Türkiye imposes trade restrictions with ‘Israel’
Since Israel began its genocidal war on Gaza, Türkiye withdrew its ambassador from Israel and backed South Africa’s genocide suit against it in the International Court of Justice.
By: Peoples Dispatch

Erdoğan during a state visit of Israeli President Isaac Herzog to Turkey (2022). Photo: Government Media Office of Israel / Wikimedia commons
The Palestinian Authority (PA) on Wednesday, April 9 welcomed Türkiye’s decision to impose trade restrictions on Israel pending ceasefire in Gaza and “sufficient and uninterrupted flow” of humanitarian aid to the region as a “step in the right direction.”
On Tuesday April 9, Türkiye’s Ministry of Trade announced the suspension of export of 54 items including machinery, mostly related to the construction industry to Israel, until it ends the war in Gaza and allows the flow of adequate humanitarian aid in the territory. The ministry cited resolutions adopted by the UN Security Council, the General Assembly, and the interim injunction issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the statement announcing its restrictions.
“Israel continues to violate international law flagrantly and ignores the international community’s numerous calls for ceasefire and uninterrupted humanitarian aid” the ministry said in a statement. “As the state and people of the Republic of Turkiye, we will continue to stand by and support Palestine and its people, as we have done so far” it said.
Mohammad Alamour, Palestine’s minister of economy, claimed that the Turkish decision is a step “in the right direction to implement the resolutions of the UN Security Council and the International Court of Justice regarding an immediate ceasefire and providing aid and relief to our people in Gaza.”
The UN Security Council and General Assembly have passed separate resolutions demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and increased access to humanitarian aid for the Palestinians in the besieged territory.
The ICJ had issued an interim order in January asking Israel to stop acts of genocide and to allow access to adequate humanitarian aid while hearing a petition brought by South Africa which alleged Israel of committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.
Talking about how Israel denied Turkiye’s request to join air dropping of humanitarian aid in Gaza and its restrictions on the land route for aid, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said in a press conference on Monday that his country has designed a set of measures against Israel which would be implemented in phases until there is a ceasefire in Gaza.
Türkiye has been one of the leading aid providers to Gaza since the beginning of the war in October.
Israel threatens actions against Türkiye
Reacting to Türkiye’s decision, Israel Katz, the Israeli foreign minister, threatened to take action against Türkiye in a statement on X. He claimed that Israel will lobby the US and other countries to stop the flow of international investment in the country. He also threatened to impose a ban on the imports of other goods from the country.
According to the Turkish media, Türkiye exported goods and services worth USD 5.43 billion to Israel in 2023. Trade between both the countries has already been affected by the Israeli war in Gaza.
Türkiye was one of the first countries in the region to recognize Israel in 1948. However, the relations between both the countries have seen several ups and downs since Recep Tayyip Erdogan came to power in the early 2000s. In 2018, following Israel’s killing of hundreds of Palestinians during the Great March of Return protests, Türkiye withdrew its ambassador from Israel.
The relations were normalized four years later in 2022 when both the countries agreed to restore their diplomatic ties. However, in November last year, Türkiye withdrew its ambassador from Israel again in opposition to the war in Gaza which as of April 10 has killed over 33,000 Palestinians and wounded nearly 76,000 others.
Erdogan has called the Israel a “terror state” and supported South Africa’s charges in the ICJ of it committing genocide of Palestinian people in Gaza.
Colonel Africa
By: Ilona Yegiazarova

The following article is taken largely verbatim from an article written by Ilona Yegiazarova in the Moskovskaya Pravda of 18 September 2020. Some material irrelevant for the present purposes has been omitted and a few additional facts have been added. It recounts the life of a Spanish-born KGB Intelligence Officer, Africa de las Heras, whose little-known story we bring forward as LALKAR’s contribution to the celebration of International Women’s Day.
On September 18, 2020, the City of Moscow daily newspaper Moskovskaya Pravda published a chapter from an upcoming book on Soviet intelligence officers by journalist Ilona Yegiazarova. The chapter describes the life and work of Africa de las Heras (1909-1988), a Spanish-born Soviet intelligence officer active both during the World War Two and the early Cold War. In her later life, De las Heras was active in training the new generations of Soviet illegal intelligence officers.
The Sultry Girl
She was born in the city of Ceuta (Spanish Morocco) in 1909, where her father, an officer who was critical of the ruling regime of Miguel Primo de Rivera, worked in the military archive. And although Zoilo de las Heras Jimenez was the brother of the famous Spanish general Manuel de las Heras, working in Morocco was for him essentially an exile. (Remember the uncle who was the general; we will come back to him later in our story). The father gave his daughter an unusual name – Africa – in gratitude to the African continent which had sheltered him and his family. After some time, they returned to Spain where Zoilo died suddenly in 1933. Africa and her older sister Virtudes found themselves on their own.
Our heroine got married early; she had barely turned 19 and her husband was an officer, of course. He was a supporter of Francisco Franco, but at that time Africa did not attach any significance to that. Then the couple had a child, and, with all the passion of her nature, she plunged into the joys of motherhood. But the baby died.
This was the traumatic turning point that changed her life. The unhappy woman looked for an outlet for her emotions; she did not know where to direct her unspent energy… Her husband seemed not to understand what was going on and they divorced. Then Africa turned to the parties of the Left.
[Having trained as a dressmaker], in mid-1933, she worked in a textile factory in Madrid and joined the Communist Party. Soon she took part in the preparations for the miners’ uprising in the province of Asturias. She carried out the most dangerous assignments: she distributed weapons and acted as a liaison between the various detachments of the rebels all the while using the cover of being the famous general’s niece.
She ended up in jail a couple times and then hid from the authorities for a whole year.
When the Spanish Civil War broke out, ‘Afrikita’ enthusiastically joined the fight against the Franco regime. It was then that she was recruited by Soviet foreign intelligence in Madrid. On its behalf, she began taking dangerous trips to neighbouring countries. She took on the operational pseudonym “Patria” which she used in her reports to the Centre for the rest of her life.
Leon Trotsky, Ramon Mercader, and Nikolay Kuznetsov
Our heroine faithfully served in the Soviet foreign intelligence service for more than 45 years. It is breathtaking just to try to count the roles she played and the missions she was involved in. However, the truth and the legend are difficult to keep apart in this respect. Her full biography is still classified and there are gaps that many have filled with invented tales.
The most intriguing chapter in her life is perhaps her acquaintance with Leon Trotsky. It is said that she was assigned to him in the role of a translator and a secretary. It is also claimed that she was a friend of Ramon Mercader and helped him prepare the assassination of the ‘demon of the revolution’ on Stalin’s orders. [However, Trotsky was not killed until August 1940, quite some time after she left Mexico, so although she may have been spying on him and would probably have met Mercader who was a part of Trotsky’s circle, it is unlikely she had anything to do with his death, which the Soviets have always denied having organised]. She was urgently recalled to the USSR in 1939 when the Soviet intelligence chief in Madrid, Alexander Orlov, frightened by the purge in the intelligence service, defected to the West. The Centre feared that he would expose Africa and therefore it recalled her to Moscow. Here our heroine received Soviet citizenship and got a job in a textile factory. Many Spaniards arrived in the USSR at that time and no one even suspected who this dark, fragile beauty really was. And Orlov never exposed his former subordinate…
When the Great Patriotic War began, Africa made every effort to be sent to the frontline. She enlisted in the Special Medical Unit of the OMSBON (Independent Motorised Brigade for Special Operations) of the NKVD, then she attended the accelerated courses for radio operators. After graduating with honours, she was sent to the newly formed reconnaissance and sabotage unit ‘Victors’ under the command of the future Hero of the Soviet Union Dmitry Medvedev. In her memoirs, she wrote:
“Sometime later, I took the oath of a radio operator. I solemnly swore that I would never surrender to the enemy alive and would blow up with grenades the transmitter, the quartz mechanism, and the ciphers. I was handed two grenades, a pistol, a curved [Finnish] knife. From that moment on, I constantly carried all of that with me…”
From a partisan detachment, deep behind enemy lines, she fearlessly sent to Moscow secret information obtained by intelligence officer Nikolay Kuznetsov who operated under cover as an officer of the German secret police Paul Siebert. In order to send his encrypted messages to the Centre, three radio operators, accompanied by guards, would go out of the camp into the forest. Two radio operators would broadcast disinformation, and only Africa – because she was the best – was chosen to transmit accurate information to Moscow. This was done to deceive the potential German interceptors. Nikolay Kuznetsov called her his favourite radio operator.
She steadfastly endured all the hardships of partisan life: “We received telegrams from about thirty partisan units. We handled encryption, transmission, reception, decryption… We had almost no time left for sleep.” The Russian winter caused physical suffering in this woman from the South: she felt cold all the time. Once Kuznetsov got three short fur coats for his radio operators and he also gave Africa a beautiful woollen shawl. For the rest of her life, she remembered him fondly…
For the successful performance of combat missions and active participation in the partisan movement during the war years, Africa was awarded the Order of the Patriotic War of the 2nd degree and the Order of the Red Star, as well as the medals ‘For Courage’ and ‘Partisan of the Patriotic War’ of the 1st degree.
She got married on the orders of the Centre
In the first year after the war, Africa settled in Paris [as a dressmaker]. [There she married a Uruguayan and transferred to Uruguay with her husband whom she divorced after she received her residency permit]. Her cover was that of the owner of a fashion studio and later of an antiquarian shop [in Montevideo]. And you know, she had some brilliant successes. Elegant, with a lot expertise in art, a painter herself, she easily made friends with high society ladies. Through them, she met their high-ranking husbands and obtained valuable information. She spent 22 years in Latin America [where she was known as Maria Luisa]. There was a lot of work to do. After eight years of solo work, in 1956, the Centre sent her a husband!
She obeyed without a protest and did not ask a single question. Her husband, the station chief Giovanni Antonio Bertoni was an Italian by birth and had worked for the USSR since 1936. He was Africa’s supervisor and a friend. Was there any romantic love between them? When, after eight years of marriage, he died suddenly, she was crushed with grief.
Africa was also engaged in covert missions linked to the Cuban missile crisis and the struggle against the American atomic programme. Although she could have retired after the death of her husband, “Patria” wanted to remain working. The country where she was based seemed to be on the verge of a military coup, and she remained there for another three years to collect and transmit important information.
Afterword
She returned to the USSR in the 1970s [with the rank of Colonel in the KGB, and was awarded the Order of Lenin]. She trained young intelligence officers and shared her experiences with them. She did not have any children of her own and her maternal care and tenderness found an outlet in her relations with her students. Of course, she longed for her family members left behind in Spain, whom she had not seen since 1939. Once she heard on the radio how the Spanish Red Cross was looking for lost loved ones. The list of endless names included her sister Virtudes who was looking for her. Her heart sank, but she could not reply because of her intelligence work. That’s the kind of life she led: she was completely devoted to the ideals of peace and security.
Africa de las Heras died at the age of 78, on an important day – March 8, 1988 [and is buried in the Khovanovskaya cemetery in Moscow].. On an international women’s holiday, on a date with three eights, which symbolise infinity. …
OBITUARY – Gonzalo Lira

Reproduced from the Helsinki Times of 13 January 2024, with thanks
Gonzalo Lira, a Chilean-American war commentator known for his critical views on the Zelensky regime and Russia-Ukraine conflict, passed away on January 11, 2024, in a hospital in Kharkiv, Ukraine. Lira’s death followed an eight-month imprisonment on charges of ”justifying Russia’s military actions in Ukraine”, sparking international controversy and raising questions about freedom of speech and human rights during wartime.
Gonzalo Lira gained notoriety in 2022 as a vocal critic of what he perceived as increasing authoritarianism in Ukraine. Lira saw the conflict as a proxy war waged by US against Russia and criticised the loss of life for a futile and unwinnable war.
