Articles

USA
NOVANEWS   by Ed Mattson Congress is at it again. No doubt the degree of urgency is greater this time around ...Read more

USA
NOVANEWS   Facebook, Helen Thomas, LBJ and 8 June 1967, a Day that Lives in Infamy for U.S. Military Veterans by ...Read more

USA
NOVANEWS   by Stephen Lendman During his presidential campaign, Obama pledged to “(s)upport the principle of network neutrality to preserve the ...Read more

NOVANEWS   Israeli defense establishment seems to want Netanyahu out U.S. media buys Israel’s Naksa spin that protesters were orchestrated ...Read more

NOVANEWS *    Glenn Beck would like you to stand with Israel Privatised services ignore duty of care and yet ...Read more

NOVANEWS   Mohammed Salem is about 30 years old. He lives in Umm-Al-Kheir, in a home inherited from his late ...Read more

NOVANEWS   So with the ambiguously liberal-left nouveau Israeli journalists that labor in the galleys of +972 magazine, it’s perpetually ...Read more

NOVANEWS     Lady Gaga’s album Born This Way has caused controversy since it’s release last month. But the 25-year-old ...Read more

USA
NOVANEWS   U.S. president says ‘unilateral measures are not helping at all’ to bring about a two-state solution. Reuters U.S. President ...Read more

NOVANEWS   source–http://unitedagainstzionism.wordpress.com A detailed analysis of the Israeli terrorist attack against the Gaza Freedom Flotilla 1 year ago on ...Read more

NOVANEWS   Most of Gadhafi Compound Destroyed in Latest Escalation TRIPOLI, Libya — In a sudden, sharp escalation of NATO’s ...Read more

NOVANEWS   British Prime Minister David Cameron warns anyone who would vote against the resolution, which condemns Syria for its ...Read more

Military Cutbacks In Crosshairs of Congressional Deficit Reduction Plans

NOVANEWS

 

by Ed Mattson

Congress is at it again. No doubt the degree of urgency is greater this time around because of the unsustainable federal debt, but it is something we as veterans, military, and freedom-loving Americans, had better understand.

In November, 2010, former Senator, Alan Simpson (R), co-chairman of the Obama Debt Commission, and respected Democrat (from the Clinton era), Erskine Bowles, presented the committee’s budget assessment and a checklist of suggested cuts that would trim $4 trillion dollars from the US Budget deficit over the next decade. Failure to do so, was the warning, there would be a collapse of the US dollar and the entire economy as we would be forced to default on our country’s financial obligations.

This is not “rocket science”, as every person in America should know. As individual citizens we are forced to live within our own personal budgets, or we end-up bankrupt. It is hard to imagine the government not understanding this simple fact of life. As a country we are facing more than $14 trillion in debt, with another $61.6 trillion in unfunded future mandates. This is insane.

It boils down to the fact that every man, women and child, carries a debt burden of more than a half million dollars (estimated at $534,000)

“In 2015, the estimated interest due – $533 billion – is expected to be a third of the federal income taxes paid that year”, said Charles Konigsberg, chief budget counsel of the Concord Coalition, a deficit watchdog group. Interest payments alone on the federal debt are expected to be $4.8 trillion over the next ten years. This is totally unsustainable.

Why is this important to the military and veterans? We are right in the cross-hairs of the Debt Commission budget-cut recommendations. Being the fiscal conservative that I am, I can understand the need to bring the US financial house under control. There is no doubt the entire budget is unsustainable, but we’ve been down this road before and sometimes politicians, looking at their re-election agenda, are not the brightest bulbs in the lamp when it comes to budget cutting. As a matter of fact, you can’t even find those words in what I call in thecongressional dictionary, however, the Simpson Committee did a very credible job in laying out what needs to be done.

The military, has three on-going war-time engagements (Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya), and more than 175,000 troops stationed in about 150 countries around the world, many of whom are still in locations that were necessary during the cold war. The US spends an estimated 43% of the world’s military expenditures.

Why do we need more than 50,000 troops Germany, 10,000 in the UK, nearly 10,000 in Italy, 32,000 in Japan, and 28,000 in South Korea? Surely this would be an attractive target for some cutbacks. Shouldn’t these countries  be responsible for their own security?

The same reasoning could then be used to scrutinize the Navy’s 313-Ship Plan by the year 2020. No doubt the need for 10-11 aircraft carriers as we have seen how valuable they are in carrying the battle to the enemy and providing global security, but how about the other countries stepping to the plate! All of the defense items need closer analysis, but compensation for those troops who keep us safe, should never get near the chopping block of Congress. Our troops don’t get paid enough…never have…never will.

Alan K. Simpson (R), Chairman of the Obama Budget Deficit Commission

A better bet would be to cut to pieces (even eliminate) such useless federal departments at Department of Energy…remember those folks? Started in 1977 under Jimmy Carter to solve our dependence on imported energy, yet today with 16,000 employees, we are still not energy independent, and can’t drill in known fertile oil producing areas of the country (only 8 drilling permits have been issued since March 2011).

DOE is simply a typical bureaucratic boondoggle growing like “The Blob”, mired in a maze of inefficiency, conflicting rules and regulations, costing business billions of dollars every year in legal fees. As to its effectiveness… we’ve gone from importing 22% of our needs in 1976 to over 75% of our needs in 2010.

Over the next few columns we will look at some of the commission’s recommendations, particularly the cuts in military spending.

A Tragic June 1967 Day Veterans Will Never Forget

NOVANEWS

 

Facebook, Helen Thomas, LBJ and 8 June 1967, a Day that Lives in Infamy for U.S. Military Veterans

by Eileen Fleming

Although it was after midnight when my evening with Helen Thomas ended much too soon: Read more… my questions have only just begun!

Last Sunday afternoon, round about the time I was leaving a few more questions for Ms. Thomas on Michelle’s [her friend and assistant] phone, busboysandpoets‎ tweeted, “Helen Thomas event today got cancelled due to illness. Sry for any inconveniences. Stay tuned for new date!”

I spoke with Michelle last night and Helen is OK, but battling a cold after a weekend of houseguests. Some of my questions follow and I begin with an FYI regarding Facebook:

As my only purpose at Facebook is disseminating my work and learning what others are doing in pursuit of justice by telling the truth, I have an open Wall-meaning anybody in the world can read me and leave comments that reveal their hearts.

When I changed my profile picture from this: 

To this: 

I ‘received’ hundreds of comments from a few particular people who accused me of being a “Jew-hater” “whore” “ugly bitch” and “liar” but not one has taken my offer to PROVE their slander by citing anything I have ever written in three books, hundreds of articles or said in dozens of YouTube’s to back up their inane accusations that flow from a narrow world view that can only thrive in a heart of stone.

If I were to care about what people who do NOT know me ‘think’ of me-because they do NOT READ me- I would/could not be a writer. Or would I be a candidate for Congress, but I am both.

The truth will make one fearless and only an engaged citizenry and thriving dissent can assure the essence of democracy: freedom of conscience and speech and that requires a press that seeks and reports the true facts on the ground.

Helen Thomas has said, “I do believe that our democracy can endure and prevail only if the American people are informed.”

Let us begin with this day in infamy: 8 June 1967

If the 1967 press had known about LBJ’s and Mathilde’s ‘passionate attachment’ would it have been reported?

Mathilde Krim was twenty years LBJ’s junior, a blonde Italian and Irgun operative.

The Irgun were the Zionist terrorist network led by Menachem Begin who emerged as Likud Party Prime Minister in 1977.

With and without her husband, Mathilde was a frequent guest at the LBJ Ranch as well as the White House.

On the night before the 6-Day War that continues on as a 44-year military occupation, Mathilde was a sleepover guest in the Johnson White House.

“Observe good faith and justice towards all nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all…and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges towards another a habitual hatred or a habitual fondness is in some degree a slave…a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils.”-George Washington’s Farewell Address, 1796.

I wonder if Ms. Thomas knew H.R.Gross, a Republican representative from Iowa, whose words are buried in the 1967 Congressional Record:

“Is this Government now, directly or indirectly, subsidizing Israel in the payment of full compensation for the lives that were destroyed, the suffering of the wounded, and the damage from this wanton attack? It can well be asked whether these Americans were the victims of bombs, machine gun bullets and torpedoes manufactured in the United States and dished out as military assistance under foreign aid.” [1]

By November 1967, lawmakers were willing to spend six million USA tax dollars to build schools in Israel but during the debate, Representative Gross introduced an amendment that not one dollar of U.S. credit or aid of any kind [should] go to Israel until there is a firm settlement with regard to the attack and full reparations have been made [and Israel] provides full and complete reparations for the killing and wounding of more than 100 United States citizens in the wanton, unprovoked attack.

“I wonder how you would feel if you were the father of one of the boys who was killed in that connection-or perhaps you do not have any feelings with respect to these young men who were killed, wounded and maimed, or their families.” [2]

Gross was ‘shot down’ by silence.

Paul Findley is one of many congressional representatives who lost their seat for daring to speak out about the injustices Israel gets away with because of a complicit Congress.

On 8 June 2007 Findley was keynote luncheon spokesperson for the 27th annual American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee Conference:

“I was here for the first convention 27 years ago and I still have a fire in my belly for the civil and human rights of Arabs. It is time to speak openly and honestly about Israel. But, in American politics, that is still forbidden.

“Pity that we cannot seem to shed our fear of Israel! We are afraid to speak out on Capitol Hill, for fear of losing the next election. They are more like trained poodles jumping through hoops than leaders!

“Why this fear? How did we get here?

“Forty years ago to this day, June 8, 1967 the change occurred, the floodgates opened and money poured into Israel as never before. When President Johnson heard about the U.S.S. Liberty being attacked by Israel he ordered the rescue fighter planes to return to the deck. The rescue mission was aborted and the survivors have said they heard LBJ’s voice tell Admiral Giess, ‘Get those planes back on deck. I don’t care if the ship sinks, I will not embarrass Israel.’

“LBJ also threatened to court martial anyone who reported what had happened. Johnson accepted Israel’s false claim of “mistaken identity” and he knew it was a lie.  That is when the change began and Israel learned they could get away with murdering U.S.A. soldiers.”

The attack on the USS Liberty remains the only incident of damage to a major US ship since the sinking of the USS MAINE in Havana Harbour in 1898, prior to the Spanish-American War, that has not been investigated by the US Congress.

