is a narrative being pushed by the Ben Shapiro wing of the media that equates Hamas and Palestine with BLM and then associates it with immigrants and trannies. They use standard Jewish psychological manipulation tactics to claim that if you don’t support Israel, you’re on the team of these left groups.
I’ve even heard one leftist group claim that Hamas is “a left-wing, pro-abortion group.” I don’t know how that jives with “Islamic terrorism” – which, I think, has to be “right-wing” in a basic sense. But none of it has to make sense. It is what I like to call “Jew gibberish.”
The claim is that visually, Palestinian protesters look similar to BLM, and also that leftists stand with Palestine, and therefore, Palestine is BLM.
The existence of Israel is an extension of the Holocaust narrative and the crown of the Jewish world conspiracy. I am wholly against the existence of the Zionist state. I don’t “hate both sides.” I dislike hordes of Arabian immigrants as a concept, but that has nothing to do with what is going on in Palestine – other than the fact that what the Jews are doing is going to lead to more Arabian immigrants.
BLM and pro-Palestine protesters are both “angry brown people marching around demanding something.” But that’s where the similarities end. BLM did not have a valid complaint. Pro-Palestine demonstrators are demanding the US stop helping Israel murder children. It was impossible to meet the demands of BLM, or even understand what they were. We couldn’t stop a racist conspiracy that didn’t exist. It was frustrating and exhausting. Conversely, the US could very easily stop Israel from murdering innocent people. It could be done by the president or by Congress. The slaughter could be stopped within 48 hours.
My complaints about Jews and Israel go very far beyond what is happening in Palestine, they go very far beyond the understanding of any leftist who supports Palestine. However, if a leftist (even a tranny) supports Palestine against Israel, they are doing the right thing. That’s just the way it is. Nothing can ever change that. Hamas are the good guys.
I understand that there is a lot of disinformation, so this is going to be a long one.
First Section Following Introduction
I listen to anti-Semitic internet personality and fashion icon Nick Fuentes, and he does regular “vocab checks.” A “vocab check” is including a “college word” or a “Jeopardy word” in communication, and you “check” your audience to see if they know the word. I don’t personally do this in public communication. It’s a valid stylistic choice and behavior, but “checking” the audience to see if they know a word, feels to me like going big on the audience (“going big” is nigger slang, the use of which is sort of the opposite of a vocab check). He recently used a piece of irregular language that is useful for the analysis of the equating of BLM with Palestine.
Related: Nick Fuentes and Alex Jones Quash the Beef in Friendly Interview
Personal vocabulary note: I’m a writer, and when you’re writing, you can use a thesaurus. It’s very easy to use words that you don’t even know the meaning of. It’s a way to immediately spot amateur writing by just glancing at it – amateurs will (almost universally) use a thesaurus to try to pepper their materials, and give the illusion of depth and intellect. It’s very easy to do on a computer (you can install software that allows you to right click a word and pull up thesaurus words). I did this with a paper dictionary when I was in 7th grade. Back then, they used to cut down trees (the things outside with the leafs on them) and use the wood to make a pulp they could turn into “books” that included paper sheets with words. A teacher, a very nice fat lady who believed in the Holocaust but was otherwise smart, and was very interested in my writing, explained what I’m explaining to you: thesauruses are for elaborating your personal understanding or for trying to find words that rhyme, they’re not for writing. This was a lucky break (God has given me quite a few), because I’ve heard people claim that college professors told them a thesaurus is for writing. “A thesaurus is not for writing” is a piece of wisdom that sounds like it’s from Mark Twain and which should be given to all students.
I like that Nick drops these words on an audience of mostly high schoolers that don’t understand the meaning. It’s funny. It fits into a kind of “hostility towards audience” meta humor he has going on. He’s not trying to demonstrate his intellect in a gaudy way, as someone suggested to me once. He actually sometimes uses archaisms, which proves that it’s a joke, at least in part – it’s a self-conscious fun thing, not a real attempt to appear smarter than the audience. And, in fact, jargon can be useful in understanding complex ideas.
Paragraph check. By the way, since I’ve already opened up a bit about my writing style I’ll add: I am aware my paragraphing is not appropriate at all. Nothing, in fact, about my writing is appropriate, including all of the content. I have developed a personal style of writing that is attuned to the medium of the internet. In fact, I’ve actually pioneered an entirely new style of writing to fit the medium. I am aware of how young people read on the internet, and the style is consciously designed to fit that. I also invented “physical internet humor,” by the way (example here).
Back before all mention of me was blacklisted by the media, my style guide was leaked to the media. It was leaked by me, on purpose, so the media would publish a bunch of articles saying “wow, he’s surprisingly a genius.” It was a “big scoop” back then. This is why virtually all mention of me was banned from all media – I was winning, bigly. I was able to get them to print what I wanted them to print. This might sound like mastermind shit, but it’s not. It’s very easily to manipulate journalists, because they are astonishingly stupid and inept. Journalists are such babies, a British think tank had to come in and publish not one but two papers about what I was doing, and declare that I just shouldn’t be mentioned at all.
(Republished from The Daily Stormer by permission of author or representative)