His arrest in May 2023, under the charges of “production and dissemination of materials justifying Russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine,” was a turning point. It not only highlighted the complexities of war-time free speech but also catalysed opposition movements against US funding for the conflict. High-profile figures like tech mogul Elon Musk and Fox News host Tucker Carlson called for his release, bringing global attention to his case.
The news of Lira’s deteriorating health emerged from communications between his father, Gonzalo Lira Sr., and the US embassy. Documents and emails revealed attempts by Lira Sr. to alert the embassy about his son’s critical condition and the lack of transparency from Ukrainian authorities regarding his health status.
“I cannot accept the way my son has died. He was tortured, extorted, incommunicado for 8 months and 11 days and the US Embassy did nothing to help my son,” Lira Sr. stated in an email announcing the news.
“The responsibility of this tragedy is [with] the dictator Zelensky with the concurrence of a senile American President, Joe Biden,” he wrote, adding: “My pain is unbearable. The world must know what is going on in Ukraine with that inhuman dictator Zelensky.”
In a poignant hand written note, Lira described his health ordeal, including double pneumonia, pneumothorax, and severe oedema. This letter, believed to be his last written correspondence, detailed the neglect he faced in prison. Despite these alarming symptoms, proper medical attention was reportedly delayed until it was too late.
The letter reads: “I have had double pneumonia (both lungs) as well as pneumothorax and a very severe case of edema (swelling of the body). All this started in mid-October, but was ignored by the prison. They only admitted I had pneumonia at a Dec. 22 hearing. I am about to have a procedure to reduce the edema pressure in my lungs, which is causing me extreme shortness of breath, to the point of passing out after minimal activity, or even just talking for 2 minutes.”
Lira Sr.’s persistent efforts to seek help from the US embassy and to ensure his son’s welfare while hospitalised went unheeded. His worst fears were confirmed a week later with the news of his son’s death. In a heart-wrenching statement, Lira Sr. condemned both the Ukrainian and US governments for their roles in his son’s demise, calling it a result of “torture, extortion, and incommunicado detention.”
In a significant development last August, Gonzalo Lira, after being silent on social media for months following his arrest by Ukrainian authorities, reemerged with messages claiming he was attempting to escape Ukraine. However, his efforts were reportedly thwarted, leading to rumours of his recapture. Mark Sleboda, an international relations analyst, affirmed on social media that Lira had attempted to flee to Hungary to request political asylum but was stopped at the Ukrainian border. Lira’s posts detailed his ordeal, including allegations of torture and extortion for $70,000 while detained. He also expressed skepticism about receiving political asylum in any European Union country other than Hungary, fearing deportation back to Ukraine. The last communication from Lira hinted at the risk of being sent to a labor camp, with subsequent silence raising concerns about his fate.
The US Department of State eventually confirmed Lira’s death, extending condolences to the family but refraining from further comments. This confirmation followed Tucker Carlson’s report on Lira’s death and Elon Musk’s earlier appeals to Ukrainian President Zelensky to explain Lira’s arrest and detention.
Russian authorities had previously called for the global journalistic community to defend Lira, highlighting the complex geopolitical implications of his case. The SBU maintained that Lira was lawfully arrested and detained, adding another layer to this international dispute.
Report from the courts

Given the lead given by the British government to encourage the forces of law and order to victimise those who support the Palestinian people in their struggles against the Zionist entity that is currently engaged in genocide in Gaza, it is both welcome and surprising that two judicial proceedings last month actually upheld, at least to some extent, the right of people to express their support for Palestine and their opposition to Zionism and the Zionist state that is Israel.
David Miller at the employment tribunal
Professor David Miller was sacked 2 years ago from his post as a lecturer at Bristol University because he had expressed anti-Zionist views, much to the distress of Zionist supporting students at the university who, as Zionists always do, tried to claim that his views were anti-Semitic! David Miller went to the Employment Tribunal claiming unfair dismissal contrary to Section 13 of the Equality Act 2010, which protects an individual’s right to hold and express “philosophical beliefs”. The Tribunal accepted that anti-Zionism was in fact a protected philosophical belief and that therefore, since this was the reason for his dismissal, that dismissal was indeed unfair.
The Employment Tribunal determined that the claimant’s anti-Zionist beliefs did qualify as protected beliefs pursuant to section 10 Equality Act 2010. In doing so, the Tribunal applied what are known as the Grainger criteria: (i) The belief must be genuinely held (ii) It must be a belief and not an opinion or viewpoint based on the present state of information available (iii) It must be a belief as to a weighty and substantial aspect of human life and behaviour (iv) It must attain a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance, and (v) It must be worthy of respect in a democratic society. The Tribunal found that anti-Zionist beliefs satisfied all these criteria.
Although the Tribunal found in Professor Miller’s favour, it did also indicate that there is effectively a limit on one’s right to express one’s “philosophical beliefs”: while he was perfectly entitled to express them in the course of his work so long as they were relevant to his work, his angry confrontations with students demanding his dismissal was in the Tribunal’s opinion excessively aggressive and justified the amount of damages he would be awarded being halved. The Tribunal also thought it might have been justifiable to dismiss him for saying that “Jews are not discriminated against”, they are “overrepresented” and that “Judeophobia barely exists these days”, remarks he had made publicly after his dismissal. Yet whether one agrees with these statements or not, it is obvious Professor Miller did not make these statements in order to incite hatred of Jews and they would not have had that effect. So why is he not entitled to his opinions, especially as he is a Professor of political sociology who would have based his opinions on a considerable body of fact?
Professor Miller was nevertheless delighted with the Tribunal’s decision.
“I am extremely pleased that the Tribunal has concluded that I was unfairly and wrongfully dismissed by the University of Bristol,” he said.
“I am also very proud that we have managed to establish that anti-Zionist views qualify as a protected belief under the UK Equality Act.
“This was the most important reason for taking the case and I hope it will become a touchstone precedent in all the future battles that we face with the racist and genocidal ideology of Zionism and the movement to which it is attached.”
Criminal proceedings against three lady demonstrators, Heba Alhayek, Pauline Ankunda and Noimutu Olayinka Taiwo,
On October 14 2023, a week after the Palestinian Resistance had mounted a highly effective attack on Israel, three women went on a pro-Palestinian march in London to express their approval of the fact that the oppressed were fighting back so fiercely against their oppression. They were clearly impressed by the fact that the Resistance fighters had been able to evade Israeli defences by using paragliders to enter Zionist held territory and they attached a small picture to themselves displaying an image of a parachute to express their approval. The women were charged under the Terrorism Act, no less, with carrying or displaying an article to arouse reasonable suspicion that they were supporters of a banned organisation, i.e., Hamas.
Yet, based on the Charter of the United Nations, the 1970 United Nations General Assembly, Resolution 2625 explicitly endorsed a right to resist “subjection of peoples to alien subjugation, domination and exploitation“, exactly the situation in which the Palestinian people find themselves. One assumes that nobody is going to argue that the United Nations is a terror organisation, or a supporter of terror!
Anyway, when the case reached the court, the ladies were found to be guilty but the judge took the view that there was no evidence at all to suggest that they were in fact supporters of Hamas. Presumably he thought that by sticking a small picture of a paraglider on their coats it would have been reasonable for the man on the Clapham omnibus, however mistakenly, to say to himself: Ah! They must be Hamas supporters! Ignorant of United Nations Resolutions (and of the very many UN General Assembly and Security Council Resolutions of which Israel is in breach), and equally ignorant of the fact that multiple Palestinian factions – not only Hamas – were involved in the 7 October attack, it was ‘reasonable’ for him to assume they were Hamas supporters!
On that basis the judge must have been aware that it was arguable that the hundreds of thousands of people who attended the demonstration were all Hamas supporters! Holding a Palestinian flag? You must be a Hamas supporter. Chanting ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free’? You must be a Hamas supporter! It would not be surprising if the judge was thinking that the whole business was an outrageous waste of the time of both the court and the police – time which would have been better spent catching and convicting real criminals.
Be that as it may, and convinced as he was that no evidence had been brought to show that any of the ladies actually supported Hamas even if they were, in his opinion, technically guilty as charged, he refused to send them to prison and instead gave them a conditional discharge. We don’t know what the conditions are, but if they are kept to then their conviction will effectively be struck out.
This sensible course of action has of course been roundly condemned by the Zionist coterie and the bourgeois establishment bent on trying to silence the opponents of the racist apartheid Israeli state, a hard job because it is the opponents who have truth and justice on their side. Trawling through the judge’s social media accounts, someone was able to identify one occasion when the judge ‘liked’ some anti-Israel remark and on that basis claimed he was biased and should not have tried the case. We are quite sure they would have been very happy, however, if the case had been tried by some tried and tested Zionist, who had donated to Zionist causes and/or paid regular visits to Israel for his holidays. This is not an issue in which anyone who is in any kind of public office is not going to have taken sides, and if anything the judge did bend over backwards to find the ladies guilty although his judgment would have been much better and closer to the truth had he found that no reasonable person would have assumed that sticking a picture of a paraglider on one’s coat gave rise to a REASONABLE suspicion that whoever did it was a supporter of Hamas. In the circumstances it was no less likely that they were opponents of Hamas but supporters of some other Palestinian faction. In fact, the judge to that extent did bow to establishment pressure. An appeal is being threatened but imprisonment for even a day of these ladies would seem to any reasonable person to be entirely undeserved and an outrageously disproportionate punishment.
Principled stand of the Morning Star against “political policing” – Lalkar’s appreciation and response

The following is the article by Andrew Murray that appeared in the Morning Star of 13 February, arguing that we must stand together against injustice regardless of political differences. We appreciate their defence of our comrades, as we would stand to defend CPB members and comrades from any other organisation in a similar situation. Nevertheless we do feel it necessary to correct some misapprehensions apparent in Andrew Murray’s article as to the political line of the CPGB-ML on the question of Zionism.
WE MUST UNITE AGAINST THE NEW WAVE OF POLITICAL POLICING
All shades of red must stand in total solidarity with any person or group, from the CPGB-ML to Socialist Appeal, that is facing the unprecedented attack on left-wing speech that began over the Gaza protests, demands ANDREW MURRAY
FROGS apparently boil in water without noticing anything amiss until they are done for.
Or, as Ernest Hemingway put it, you go bankrupt “gradually, then suddenly.”
Democratic rights go the same way. We are being boiled and bankrupted right now.
War has always meant a threat to freedom, and for the Tory government — without dissent from the Labour “opposition” — that threat is opportunity.
The huge mass movement against Israel’s genocidal assault on the Palestinian people has rattled the ruling elite with its sustained and intense anti-imperialist anger.
And the elite has fought back. Sometimes they have not been so smart — Suella Braverman self-immolated by challenging peace protesters and “woke” police simultaneously.
But that was always only a start. Under cover of anti-terror and public order laws the state has been extending the frontiers of the impermissible week in, week out during the Gaza crisis, building on previous anti-protest laws mainly aimed at climate change campaigners.
First, take the assault on the Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist) — hereinafter CPGB-ML — a small communist group rooted in the anti-revisionist movement of the 1960s.
Its members have been arrested, detained, had their homes raided and their families terrified, their literature, phones and computers confiscated and been subjected to draconian bail conditions over the last couple of months.
Their crime? They have praised the Palestinian resistance and have distributed on the ceasefire marches an anti-zionist pamphlet illustrated with a star of David entwined with a swastika on the cover, apparently a reference to the talks around Jewish emigration between the Hitler regime and some German zionists in 1933.
The whole image is clearly offensive to many Jews — and many other people — and zionism’s history and Israel’s methods today both owe a good deal more to British imperialism than to the peripheral engagement of beleaguered German zionists with the Nazis in 1933.
The Haavara talks were scarcely negotiations between equal parties, as the image may imply, nor did the zionists and the regime have the same intentions, unless intent to destroy and to preserve a community are placed on the same moral plane. German Jews able to leave as a result likely survived the war, while those who remained in Germany almost certainly did not.