During a phone interview on 3 November 2007, with Lt. Commander Dave Ed Lewis [the officer in charge of 195 men out of the total crew of 294 on the US LIBERTY] informed me:

“Rear Admiral Lawrence Geiss was in charge of the USS Saratoga and USS America. He swore me to secrecy until his death, which happened about nineteen years later. What he told me I kept secret until I learned of his death at the first reunion and twenty year anniversary of the veterans of the USS LIBERTY.

“He told me that as soon as he got the word of our distress he launched aircraft and notified D.C. Immediately he heard from McNamara to recall the aircraft. He said he assumed it was because some idiots in Washington thought that he was launching nuclear weaponry. He reconfigured and then re-launched aircraft without nuclear capabilities. Admiral Geiss notified Washington of this and once again the immediate response that came from McNamara was the order to recall the aircraft. Admiral Geiss challenged the order and pleaded that people are dieing!

“LBJ was heard to say, ‘I don’t give a damn! I won’t embarrass an ally.”

Now deceased, Retired Adm. Thomas Moorer, the former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman who investigated the attack, wrote in 1997 that he believed Israel intentionally attacked the Liberty to conceal that it was preparing to seize the Golan Heights from Syria.

On January 16, 2004, Adm. Moorer wrote for the Stars and Stripes:

“There is compelling evidence that Israel’s attack was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew. In attacking the USS Liberty, Israel committed acts of murder against U.S. servicemen and an act of war against the United States.”

The LIBERTY Vets have been asking for an open congressional hearing and 44 years after that day in infamy they are still waiting.

All the Founding Fathers required for a citizen to enter the U.S. House of Representatives is to be a citizen for 7 years, 25 years of age and live in the state in which your district resides.

It is time for citizens of conscience to run themselves for U.S. House Representative on a platform including calling for a Congressional Hearing of all the LIBERTY survivors who want to speak on that Record regarding what they saw that day in infamy when the LBJ Administration failed to support the troops.

Any government that chooses a ‘passionate attachment’ for another State and willingly sacrifices its own blood is not representing we the people of this republic.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all [people] are created equal; that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights…that, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among [people] deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; and, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the RIGHT of the people to ALTER or to ABOLISH it.” -July 4, 1776, The Declaration of Independence.

While navigating in international waters off of Gaza 44 years ago, out of a 294-man crew 34 officers, sailors and civilians were killed and 174 injured by Israeli forces during its attack on the spy ship, the USS Liberty. Those who died that day in infamy:

Lt.Cmdr Philip Armstrong
Lt James Pierce
Lt Stephen Toth
|CPO Raymond Linn
CPO Melvin Smith
PO William Allenbaugh
PO Francis Brown
PO Ronnie Campbell
PO Jerry Converse
PO Robert Eisenberg
PO Jerry Goss
PO Curtis Graves
PO Warren Hersey
PO Alan Higgins
PO Richard Keene
PO James Lupton
PO Duane Marggraf
PO Anthony Mendle
PO John Smith
PO John Spicher
PO Alexander Thompson
PO Homas Thornton
PO Phillipe Tiedtke
PO Frederick Walton
SGT Jack Raper
CPL Edward Rehmeyer
CIV Allen Blue
SN Gary Blanchard
SN Lawrence Hayden
SN Carl Hoar
SN James Lenau
SN David Marlborough
SN Carl Nygren
SN David Skolak

“Never give up this fight for the truth” were Adm. Moorer’s marching orders to Ernest Gallo, Petty Officer and Communication Technician aboard the USS Liberty and Chairman and Liberty Foundation President of the USS liberty Veterans Association.

If we truly support the troops we must march along and persist to demand justice until justice is done: an open transparent congressional hearing that includes any LIBERTY survivor who want to tell what they saw that day in infamy, 44 years ago.

1. James Scott, “The Untold Story of Israel’s Deadly 1967 Assault on a U.S. Spy Ship” Page 216, 271-273.

Internet Censorship Bill Introduced

NOVANEWS

 

by Stephen Lendman

During his presidential campaign, Obama pledged to “(s)upport the principle of network neutrality to preserve the benefits of open competition on the Internet.”

In fact, he failed to deliver on every major promise made, including the last frontier of press freedom, protected from censorship and corporate control.

Post-9/11, both he and Bush expanded intrusive government surveillance, including Internet monitoring of personal communications. On April 1, 2009 the Senate introduced two bills, endangering a free and open Internet – S. 773: Cybersecurity Act of 2009 and S. 778 to establish a White House cybersecurity czar.

Both measures included provisions to give federal authorities unprecedented Internet control by:

  • – federalizing critical infrastructure, shifting power away from providers and users to Washington; and

  • – letting the president shut down Internet traffic for alleged “national security” reasons or during a claimed “emergency.”

Neither measure passed. Had they, personal privacy and security would have been compromised through one provision alone – by giving the Commerce Secretary access to all relevant data relating to critical infrastructure networks without restriction.

In other words, privacy and judicial review protections guaranteed under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, the Privacy Protection Act, and financial privacy regulations no longer would apply.

Under an administration appointed czar, other provisions would have let the executive shut down parts of the Internet, as well as businesses and organizations, not complying with national emergency declared orders.

In addition, on September 20, 2010, S. 3804: Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) was introduced. Its purpose – to destroy Internet freedom one domain at a time, by requiring their registrars/registries, ISPs, DNS (domain name system) providers, and others to block users from reaching certain websites.

If passed, COICA would have let Washington suppress free speech and block access to non-infringing material, inflicting enormous constitutional damage by requiring all Internet communication providers (including ISPs, Facebook, Twitter, Skype, and others) to rebuild their systems, giving Washington backdoor access to everyone’s Internet’s communications.

On November 18, 2010, COICA was reported to committee, then stalled without coming to the Senate floor for a vote.

Various other ways of subverting Net Neutrality have also circulated, including giving cable and telecom giants more control, letting them establish higher-priced lanes (two Internets) and censor unwanted content, destroying Internet freedom in the process.

An October 2007 global measure, overriding national sovereignty, also threatens Net Neutrality, consumer privacy, and civil liberties. Called the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), secret negotiations seek to subvert them, ostensibly to protect copyrighted intellectual property, including films, photos, and songs. ACTA remains a work in progress, but developments going forward bear watching, especially if a global agreement is reached.

On May 27, the Foundation for Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) said the European Commission published a “final” ACTA text with few changes from its last known version. Since introduced, Western media, especially America’s, have reported virtually nothing about this destructive measure, those backing it wish to enact with little or no public disclosure, let alone input over something this important.

Revised Senate Internet Censorship Bill

On May 12, Senator Patrick Leahy (D. VT) and nine other rogue senators introduced S. 968: Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act of 2011 (PROTECT IP). Co-endorsers include:

  • – Orrin Hatch (R. UT)

  • – Charles Grassley (R. IO)

  • – Charles Schumer (D. NY)

  • – Diane Feinstein (D. CA)

  • – Sheldon Whitehouse (D. RI)

  • – Lindsey Graham ( R. SC)

  • – Herbert Kohl (D. WI)

  • – Chris Coons (D. DE)

  • – Richard Blumenthal (D. CT)

Reported to committee on May 26, it was placed on the Senate calendar for a floor vote yet to occur.

Deceptively calling it a measure against selling copyrighted content and counterfeit goods, Leahy said it:

“will protect the investment American companies make in developing brands and creating content and will protect the jobs associated with those investments.”

In fact, it’s a smoke screen to introduce new censorship provisions that violate First Amendment freedoms, without which all others are at risk.

Like most others in Congress, Leahy is no democrat. He supports imperial wars, Wall Street pillage, corporate-run healthcare, agribusiness-empowering bills, and numerous other anti-populist measures harming millions while pretending to help them.

In September 2010, he introduced COICA. At the time, the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s (EFF) Richard Esguerra said “if there’s anything we’ve learned about efforts to re-write copyright law to target ‘piracy’ online, it’s that they are likely to have unintended consequences.”

In fact, COICA and PROTECT IP run roughshod over First Amendment rights by censoring speech and chilling other freedoms.

On June 6, EFF alerted its followers to urge their congressional representatives to “reject this dangerous bill,” calling it “a threatening sequel to last year’s COICA” measure explained above.

If enacted, PROTECT IP will give federal authorities “unprecedented power to attack the Internet’s domain name system (DNS),” by:

  • – forcing ISPs and search engines to redirect or reject user attempts to reach certain cites; and

  • – vaguely call DNS servers:

“server(s) or other mechanism(s) used to provide the Internet protocol addresses associated with a domain name.”

This definition endangers other technologies, including operating systems, email and web clients, routers, and others able to provide IP addresses when given domain names like traditional DNS servers

Calling PROTECT IP “COICA Redux,” EFF’s Abigail Phillips explained differences between both measures, expressing grave concerns about the new one, saying:

It includes “a private right of action for intellectual property owners (as well as government to) seek injunctions against websites (allegedly) ‘dedicated to infringing activities’ in addition to court orders against third parties providing services to those sites.”

Its language also adds new third-party provider categories, including “interactive computer services” and “servers of sponsored links,” requiring they no longer serve targeted sites.

Moreover, “new language no longer requires explicit action on the part of domain name registries and registrars,” but still covers unauthorized domain name system server operators.

In addition, the measure requires government or private plaintiffs to identify infringing persons or entities before action is taken against a domain name. Nonetheless, doing so falls far short of protecting speech with plenty of wiggle room to violate it.

As a result, Phillips called PROTECT IP “no improvement on COICA.” Moreover, in many ways it’s worse, and may produce defensive countermeasures, including establishing alternative servers with total Internet access, creating possible new security vulnerabilities.

Currently, Senator Ron Wyden (D. OR) placed a hold on S. 968, providing concerned Internet users time to email, call, and/or write their congressional representatives, expressing opposition to this repressive act, essential to stop.

Mondoweiss Online Newsletter

NOVANEWS

 

Israeli defense establishment seems to want Netanyahu out
Jun 07, 2011 09:34 pm | Ira Glunts

According to a Ben Caspit column in Ma’ariv (Hebrew), for the past two years there has been a growing power struggle involving the Israeli leadership team of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his defense minister, Ehud Barak, against many officials past and present who are in the highest echelons of the defense establishment.  That struggle is apparently quickly becoming a real challenge to the Netanyahu government.

The battle focuses upon the Netanyahu/Barak desire to launch a military attack against Iran, which the dissidents regard as reckless and irresponsible.  In addition, there appears to be more general dissatisfaction with the Bibi and Barak duo, both of whom are known as extremely difficult personalities.

