Historian writes of ‘pleasure’ at murder of pro-Palestinian activist

NOVANEWS

Not that Vik needs anyone’s defense, and so there’s no need to respond to the specific claims, but I just wanted to register how pathetic this Jewish Chronicle article by Geoffrey Alderman is:

Few events – not even the execution of Osama bin Laden – have caused me greater pleasure in recent weeks than news of the death of the Italian so-called “peace activist” Vittorio Arrigoni.

On Thursday 14 April Arrigoni was murdered in Gaza by members of Jama’at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad (JTJ), who had him strangled and then dumped his body in a deserted Gaza apartment. This same group had previously had him kidnapped in order – apparently – to compel the Hamas government of Gaza to release the group’s leader, Sheikh Abu al-Walid al-Maqdisi.

Hamas was naturally having none of this, and launched a search for Arrigoni, whose murder may have been ordered to prevent discovery of the kidnappers, though it is just as likely that the deed was carried out merely as a routine (so to speak) quasi-judicial punishment for the crime of being a foreigner (i.e. a non-Muslim) in a Muslim land.

JTJ is an al-Qaida affiliate. Its precise history is necessarily obscure, but it seems to have originated in Iraq, where it has resorted to any means (including the use of chlorine gas) in the pursuit of its goal of turning Iraq, post-Saddam, into an Islamic state.

In Gaza it has sought to establish itself as an alternative government to that of Hamas. Its religious leader, al-Maqdisi, by birth an Egyptian, is credited amongst many other things with having orchestrated the murder of western tourists in Sinai in 2006. He is certainly the author of a fatwa enjoining the kidnapping and killing of tourists in countries ruled by what he and his followers would regard as “apostate” Muslim governments. At the beginning of March this year he was detained by Hamas, perhaps at the request of the Egyptian authorities.

But my concern is less with Abu al-Walid al-Maqdisi than with Vittorio Arrigoni, whose killing was immediately pounced upon by the western media as an affront to the civilised world. Even Hamas felt impelled to associate itself with these encomia.

The Italian was described as a “peace activist.” But the truth is very different. Vittorio Arrigoni, a disciple of the International Solidarity Movement, had travelled to Gaza to assist in the breaking of the Israeli naval blockade. As a supporter of Hamas he was a consummate Jew-hater. His Facebook page contained not merely the customary insults aimed at Israel but explicit anti-Jewish imagery, which may have reflected in part his Catholic upbringing: one image, for example, shows Jesus under arrest by Israeli soldiers.

The death of a consummate Jew-hater must always be a cause for celebration. In this case, however, the benefit is compounded by the dissensions that it has sown within the wider Israel-hating and Jew-hating fraternities.

Some members of these fraternities, ignoring or (in one case) making a virtue of the complete absence of evidence, have actually accused Mossad of his murder, alleging (in the wake of the Goldstone Retraction) that Arrigoni alone knew “the truth” of Operation Cast Lead. The Zionists, according to this argument, having forced Richard Goldstone to withdraw his contemptible allegation that during Cast Lead Israeli troops deliberately targeted civilians, needed to silence Arrigoni lest “the truth” be told.

But what particularly caught my eye was the emotional plea for Arrigoni’s life posted on YouTube by Ken O’Keefe, the former US marine who has taken it upon himself to espouse the cause of Hamas and with whom I appeared on Press TV last year.

Arrigoni is not the first ISM activist to be murdered by Palestinian Arabs. In September 2007 Akram Ibrahim Abu Sba’ was killed in Jenin by members of Islamic Jihad. But in his video plea O’Keefe ignored this precedent, and engaged instead a typical rant not only against the Jewish state but against its Christian supporters. Whoever had kidnapped Arrigoni, he argued, had branded themselves as collaborators of Israel and of its Zionist enterprise. And he repeated the charge of collaboration in a further video made after the discovery of Arrigoni’s body.

The idea that JTJ – or indeed any fundamentalist Islamic group of the Salafist variety – would collaborate with Israel is too fanciful to merit attention. But in putting forward this argument O’Keefe has revealed himself as completely detached from reality.

During our Press TV discussion O’Keefe challenged me to a public debate. Naturally I accepted, and we subsequently fixed the date – 28 April 2011. This date has come and gone. But if we manage to reschedule the event I’ll let you know.

That whatever sub-sector of the British Jewish community reads Alderman, that his editor basically defends him, is also pathetic. That a Jew wrote this in a Jewish newspaper in ostensible defense of “Jews” is also pathetic. These are sick people, and it’s a good thing that the Jewish people is a Zionist invention. One wouldn’t want to have anything to do with these people.

But please don’t get in too much in a tizzy over the aestheticized bigotry of the frothing far-right. The reaction is also a mirror. By ripping into it you (rightfully) engage in judgment. But then “we” (including the Chronicle‘s more “liberal” readers) erect themselves above the fray. Extremists on both sides, what shall we ever do? And so on, perfectly exemplified in the Guardian’s comment section: that Alderman, what a loon, and so on. We are not supposed to exult publicly over the deaths of our victims and those who struggle alongside them. Instead, better to simply not notice, or, noticing, wring our hands over the sheer intractability of the situation.

I’m reminded of Amos Oz: “What will become of us all, I do not know. If there is someone with an answer, he would do well to stand up and speak. And he’d better not tarry. The situation is not good.” Over in the real world, some people have had answers: march towards the borders the Israel state maintains with violence. And over in the real world, three days ago J Street called Palestinian non-violence “violence.” There is truth in that lie. For Washington technocrats and the rulers of the world, violence is just code for resistance. And that’s one thing that’s never permitted.

One wouldn’t want the rabble to get the idea that they can change the world without the approval of their masters.

Technorati Tags: Gaza, ISM, Israel, Palestine, Vittorio Utopia Arrigoni, Zionism

Related posts:

1. another Palestinian, another terrorist Israel National News reports that “Israeli tanks and bull­doz­ers crossed…

2. Palestinian Gandhi, mark II I am not going to reca­pit­u­late the debate about Palestine,…

3. murder attempt on Haneen Zoabi? Jonathan Cook reports that at a demon­stra­tion yesterday when right-wing…

4. remember this story when someone mumbles about the Palestinian Gandhi Public servant Bassem Mohammed al-Tamimi is from al-Nabi Saleh, a…

5. the war against Gaza continues My friend Adie Mormech reports from the Gaza Strip: When 91…