The alternative to the talks — which were repudiated by many other zionist leaders at the time — was not living as a minority under the Nazis. It was, as it turned out, discrimination followed by death. So there is no good point to be made by the image of the star of David and the swastika.
But displaying it on a pamphlet sold at an anti-war march should not be an arrestable offence. It forms part of political debate, and there is no right to go through life unoffended.
I spoke to one of the CPGB-ML comrades affected, NHS surgeon Ranjeet Brar, recently. He was first arrested when the police took against their pamphlet.
“They had seen this booklet many times before but this time they said we have to arrest you. Four of us were taken from outside Downing Street to a police station in Sutton, which had been specially reopened for handling arrests at these protests and of Just Stop Oil demonstrators,” he says.
“They then raided our homes, seized literature, hard drives, phones and laptops, and they still have them. We were arrested under sections 5 and 18 of the Public Order Act, which includes intending to incite racist hatred.
“We were bailed on condition of not being allowed to distribute literature or display far-right insignia, as if I was going to carry a swastika.”
The next attack was on the demonstration on January 13. This time, the police waited until the demonstration had passed the point where the CPGB-ML stall had been set up.
“Fifty police then surrounded the stall, arresting three comrades, this time under the Terrorism Act 2000, section 12, for supporting Hamas.” Brar, cognisant of his bail conditions, had merely been addressing the crowd.
“They had been urged on by a blog called Harry’s Place, which seems to be working directly with the police, photographing and videoing us,” then tweeting at the Metropolitan Police to act.
Harry’s Place was established more than 20 years ago by a Reuters sports journalist to rally support for those claiming to be on the left who supported the invasion of Iraq, and has long since morphed into a police-aligned, Islamophobic witch-hunt site.
“This time the police were not interested in the pamphlet,” Brar says, the offending image by now covered with a sticker. It was the group’s support for Palestinian resistance, including by means of armed struggle, which was the issue.
The arrested communists were taken to Hammersmith police station. Brar was protesting outside the station when he was identified as having spoken publicly the previous day, surrounded by about 10 police officers, forcibly separated from his four-year-old son, whose welfare was ignored, and arrested again.
“The police were pretty severe and unaccommodating,” he says. He was eventually released with still more restrictive bail conditions. Again, his home was raided, with his wife and children made to stand outside while it was ransacked.
Eventually, more leaflets and a printer were confiscated, but no armalites or semtex. This was under anti-terror legislation. No charges have yet been brought arising out of either episode.
But Brar is right to say that this is political policing with a clear purpose: “It is about dividing the movement, alienating working-class people from attending demonstrations, and frightening people off.”
Since then there have been reports of arrests of an SWP member leafleting for a demonstration and of a Socialist Appeal member holding a placard referring to an “intifada,” or uprising.
The issue is not whether one agrees with a particular placard or pamphlet. The point is that the police are now restricting what can be said on protests, arresting and harassing socialists for their expressed opinions, at marches where it is all but certain that no-one will feel threatened or menaced.
If the logic being applied by the police today had been used in the 1980s, the anti-apartheid movement would have been criminalised for its support for the African National Congress, which the Thatcher government then held to be a “terrorist” organisation.
New boundaries of the acceptable are being imposed. That is also true of the banning of Hizbut Tahrir, an Islamist group whose advocacy of a reconstituted Caliphate is at once utopian and reactionary, but which is entirely peaceful in its promotion.
This is what their conference stated in 2020: “The world is yearning for change; for an end to this unjust capitalist hegemony. It is not enough to waste our energies reforming capitalism, rather the complete implementation of Islam is the only solution that will end the horror and tyranny that is the secular world order.”
Their proscription follows protests they have held — separate from the main demonstrations — since the Gaza attack demanding that Muslim armies come to the aid of the Palestinians.
That might be a concrete demand to raise in the middle of Cairo or Amman, but in London not so much. There is no suggestion that this small group of British Muslims have tried to raise an army or encouraged anyone to join such a thing, still less promoted any violence in Britain.
Richard McNeil-Wilson, an academic specialising in counter-terrorism, puts it well:
“The ban represents a significant growth of the application of security law, the first banning by the British government of a non-violent organisation under counterterror legislation. From a societal perspective, the ban is rooted in, and directly exacerbates, wider patterns of Islamophobia and racism in Britain, risking community cohesion.”
The government proscribed Hizbut Tahrir without a murmur, Rishi Sunak actually describing it in the Commons as a “terrorist” group as if we were talking about bombmakers. The authoritarianism and rank Islamophobia of Starmer’s Labour ensured bipartisan support.
So the police — at the behest and under the supervision of the government, to be clear — are determining what speech is permitted on anti-war marches, the government is banning peaceful organisations, and communists’ homes are being raided in the middle of the night.
Are you feeling warm yet? Brar is right to say this is not near to fascism yet, but it is still a menacing growl from history’s basement.
It is time that the labour movement took a stand. New lines are being drawn which, once imposed, will be much harder to erase.
A start would be rallying in solidarity with the members of the CPGBM-L and other groups if charges are pressed against their members.
Beyond that, we should take every opportunity to make it clear to the Establishment that, with hundreds of thousands on the streets, they need to be more scared of us than we are of them.
Comrade Brar’s response to Andrew Murray’s article
Thanks to Andrew Murray for his solidarity article in the Morning Star. We would note, however, that
1. The overriding point that is missing from the article is the appraisal that it is the Labour Party, and its promotion of the interests of British imperialism, that is one of the most insidious reasons that our rights are being eroded – and indeed that the majority of the groups that have called the Palestine demonstrations offer no meaningful support or solidarity to any workers arrested at its events. The PSC, for example, or CND or StW, under the influence of their ‘left’ Labour connections have been silent – even expelling constituent organisations (Manchester PSC, eg) for their defence of the right of the Palestinian people to resist Israeli genocide.
2. Andrew minimises the connection between the ultranationalist ideology of Zionism and its ability to make deals with all imperialist forces in the world – as a junior partner. While British and US imperialism have had the key role in sponsoring Israel’s creation, precisely to further their own colonial/imperial ambitions – and indeed Anglo-American imperialism has had the most lasting and deleterious effect on the world – it is not a minor point, but a defining feature of the German Zionist organisations that they made their notorious transfer agreement and deals with Hitler’s SS. The Zionists made these deals with Nazism, to further their colonial project, at the expense of, and behind the backs of, the majority of progressive European Jews, so negating at the outset their claim that the Israeli state stands as the guarantor of the rights of Jews worldwide. The reverse is the case. The ideology of Zionism coincided with the view of the Nazis – both were of the view that Jews did not belong in Germany or in the rest of Europe; that their home was Palestine. In fact the Zionists welcomed the rise of Hitler as facilitating the end of assimilation, which they regarded as the greatest threat to their racist, supremacist ideology. That is what led their representatives into collaborating with the Hitlerites to send a million Hungarian Jews to their deaths in concentration camps. This is by no means a minor, peripheral matter but is crucial to the exposure of Zionism as a racist, anti-Semitic and reactionary tool of imperialism.
3. Therefore to opine that a picture on the cover of a history of Zionism (that compares of the Israeli state to the Nazi state) is “deeply offensive” is meaningless. If the two are historically connected, ideological bedfellows and in fact Israel is currently involved in ethnic cleansing and genocide – then where is the “deeply offensive” aspect of pointing out this truth in an image? Surely it is Israel’s genocide itself that is “deeply offensive” to all humanity?
4. Anyone who cares to READ the book in question will see just how deeply complicit in the Nazi Holocaust were the Zionists in Palestine and Hungary. This has been documented by Israeli courts dealing with the Kastner Case and in Lenny Brenner’s excellent book Zionism in the age of the dictators – quoted in the pamphlet. We make these points to further the cause not only of the Palestinian people struggling for national self-determination, and to end the US and UK sponsored (and Labour Party supported) genocide; but to help British workers make the steps necessary to safeguard their own interests, free speech, liberty and ultimately to build a society in which the interests of the working people decide all.
We remain extremely grateful to Andrew for reaching out to us and for his article.
Tick. Tock. What did you do to prevent the genocide in Gaza, Daddy?

I waited as long as possible, and then negotiated to empty already toothless resolutions of all meaning, my son.
On Wednesday 21 February, while British justice was in action figuring out how best to break all its own rules so as to accede to the wishes of US imperialism and extradite the persecuted journalist Julian Assange, the Mother of all Parliaments was making a mockery of another pillar of our hallowed British democracy by tying itself up in knots over the question of the ongoing genocide in Gaza.
This heinous crime, unfolding in front of the horrified eyes of humanity, is one with which almost all our parliamentarians and parliamentary parties are complicit, but over which they are coming under increasing pressure from an irate and disgusted public.
As a result, a safely marginal section of the Commons, the Scottish National Party (SNP) asked for a parliamentary debate on whether the British government should ‘call for a ceasefire’ in Gaza (whether British imperialism should stop sending weapons is a whole other question, of course).
When the debate should have kicked off, a Labour Party MP spent 10 minutes filibustering to delay the proceedings (just one of many time-honoured democratic practices on display in the chamber during that session) while the Labour leader was negotiating behind the scenes to have the wording of the resolution changed.
Tick. Tock.
The nub of the matter stems from the fact that the great human rights lawyer Sir Keir Starmer won’t allow his MPs to agree to the proposition that Israel’s bombing campaign is “collective punishment”, although it clearly is, since that has implications under international law that the law-fearing Zionist-faithful Labour Party doesn’t want to have to deal with.
And so Parliament descended into a ridiculous and chaotic drama as the circus clowns ran around pretending that they really are the nation’s decision-makers, expressing shock and outrage at the perversion of their hallowed ‘procedures’ – a set of arcane rituals whose collective effect is to ensure the total lack of any meaningful outcome and to close down the possibility of unexpected outcomes.
Tick. Tock.
What actually happened? The Speaker of the House broke with the rules he’s supposed to be enforcing and allowed Labour to introduce its own amendment so that Labour MPs could vote in favour of a very watered down and meaningless ‘demand’. Which they duly did. Box ticked. Look: we want peace; we support both sides; don’t blame us.
Tory and SNP MPs stormed out at this blatant favouritism. The Speaker left, then came back and apologised. And his apology was duly accepted.
In the end, of course, all the outraged parties will be perfectly happy with the outcome, which has saved all concerned from difficult conversations with their constituents, allowed all concerned to blame everyone else, and ensured nothing was actually done that might impede British imperialist support for Israel’s genocidal war against the Palestinian people.
Tick. Tock.
Meanwhile facts on the ground continue to be made, and the hollow calls for a ‘ceasefire’ or ‘temporary humanitarian pause’, are ignored and even mocked by the Zionist forces, who know they can continue to act with the same impunity that has for 75 years fed the monumental arrogance and supremacism we see today.
Bombs are delivered from the USA and Britain. British and US special forces continue to covertly assist on the ground. Aid trucks are blockaded by rabid settler militia without consequence. Israeli politicians announce that any baby over the age of four is a legitimate target. Palestinians are rounded up and interned. Homes and land on the West Bank are seized.
Gazans freeze. And starve. And suffer continual bombardment. Every vestige of their culture and civilization is razed to the ground. Rabid politicians openly declare their intention of settling the land that has been ‘cleared’.
And, as the author of a Times article pointed out, while the Palestinian representative at the ICJ still clings desperately to the ‘internationally recognised’ viability of the ‘two-state solution’ and expresses his faith in a future in which Palestinians and Israelis live side by side in two separate ethno-states (‘democracies’), the Israeli Knesset has voted that it will never recognise a Palestinian state.
Tick. Tock.
The truth that is gradually making its way into the heads of more and more people is that only a complete defeat for Zionist Israel, which means an end to its financial, military, political, media and diplomatic backing by the USA and Britain and the dissolution of the supremacist, apartheid occupation and Zionist ethno-state can lead to a lasting peace – not only for Palestinians but for all the peoples of the Middle East.