Ex-Mossad head, Meir Dagan, has recently been the most publicly vocal opponent of the current Israeli leadership and its push for military action against Teheran.   However, his discontent is just the tip of the iceberg.  It has been reported that many power players support Dagan’s views, including the recently retired head of the military, Gabi Askenazi and his present replacement, Benny Gantz.

The level of vituperative discourse and personal attacks which characterizes the current debate have been highly unusual even for the freewheeling and sometimes bizarre Israeli political scene.  “There is something not right about him,” is how Dagan described Netanyahu, according to a high level official quoted in Ma’ariv.

Surprisingly, Ben Caspit claims that the dissidents blame Barak and see Netanyahu as a weakling under the spell of his defense minister.  What a shocker!!!  Did anyone see Netanyahu’s performance in Washington recently?  He didn’t look weak to me.

In the following excerpt from Ben Caspit’s report he describes the bitterness of the words and feelings of the dissidents.

Their (Dagan and the other dissidents) shared fear is Barak.  In Netanyahu they see a naïve captive, a weakling and a lightweight mind that has become a rubber stamp for the Defense Minister.  The words that Dagan uses, that others use, in regard to the present danger that comes from the double leadership, Barak and Netanyahu; they are the most bitter and sharp words that are in the dictionary.  Most of them are not suitable for print [translation mine].

Who knows what to make of all this?  Dagan has always been known as an Arab hater who is a Jewish Rambo.  Maybe he has a soft spot for Persians.  I am just kidding.  Dagan has headed all manner of covert operations against Iran which include assassinating scientists, computer viruses which attack Iranian nuclear facilities, sabotage and promoting regime change.  Still none of these misadventures have caused a regional war which a military attack probably would.

All of the dissidents, of course, have always supported the occupation and have contributed greatly to its horrors.  Also, Dagan’s recent embrace of  the Saudi Initiative smells bad to me. And plans for attacking Iran have been on the Israeli agenda in a very public way for at least 15 years.  In the summer of 2008, the U.S. red- lighted the Olmert government, which was intent on military action against Iranian nuclear installations.  Why didn’t Dagan or the others speak out then?

Still, in reading the reports in the Israeli press today, I am convinced that there is a serious campaign to remove Barak and Netanyahu from power.  It is coming from the defense establishment, which has a lot of power in Israel.  The leaders seem to have sympathizers in the press.

My question is: would a government led by the dissidents be any better?  My answer is that for the Palestinians, no.  However, if it could prevent the regional war which an Israeli or American military action against Iran would produce, then my answer is definitely yes.

U.S. media buys Israel’s Naksa spin that protesters were orchestrated

Jun 07, 2011

Alex Kane

Variations on the line the Israeli government fed to Israeli media yesterday about the killings of demonstrators in the Golan Heights Sunday have made their way to the U.S. media, despite there being little evidence produced to support their claims.

The New York Times report is representative of how U.S. corporate media is covering the killings:

Israeli military officials on Monday disputed the casualty figures announced by Syria a day earlier, after Israeli forces fired on protesters who had tried to breach the Syrian frontier border with the Israeli-held Golan Heights. The discrepancy in numbers underlined the messages being conveyed by each side…

Israel said the government of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria was exploiting the Palestinian issue by sending unarmed protesters to the frontier in order to divert attention from its own antigovernment uprising and the bloody attempts to put it down.

Israel could not provide an exact number of how many protesters had been killed. But the Israeli military said Monday that 10 protesters were killed after they threw makeshift firebombs and started a fire that set off land mines near the border town of Quneitra, on the Syrian side of the lines.

“There were also a lot of shows being put on for the cameras,” said Lt. Col. Avital Leibovich, a spokeswoman for the Israeli military. “If somebody was shot in the toe, 30 people would crowd around with a stretcher. At night, when there was no shooting, the ambulances kept running up and down, their lights flashing in the dark.”

The Washington Post and the Christian Science Monitor reports have similar bents. On CNN, Eliot Spitzer interviewed Aaron David Miller, and they both agreed that the protests had been “orchestrated” by the Assad regime, which is in the middle of suppressing its own uprising for democracy.

It very well may be that the Syrian regime decided not to block protesters from approaching the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. But that is a far cry from saying that Syria deliberately orchestrated unarmed protests by, perhaps, paying demonstrators, implying that Palestinian refugees demanding their rights can’t protest on their own initiative. Max Blumenthal does a good job of casting doubt on the “demonstrators-for-hire” claim here.

More evidence and analysis point in the opposite direction of the Israeli military’s justifications that are printed in U.S. media. The Israeli government has not produced a shred of evidence in support of their claims (and if they have, do point them out to me). Yet there’s plenty of evidence to support claims of Israeli troops firing on protesters and killing them.

Before getting into the evidence and analysis, though, it’s worth asking: why were there only hundreds of people marching to the Golan Heights on Naksa Day, if the Assad regime really wanted to divert attention from their own oppressive tactics? Couldn’t they have brought out thousands if that were true? And why would they be blocking people from reaching the Golan again if they wanted to provoke Israel more?

Over at the Electronic IntifadaJillian Kestler D’Amours, a journalist based in Jerusalem, interviews Salman Fakhreddin, an activist who protested in the Golan. His response testifies to reports that Israeli snipers killed unarmed demonstrators:

Yesterday, hundreds of refugees from Syria — Palestinians and Syrians — marched to the ceasefire line near Majdal Shams in a place called the Valley of Tears. We usually use this place for families [living opposite of the ceasefire line] to meet each other and to speak to each other with loudspeaker on all days of the year. Yesterday, it was a demonstration in memory of the war of ‘67 and the occupation of the Golan, West Bank and Gaza and Sinai. When these people reached the ceasefire line, the Israeli forces were well prepared with snipers. They were there already and they began firing live bullets and they killed and injured hundreds of people. Twenty-three people were killed yesterday.

It is a blood harvest of the Israeli army. I think first they began shooting to kill and during the afternoon and at beginning of the night, they began firing tear gas and rubber bullets. It means that the Israeli army yesterday was standing on its head and thinking with its feet. They dealt with the issue in the opposite of a humanitarian way. They decided to kill people in order to frighten them not to continue with this demonstration because they are afraid of the delegitimization of the state of Israel and the Israeli policy in the international community.

On the other hand, the demonstration yesterday and the demonstration of Nakba Day [on 15 May] is trying to develop a culture of nonviolence in the area, in the struggle against the Israelis, or what’s called the popular resistance. In Israel, they want to stop that because they are afraid it will reach the knowledge of the international community and the internal Israeli community will join this struggle as a peaceful struggle against colonialism and apartheid in this place of the world.

I think the idea was to stop that and because of that, they chose this way: to kill people first and then to shoot them with tear gas.

An eyewitness account released by Amnesty International and reported on by the Ma’an News Agency deal further blows to Israeli claims:

The global rights group said they had spoken to a human rights activist in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights who “contradicts IDF [Israeli army] claims that all possible non-lethal means were used to disperse the protesters before lethal force was used.”

The march, marking Naksa day which commemorates the 1967 war, saw thousands of demonstrators calling for an end to Israel’s occupation of Palestinian and Syrian lands rush the ceasefire line. Syria’s state media say 23 were killed by Israeli army fire, while the Israeli military say 10 died throwing Molotov cocktails toward landmines.

A human rights activist who was 10 meters from the army told Amnesty he saw Israeli soldiers sheltering behind multiple barbed wire fences and periodically firing live ammunition at protesters some 60 meters away between 11am to 9pm.

The activist said soldiers had initially warned protesters in Arabic before opening fire, as Israeli army statements had said, but that troops did not fire tear gas or sound bombs to disperse the protesters until around dusk, in contradiction to army assurances that all non-lethal means were used, Amnesty said in a statement.

The rights organization also noted that while military spokespeople said Israeli troops aimed at the lower half of protesters’ bodies, Syrian health authorities reported that the majority of injuries were to the upper body.

Amnesty said it was “seriously concerned that Israeli troops used excessive force by firing live ammunition against protesters who were not endangering the lives of Israeli military personnel or others.”

The Israeli disinformation about the Naksa Day killings are similar to what happened after the flotilla raid and the death of Jawaher Abu Rahmah. But the U.S. media continues to print Israeli spin without investigating what really happened.

Alex Kane, a freelance journalist based in New York City, blogs on Israel/Palestine and Islamophobia at alexbkane.wordpress.com, where thispost originally appeared. Follow him on Twitter @alexbkane.

Israel arrests 76-year-old Israeli journalist for incitement and 6-year-old Palestinian boy

Jun 07, 2011

Kate

and other news from Today in Palestine:

Land, property, resources theft & destruction / Ethnic cleansing / Settlers
[price tag] Settlers set fire to mosque near Ramallah
RAMALLAH (Ma’an) 7 June — A Ramallah-area mosque was torched overnight and its remains graffitied with racist anti-Arab slogans; witnesses said Israeli settlers were seen setting the fire at 3 a.m. on Tuesday morning. Al-Mughayyir’s village council said the building was badly damaged, and its contents incinerated, drawing condemnation of the third mosque torching in three years … The vandals spray-painted “Alei Ayin” on the walls, which is the name of a nearby settlement outpost demolished by Israeli police last week, sparking fierce clashes with the settlers … The National Christian Coalition in the Holy land condemned the arson, with President Dimitri Diliani blaming Israel’s occupation and unquestioning protection of militarized settlers … Al-Mughayyir, north east of Ramallah, is the fifth village to have their mosque vandalized by settlers in the last three years, four of which were burnt down.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=394434
Netanyahu condemns West Bank mosque attack as ‘criminal act’
Haaretz 7 June — Defense Minister Barak echoes PM’s condemnation and says IDF will take steps to catch the perpetrators … Civil rights organizations have spoken out against the arson as well. Rabbis for Human Rights said Tuesday that this kind violence threatens everyone and may backfire. “This despicable act goes against human morality and our Jewish belief that we must not harm followers of different religion,” the organization said in a statement. The Peace Now movement responded by calling for more decisive actions against violent settlers. “The Shin Bet security service and the police must uproot the ‘hill youth’ phenomenon,” it said. This condemnation has not, however, been universal. Rightist activist Itamar Ben-Gvir said the arson doesn’t come as a surprise. “In the last few months Jewish blood has been spilled like water in Judea and Samaria,” he said.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/netanyahu-condemns-west-bank-mosque-attack-as-criminal-act-1.366525

