NOVANEWS
By: TUT
ed note–assuming that this is an accurate statement, i.e. that all the translations were done accurately and weren’t ‘spiced up’ like the JMSM’s translation of former Iranian Pres. Ahmadinejad’s ‘wipe Israel off the map’ statement, it suggests some very interesting implications.
Despite the poetic and metaphor-rich language that is infamously part of the Middle Eastern mind and its accompanying language, nevertheless the White House being ‘destroyed in 10 minutes’ pretty much seems to mean one thing and one thing only–a WMD of some type going off in DC, and therefore, It may be–likely or unlikely as it is–that the reluctance on the part of the US to ‘deal’ with Iran in the same the way that she has dealt with Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, etc, is this very scenario, not as a result of Iranian nukes, but rather those of other countries whose interests lie in keeping Iran intact an reigning in the US, such as the Russians, Chinese or even Pakistanis.
Let’s face it, when has America EVER dealt with another nation based upon such notions as ‘international law’ or ‘sovereignty of nations’? America understands one thing and one thing only–the barrel of a gun, and it may very well be that the US understands that a war with Iran means a war with any one or all of the aforementioned players and has decided therefore that it is ‘bridge too far’.