This is what all the resistance forces of the region have worked out. This is why they are increasingly coordinated with one another, and why they all consider Palestine to be central to their own liberation struggle, which is in essence a struggle to remove the dead hand of US imperialist control from the Middle East.
That is why the Yemeni army has been begging the Arab states to allow its forces to pass, so that it can send a contingent to join its Palestinian brothers and sisters and fight by their side in Gaza.
In making their demand, just as in carrying out their blockade of the Red Sea, the Yemeni people have exposed the treachery and complicity of every Arab regime that claims to be on the side of Palestine in words but which looks the other way and even cooperates and normalises with Israel and imperialism in deeds.
Meanwhile, the genocide is continuing every hour and in the broad glare of publicity. From every direction the pressure is building.
The position of those in power looks stable until suddenly it doesn’t. The status quo appears to be eternal until suddenly it isn’t.
Tick. Tock.
Avdeyevka has fallen!

Russian forces are now in full control over the city of Avdeyevka whilst thousands of Ukrainian troops remain there trapped in isolated pockets. Their command structure has broken down and there is little effective communication between units. In an attempt to turn this around, the fascist Azov brigade was sent in to clear the mess but succeeded only in becoming part of the mess themselves. They were last heard of “firing at 360 degrees”, army-speak for being surrounded on all sides and hoping for the best.
It is a mark of how bad the situation is for the Kiev junta that the mainstream media are not even trying to cover up the seriousness of this development. The capture of Avdeyevka is the biggest Russian advance since taking Bakhmut last May and opens the way to full control of the entire Donbass.
News of this great Russian victory reached the Munich Security Conference on Saturday 17 February, just in time to rub the noses of the collective West in the failure of all their regime-change hopes. Needless to say, for the second year running Russia was not invited to this jamboree, but happily found other ways of making her presence felt.
Thieves fall out
The fall of Avdeyevka was preceded in Ukraine by the sacking of one former commander in chief and his replacement by a protégé of Zelensky. This move was preceded by a long period of rumour and counter-rumour, giving ample scope for conspiracy theories and departmental backbiting to weaken and distract the high command when it most needed unity and concentration.
Were it not for the fact that the fate of thousands of lives hangs upon the say-so of these clowns, it would be hard to ignore the comic opera feel to the shenanigans surrounding the summary dismissal of Kiev’s army chief, Valerii Zaluzhny, and his instant replacement by the commander of armed forces, Oleksandr Syrsky, with everyone briefing against everybody else in full public view and even, it is rumoured, with Zaluzhny initially refusing point blank to accept his sacking. As with so much else in Ukraine’s public life, the actors in this drama, rather than coming across as political giants joined in a titanic struggle to determine the future of the country, appear rather as historical nonentities trying on their grandfathers’ clothes in the wings.
The departing Zaluzhny is said to be a popular and influential leader, one who is not afraid to voice his dissent on occasion. In particular, he has criticised Zelensky’s conduct of the war against Russia, especially the disastrous failure of the so-called ‘summer offensive’. Conversely, Zelensky blamed Zaluzhny for that same disaster.
AccordIng to the Economist, “It is no secret that, as their relationship worsened, the two men also came to differ about what to do on the battlefield. Mr Zelensky and his administration held General Zaluzhny responsible for last year’s failed counteroffensive. They wanted the Ukrainian army to prepare for further attacks and had been pressing him to draw up battle plans and to take on the unpopular burden of mobilising more troops. The general rejected their arguments. He observed that his caution after the failure of the initial assault ended up sparing vital troops and equipment. He argued that he could not plan for the next counteroffensive unless he knew what resources he had. He said that it is politicians’ responsibility to mobilise society—and he was right” (‘The dismissal of Valery Zaluzhny is a crucial new phase in the war’, The Economist, 8 February 2024).
In other words, it seemed that Zaluzhny had exhibited a habit of thinking out loud which threatened fatally to undermine Zelensky’s defiantly rose-tinted view of things. With Zaluzhny gone, his place has been taken by the land forces leader Oleksandr Syrsky. Unlike his predecessor he is said by some to have concentrated on fulfilling whatever mission he was given and not questioning his brief. He is said to be a close ally of Zelensky, accompanying the president on a number of well-documented visits to the front line. Among the rank-and-file soldiery, though, the reception is not uniformly warm. According to the Financial Times he was criticised for his “refusal to retreat during the battle of Bakhmut, a fight that saw precious ammunition expended, thousands of troops lost and experienced brigades decimated.”
These enmities had rankled on throughout the war but have now ripped to the surface in consequence of the collapse of Ukraine forces and the increasingly toxic atmosphere of mutual recrimination which this has unleashed. Switching the top brass may buy Zelensky some time, putting off the evil hour when real decisions have to be made about Ukraine’s future. But pressing on with mobilisation plans will only pile more Ukrainian lives into the meat grinder and do nothing to alter the outcome of the war, merely driving up the death toll and intensifying demoralisation. Begging the West for more firepower may enable a few more terrorist spectaculars like the drone attacks in the Black Sea but will likewise do nothing to reshape the war in Kiev’s favour. Sooner or later, Zelensky, or Zelensky’s successor, will be obliged to sue for peace, and it won’t be on the basis of the president’s increasingly hollow assertion that Ukraine will “take back every inch of soil occupied by Russian forces”.
So unignorable is the scale of the military crisis in Ukraine and the desperate efforts to mobilise everything that moves to plug the gaps in the ranks, that even the mainstream press feels obliged to start documenting it. This bleak assessment comes from the Washington Post.
“In interviews across the front line in recent days, nearly a dozen soldiers and commanders told The Washington Post that personnel deficits were their most critical problem now, as Russia has regained the offensive initiative on the battlefield and is stepping up its attacks.
“One battalion commander in a mechanised brigade fighting in eastern Ukraine said that his unit currently has fewer than 40 infantry troops — the soldiers deployed in front-line trenches who hold off Russian assaults. A fully equipped battalion would have more than 200, the commander said.
“Under normal circumstances a mechanized battalion is supposed to hold a 3 kilometer long frontline. With only 40 infantry soldiers available that becomes an impossible task. The further deterioration from that depleted state will be rapid.
“Oleksandr, a battalion commander, said the companies in his unit on average are staffed at about 35 percent of what they should be. A second battalion commander from an assault brigade said that is typical for units that carry out combat tasks.
“Asked how many new soldiers he has received — not including those who have returned after injuries — Oleksandr said his battalion was sent five people over the past five months. He and other commanders said the new recruits tend to be poorly trained, creating a dilemma about whether to send someone immediately onto the battlefield because reinforcements are needed so badly, even though they are likely to get injured or killed because they lack the know-how.
“‘The basis of everything is the lack of people,’ Oleksandr said.
‘Where are we going? I don’t know,’ he added. ‘There’s no positive outlook. Absolutely none. It’s going to end in a lot of death, a global failure. And most likely, I think, the front will collapse somewhere like it did for the enemy in 2022, in the Kharkiv region.’
“The new Ukrainian mobilisation law, which is supposed to refill the army with fresh bodies, is still creeping through the Ukrainian parliament. It will likely come into force only by April. The first new troops conscripted under it will take until July to be combat capable. One wonders if the current Ukrainian army can hold that long” (Isabelle Khurshudyan and Anastacia Galouchka, ‘Front-line Ukrainian infantry units report acute shortage of soldiers’, Washington Post, 8 February 2024).
Standing with Ukraine?
Back in Washington, where the whole Ukraine project was dreamed up in the first place, Congress is dragging its collective feet over if or when its latest military aid package to the Kiev junta will be ratified. Though in theory it is the Republicans who are holding everything up and the ruling Democrats who are getting frustrated in their efforts to get urgent military aid to Ukraine, in practice disillusion with the whole project is rife on both sides of the hall.
With Donald Trump, fresh from victory in the Republican Party caucuses in Nevada, now setting his sights on a second term as US president, his open scepticism about international alliances like NATO and the EU (let alone the UN and UNRWA) sends a clear signal as to what kind of long-term support, if any, the Kiev clique can expect to get from a Trump presidency. Whilst NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg continues to intone dutifully the mantra that “Any suggestion that allies will not defend each other undermines all of our security, including that of the US, and puts American and European soldiers at increased risk,” Trump nonchalantly blows the gaffe on the whole NATO protection racket, telling reluctant payers he would encourage Russia to do “whatever the hell they want” if they failed to hand over two percent of their GDP, saying “I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. You’ve got to pay. You’ve got to pay your bills.” While Stoltenberg struggles to keep the door ajar for Ukraine’s Nato candidacy, Trump is busy undermining whatever confidence remains in the institution. In these circumstances Stoltenberg’s avowed expectation that “regardless of who wins the presidential election the US will remain a strong and committed Nato ally” will be greeted with hollow laughter (see James Politi, Lauren Fedor and Henry Foy, ‘Donald Trump says Russia can do what it wants to Nato allies who pay too little’, Financial Times, 18 February 2024.
The Palestinian Resistance is changing the world

The Zionist murder machine continues its daily slaughter of unarmed Palestinian men, women and children, taking a toll of hundreds each day. At the time of writing (22 January), 30,000 Gazans have been murdered, the overwhelming majority of them being women and children, whereas 70,000 have been badly wounded. This horrendous toll does not take into account those who are missing or under the vast areas of rubble that are the result of indiscriminate Zionist bombing raids. Eighty percent of northern Gaza’s homes have been destroyed.
The Zionist state has blocked almost all electricity, water, food supplies and medicines from reaching the imprisoned Gazans. As a result, according to UN agencies, at least a quarter of the territory’s population is at risk of famine. In addition to large-scale deaths through bombing, people have begun to die of starvation and disease consequent upon the destruction of infrastructure such as sewage facilities, water purification plants, non-availability of electricity for running medical equipment. Gaza’s sole power station has been offline since 11 October. For lack of security, the World Food Programme, on which a large section of the population is reliant, has been forced to stop distributing food to northern Gaza. Most of the imperialist countries have stopped funding the relief agency UNWRA on the basis of an accusation, so far unproved, that a dozen of its employees (out of a total of 13,000!) were involved in the 7 October assault by the Resistance on southern Israel, leaving a gap of $450bn in the Agency’s funding, further endangering the lives of tens of thousands of innocent Palestinians.
This collective punishment, which is a war crime under international law, is calculated to cause the disappearance of Palestine and the destruction of the Palestinian people. This plan is a plan for the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. It has been implemented ever since the creation of the Zionist state which was accompanied by the expulsion of 750,000 people from their homes and land, people who constituted three-quarters of the Palestinian population at the time. Since the events of 7 October, the Zionists have accelerated that programme through the mass slaughter of Gaza’s citizenry and the wholesale destruction of its material wealth and means of life. Cultural centres; universities and schools; places of religious worship; and hospitals – have been reduced to rubble without a murmur from Israel’s imperialist backers – the self-proclaimed guardians of democracy, freedom, human rights, the rule of law, and suchlike hypocritical cant.
At the beginning of its bombing of northern Gaza, the Israeli government told its residents to move to the safety of southern Gaza while continuing to slaughter those on the move. Having run out of targets in the north, the IDF started bombing the south. Now it has started bombing the Rafah area and there is nowhere for the Gazans go except live in hastily erected tents – without food, water, electricity or medicines, while still subject to terror bombing.
Let alone anyone else, the oil-rich Arab states such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have failed to come forward to fill UNWRA’s funding gap, which for them would be no more than small change. While paying lip service to the cause of Palestinian self-determination, most Arab states would rather that Palestine disappeared from the face of the Middle East so that they could ‘normalise’ their relations with Israel. But 7 October has upset their plans, as it has those of Israel and its imperialist patrons. There is a deluge of pent-up rage in the Arab street which the ruling circles in these countries will ignore at their peril.
The role of Yemen
While most of the Arab governments in the Middle East have shamefully failed, quite against the wishes of their own people, to come to the aid of the besieged and brutally bombed people of Gaza, who have been suffering slaughter by the fascist Zionist murder gangs euphemistically called the Israeli Defence Force (IDF) for nearly 5 months, the one government that has rendered the most selfless service and unstinting help to them is the government of Yemen.