Palestinians say Israeli government was behind West Bank mosque fire
CNN 7 June — The Palestinian Authority has accused the Israeli government of incitement in an arson attack Tuesday on a West Bank mosque, claiming the act was committed by settlers under the protection of the Israeli military. “Israel is forever accusing Palestinians of incitement, but does nothing to stop its citizens attacking our religious places — what is that but incitement?” read a statement from the Palestinian Authority’s media office.
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast/06/07/west.bank.mosque.fire/index.html
Jewish settlers burn 250 Palestinian trees in Nablus village
NABLUS, (PIC) 6 June — Jewish settlers started a huge fire in Palestinian farmland in Deir Al-Hatab village east of Nablus on Monday burning 250 olive and almond trees, local sources reported. They said that Palestinian fire brigades managed to contain and extinguish the fire before it spread to nearby groves. The firefighters said that the fire destroyed 200 olive trees and 50 almond trees, but hundreds of others were protected and saved.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2BcO
Israel to approve 4,100 settlement units in Jerusalem
OCCUPIED JERUSALEM, (PIC) 6 June — An expert planning researcher has revealed that an official board in Israel is on the verge of approving the construction of 4,100 houses in Jewish settlements in Jerusalem. The Israeli interior ministry tasked the board two months ago to see that settlement construction increases in Jerusalem, said Attorney Qais Nasser, who specializes in monitoring settlement activity in holy city. In its first session scheduled for June 14, the committee is expected to approve plans to erect 4,100 homes in Ramat Shlomo, Gilo, Pisgat Ze’ev, and Har Homa.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%
Dark days for Silwan’s youth
Silwan, Jerusalem (SILWANIC) 7 June — Israel’s continuous arrest campaign of Palestinian youth and children of Silwan has intensified in recent weeks, with no place or activity seemingly safe for minors from Israeli authorities. Arrests have occurred as children return from school, drink coffee on the balcony of their family home or buy vegetables in the street. Many minor arrests in recent days have taken place during quiet periods in Silwan, entirely unprovoked. The campaign highlights Israeli authorities’ willingness to defy basic standards of conduct and treatment, such as targeting and criminalisation of minors. Humiliation and physical assault are reportedly commonplace in interrogation and detention, even for minors. 7 children numbered amongst 8 arrested by Israeli forces in Silwan today. One child arrested, Yahya al-Rishaq, is not even 6 years of age. Despite al-Rishaq’s attempts to persuade soldiers not to take his young son, Israeli forces insisted on his arrest.
http://silwanic.net/?p=17999
Violence
Rights group: Israel holding boy nearly blinded by IOF
NABLUS, (PIC) 6 June — A human rights group has revealed that the Israel Prison Service is detaining an ill Palestinian boy left nearly blind by Israeli occupation force soldiers. The development shows that the IPS has not restricted its medical neglect policy to adult prisoners alone. Ismail Turki Mohammed Okel, 16, from the Old City of Nablus was arrested a year back and sentenced to 20 months in jail … [His mother] said that earlier in 2002, Ismail was caught in a situation while playing ball with friends. After an Israeli soldier stationed nearby claimed to have been attacked by stones, patrol cars began searching for suspects; and they reportedly hit Okel with their vehicle under suspicion that he was behind the attack. Ismail’s mother Umm Rasmi asserted that the soldiers not only ran Oker down but they also assaulted him with the butts of their rifles, putting him in a coma for a week as he stayed at the Rafidia hospital in Nablus. The crash broke Oker’s skull and caused internal bleeding and broken teeth and back pains, and he also lost about 70 percent of his vision, ISHRO researcher Ahmed al-Beitawi said.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2B
OCHA weekly report says 13 Palestinians injured in West Bank at end of May
JERUSALEM (WAFA) 7 June — Israeli forces injured 13 Palestinians in West Bank incidents during the week between May 25 and 31, said the weekly report of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs to the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OCHA) … Thus far in 2011, 699 Palestinians and 47 Israeli soldiers and policemen were injured in conflict-related incidents in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, a 6% increase and 44% decline, respectively, compared to the equivalent period of 2010. … Overall that week, Israeli forces conducted over 100 search-and-arrest operations throughout the West Bank, including in East Jerusalem, a slight increase compared to the weekly average for such operations since the beginning of 2011.
http://english.wafa.ps/index.php?action=detail&id=16377
Gaza – under siege for 1,455 days now
Gaza: Non-violent protester injured by Israeli fire
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 7 June — A young Palestinian man was injured Tuesday when Israeli forces opened fire on a non-violent rally in Beit Hanoun near Erez crossing in the northern Gaza Strip. A group of dozens had marched toward the border with Israel, demanding Israel’s disengagement from a swath of land inside the coastal enclave that has been declared a “no-go zone” by the military. Eyewitnesses identified the injured man as Muhammad Osama Kafarna, saying he was shot in his head and neck and was evacuated to a hospital in Beit Hanoun … Extending between 300-1,500 meters from the border, the “no-go zone” consumes 20 percent of the arable land in the coastal enclave.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=394602
Video — Trapped in Gaza: Rafah crossing closed to Palestinians soon after Egyptian pledge to reopen it
Democracy Now 7 June — Democracy Now!’s Sharif Abdel Kouddous and Nicole Salazar were one of the few teams of foreign journalists to witness the scene at the Rafah border, and they file this report from the Gaza Strip … BADREYA: [translated] The Egyptians told us the crossing is open and that they’re letting in elderly people and women. They haven’t let in anything. I’m going to have surgery that I myself am paying for. For three days I’ve been coming to this crossing for no reason.
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/6/7/trapped_in_gaza_rafah_crossing_closed
Rafah crossing to re-open Wednesday
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 7 June — The crossing between Egypt and the Gaza Strip will be re-opened Wednesday after a four-day closure, the Palestinian official responsible for the Rafah terminal said Tuesday. Ayyoub Abu Sha‘ar said in a statement that the transit point would open normally in both directions for travel, and travelers on a list of passengers due to cross last Thursday and Saturday would be given priority.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=394733
Gaza activists: Monitoring boat to sail Wednesday
BETHLEHEM (Ma‘an) 7 June — The first monitoring boat in Gaza waters crewed by international citizens will set sail on Wednesday morning, activists said. The vessel, named Oliva, will leave from Gaza City fishing port with crew from Spain, the US, Sweden and the UK, and accompany Gaza fisherman in the waters, organizers said in a statement released Tuesday. “Violations of international law will be monitored, documented, and disseminated,” the release from the Civil Peace Service said … Israeli military vessels monitor the Gaza coast and enforcing a fishing limit of three nautical miles and blockade of the Gaza Strip, with fishermen reporting fire, boat confiscations and detentions by the navy.  Last Wednesday, fishermen said one skiff was hit by an Israeli ship and sunk, injuring a fisherman, off the southern Gaza coast.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=394677
Turkey asks flotilla to ‘rethink’ planned voyage
ANKARA, Turkey (AFP) 7 June — Turkey’s foreign minister has called on activists to rethink a planned flotilla to the blockaded Gaza Strip and suggested how to avoid fresh tensions after last year’s bloodshed, reports said. “Civic groups should take into account the fact that the Rafah crossing [between Gaza and Egypt] has been opened and… act in a more careful manner,” Ahmet Davutoğlu said in remarks carried by Anatolia news agency Tuesday.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=394646
Activism / Solidarity / BDS
Video: Kalandia checkpoint 5 June
An Naksa demonstration in Ramallah on the way to Kallandia Checkpoint – photos, filmed, edited by Jan Beddegnoodts   IDF violence towards Internationals, Israelis, as well as Palestinians – women as well as men
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgZuMcuSgtc&feature=youtu.be
Scores treated for gas inhalation as soldiers attack protest in northern West Bank
Tul-Karam (PNN) 7 June — Scores of civilians suffered from tear gas inhalation as Israeli soldiers attacked a non-violent protest against the wall and settlements on Tuesday at the village of Nazlit Issa, near Tul-Karam city in the northern West Bank. The protest was organized by the popular committee against the wall and settlements in the village and was meant to commemorate the 44th anniversary of the Naksa.
http://english.pnn.ps/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=10189&Itemid=59
Three arrested in Majdal Shams; Israeli army enforces closure of the Golan Heights
Majdal Shams (PNN) 7 June — At dawn on Tuesday, the Israeli police arrested three young men from the town of Majdal Shams in the occupied Golan Heights after clashes erupted between local youth and Israeli soldiers. Young men and women from Majdal Shams organized a protest that started late on Monday evening. The youngsters were protesting the Israeli military attack on Naksa Day protesters on Sunday across the border from Majdal Shams, which left 23 dead, according to Syrian TV.
In related developments Israeli army radio announced that the West Bank and Gaza would be closed military zones and only people with special permission and humanitarian cases would be allowed through to Israel.
http://english.pnn.ps/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=10182&Itemid=63
Syria warns of more marches on Israeli border, says thousands of refugees will return
DAMASCUS, Syria (AP) 7 June — A Syrian government newspaper said Tuesday that more Syrians and Palestinians plan to march to the Israeli border, warning Israel the day will come when hundreds of thousands of refugees return to their occupied villages.Israeli forces opened fire on Palestinian and Syrian protesters Sunday, killing as many as 23 people who tried to cross into the Israeli-occupied Syrian Golan Heights. The article referred to Palestinian refugees in camps in Syria, as well as Syrians who fled the Golan Heights when Israel captured the strategic plateau in the 1967 Mideast war.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/syria-warns-of-more-marches-on-israeli-border-says-syrian-refugees-will-join-protest/2011/06/07/AG4OF1KH_story.html
IDF on high alert for ‘Al-Quds Day’
Ynet 7 June — Palestinians prepare to mark day IDF seized control of east Jerusalem [today, 7 June]; IDF, police remain on high alert on northern border, Jerusalem
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4079333,00.html
IHH publishes second Marmara book
Ynet 7 June —  Turkey’s IHH, the group which organized the 2010 Gaza flotilla, has released a book detailing the story of the aid sail and its tragic results, Ynet learned Tuesday. The book, titled “Freedom Flotilla through Language of Global Conscience: Interviews with Passengers,” follows a previous publication by the IHH, “Mavi Marmara/Gaza Freedom Flotilla,” and reportedly details “never before published testimonies” by 39 passengers.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4079460,00.html
Cosmetics firm LUSH endorses “Freedom for Palestine” / Ali Abunimah
EI 4 June — The UK-based international cosmetics firm LUSH has endorsed a single aimed at raising awareness of the struggle for human rights in Palestine … The LUSH statement adds, “The catastrophe facing the Palestinian people is one of the defining global justice issues of our time” and urges, “If OneWorld are successful at getting the song in the charts, the mainstream media will find it hard to ignore it or censor its message.”
http://electronicintifada.net/blog/ali-abunimah/cosmetics-firm-lush-endorses-freedom-palestine
Detention
Hamas legislator detained by Israeli forces
NABLUS (Ma‘an) 7 May — …Ahmad Al-Hajj Ali was taken into Israeli custody after soldiers entered and searched his home in the Ein Beit El-Mai refugee camp west of Nablus in the northern West Bank …The 73-year-old lawmaker is the fourth Hamas official to have been detained without charge since the party signed a unity deal with its former rival party Fatah in early May.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=394447
Israeli forces detain man in Jenin
JENIN (Ma‘an) 7 June — Israeli forces detained a Palestinian man in Jenin on Tuesday morning, after a raid on houses in the city’s ancient center. Palestinian security sources said Hani Adnan Makhzoum was detained after 15 military vehicles entered the city, fired sound grenades and raided a number of houses. Also Tuesday morning, witnesses told Ma’an that the Israeli army set up a flying checkpoint to the south of Jenin. Soldiers stopped cars on the road between villages Meithalun and Sanur, with no detentions reported, the locals said.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=394663
Hamas: PA detained 4 members in West Bank
BETHLEHEM (Ma‘an) 7 June — In a statement, Hamas officials in the West Bank accused Palestinian Authority security forces of arresting four of the party’s members and summoning several others for an appearance in front of police. The statement, issued on Tuesday, was the first accusing PA-affiliated security forces of carrying out politically-motivated arrests since the signing of a unity agreement in early May.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=394621
Refugees
Videos: Update on protests, killings in Yarmouk Palestinian refugee camp in Syria / Ali Abunimah
EI 7 June — More information is emerging about events in Yarmouk Palestinian refugee camp near Damascus, Syria. Yesterday, 6 June, news emerged of the shooting of a number of people in the camp. According to various reports members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – General Command (PFLP-GC) a small faction headed by Ahmad Jibril, opened fire on people protesting and chant slogans against faction leaders, after some protesters had set fire to a PFLP-GC building. A shocking videoshowed an unarmed young man being shot in the head, although the shooter is not visible … New videos show more of the 6 June events in Yarmouk camp, including a mass protest as what is said to be the PFLP-GC building burns. In the first video, posted above, protesters are apparently heard shouting “al-sha’ab yurid isqat al-fasa’il” – or “The people want the fall of the factions.” Political factions have a long history of exercising some governance functions and controlling resources and patronage within refugee camps. … 
http://electronicintifada.net/blog/ali-abunimah/update-protests-killings-yarmouk-palestinian-refugee-camp-syria

