After nearly six years of weekly protests, the army began dismantling the Wall
in Bil’in this week. Protesters will march to the Barrier this Friday implementing
their right to access their lands.
What: Mass demonstration in Bil’in Where: Bil’in Village, West of Ramallah When: Friday, June 24th at 12:30
The Bil’in Popular Committee has declared Friday the 24th to be the last day of
the old path of the Barrier on village’s lands, and the beginning of the struggle
against the new path. A mass demonstration will march on the Barrier to dism-
antle it and access the lands sequestered behind it.
On Tuesday morning this week, army bulldozers began work to dismantle the
Wall in Bil’in. As early as 2007, after two years of weekly protests in the village
and following a petition filed by the residents, Israeli high court declared the
path of the Barrier illegal. The court ruled that the route was not devised according
to security standards, but rather for the purpose of settlement expansion. Despite
the high court’s ruling four more years of struggle had to elapse for the army to
begin dismantlement. During these years two people were killed in the course of the
weekly protests and many others injured.
Yet even according to the new path, sanctioned by the high court, 435 acres of
village land will remain on the “Israeli” side of the Barrier.
On September 4th, 2007, the high court ordered the state to come up with an altern-
ative path for the existing Barrier in Bil’in within a reasonable period of time. Despite
the ruling, many months elapsed and no new plan was offered. On the May 29th, 2008,
the residents of Bil’in filed a petition to hold the state in contempt of the court due to
this delay. In response to the petition, the state offered an alternative path. However,
the plan failed to comply with the high court’s ruling as the proffered path left a large
area designed for settlement expansion on the “Israeli” side of the Barrier. The only
difference between the two paths being that the latter offered to award 40 acres of land
back to the residents.
A second petition claiming the alternative path not in accordance with court ruling was
then filed. On August 3rd, 2008, the court declared that the first alternative path indeed
fails to adhere to the ruling. The court ordered the state to come up with another alterna-
tive path.
On September 16th, 2008, the state offered a second alternative path. This path also left
a large area designed for settlement expansion on the “Israeli” side, offering to return a
100 acres of village land to the residents. A lawyer for the residents asked that the state
be held in contempt of the court for violating a court ruling for the second time.
On December 15th, 2008, the high court ruled that the second alternative path was not
in accordance with the original court ruling.
In April 2009 the state offered a third alternative path which left most of the area destined
for settlement expansion on the “Palestinian” side of the Barrier, thereby returning to the
village 150 acres of 490 acres annexed by the original path.