In response to the Israeli onslaught on Gaza, the Yemeni government, contemptuously referred to in the imperialist media as the ‘Houthis’, have brought the Red Sea to a near standstill. Anglo-American imperialism has been waging war against the Yemeni people for a long time. But from 2015 until very recently the imperialist role was somewhat hidden as it waged the war using Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as proxies, supplying them with weaponry and intelligence. The brave Yemeni people fought back against these proxies, taking the war to their territories and disrupting their oil production, forcing them to discontinue their unjust war against the people of Yemen.
The Yemenis were targeting vessels owned by Israel or those engaged in supplying materials to it. They seized the Galaxy Leader, partly owned by an Israeli. No longer able to stand on the sidelines, the US and Britain started bombing targets in Yemen on 11 January this year – all in the name of freedom of navigation, attempting to assemble a ‘coalition of the willing’ to fight against the Yemenis. Not many countries came forward to volunteer for this dangerous enterprise – not even the Saudis and the UAE who had since 2015 waged a brutal proxy war against Yemen in which they were taught a lesson not to mess with Yemen.
In the most devastating attack so far, the Yemeni resistance on 18 February forced the crew of a commercial ship to abandon it. This strike on the Rubymar, carrying a cargo from the UAE to Bulgaria, served to underline the Yemeni ability to target vessels navigating in the Red Sea despite US and UK attacks on missile launching sites of the resistance.
The vessel, which the resistance spokesperson described as being British, is now at risk of sinking. It is the first reported direct hit for the resistance since it sparked a fire on 26 January on the Marlin Luanda, a fuel tanker operating on behalf of Trafigura commodity trader.
The arrivals of container ships around the entrance to the Red Sea have fallen more than 90% since early December 2023 according to data from London-based Clarkson, while the non-containerised bulk carrier arrivals have fallen by only 50% – these carrying bulk commodities in large holds.
Referring to the Rubymar strike, and emphasising the discriminate and humane stance of the Yemeni resistance, its spokesperson, Yahya Sare’e, said: “During the operation we made sure that the ship’s crew exited safely”.
Rubymar was flying the flag of Belize with an address in the British port of Southampton; it is a Lebanon-operated vessel but it is registered in Britain.
The actions of the resistance in the Red Sea have pushed up shipping costs and lengthened delivery times as the ships of the targeted countries, avoiding navigation through the Red Sea, are forced to take the longer route through the Cape of Good Hope.
Referring to a resistance strike from the nearby Red Sea port of Hodeidah, Mr Sare’e added that “the Yemeni air defences were able to shoot down an American plane with a suitable missile while it was carrying out hostile missions against our country”. He identified the downed aircraft as an MQ9, an unmanned aircraft known as a Reaper drone. What has alarmed the American defence establishment is that the Yemenis are deploying unmanned underwater vessels (UUVs) in a series of attacks.
Israel losing the battle for public opinion
The imperialist states, especially the US and Britain, are complicit in Israel’s genocidal war, which they are not only supporting but facilitating with arms and ammunition as well as diplomatic cover. The US cannot even bring itself to call for a ceasefire and has vetoed several resolutions at the UN Security Council that did call for a ceasefire. Every week plane loads of lethal weaponry from the US land in Israel to help facilitate the Zionist genocide that is under way in Gaza. There is overwhelming support for Israel’s crimes in the US Congress – 70 out of 100 senators voted for Biden’s $95bn security bill, which included $14bn for Israel.
There is an increasing disconnect between the ruling class and the masses of people in these countries where Israel has lost the battle for public opinion. While public opinion is on the move, the ruling circles cling to their unsustainable stance. According to an AP-NORC poll in January, 50% of US adults, including a majority of Democrats and a majority of Independents, believe that Israel has “gone too far”. Arab-Americans, traditionally Democratic Party supporters in key swing states such as Michigan, could well desert this disgusting outfit in protest. Young people’s sympathies are tilting in favour of Palestine.
Hundreds of thousands of people, including large numbers of Jews, have staged demonstrations in the US against Israel’s genocidal war against the Palestinian people and US backing for it.
One cannot but have the greatest regard and admiration for the courageous stand taken by eminent people of Jewish descent, such as Max Blumenthal, Arron Matte, Dr Gabor Matte, Dr Norman Finkelstein, Katie Halper and several others in the US and Canada who, in the face of attacks by imperialist stooges, have stood up in defence of the Palestinian people’s right to resist, and who have mercilessly exposed Zionist crimes.
Likewise one must bow one’s head to Israelis such as Professors Avi Shloam, Ilan Pappe and Gideon Levy of the Ha’aretz newspaper, who show exemplary courage in exposure of Zionism and support for the Palestinian people alike.
Hundreds of thousands of people have been regularly marching in Britain to show their anger at the slaughter in Gaza and the British government’s support for it. Defying threats from the authorities, they have been defiantly waving Palestinian flags and shouting ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free’ – a slogan which the authorities have unsuccessfully tried to ban.
Vain attempts at repression
Unable to win the argument, those in power are increasingly resorting to repression, with the police selectively arresting peaceful protesters under anti-terrorism and other such legislation. Among those targeted have been members of the Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist) – CPGB-ML – who have been arrested, handcuffed and detained overnight while their homes were raided and searched aggressively in the middle of the night. All this is because, on the one hand, the CPGB-ML has been a consistent supporter of the right of the Palestinians to self-determination and of their right to resist Zionist occupation of their country and, on the other hand, it has over the years exposed the fascist essence of Zionism, as, for instance, through its booklet Zionism – a racist, anti-semitic and reactionary tool of imperialism’.
This is happening because the CPGB-ML’s message is beginning to resonate with a wider section of the population. It is an attempt by the authorities to suppress it, but this attempt is destined to fail. Like all reactionaries, the authorities are lifting a rock to drop it on their own feet.
The Palestinian people have the right to resist by any means, including armed resistance, a right which is recognised under international law. As an occupying power, Israel has no right of self defence. Contrary to the assertions of the despicable bourgeois political representatives and their media organs, it is the Israeli state and its armed forces who are guilty of terrorism; it is they who are guilty of subjecting the people of Palestine to the kind of holocaust to which the Hitlerites subjected the Jews, and many other people, during the Second World War. This is a truth recognised by the majority of humanity. For telling this truth our comrades are being persecuted. In the end the truth shall be victorious. Imperialist governments will be no more successful in suppressing this truth than the Catholic Church of yore was successful in attempting to suppress Galileo’s teaching that the earth moves round the sun.
The significance of 7 October
October 7 has changed not just the shape of Middle East politics but also the shape of discourse in the imperialist countries. No longer is Israel regarded as invincible. The events of 7 October revealed it to be very vulnerable indeed, which has enraged the Zionist rulers to the point of madness.
Israel is far from achieving its declared twin goals, namely, to destroy the Palestinian resistance and to secure the return of the Israelis detained by the Palestinian liberation fighters. Notwithstanding the relentless bombing and destruction of human life and property, the Resistance continues to fight with courage and determination. On 23 January, in the most difficult circumstances, the Resistance eliminated 24 occupation soldiers at the al-Maghazi refugee camp. Where there is oppression there is bound to be resistance. There is one way to bring an end to the Resistance and that way is to end the occupation,
These events have alarmed Israel’s imperialist backers. In Britain the House of Commons was reduced to a pitiable shambles on Wednesday 22 February over the question of an SNP Resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza (see elsewhere in this issue). The Labour Party is falling apart over the question of Palestine, with threats of rebellion by an increasing number of its parliamentarians and local councillors – all of whom had before 7 October been cowed into submission by Labour leader Starmer, with the full support of the ruling class and its organs of propaganda, which have been another casualty of 7 October. An increasing number of people are deserting these purveyors of lies and deception, instead getting their information from social media platforms.
Brutality in the West Bank
While the world’s attention has been focussed on Gaza, the Zionist occupation has continued its brutality in the West Bank. In 2023, one of the bloodiest of years, Zionist forces killed 487 Palestinians. Since 22 October: an airstrike has destroyed al-Ansar mosque; fighter jets and drones have destroyed buildings in refugee camps across the West Bank, with 84 children killed between 7 October and 12 January; drone strikes turned streets to rubble in Tukrem and Balata refugee camps on 17 January, killing ten people. Between 7 October and 12 January there were381 settler attacks on Palestinians.
Six hundred Palestinians have been displaced from their West Bank homes. This was facilitated by Itmar Ben-Gvir, Israel’s national security minister, who has made it easier for settlers to acquire guns.
Role of the Palestinian Authority
Within the Palestinian camp, the Palestinian Authority (PA) has become an extension of the Zionist occupation to control the Palestinian people. Its president, Mahmoud Abbas, is no more than a quisling serving Israel. On 1 January PA forces murdered Resistance fighter Ahmed Obeidi while imprisoning Resistance fighters and confiscating their weapons.
On 10 January, US Secretary of State Blinken’s visit to the area met with massive protests outside the Ramallah headquarters of the PA which were violently suppressed by the PA forces. The Palestine Centre for Policy and Survey Research found that support for Fatah was down to 14% and that 90% of West Bank Palestinians called for Abbas to resign. 60% across Palestine and 70% in the West Bank were in favour of armed struggle as the route to liberation.
Craven role of bourgeois journalists and politicians
Whenever bourgeois journalists interview a Palestinian or a supporter of the Palestinian cause, the first question they ask is: do you condemn the 7 October assault on southern Israel by Hamas (the imperialist expression for the Resistance, which actually is composed of many shades of political orientation but united in their resistance to Israeli occupation and their determination to free Palestine from Zionists)? But this cowardly and corrupt coterie, their wallets stuffed with crumbs coming from the table of imperialist gangsters, never ask Zionist spokespersons, or those representing their imperialist masters: do you condemn the murder of thousands of defenceless Palestinians in Gaza? Do you condemn the denial of food, water, electricity and medicines to the imprisoned Gazans? Do you condemn the destruction of hospitals, universities, schools and churches by the Israeli air force? Do you condemn the destruction of most of the residential property in Gaza? Any bourgeois journalist who asked such uncomfortable questions would be labelled an anti-Semite and immediately dismissed from their lucrative employment and probably prosecuted for a hate crime if not for violating the anti-terror legislation. It is therefore not surprising that these pampered purveyors of deceit and lies, knowing on which side their bread is buttered, maintain a deadly silence. They don’t even have the courage to defend Julian Assange, a fellow journalist, who has been hounded and incarcerated for a decade for exposing the crimes committed by Anglo-American imperialism and its vassals in their never-ending wars against people everywhere, especially in the Middle East, whose governments come into imperialist crosshairs through pursuing an independent course in the conduct of their foreign policy or in the management of their economy.
What is true of bourgeois journalists applies just as much to the equally corrupt and cowardly bourgeois politicians and their governments whom Marx and Engels correctly characterised as the committees for managing the affairs of the bourgeoisie.
The right to resist occupation by any means
Those who feign outrage at the alleged atrocities of the Resistance on 7 October ought to be reminded of the atrocities committed by Zionism over a period of more than seven decades against the people of Palestine. How would any other people react in similar circumstances? Are we to condemn the French Resistance for armed struggle against the Nazi occupiers? Are we to condemn the Warsaw ghetto rising?
During their first war of independence, when the Indian people rose up against their brutal British colonisers, the Indian revolutionaries were accused of committing atrocities against the British. The British press went lurid with jingoistic fury. Marx and Engels were on the side of the Indian revolutionaries, reminding the British public of the crimes committed by the British rulers of India over a long period against the Indian people. Writing in the New York Daily Tribune of 16 September 1857, Marx said:
“However infamous the conduct of sepoys, it is only a reflex in a concentrated form, of England’s own conduct in India, not only during the epoch of the foundation of her Eastern Empire, but even during the last ten years of its settled rule. To characterise that rule, it suffices to say that torture formed an organic institution of its financial policy”, adding that “here is something in human history like retribution; and it is a rule of historical retribution that its instrument is forged not by the offended, but by the offender himself” (The Indian Revolt).