Racism / Discrimination / Repression of dissent
WAFA monitors incitement and racism in Israeli media May 27-June 2
RAMALLAH (WAFA)  June — Mordechai Kedar, an Israeli researcher and lecturer at Bar-Ilan University, published a racist article on NFC website under the title “Arabs Can’t Live Without War and Arms.” He said that Netanyahu’s demand of a demilitarized Palestinian state is absurd and unacceptable for the Arabs, who live by the law of the gun, adding “perpetual conflicts are the core of an Arab’s existence.” … . M. Shalom wrote an instigating article against Abbas in ‘Hamodia’ newspaper, accusing him of being a racist. … Shalom also attacked Islam, saying that deception and lying are Arabs’ main traits and solid characteristics of Mohammad’s religion.
http://english.wafa.ps/index.php?action=detail&id=16384
Can equality exist in the Jewish state? Kieron Monks
AJ 4 June — As right-wingers dominate the Knesset, Arab citizens of Israel say institutional discrimination is getting worse.
http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/06/2011648192849821.html
Israel’s treatment of gay Palestinian asylum seekers / Caroline Esser
WashNote 6 June — …Israel advocacy groups like the ADL and the Jewish Federations have latched on to LGBT rights in Israel as a means of combating negative press and demonstrating Israel’s dedication to equal rights and democracy … Sadly, when the ADL wrote in small print that Israel supports civil rights for “all its citizens” it meant exactly what it said–basic human rights are strictly for Israelis. In their 2008 study, “Nowhere to Run: Gay Palestinian Asylum-Seekers in Israel,” Michael Kagan and Anat Ben-Dor describe in detail Israel’s unsympathetic and unbending policy towards gay Palestinians. In stark contrast to the vibrant gay culture within Israel, in the West Bank and Gaza Strip Palestinians face intense discrimination and often brutal violence if they are discovered to be gay … However, despite their desperation, Israel refuses to even review gay Palestinian applications for asylum (those who have successfully received asylum have had to submit their cases directly to the UNHCR headquarters in Geneva). Moreover, gay Palestinians who have illegally entered Israel have been arrested and promptly deported
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2011/06/israels_treatme/
Journalist and activist Gideon Spiro arrested for ‘incitement’
978mag 7 June — A Tel Aviv Police investigator arrested Monday Gideon Spiro, a veteran leftist activist aged 76, for suspected incitement relating to an article he had written. Spiro was discharged two hours later, after his attorneys – from the office of Michael Sfard – intervened on his behalf.
http://972mag.com/a-leftist-activist-is-arrested-for-%E2%80%9Cincitement%E2%80%9D/
Political / Diplomatic / International news
Palestinians in Washington deny indirect talks with Israel
Haaretz 6 June — Top Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat on Monday denied that a Palestinian delegation to Washington exchanged messages with an Israeli official, who is also in the United States for meetings with the White House, saying that he did not know the Israelis would be there.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/palestinians-in-washington-deny-indirect-talks-with-israel-1.366355
Obama: Palestinians should avoid seeking UN recognition for statehood
Reuters 7 June — U.S. president meets German Chancellor Merkel, who says ‘unilateral measures are not helping at all’ to bring about a two-state solution.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/obama-palestinians-should-avoid-seeking-un-recognition-for-statehood-1.366569