Three weeks earlier, in his article ‘Investigation of tortures in India’, detailing the extortion and violence practised by the British rulers on the Indian people, he wrote:
“We have here given but a brief and mildly-coloured chapter from the real history of British rule in India. In view of such facts, dispassionate and thoughtful men may perhaps be led to ask whether a people are not justified in attempting to expel the foreign conquerors who have so abused their subjects. And if the English could do these things in cold blood, is it surprising that the insurgent Hindus should be guilty, in the fury of revolt and conflict, of the crimes and cruelties alleged against them?” [our emphasis].
The above penetrating observations of Marx are relevant to the conflict in Palestine. The instruments of retribution, as revealed by 7 October, were forged by the offending Zionists and their imperialist backers, not by the offended Palestinians. If the Zionists could do in cold blood what they have been doing for 75 years against the Palestinian people, is it surprising that the Palestinian Resistance “should be guilty, in the fury of revolt and conflict, of the crimes and cruelties alleged” against it?
Conclusion
There is an old saying: Man proposes and God disposes. Imperialism has grand schemes for world domination. the Zionists have plans for ethnically cleansing historic Palestine. These plans are in ruins and are being disposed of by modern-day gods – that is, by the anti-imperialist resistance in several parts of the globe.
The imperialist proxy war in Ukraine against Russia is collapsing with each passing day, just as Israel’s grip on Palestine is confronted with a mortal threat. Imperialism’s attempt to effect regime change in Russia and to dismember it through a combination of economic sanctions and war is facing a devastatingly humiliating defeat. Likewise, Israel’s army, notwithstanding its fascistic brutality, is making no progress against the Palestinian Resistance. The Israeli economy is suffering badly as the call-up of 300,000 has left it short of people to run businesses and other establishments. It has been forced to evacuate 42 communities along its northern border because of the low intensity armed conflict between Hizbollah, the Lebanese resistance movement, and the IDF. Several thousand Israelis have also fled the southern border with Gaza. All those evacuated from the north and south of Israel have to be accommodated and fed, putting Israeli resources under severe stress. Thousands of Israelis with dual nationality have fled Israel since the beginning of the conflict.
Israel and its patrons are facing an acute dilemma, to get out of which they may well double down and extend the war. That very dangerous option would only hasten their doom.
The two-state solution
Imperialism, while paying lip-service to the two-state solution, has done nothing to implement it. October 7 has forced the US and its allies to once again return to it, but this ‘solution’ is long dead, for two reasons.
First, the presence of 700,000 settlers, with their special roads on which Palestinians are not allowed to drive, the confiscation of water resources by the settlers, the apartheid wall and hundreds of checkpoints, have reduced the West Bank to dozens of unconnected Bantustans. Gaza has been under siege for nearly two decades, and is now reduced to rubble. East Jerusalem has slowly been taken over by the Zionists.
Second, as if the above were not enough to put an end to the fairy tale of the two-state formula, the Israeli parliament and Netanyahu’s war cabinet have declared that they will never accept or allow the creation of an independent Palestinian state.
Thus the Palestinian people have no option but to struggle for the dismantling of the monstrosity called Israel and it its place to create a secular state where Muslims, Christians and Jews can live with equal rights, without any having special rights or privileges. Until that comes about there will be no end to this conflict.
Growing resistance
Not only in Palestine but also in Lebanon, Iraq and Syria, not to speak of Yemen, the Resistance is attacking US bases and the US is bombing again on the pretext that three of its sodiers were killed by Resistance attacks on its bases. The lives of certain US citizens are more important to US imperialism than others of its citizens – such as Rachel Corrie, a US citizen deliberately murdered by an Israeli soldier who crushed her to death by driving a bulldozer over her as she heroically stood in the way of the demolition of Palestinian homes; or Shirin Abu Akleh, shot dead in cold blood by an IDF soldier who could clearly see the Press badge on her jacket as she reported on the siege of the Jenin refugee camp; or Gonzalo Lira (another American citizen) murdered by the SBU (Ukraine’s secret service). Not a word has appeared in the imperialist press and electronic media, who have devoted thousands of hours of broadcasting time and tons of paper to the death in prison of Alexei Navalny, who has been portrayed as the most important Russian freedom fighter whose death has been pinned on Russian President Vladimir Putin. The fact that Navalny commanded no support among the Russian people is of little concern to the bribed imperialist political and media establishment. Anyone who wants to know more about this alleged fighter against corruption should look at Scott Ritter’s recent blog on this question, This is how the self-appointed guardians of truth and freedom safeguard their much vaunted values.
Death to Zionism!
Death to imperialism!
Victory to the Resistance!
Daily Mail doxes young people on their return from Russian festival
Why did Russia’s hosting of an international youth festival provoke such a hysterical reaction from British media?
Proletarian writers

Nato’s power, the USA’s hegemony and what remains of the British empire are all in irreversible decline. A new world is coming into being and there is no room for imperialists in humanity’s future. This is the context in which the World Youth Festival 2024 took place in Sochi – and why it provoked such a hysterical response from Guy Adams of the fascist-loving Daily Mail.
Origins of the World Youth Festival
The festival was originally named the World Festival of Youth and Students. The WFYS was founded in 1947, just after the second world war, at a time when it was becoming clear to many progressive people that the imperialists were taking over from Nazi Germany and continuing to wage a covert war against the USSR.
Many declassified documents have since proved this irrevocably, with notable examples being Britain’s ‘Operation Unthinkable’ and the US’s ‘Operation Cartel’, later renamed ‘Project Aerodynamic’.
That the desires of the imperialists manifested themselves in a so-called ‘cold war’ (characterised by low intensity operations and subterfuge) rather than an all-out open confrontation was a testament to the power of the Soviet Union – that it could win a war against Nazi Germany and most of Europe and still be strong enough to keep the Anglo-American imperialists at bay.
It was also a testament to the Soviet Union’s aversion to war. Indeed, according to its last leader Michael Gorbachev, the USSR was such a peace loving nation that it dissolved itself and handed itself over to the imperialists on a silver platter in order to avoid ever having to go to war again.
With the power of hindsight it is clear that the hot war could not be avoided by surrendering the Soviet Union. In fact, it was precisely the power of the Soviet Union that had prevented another hot war from engulfing Soviet territory. This correct understanding of imperialism had always been promoted by the Soviet Communist party under the leadership of VI Lenin and Josef Stalin, but was buried by the revisionists when Nikita Khrushchev came to power.
Indeed, Khrushchev was so sure there was a way to ‘get along with’ the west that he tried to join Nato in 1954 – the same year he transferred Crimea from the Russian to the Ukrainian SSR.
The legacy of the revisionist Soviet leaders who followed Stalin, from Khrushchev to Gorbachev, was the weakness of a crippled post-Soviet Russia, the massive economic devastation of the 1990s, which has been called an “economic genocide”, the stoking of fascistic and terroristic nationalisms surrounding and directed at Russia, the Nato expansion to encircle Russia … and, of course, the current war in Ukraine.
It is no wonder that the pundits of the ‘collective west’ like to compare President Vladimir Putin with Josef Stalin now that Russia has finally stood up to imperialism.
The aim of the World Festival of Youth and Students was to bring together young adults from all over the world to promote solidarity and democracy and to oppose war and imperialism. Popular mottos from acfoss the years included “For peace and friendship – Against the aggressive imperialist pacts”, “For peace and friendship and peaceful coexistence” and “For anti-imperialist solidarity, peace and friendship”.
The festival was held every few years and hosted by the following countries: Czechoslovakia, Hungary, East Germany, Romania, Poland, the USSR, Austria and Finland. From 1962 to 1968, the festival was postponed owing to political turmoil in the designated host countries – ie, because Algeria and Ghana had to fight the French and the British respectively for their independence. After 1968, the previously biennial event was held roughly every five years, hosted by Bulgaria, East Germany, Cuba, the USSR and the DPRK.
The dissolution of the USSR at the hands of Gorbachev led to a longer break than usual, until the mantle was taken up by Cuba in 1997. Since then, the festival has been held in Algeria, Venezuela, South Africa, Ecuador and Russia. The largest iteration of the event in its history was the 2017 festival in Sochi, in which 30,000 participants from 185 countries took part.
The most recent festival of March 2024, again hosted in Sochi, happened for the first time under a new name – the World Youth Festival. The organisation and funding for the event were handled by the Federal Agency for Youth Affairs – Rosmolodezh – as well as by the federal territory of Sirius. It had the backing of numerous giant state enterprises such as Rosatom, Roscosmos, Rostelcom, Rosneft, Gazprom and Sberbank.
According to official sources, the event hosted 20,000 participants from 190 countries. Including all the local participants, volunteers and workers behind the scenes, it was temporary home to some 90,000 people.
World Youth Festival 2024 and its ideological significance
In the current climate, the imperialists are trying to rewrite history in order to hide their role in creating Nazi Germany, to hide the indispensable help their corporations gave to the Nazi Reich, and to hide the great sacrifice and glorious victories of the Soviet people who defeated them.
The current climate of anti-Russian hysteria, when even Russian tennis players have their flags replaced by white rectangles at international events, Russian athletes, musicians, dancers and others are banned from participating in global events, Russian culture is being banned, statues of Russians are being torn down, streets named after Russians are being renamed – and in Ukraine even Russian books are being burned … has all been nurtured and promoted by imperialist politicians, media and secret services.
The global russophobic campaign being conducted by the imperialists is reminiscent of Nazi Germany, and western corporate media are fully complicit in promoting and prettifying it.
It was in this climate that Russia opened its arms to the world – including to citizens of the imperialist heartlands – and showed them its generous hospitality. In doing so, it provided an example to the world of standing by its values and applying them in practice.
The imperialists like to pretend to hold such ‘universal’ and ‘humanitarian’ values, but in practice they have utter contempt for the masses of humanity. This is just one of the reasons why Russia is gaining so many fans in the west, where growing numbers of people are seeing through the lies of the mainstream media.
Evidence of this could even be found in the comments section under a recent Daily Mail article by Guy Adams, under the snappy heading: ‘Putin’s British useful idiots: This week an adoring crowd of over 20,000 hand-picked young delegates hailed the Russian despot at Nuremberg-style rally. Shockingly, several came from the UK. What are they thinking – and what poison might they spread?’
Interestingly, the most popular comments underneath this hit-piece included the following:
- It would be naive not to think of there being some UK citizens supporting Putin. – Hugofirst of Bournemouth, UK (46 likes, 3 dislikes).
- The vast majority of the world’s nations and populations are NOT against or boycotting Russia. – Luigi Peach from Brooklyn, UK (204 likes, 67 dislikes).
- Disinformation – the sinister new term for information which deviates from the line our rulers want us to believe. – Petrovicz from Manchester, UK (97 likes, 11 dislikes).
- I’m more concerned about our politicians and billionaires conspiring at Davos. – Bootie bear from Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (122 likes, 20 dislikes).
- What kind of poison will they spread? Probably the antidote to the poison you spread. Why are people not allowed to have a different point of view without being ridiculed and insulted? – monimadness from No Limits City, South Korea (187 likes, 51 dislikes).
- Because British society has been irreparably broken. Young people will look to stable cultures elsewhere where you can have an intelligent conversation without falling foul of wokery! – TheSport from Mayfield, UK (86 likes, 10 dislikes).
This gulf between what Guy Adams writes and what his readers think is revealing. When one of the delegates asked Adams about this he responded by branding his dissenting readers “anonymous trolls”.
The plain truth is that, despite the concerted efforts of ‘journalists’ like Adams, and despite the vast resources at the disposal of the mainstream media corporations, all of which aim to keep workers’ minds safely trammelled by bourgeois newspeak, many Britons are beginning to wake up to the fact that they are being lied to.
Ironically (given zionism’s track record as the ideological inheritor of nazism), the Times of Israel has chronicled how the Daily Mail and other mainstream media in Britain supported the growth of fascism in Europe in the years leading up to WW2. That being so, one might suppose that if Russia were holding Nuremberg-style rallies, the Daily Mail would be all in favour …
The neo-Nazi regime in Kiev, over which the Daily Mail waxes lyrical, has declared WW2 genocide perpetrators and Nazi collaborators like Stepan Bandera to be national heroes and is bringing up its children to revere them as such.
It takes a very special kind of ‘useful idiot’ to praise the Kiev regime as a democracy while condemning Russia as fascist – and to do so in the pages of the Daily Mail of all places. We can only assume Mr Adams is as unaware of this irony as he is of European history generally.
We note in this context that the imperialist countries do everything possible to prevent their citizens from accessing Russian media and culture. RT and Sputnik news have both been banned across the European Union and North America. Russian sources don’t appear in internet search results in the west, even if the information or event one is interested in took place in or involves Russia.
For this reason, it is very difficult for western workers to access the truth about the war in Ukraine, or to get any reliable information on any aspect of Russian contemporary or historical life. By contrast, Russia has imposed no such censorship: Russian citizens have free access to both local and western sources.
Economic significance
The economic warfare between the imperialist camp and Russia was initiated by the west back in 2014 – a punitive response to the decision by Crime’s people to return to Russia rather than remain subject to the puppet fascist proxy regime in Kiev after the Maidan coup. The EU ban on imports of Russian iron and steel is one of several measures that dates back to that time.
The 2024 youth festival took place at a time when Russia and the western powers had been embroiled in open warfare in Ukraine for two years. By this time the imperialists had done everything they could to sanction, sabotage and economically isolate Russia.
They blew up the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, they nationalised Russian state enterprise subsidiaries in Europe, they threatened third countries to try to stop them doing business with Russia, they tried to impose an international price cap on oil to reduce Russia’s revenues, they banned Russia from using the Swift banking system, and they froze $300bn worth of Russian state assets abroad.
But even after they had exhausted all the economic tools at their disposal in the hope of bringing the Russian economy to its knees, the successful hosting of 2024’s World Youth Festival merely showcased their failure.
The festival showed the world that Russia has the money and resources to host such an event. None of the participants had to pay for accommodation or food during their stay, meaning that there was no need for them to spend any money in Russia. Furthermore, thousands of participants even had their flights paid for from all parts of the world.
The food was delicious, the catering was superb, the rooms were spacious and comfortable, and the city was clean and beautiful. The huge cost of this festival shows on one hand how much Russia values the event and its noble aims, but on the other hand it shows how well the Russian economy is doing despite the imperialists’ crazed onslaught.
Diplomatic significance
Another objective of the imperialists was to diplomatically isolate Russia. The USA’s agents have long been pressuring the representatives of other countries to vote against Russia at the United Nations and to condemn ‘Russian aggression’. Nato countries have used all media dominance to create a synchronised echo chamber, drilling their Goebbelsian lies into every worker’s head, and injecting a default russophobia into every sphere of political, economic and social life.
So many enterprises and institutions linked to western monopoly capital have gone out of their way to condemn Russia since 2022, to silence any voice that questions the imperialist narrative, to plaster Ukrainian flags all over their marketing and products, to raise money for Ukraine through public collections, and to help create a general atmosphere of fear in which there has been no room for individuals to support Russia or even to put forward any view short of the extremist pro-Ukrainian fanaticism demanded by the lords of finance capital.
But the festival proved that Russia is not isolated despite the relentless information war being waged by the west. It showed that, on the contrary, the world is full of friends of Russia. A competitive selection process chose 20,000 people from 190 countries (that’s 190 delegations with an average size of 105 people) but the number of applicants – ie, young people who wanted to visit Russia – was vastly greater.
To give an idea of the scale, out of 160 British applicants only ten were chosen. The majority of countries, representing the vast majority of the global population, were happy to have their delegations attending the festival, and in many cases encouraged young leaders to attend.
Military significance
The hosting of the festival on the shores of the Black Sea while the war in Ukraine was ongoing demonstrated both that Russia is confident in its intelligence and defence capabilities and that the participants were confident in Russia. To boost this confidence even further, high officials such as President Vladimir Putin, former president Dmitry Medvedev, foreign minister Sergey Lavrov, foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, and Kremlin press secretary Dmitry Peskov were all present at the festival.
The Ukrainian army released a video directly threatening all foreign participants in the festival, which ended with the words: “After Russia we will come for each of you.” During the last two years of war several incursions have taken place into Russian territory and several terrorist attacks have been carried out by Ukraine on Russian territory such as the Crimean Bridge attack and the assassinations of Daria Dugina and Vladlen Tatarsky. Despite this, the festival took place with no sign of tension or fear.
The World Youth Festival 2024 was a clear demonstration of the fact that the imperialists have failed in their ideological, economic, diplomatic and military objectives. There are telling signs that Russia is returning to a foreign policy more akin to that of the Stalin era than of the post-Stalin era. Russia has reassured the world that it can play a leading role in the struggle against imperialism – a historical mission bestowed upon the Russian people that deserves the support of the workers of the world.
Impotent imperialists seek reprisals against those who tell the truth
On 15 February 2024, the American delegation to the festival held a press conference at the United Nations building in New York, which was sponsored by the Russian mission to the UN. The panel of speakers included Caleb Maupin of the Centre for Political Innovation, Chris Helali of the Party of Communists USA, and Elizabeth Pekin of the American Student Union.
The speakers made a strong case in support of Russia’s just war in Ukraine, explaining why they felt it was important to attend the festival and why there should be no reprisals against any young American for attending. This was particularly important in light of the prosecution already being pursued against members of the Uhuru movement in the USA for the ‘crime’ of having visited Russia and spoken in its defence.
Attacks against free speech, dissenting opinion and independent journalism that isn’t in line with the official narrative are now commonplace in the west. The case of Julian Assange is well known, but there are hundreds if not thousands of lesser known examples.
The Spanish journalist Pablo Gonzalez who was detained without trial in Poland for the ‘crime’ of reporting form the ground in Donbass, British journalist Graham Philips who has been sanctioned for the same ‘crime’, and the US commentator Gonzalo Lira who died in Ukrainian custody after being detained for speaking out against the Kiev regime are just a few of many examples.
The intertwining of the bourgeois state and the corporate media makes it difficult to tell western journalists from spies. A recent case in Britain is that of Paul Mason, who embarked on a holy crusade with British ‘intelligence’ against anti-imperialist independent media the Grayzone. This type of collusion goes back a long time. The name George Orwell is well known, but few people know that he was a British intelligence asset working for Britain’s anti-communist ‘Information Research Department’.
Meanwhile, notwithstanding the Daily Mail’s boundless hatred of everything that stands in the way of Anglo-American imperialism, hatchet-man Guy Adams was unable to find anything substantive to report against Russia, the festival or its participants.
In his frustration and impotence, he dedicated more than two-thirds of his article simply to doxing the members of the British delegation one by one, exposing as much personal information about them as he could, with the goal of causing them as many problems as possible in their personal and professional lives.
At time of writing, one member of the British delegation has lost their job as a result of Adams’ article. This is an example of how repression operates via the corporate media, which have the power to ruin people’s lives not as a result of their quest to get at the truth, but because of their monopoly over the official narrative and the pressure they bring to bear over employers and institutions as a result.
And yet despite all this ceaseless propaganda, the comments under Adams’ article demonstrate that many readers sympathise with the delegates. There is a growing consensus that the delegates should have been free to attend the festival without being smeared and doxed by the press on their return.
Letter to the world from a British delegate
One British delegate eloquently summed up their thoughts about the Mail’s hatchet piece in an open letter:
Dear people of the world and dear Britons
A certain tabloid news outlet has decided to menacingly dox every member of the British delegation to the World Youth Festival 2024 in Russia.
First of all, I would like to apologise to my fellow British friends, whose reputations have been unfairly damaged. Some of us have already experienced problems with work and study. So much for freedom of movement and speech, which were supposedly a core value of our country (as we can see – no longer).
The World Youth Festival was by far the greatest event for young people in the world. I know no other country capable of unifying such different cultures, races and traditions into one big and friendly multicultural family. The amount of handshakes with people from different countries of the world, the sheer emotions these few days brought me – are priceless.
But perhaps the most important point of the festival would be that it was absolutely non-political. We got together, nothing was forced upon us, no politicians forced their agenda on us, we were absolutely free to roam or go where we wanted to and enjoy our time in one of the safest, nicest places in Russia (and, I dare say, the world).
The aforementioned article described the festival as a ‘Nazi-like parade in the style of Hitler’s Nuremberg rally’ but kindly omits the fact that their own news outlet was proudly supportive of Hitler in the 1930s, as was the British royal family.
Comparing the Russian people and the festival to Nazis is not only a sign of total stupidity and ignorance, it also shows the shallow, disrespectful and primitively aggressive level that the official British narrative has fallen to.
I feel ashamed of my country and its way of dealing with its own young people, who dared to challenge the official narrative.
I pray that in Britain there are many people who will not trust this slimy evil propaganda reporting and I feel that it is important for them to know the truth: the British mainstream media lies to you and paints us in the worst possible colours. Their agenda is to pose Russia as our enemy: the Russian people – wild and uncivilised; the Britons coming to Russia – useful idiots.
This is complete calumny: we stand against this agenda and will do everything in our power to ensure that the British people will know the truth and will not be fed this pile of lies daily.
You do not deserve to be lied to.
Latest twist on Assange’s extradition: cause for pessimism or optimism?
While an individualist view tends to despondence, there is a positive aspect to British imperialism’s blatant complicity in persecuting free speech.
Proletarian writers

Reflecting on some of the discussion about Julian Assange’s case on social and independent media, a few points occur to us which, while not interpreting Tuesday’s high court ruling as a great victory, still can provide us with a more positive overview of the situation as things stand now.
‘What they wanted anyway’ – a defeat?
It is perfectly possible to deduce, as many are doing, that the outcome of Julian’s most recent (supposedly final) hearing was not a stay of execution but actually what the US administration wanted to happen. After all, while British judges kicked the can of decision-making a little further down the road they at the same time denied all avenues of future argument on the real merits of the case (Julian’s persecution for journalism that revealed the crimes of British and US imperialism; the fact that this is a political extradition, etc).
Meanwhile, Julian remains incarcerated in isolation in a high-security facility, with his physical and mental health deteriorating, and US president Joe Biden doesn’t have to deal with him arriving on US soil before what looks like being an extremely turbulent presidential election in November.
We have seen some commentators conclude from all this that the last decade of campaigning has been a mammoth waste of their time and their effort, and that Julian’s life has been needlessly sacrificed to an ungrateful and uninterested public.
While we disagree with this characterisation of the mass of workers, it is true that western media and politicians have been largely successful in hiding the facts around Julian Assange’s case – or even the very existence of his case – from large swathes of the population.
It is also true that the British working-class and antiwar movements have not been mobilised – as it clearly should have been – in such a way as to force the politicians and judiciary here to release Julian and drop all their spurious lawfare proceedings against him.
The fact that even journalists, many of whom are well aware of the various undercover plots and legal manipulations that have been targeted at Julian over the last decade, have not demanded that their union mobilise a spirited and public defence is most shocking of all. Can they be unaware that this is a precedent that has implications for every single one of them too?
Yet the obedient stenographers to power who make up the mainstream presstitute fraternity have dutifully reproduced every blatant lie and sophistic legal argument produced by the British state, thus playing a vital role not in alerting the public to what is going on, but in hiding the truth from their readers; not only allowing but actively enabling the perpetration of this attack on their own profession and on free speech in general.