France: Israel considering Paris peace talks
WASHINGTON (Ma‘an) 7 June — Israel is considering a French proposal to resume peace talks with Palestine in Paris before the end of June, France’s foreign minister told reporters in the United Sates on Wednesday. Speaking alongside the minister, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the two discussed Paris’ plan, “will be certainly working together,” she said, adding that both nations believed the “status quo is unsustainable.”
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=394555
Blair open to French Mideast peace talks
OSLO, Norway (AFP) 7 June — Tony Blair, the envoy of the Quartet group of world powers seeking an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal, said Tuesday he was open to a French proposal to host a Middle East peace conference. “What the French foreign minister has been saying is absolutely right in the sense that you need to put together not just the support for Palestinian statehood and institutions building, but some political momentum has to be injected back into this,” he said on a visit to Oslo.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=394592
US delegation visits Cairo to study Egypt’s new foreign policy
MEMO 7 June — A US delegation of members of both Houses of Congress has been touring the Middle East, beginning with Cairo to identify new aspects of Egypt’s foreign policy. The delegation met with Egyptian Foreign Minister Nabil Al-Araby, who briefed them on the most important characteristics of the policy and its impact on various regional issues. Paramount is how Egypt is going to manage its role in the Israel-Palestine conflict; the American delegation is also going to visit Tel Aviv. The meeting included a discussion of the latest regional political and social developments … The delegation’s visit, headed by Democrat John Yarmouth, was arranged by Jewish-American organisation J Street.
http://www.middleeastmonitor.org.uk/news/americas/2438-us-delegation-visits-cairo-to-study-egypts-new-foreign-policy
J Street: PM refuses to meet delegation
Ynet 6 June — Despite enjoying a hearty welcome at the US Congress recently, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has refused to meet with a delegation of representatives organized by J Street, the liberal Jewish lobby said Sunday … The delegation, composed of Democratic Congress members, was set to arrive in Israel on Monday. The trip was initiated by J Street, considered a controversial group known for its fierce criticism of Israel, particularly over the issue of West Bank settlements.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4078936,00.html
Other news
Israeli towns’ new line of defense from Gaza rockets: trees
Haaretz 7 June — Israel has spent no less than NIS 1.6 billion on defenses for the townships around the Gaza Strip in the last five years, Udi Shani, Defense Ministry director general, said yesterday. “We view the present state of quiet as transient,” said Shani, speaking during a tour of the boundary between Israel and the Strip … One [defense] is afforestation — planting rows of trees by the towns located along the Gaza Strip. The idea is that the trees will prevent precise mortar fire on Israeli targets and camouflage Israeli troops. [Just give Gaza justice and freedom and you won’t have to spend anything….]
http://english.themarker.com/israeli-towns-new-line-of-defense-from-gaza-rockets-trees-1.366450
OPT: Huge demand for hearing aids
TULKAREM, WEST BANK (IRIN) 7 June — Hearing impairments are common among Palestinians mainly due to inherited genetic mutations and lack of access to adequate medical services which allows minor infections to develop into major problems, according to Rafi Walden, a surgeon at Sheba medical centre in Israel … “Hearing aids are not funded by Palestinian public health providers and are out of reach for nearly all Palestinians,” said Salah Haj Yihyeh, who recently coordinated a donation of hearing aids by the Starkey Hearing Foundation to 1,000 Palestinians in Tulkarem. Before this, speech therapists and experts from the Sheba medical centre had visited the area in April.
http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?ReportId=92923
Analysis / Opinion / Human interest
Finding the Israel lobby on the map / Yusuf Munayyer
7 June — How can you see the influence of the pro-Israel lobby on a map? … You could, I suppose, look up the address of AIPAC headquarters, but that wouldn’t be nearly as illustrative as this … [W]hen you study a conflict over land, the precise location of every square meter is important. For years, Israel’s continued colonization of Palestinian territory has happened one settlement or one settlement home at a time. Hilltops, aquifers, valleys, walls, checkpoints, distances, locations are all vital for understanding the intricacies of this conflict. So, as with just about every field, technology has revolutionized the study of Palestinian geography, especially with the advent of widely available satellite imagery (e.g. Google Maps) which allows anyone with a computer to see how big illegal settlements around Jerusalem are, just how deep Ariel protrudes into the West Bank or how tiny Gaza really is …. Take a look at this image, for example. What you are looking at, at Google Maps’ highest available resolution, is Military Aircraft parked at Area 51, the secret U.S. military base in Nevada’s desert used to test and develop state of the art weapons and planes. Go ahead, zoom in and out. But if we were to look at any random location in Israel at Google Maps’ highest resolution, not say a top-secret military facility, we get this: [blurs] This image is supposed to be of the Dahmash village outside of my ancestral hometown of Al-Lyd. Dahmash is an Arab village unrecognized by the state and thus homes there do not receive permits and they are subject to demolition. Hardly a sensitive military location, in fact, it is more like a shanty town. If you zoom out you can see it. But you won’t be able to see it, or any other area under Israeli state control (including in the Occupied Territories) at the highest resolution. Why is that? Well, it’s because Congress passed a law which stipulated that Israel and any territory it controls deserve more privacy than the USA’s most secret military installations.
http://blog.thejerusalemfund.org/2011/06/finding-israel-lobby-on-map.html
Shavuot 2011: Obscenities as words of Torah / Yossi Sarid
7 June — This isn’t the Torah we received. Since that time, Israel has been swallowed up by the Land of Israel and disappeared inside its maw — Go to your computer right now and watch the frightening video clip posted on YouTube as a memento of Jerusalem Day (it’s called “Yom Yeru 2011” ). Not a handful, but hundreds of young people high on hard-core nationalism wave blue-and-white flags; may their eyes grow dim. “Death to the Arabs, death to the leftists,” they chanted. “The Temple will be rebuilt, the mosque will be destroyed.” “Kahane lives, Mohammed is dead.” “Itbach al-Arab” (“Death to the Arabs” in Arabic ). Thus they elevate Jerusalem as their chief sin: May their tongues cleave to their palates. While I was roaming Jerusalem’s streets, another mob was gathering at the city’s Mercaz Harav Yeshiva, with rabbis Shmuel Eliyahu of Safed and Dov Lior of Hebron among the guests. The former demands Israel be purged of Arabs, while the latter endorses a book that justifies killing gentiles, urges soldiers to disobey orders and refuses to show up for questioning by the police. Nowadays, every obscenity is treated as ‘words of Torah.’ A bill was even submitted for discussion to the cabinet that would permit incitement by rabbis, and rabbis only. And MK Michael Ben Ari (National Union ) was also among the guests. The guest of honor was the prime minister; lift up your heads, O ye gates. “I see you as an elite Torah combat unit,” the king of glory – and of shame – said fawningly. Now the Torah, too, has its own elite combat unit.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/shavuot-2011-obscenities-as-words-of-torah-1.366422
Israel-Palestinian conflict is in the eye of the beholder / Amira Hass
Haaretz 6 June — Israel is fighting against the memory of the Nakba, whereas others are searching for ways to give the Nakba its rightful place in teaching and education — Some six months ago, 54 Israeli and Palestinian students received a series of photos and were asked to describe them and jot down their impressions and the feelings stirred by them in two stages – before seeing the caption explaining them and then afterwards … Some 32 such photos from 1948, along with the impressions of the Palestinian and Israeli students, appear in a book called “Zoom In, Palestinian Refugees of 1948, Remembrances.” The book was issued by the Holland-based Institute for Historical Justice and Reconciliation, which “seeks to dispel public myths about historic legacies in societies divided by ethnic conflict.”
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/features/israel-palestinian-conflict-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder-1.366212
Haaretz editorial: Readiness and blindness in the Golan Heights
7 June — The IDF proved this week that it does a good job preparing for the previous war. … On Sunday, Naksa Day, the Israel Defense Forces succeeded in blocking hundreds of demonstrators who, surrounded by cameras, stormed the border fences in the Golan Heights, carrying flags, posters and loudspeakers … The Palestinians reckoned they would have casualties. They too have learned lessons from May 15. It did not deter them, and there are no grounds to assume it will deter others on other fronts, especially when the regimes or organizations holding the Arab side of the border have no interest in acting against the demonstrators. The incidents have also shown that 30 years of forced annexation and naturalization have not turned the Golan Druze into devoted Israeli citizens. This has become routine in the Israeli-Arab conflict — the IDF scores a tactical victory, which shrinks in contrast to the strategic failure. http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/readiness-and-blindness-in-the-golan-heights-1.366418
Revealed: the untold story of the deal that shocked the Middle East / Robert Fisk
Independent 7 June — Secret meetings between Palestinian intermediaries, Egyptian intelligence officials, the Turkish foreign minister, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal – the latter requiring a covert journey to Damascus with a detour round the rebellious city of Deraa – brought about the Palestinian unity which has so disturbed both Israelis and the American government. Fatah and Hamas ended four years of conflict in May with an agreement that is crucial to the Palestinian demand for a state. A series of detailed letters, accepted by all sides, of which The Independent has copies, show just how complex the negotiations were
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/revealed-the-untold-story-of-the-deal-that-shocked-the-middle-east-2293879.html
the open-minded:
Between warm and fuzzy and dangerous in the West Bank / Olivia Snaije
Haaretz 7 June — Refugee camps, desert moonscapes, checkpoints and monasteries – all were part of an eye-opening bike trip around the West Bank, organized by a nonprofit Palestinian rights organization — We left Jenin early on our first day of cycling through Palestine. After an inaugural hill, we crossed a main thoroughfare where the terrain flattened, and whizzed along under a brilliant sun, the road lined with olive trees as well as multicolored fields of thistles, poppies, marigolds and daisies.
http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/week-s-end/between-warm-and-fuzzy-and-dangerous-in-the-west-bank-1.366516
and the very fearful:
Israel needs northern wall / Yosef Argaman
Ynet 6 June — Op-ed: In face of new Arab invasion strategy on Golan, Israel must build new cement wall — Not transparent fences that can be cut, not a series of new outposts, and not a system of fortifications that can be circumvented. We need a contiguous, high and deterring cement wall like the security fence in Judea and Samaria or the Great Wall of China.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4079282,00.html
groups.yahoo.com/group/f_shadi (listserv)
www.theheadlines.org (archive)

Wait– did Israel lay a minefield in Golan in last 3 weeks to kill protesters?

Jun 07, 2011

Philip Weiss

Marian Houk has a disturbing report at UN-Truth. The beginning of her post:

There were several Israeli media reports published yesterday (in English) and today (in Hebrew) that the IDF has, in recent weeks, laid new minefields in the Golan — as part of the military preparations against continuing demonstrations at the “border”.

According to these reports, new minefields were laid in the weeks between the May 15 Nakba Day demonstrations [marking the expulsion of some 750,000 Palestinians in the fighting that surrounded the creation of the State of Israel in 1948] and the June 5 demonstrations held on Sunday [to mark the 1967 war and the start of the occupation of the West Bank, Gaza, and Golan].

On May 15, Israeli officials were surprised by an infiltration of Palestinians and their supporters who managed to cross the lines and enter the Golan town of Majdal Shams. One of these infiltrators even managed to get as far as Yaffa, the birthplace and home town of his parents, where he went for a meal, looked around, and then turned himself in to Israeli police.

The Syrian Golan Heights was occupied by Israel in the June 1967 war — and annexed by Israel in 1980, a move that UN members said was “null and void”.

The well-informed Defense Correspondent for the Jerusalem Post, Yaakov Katz, wrote in an article published last night [06/06/2011 22:01] that “In general, the army was pleased with the way it handled the protests on Sunday … In the weeks before, the IDF prepared extensively, laying down new minefields, digging trenches and installing new barbed-wire fences … At least eight of the dead, IDF sources said on Monday, were killed by mines that exploded after the protesters threw Molotov cocktails in fields near the border, causing their premature detonation”. This was posted here.

Laying new minefields in the Golan raises serious questions — including whether proper notification was made, particularly to the Syrian authorities (also to the UN, which has peacekeeping missions there).

It also raises questions about whether such military measures — normally intended to address grave dangers and prevent invasions — are also intended as the Israeli response to protest demonstrations and civilian infiltration.

‘Mishigas’ and ‘mensch’ make primetime

Jun 07, 2011

Philip Weiss

I track Yiddish in the mainstream media. And yesterday:

1. John Schaefer of Soundcheck was interviewing the bandleader of “My Morning Jacket” in the afternoon and asked him how recording had gone on their latest album. No “mishigas,” he said, ala Crosby Still and Nash or the Beatles? No, said the bandleader.

2. Chris Matthews was talking about Anthony Weiner last night and said that he was a “mensch” in one respect, that he came out and admitted lying.

Yiddish isn’t ours anymore, it shapes American culture. I can’t wait formohel jokes.

Democracy Now reports from the Rafah border crossing

Jun 07, 2011

Adam Horowitz

Encountering Leonard Cohen in an L.A. pizzeria

Jun 07, 2011

Rachel Roberts

I graduated from law school two weeks ago. Last Tuesday, I decided to take the evening away from boring bar prep outlines and write a few lines of poetry. I have sorely neglected my writing for a few months as I focus on transitioning from student to grown up but the lines needed to come out. So I sat in a pizza parlor in Los Angeles near where I live, ordered some food and put my pen in my hand. At first I thought my eyes were playing tricks, because I’ve spent so much time listening to his music, reading his words, watching him perform. Maybe it was just my mind, I thought, but there was no mistaking that black hat, he was wearing exactly what he wears on stage, and then I heard him speak. Oh gosh.

The legendary singer-songwriter and poet, Leonard Cohen, had walked into the pizzeria. I knew I had to approach him, because he is not just a writer whose work I’ve learned and grown from, but because there is some unfinished business between Leonard and me. A year and a half ago, he made the decision to play a concert in Tel Aviv only months after the Israeli government perpetrated a horror on the people of Gaza, Operation Cast Lead. According to B’tselem, the Israeli human rights group, 1,389 Palestinians were killed, 789 of whom did not take part in hostilities. This all happened in the context of Israel’s ongoing military occupation and settlement of Palestinian land, which has rendered the Palestinians second class citizens in the country their ancestors built. The Israel Discount Bank, which according to Israel’s Coalition of Women for Peace is deeply involved in Israel’s settlement building enterprise, co-sponsored Cohen’s concert.

Despite my disappointment, I understand where Leonard Cohen is coming from. Artists want their work heard far and wide and don’t want politics to get between them and their audiences. And coming to terms with Israel’s perpetuation of Palestinian suffering wasn’t easy for me as I’m sure it’s not easy for Cohen. Speaking it aloud felt like I was betraying my own. I worried that I was helping those who wanted to demonize Israelis if I acknowledged Israel’s crimes publicly. What I found when I became involved in the struggle against the occupation, however, is that Israelis march side by side with Palestinians every weekend to protest the confiscation of Palestinian land. Israelis also play an important role in undermining those who profit off of Palestinian suffering. The BDS movement embodies co-existence and peace, because it is made up of Palestinians, Israelis and people around the world working together to stop those who would profit off of suffering and war. When an artist chooses to support the boycott, he or she makes a strong statement that bolsters these unpopular voices for change.