Vital lessons learned – the case for strategic optimism
But despite all this complicity from those who should be working to expose this issue, it is not true that the establishment in Britain and the USA feels under no pressure at all about Julian’s case. There has been enough publicity to cause them serious embarrassment at home and abroad (hence the view that ‘Genocide Joe’ Biden would prefer not to have Julian land on his doorstep just at this moment).
Not only did WikiLeaks’ work open the eyes of huge numbers of workers around the world to the truth about Anglo-American imperialism’s barbaric and corrupt prosecution of the Iraq and Afghan wars, but Julian’s case has brought further and continued attention to those crimes and others.
It is only a result of growing pressure and the difficulty of continuing to be associated in public with such criminal hypocrisy that the Australian parliament was pushed into to declaring that Julian should be sent home, after years of turning a deaf ear to all those who tried to bring the Australian government to a sense of its duty towards this most persecuted of its citizens.
And in recent years, Julian’s case has highlighted the absolute hypocrisy of those who claim that Britain has a functioning and fair ‘justice system’.
As Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova pointed out recently: “The entire justice system of the United Kingdom has become a farce – a laughing stock in front of the whole world. All this is a mockery of human dignity on the part of the monstrously ineffective, punitive British pseudo-justice …
“On the dome of the Old Bailey, the central criminal court in London, there is a statue of Themis. With wide open eyes, she looks to the west – towards America.”
Work to be done
Over the course of the last decade, the numbers of people who are aware of Julian and his plight have grown, and the education those people have received regarding the nature of the British state, its relationship to British and US imperialism, and the total subservience of Britain’s judiciary to those interests, has been revelatory to a group of people many of whom had previously had great faith in the ultimate fairness of the system – or at least in the possibility of forcing it to do the right thing via judicious use of ‘the rules’.
What a small but very significant part of the population is now coming to understand is that Julian’s case is not an aberration, but merely a high-profile illustration of the fact that ‘the rules’ we have been taught to revere have been written to keep us, the masses, in order and policeable. Those who rule over the system feel free to tear up, rewrite or simply ignore whatever ‘rule’ gets in the way of what they want to do.
This valuable education in the nature of the bourgeois state is a vital part of awakening the British people to the need for the socialist transformation of society.
Rather than sinking into despondence over the fact that this vital education has not yet reached the understanding of the majority, we can take heart from the fact that a newfound understanding is undoubtedly reshaping the consciousness of a significant minority of our fellow workers. Just as is the ongoing genocide in Gaza and the blatant complicity of Britain’s media and political class.
Amongst the people who are being awakened by these events, we should be working to attract and train more Marxist cadres, who will be capable of using their own experiences, and the fresh opportunities constantly being created by a system descending into crisis and war, to spread revolutionary consciousness steadily deeper into the ranks of the working class.
The tragic end of Gonzalo Lira: A voice silenced in Ukraine
A US citizen done to death by the US’s fascist proxies in Ukraine for the crime of telling the truth about Nato’s proxy war against Russia.

Reproduced from the Helsinki Times, with thanks
*****
Gonzalo Lira, a Chilean-American war commentator known for his critical views on the Zelensky regime and Russia-Ukraine conflict, passed away on 11 January 2024 in a hospital in Kharkov, Ukraine. Lira’s death followed an eight-month imprisonment on charges of “justifying Russia’s military actions in Ukraine”, sparking international controversy and raising questions about freedom of speech and human rights during wartime.
Gonzalo Lira gained notoriety in 2022 as a vocal critic of what he perceived as increasing authoritarianism in Ukraine. Lira saw the conflict as a proxy war waged by the USA against Russia and criticised the loss of life in a futile and unwinnable war.
His arrest in May 2023, under the charges of “production and dissemination of materials justifying Russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine”, was a turning point. It not only highlighted the complexities of wartime free speech but also catalysed opposition movements against US funding for the conflict. High-profile figures like tech mogul Elon Musk and Fox News host Tucker Carlson called for his release, bringing global attention to his case.
The news of Lira’s deteriorating health emerged from communications between his father, Gonzalo Lira Sr, and the US embassy. Documents and emails revealed attempts by Lira Sr to alert the embassy to his son’s critical condition and to the lack of transparency from Ukrainian authorities regarding his health status.
“I cannot accept the way my son has died. He was tortured, extorted, incommunicado for eight months and 11 days and the US embassy did nothing to help my son,” Lira Sr stated in an email announcing the news.
“The responsibility of this tragedy is [with] the dictator Zelensky with the concurrence of a senile American president, Joe Biden,” he wrote, adding: “My pain is unbearable. The world must know what is going on in Ukraine with that inhuman dictator Zelensky.”
In a poignant handwritten note, Lira described his health ordeal, including double pneumonia, pneumothorax and severe oedema. This letter, believed to be his last written correspondence, detailed the neglect he faced in prison. Despite these alarming symptoms, proper medical attention was reportedly delayed until it was too late.
The letter reads: “I have had double pneumonia (both lungs) as well as pneumothorax and a very severe case of edema (swelling of the body). All this started in mid-October, but was ignored by the prison. They only admitted I had pneumonia at a Dec. 22 hearing. I am about to have a procedure to reduce the edema pressure in my lungs, which is causing me extreme shortness of breath, to the point of passing out after minimal activity, or even just talking for 2 minutes.”
Lira Sr’s persistent efforts to get help from the US embassy and to ensure his son’s welfare while hospitalised went unheeded. His worst fears were confirmed a week later with the news of his son’s death. In a heart-wrenching statement, Lira Sr condemned both the Ukrainian and US governments for their roles in his son’s demise, calling it a result of “torture, extortion and incommunicado detention”.
In a significant development last August, Gonzalo Lira, after being silent on social media for months following his arrest by Ukrainian authorities, reemerged with messages claiming he was attempting to escape Ukraine. However, his efforts were reportedly thwarted, leading to rumours of his recapture.
Mark Sleboda, an international relations analyst, affirmed on social media that Lira had attempted to flee to Hungary to request political asylum but was stopped at the Ukrainian border. Lira’s posts detailed his ordeal, including allegations of torture and extortion for $70,000 while detained. He also expressed skepticism about receiving political asylum in any European Union country other than Hungary, fearing deportation back to Ukraine. The last communication from Lira hinted at the risk of being sent to a labour camp, with subsequent silence raising concerns about his fate.
The US Department of State eventually confirmed Lira’s death, extending condolences to the family but refraining from further comment. This confirmation followed Tucker Carlson’s report on Lira’s death and Elon Musk’s earlier appeals to Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky to explain Lira’s arrest and detention.
Russian authorities had previously called for the global journalistic community to defend Lira, highlighting the complex geopolitical implications of his case. Ukraine’s security service (SBU) continues to maintain that Lira was lawfully arrested and detained, adding another layer to this international dispute.
Nicaragua joins South Africa at the ICJ in support of Palestine
The way that different countries have responded to the ongoing genocide in Gaza says everything about which interests their governments really represent.
Proletarian writers

While Yemen has been the first state actor to deliver full practical solidarity with the Palestinian struggle, and South Africa was the first to have recourse to international law, the government of Nicaragua has been the first to file a formal application with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to join South Africa’s genocide case against Israel.
In making its application, Nicaragua also asked the ICJ to declare that Israel “must perform the obligations of reparation in the interest of Palestinian victims, including but not limited to allowing the safe and dignified return of forcibly displaced and/or abducted Palestinians to their homes, respect for their full human rights and protection against further discrimination, persecution and other related acts, and provide for the reconstruction of what it has destroyed in Gaza”.
Representatives of the Nicaraguan government joining an international conference on Palestine in Tehran in February stated: “The Palestinian people are victims of unimaginable atrocities that move, dismay and outrage the people of this planet. The atrocities committed by Israel against the Palestinian people in Gaza and the West Bank, against innocent children and defenceless women are condemnable, the government and people of Nicaragua denounce and strongly condemn them.
“The government of Israel is becoming a state incompatible with the community of states that make up the United Nations. Their supremacist criminality is unparalleled in the history of humanity. The international community rejects and condemns this atrocious and despicable behaviour.”
The case against Germany
Not resting there, the central American state has also filed charges against Germany for continuing to provide aid to Israel after the ICJ had ruled that special measures were needed to ensure the prevention of genocide in Gaza.
In its application, Nicaragua has charged Germany not only with continuing to give financial and military aid to Israel but also with defunding the UN Palestinian refugee agency (Unrwa), in violation of both the 1948 genocide convention and the 1949 Geneva conventions on the laws of war in the occupied Palestinian territories.
Reflecting once again the urgency of the situation in Gaza, where famine is now endemic amongst the population and Israel is threatening to launch an invasion of the southernmost Gaza town of Rafah (which has become a vast tent city housing the 1.5 million Palestinians who have been displaced from the rest of the strip), the ICJ has scheduled a hearing for the case against Germany on 8 and 9 April.
Most of the imperialist camp will be watching this development nervously. If ever a day comes when ICJ rulings can be backed up by actions, governments and officials from across the Natosphere could find themselves in trouble.
Not only are they all backing Israel with weapons and other aid, but most of them have also joined the USA in pulling funding from Unrwa – which is responsible for delivering nutritional, educational and health services to Palestinian refugees across the occupied territories and in refugee camps across the region (Lebanon, Jordan and Syria). Other governments liable to find themselves in the dock are those of Britain, Italy, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Finland and Australia. Canada and Sweden had initially joined this US-instigated group of Unrwa ‘de-funders’, but reversed their decision earlier this month.
Germany is one of the largest arms exporters to Israel, after the United States, and its sales to the zionist occupation forces ballooned massively in the last quarter of 2023, after 7 October.
Although the true extent of military support from Britain is not known, publicy available figures put it in third place, traditionally supplying around 15 percent of the components used in F-35 bombers. The UK is also home to Israeli arms companies such as Elbit, which has been consistently targeted by Palestine Action for its role in the Palestinian genocide.
Meanwhile, under pressure from their domestic populations, and with one eye to the persistence of ICJ prosecutions, Canada, Spain and Belgium have all halted arms exports to Israel, while the Netherlands is in the process of being forced by a legal order from its domestic courts to follow suit.
Nicaragua’s history with the ICJ
Meanwhile, unknown to most workers in the west today is the fact that Nicaragua has been pursuing its own legal case against the United States since 1986.
When the case was heard, the ICJ found in Nicaragua’s favour and decided that the USA had indeed violated international law by supporting the armed rebellion of the ‘Contras’ against the Sandinista government and by mining Nicaragua’s harbours. Not only was a verdict pronounced against the United States, but reparations were awarded to Nicaragua.
Nicaragua then brought its case to the UN security council for enforcement, where the USA simply vetoed the resolution, thus demonstrating how much the imperialists really respect the international order they pretend to uphold.
When Nicaragua turned to the general assembly, the resolution in favour of the Latin-American nation was passed by a majority of 94-3. Which had zero effect on the USA’s refusal to admit guilt or pay what it owes.
In 2023, President Daniel Ortega sent a letter to UN secretary general António Guterres demanding that Washington be forced to pay up. “There exists a historical debt with the Nicaraguan people that 37 years later has not been settled by the United States … It is an obligation clearly established in a final judgment of the highest international judicial authority, the International Court of Justice.”
This earlier case highlights what the case against Gaza has brought into the centre of a global spotlight: the toothless charade of the supposed ‘international UN system’ and the impotence of most ‘member states’ to affect any real outcomes. At the UN, all are allowed to speak (on the floor of the general assembly) but only one nation has any meaningful executive power (via its veto at the UN, its physical control over.
Any branch of UN activity that acts with independence is liable to find its funding arbitrarily pulled – as was cruelly demonstrated by the barbaric cutting of funds to Unrwa just when its services are most desperately needed.
It has been said that the United Nations was long ago transformed into the colonial office of US imperialism.
The UN’s inability to stop the US-backed genocide in Gaza, or even to bring effective relief to the Palestinian people, despite the overwhelming desire of the governments and peoples of the world, are providing us with ample proof for this assertion.