Non-violent Palestinian, Israeli and international activists approached Cohen about making a historic statement in support of real peace and canceling his Tel Aviv show in protest. To his credit, Cohen donated the proceeds to a reconciliation fund, which benefited the group, Bereaved Families for Israeli-Palestinian Peace.

I got out my phone to call everyone I could for advice. How to handle this? I finally got a hold of my friend Andrew Kadi, who helped me muster my courage. After I composed myself (shaking and quaking like a knee-knocked child) I walked up to Cohen and said: “Hi, my name is Rachel. I am a big admirer of your work but I really wish you would have made a different decision about your concert in Israel. I wish that you had listened to the activists who met with your PR team. He said: “well you know I started a reconciliation fund.” I said: “I think that shows you’re really well intentioned but the boycott call is clear. I’ve been involved with the joint struggle for the past eight years and I can’t tell you what it’s meant to me as a Jewish American.”

He said that he didn’t want to get into a big discussion about it (the poor man was putting parmasan on his pasta when I walked up to him). I said that’s fine but I would be remiss in not saying anything at all because his work has meant so much to me but so has this movement. And then I said I hoped he would make a different decision next time.

Cohen’s response to the BDS movement’s challenge represents a fundamental misunderstanding about what it will take to bring peace about. We don’t need money from Leonard Cohen, we need him to stand with us. It is not helpful to simply acknowledge that both innocent Israelis and innocent Palestinians have died when you say nothing about the fact that one people live under the thumb of the other. It is not a virtue to be neutral in the face of injustice. To quote Leonard Cohen: the killers in high places say their prayers out loud. Now they do it with one of the great poets of the 20th century to use as a fig leaf. When Cohen chose to play that concert, he sided against us at the moment we needed his support the most. I can’t hide my disappointment and the sense of betrayal that comes with it.

I like to think it’s not too late. Dozens of artists the world over have chosen to support the boycott. They do so because they can see that we have the power to make things better, if we support those Israelis and Palestinians committed to facing the truth and stopping the occupation. I still hope one day Leonard Cohen will choose to join us.

Read Rachel Roberts’s poetry at her blog,http://postalcard.posterous.com/.

Brooke Gladstone is hip

Jun 07, 2011

Peter Voskamp

Saw your post about Keller retiring and Brooke Gladstone interviewing him and Abramson. I share your outrage.

I write though to relate to you a great line from Gladstone I heard on an NPR interview a few weeks ago. She was talking about her new book on the state of journalism/media — “The Influencing Machine.” She mentioned that with the Internet and Twitter there are now countless sources — from citizen journalists to “curated” blogs, etc., across the political spectrum — delivering “news.”

The interviewer, in what came off as a slightly smug, denigrating tone of voice, said, “But let me point out the inevitable: How do you know it’s true?” And Gladstone, god bless her, said, “How do you ever know it’s true?”

‘Birth pangs’ of the new Middle East? More on the Iran attack

Jun 07, 2011

Seham

Recognition of a Palestinian state at the United Nations will have little impact on the lives of Palestinians under occupation, which is why it is all the more frustrating to watch Obama flailing like a fish out of water begging the world to shun recognition.  According to Haaretz, Obama really is no better than any leader of Israel who wages war to distract from their criminal occupation of Palestinian land:

Obama’s new security staff may approve attack on Iran
Obama has chosen the summer of 2011, about a year before the election season warms up in 2012, to refresh his national security staff, a move that may have serious repercussions on Israel.
Shameless and transparent.

More from Nima Shirazi for his critical insight which cuts through American and Israeli hasbara on Iran:

05.24.2011 – A Busy Week, AIPAC’d with Propaganda
My analysis of recent speeches delivered by Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu, along with the new IAEA Safeguards Report and the hypocrisy of Iran sanctions.

05.31.2011 – Meir Javedanfar’s Continued Fear-Mongering and Shoddy Journalism
A more complete look at the new IAEA report and how the Western media – notably the work of Israeli-Iranian reporter Javedanfar – consistently repeat falsehoods about the Iranian nuclear program.
05.31.2011 – An Illegal, Unprovoked Military Attack on Iran?: Anything Less Would Be Uncivilized
A brief note regarding Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Moshe Ya’alon’s recent suggestion that an internationally coordinated attack on Iran is necessary, along with IISS’ Mark Fitzgerald’s latest fear-mongering about Iranian nuclear capabilities.
06.01.2011 – Israel’s Pompous Posturing & Idle Threats
Occasionally, the truth comes out about the impossibility of an Israeli attack on Iran.  That happened again this week with Meir Dagan’s latest statements on Israeli bluster, bluffing, and over-confidence.
06.02.2011 – Jeremy Bernstein’s Nuclear Propaganda Fail: The New York Review of Books Gets It Wrong on Iran
A comprehensive rebuttal to a new article regarding the Iranian nuclear program and the implications of the latest IAEA report.

06.05.2011 – On the Tehran Research Reactor & Polonium-210: An E-Mail Exchange with Jeremy Bernstein
A brief response from Jeremy Bernstein about two aspects of the Iranian nuclear narrative and my subsequent reply.

06.06.2011 – RAND Report: Iran is Two Months Away From a Nuke!
A new RAND report claims Iran will have a nuclear bomb in eight weeks, while Deputy Speaker of the Knesset Danny Danon wants the U.S. and its Western allies to attack Iran.

Weiner repeatedly lied (about Israel and Palestine– does anyone care?)

Jun 07, 2011

Philip Weiss

If the Anthony Weiner scandal has an upside, let us hope that it will unearth the countless lies, stretchers, and bodacious and rabid falsehoods that the congressman told three months back at the New School in a debate about the Goldstone Report that we set up between him and former Congressman Brian Baird, moderated by Roger Cohen of the New York Times.

Here are five of those lies: There is no Israeli occupation of the West Bank, the Goldstone Report was not based on the laws of war, Israel is at war with 20 neighbors, American progressives should support the absence of free speech in Israel when it comes to its character as a Jewish state, and Egypt is an Islamic state. To the videotape:

Lie #1. There is no Israeli occupation of the West Bank, no Israeli military presence there:

WEINER: You can see a difference in the development in the West Bank with 11 percent year over year growth, with no Israeli occupation there either, with increasing access to checkpoints…

COHEN: No occupation in the West Bank, did I hear you right?

WEINER: Yes.

COHEN: Have you been to the West Bank lately?

WEINER: Yes.

COHEN: You didn’t see the IDF there?

WEINER: In Ramallah? No. In Nablus? No. Now can I tell you there might be some people in this room who think Jerusalem is occupied.

COHEN: Well hold on a second there, let’s stick to the West Bank. You’re saying there is no IDF presence there?

WEINER: Yes.

Lie #2. The Goldstone Report was not based on the laws of war.

COHEN: Do you accept the idea that [Israel’s] self-defense can become grossly disproportionate?

WEINER: I will say that whether or not grossly disproportion– it is not something that is subject to the rules of international law. It is subject ot the rules of war. The Geneva Convention was followed scrupulously and I didn’t see anywhere in the allegations that even the rules of war were even considered for this report. Because quite the opposite. Goldstone said we’re looking at this through the laws of justice. Unfortunately and this pains me to say, when you’re at war it’s because the laws have broken down…

This is a flatout misrepresentation.

The Goldstone Report repeatedly invokes the laws of war. The largest body of law on which it is based are the numerous conventions of international humanitarian law (IHL) how states are supposed to behave toward non-combatants.  For instance, paragraph 270:

All parties to the armed conflict are bound by relevant rules of IHL, whether of conventional or customary character. International humanitarian law comprises principles and rules applicable to the conduct of military hostilities and provides for restraints upon the conduct of military action so as to protect civilians and those that are hors de combat. It also applies to situations of belligerent occupation.

And Goldstone repeatedly cites violations of the Geneva Conventions. Paragraph 1919.

The intentional strike at al-Quds hospital using high-explosive artillery shells and white phosphorous in and around the hospital also violated articles 18 and 19 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Lie #3. Israel is at war with 20 neighbors.

WEINER: We have a problem, we being progressives, have a problem that large numbers of us have come to turn the story of David and Goliath as relates to Israel on its head and have lost sight of the fact that Israel is the democracy in the middle east, in that region which is at war with 20 of its neighbors. Not that she declared war, the 20 neighbors declared war against her. She is the one with the judiciary, she is the one that puts out reports… that are critical of its own military

This is an absurd statement. Egypt and Jordan have treaties with Israel that permit trade and travel. And as Brian Baird promptly pointed out, the Arab League has repeatedly offered to recognize Israel on the ’67 lines. “This idea that Israel is surrounded by countries intent on driving it into the sea is just not accurate.”

Lie #4  American progressives should support Israel limiting free speech about its character as a Jewish state.

Weiner said that he had come to the debate to show that progressives in New York must support Israel. “We have to start pushing back on the notion that it is somehow anathema to progressive thought to support a democracy in the middle east, that is Israel, and im proud to be a progressive that supports that.”

Baird said, “It is an inequal democracy by any standard,” and said that when he was at the Knesset, he watched a bill being passed on first reading to make it a criminal offense to suggest in public that Israel should not be a Jewish state. “A criminal offense. Just to say it. So much for first amendment, so much for separation of church and state. All the things that we value as progressives. You can’t even say it, or you go to jail…”

WEINER: I do see discussions and debate and votes in the Knesset, the democratically elected legislature of Israel, I do see good ideas and crazy ideas. When my friend Brian Baird describes the First Amendment, it’s a Jewish state… The idea of a First Amendment, that shows a little bit of a blind spot…The idea that somehow Israel is not a jewish state is part of the problem here. Some people believe that it shouldn’t be. They have their rights, but it is, it’s going to be..

Whatever these ideas are, they are not progressive.

Lie #5. Egypt is an “Islamic state.”

WEINER: It’s a Jewish state and that’s the way it’s created to be, and it’s a right to be that, just like in Egypt it’s going to be an Islamic state… [hooting from the audience] Let me stipulate that Egypt probably will be… It’s going to have many of the precepts of Islam and I’m sure that’s going to be the prevailing religion. It’s not? [to Roger Cohen] You were there. I’d certainly be surprised if it emerged as a Coptic Christian state.

Egypt’s official religion is Islam. It does not have the same separation of church and state that we have in the U.S., but it is not an “Islamic state.” Till recently, Egypt sharply limited the role of Islamist parties. Israel, by contrast, does little to limit religious political parties.

A. Loewenstein Online Newsletter

Glenn Beck would like you to stand with Israel

Posted: 08 Jun 2011 11:03 AM PDT

 
More here on how to embrace a Christian fundamentalist, pro-settler Zionism.

Privatised services ignore duty of care and yet governments love them

Posted: 08 Jun 2011 10:47 AM PDT

Clare Sambrook reminds us of a tragic story in Australia that should provide a salutary warning to governments desperate for privatised “efficiency”:

Last week in Western Australia, Graham Powell and Nina Stokoe, two former private security guards, pleaded not guiltyto charges relating to the death of renowned Aboriginal elder Mr Ward, cooked to death while being transported more than 220 miles across searing Goldfields in a badly maintained van with faulty air conditioning in January 2008.
Powell and Stokoe’s employer, then called GSL, is part of G4S, the outsourcing monster with a £7.4 billion annual turnover, which dominates the world security market. The UK is the company’s home and a £1.2 billion chunk of business: G4S manages PFI deals, transports half a million prisoners a year, runs prisons and immigration detention centres (including, opening soon, the government’s new ‘I can’t believe it’s not child detention’ facility at Pease Pottage near Gatwick). To G4S, our welfare state is a £159 billion opportunity-in-waiting, the dismantling of the NHS another exciting prospect for growth and enrichment.
G4S, which may yet face corporate manslaughter charges here in the UK over last year’s death of Angolan deportee Jimmy Mubenga after “restraint” by G4S operatives, has repeatedly tried to pin the blame for Mr Ward’s death on Powell and Stokoe alone. After the Western Australia State Coroner found in June 2009 that the State, the company and the workers had all contributed to Mr Ward’s death, Tim Hall, G4S’s mouthpiece in Australia, insisted on national television that the company’s procedures “were not totally inadequate. Why this incident happened was because two officers disobeyed an instruction they were given to stop every two hours.”
But that isn’t anything like the whole story. Indeed the case of Mr Ward provides a shocking glimpse behind the corporate spin, exposing shakiness in the logic that has propelled the global boom in privatisation of core public services.

Murdoch empire and ethical reporting will never go together

Posted: 08 Jun 2011 10:23 AM PDT

Here’s yet more evidence:

Pressure is building on the Metropolitan police to expand their phone-hacking inquiry to include a notorious private investigator who was accused in the House of Commons on Wednesday of targeting politicians, members of the royal family and high-level terrorist informers on behalf of Rupert Murdoch’s News International.
Guardian inquiries reveal that the former prime minister Tony Blair is among the suspected victims of Jonathan Rees, who was involved in the theft of confidential data, the hacking of computers and, it is alleged, burglary. According to close associates of Rees, he also targeted:
• Jack Straw when he was home secretary, Peter Mandelson when he was trade secretary and Blair’s media adviser Alastair Campbell;
• Prince Edward and the Countess of Wessex, and the Duke and Duchess of Kent, all of whom are said to have had their bank accounts penetrated, and Kate Middleton when she was Prince William’s girlfriend;
• The former commissioner of the Metropolitan police, Sir John Stevens, and the current assistant commissioner, John Yates, who later supervised the failed phone-hacking inquiry for 19 months;
• The governor and deputy governor of the Bank of England, whose mortgage account details were obtained and sold.
Rees, who worked for the Mirror Group as well as the New of the World, is also accused of using a specialist computer hacker in July 2006 to steal information about MI6 agents who had infiltrated the Provisional IRA. According to a BBC Panorama programme in March, Rees was commissioned by Alex Marunchak, then the News of the World’s executive editor, to hack the information from the computer of Ian Hurst, a former British intelligence officer in Northern Ireland who had stayed in contact with several highly vulnerable agents. Marunchak has denied the allegations.

It’s ironic that Blair may have been targeted since he was essentially groomed and backed by the Murdoch empire during his entire reign in government.

Democracy Now! on the Egyptian and Hamas blocked border with Gaza

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 09:49 PM PDT

 

Restrooms and Sanitation at Umm-Al-Kheir (a story for Shavuot)

NOVANEWS

 

Mohammed Salem is about 30 years old. He lives in Umm-Al-Kheir, in a home inherited from his late father right next to the fence of the Carmel settlement (sometimes spelled “Karmel”; see picture).

In 2005, when Carmel built an expansion neighborhood, Mohammed was beaten by settlers involved in the construction. Since this assault, he has suffered from post-traumatic stress (PTSD). He has stopped functioning, fears and runs away from any stranger, and even from some family members.

Mohammed’s home, one of the few still standing in that part of Umm-Al-Kheir – a village suffering continual destruction from the Occupation authorities – does not have a restroom. Therefore, residents must perform their bodily functions outdoors. On Wednesday, May 25 2011, while Mohammed was outside for that reason, he was harrangued by settlers yelling, cursing and making threats. These new, government-backed residents living in fully-connected homes have had enough with this ongoing sanitation problem placed not far from their doorstep.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA UmKheirToilets3 OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

This story crosses paths with another story: about two years ago, Ta’ayush activist Ezra Nawi initiated a campaign to build outhouses at Umm-Al-Kheir. Shortly after work commenced, Carmel settlers complained to the Occupation’s “Civil Administration” about the travesty of restrooms being built for their neighbors. The “Administration” quickly geared into action, its men arriving on site, confiscating materials and posting work-stoppage order signs on those structures already standing. This government action has caused a European organization that provided most of the funding, to pull out of the project. In particular, Mohammed’s outhouse had never been completed; the floor was laid out, but the walls and ceiling are still missing (see pictures).

In these days, in view of the plight of Mohammed and his family, we intend to resume Ezra’s initiative, completing that one outhouse and building a second one in the same part of Umm-Al-Kheir. Cost is estimated at NIS 4,000. For details, feel free to contact Ehud Krinis: ksehud “at” gmail.

We hope that this time around, the good citizens of Carmel will allow the residents of Umm-Al-Kheir to complete the construction, and thus resolve the sanitary problem that is so irritating to them.

A note from Assaf
Ehud sent me this story with the title mentioning Shavuot, a Jewish holiday taking place right now, from Tuesday night through Thursday. He did not explain why the reference, but here is one possible explanation:

On Shavuot, we read the Biblical Book of Ruth. Ruth was a foreigner – a Moabite widow who arrived to Bethlehem, Judea, with her Israelite mother-in-law Naomi. Naomi’s family had lived in Moab for ten years, and then all men in the family had died. Naomi, about to return home, offered her daughters-in-law to remain in Moab with their families. Ruth refused and accompanied Naomi to Bethlehem, where she – a young foreign widow living in a man-less household and having no male offspring – would find herself on the lowest rung of the social ladder.
They lived in poverty subsisting on aid. Then, the wealthy landowner Boaz got to know Ruth, fell in love and they lived happily ever after. King David is said to be descended from them.
The settlers of Carmel, observant Jews sitting in Judea, no doubt read the story today. They also spend – as is the custom – all night in Tikkun studying and discussing the ancient scriptures and their moral lessons.
All the while, they are willfully blind to the plain fact that they are playing a lead role in a twisted parody on the story of Ruth. Like Ruth, Mohammed and his fellow villagers are Gaerim – non-Jews in a territory controlled by Jews. Unlike Ruth, the villagers have lived there long before the Jews came. Like Boaz, the settlers are wealthy. However, unlike him their wealth has no legitimacy save in their own blinded eyes. The government robbed the land from the locals, handed it over to them – and they, supposedly moral and observant, couldn’t care less. They believe in a different law for Jews and for non-Jews, rather than in treating Gaerim with justice.
Finally, unlike Boaz who opened his heart to the foreign woman and went through all the legalistic moves, some of them unpleasant, in order to make her his lawful wife rather than exploit her as a mistress – the Carmel settlers manipulate and control a “law” enforcement apparatus, the “Civil Administration”, whose chief purpose is to keep non-Jews discriminated, humiliated and robbed of their rights and property. In short, the Book of Ruth is about individuals doing the right thing under difficult circumstances imposed on them. The settlers and the Israeli government, by contrast, impose themselves on the locals, and insist on continuing to do the wrong thing at every turn, as long as they can get away with it.
The settlers assauge their doubtlessly unclean conscience, by occasional acts of charity – all the while complaining about their neighbors’ unsanitary ways and low morals.
Happy Shavuot. Please help end this disgrace to Judaism and to Jews everywhere, before our lifetime is over.]
(Crossposted from the Villages Group. See also a version with interactive comments on Daily Kos)

Todd Gitlin and the lingering colonialism of 972

NOVANEWS

 

So with the ambiguously liberal-left nouveau Israeli journalists that labor in the galleys of +972 magazine, it’s perpetually one step forward, then twenty three steps back. On a good week, they’re publishing something ripping into the despicable delusions of Israeli Peace Now-style liberalism. Yes! On a better week, they’re explaining the political economy and social bases of continued occupation. Better. And every week, they’re publishing reports from the spot-fires of civil resistance across the West Bank. Vital. On a bad week – this week – they’re publishing a piece that has exactly two differences from an Arutz Sheva piece calling Palestinians a bunch of gun-toting Koran-worshipping sand niggers, and those are that the guest-author uses a few polysyllables and makes a graceless effort to veil his racism. The culprit?Todd Gitlin. Here’s Gitlin:

On top of Tunisia and Egypt, it now looks as though—fingers crossed—a critical mass of Palestinians may, at last, be getting the point. When they blow people up, they manufacture panic and hatred, and lock themselves up. They forfeit the initiative. When they act en masse with what Gandhi called satyagraha, soul force, they seize the initiative. If the Palestinian national movement had begun with disciplined nonviolence, it would have achieved statehood by now.

Where to start? That the Egyptian demonstrators were hardened in the crucible of solidarity protests in support of the 2nd Intifada? That the Palestinians have a proud history of non-violent protest, and that the overwhelmingly non-violent 1st intifada could never have overcome Israeli power? That when “soul force” meets a gun it dies the same as when a weaker gun meets a bigger gun? Or with the simply historically illiterate, colonially arrogant, sociologically bereft claim that the failures of the Palestinian national movement lie in its failure to start off with “disciplined nonviolence”?

Resistance when facing a stronger enemy is a matter of making it cheaper for him to compromise his goals or accept your claims than to pursue his own maximal goals. After the shattering of the Palestinian economy during the 1936-1939 revolt, during which British concessions occurred in response to riots and violence, not Gandhian revolt, the Palestinian national movement lacked the strength to prevent Zionist expansionism. The non-existence of the Palestinian state is not a moral failure of the Palestinian people. One could go on, but Gitlin himself is not, in this context, what’s important.

In fact, what’s important is not even ripping into the Western fetishization of Palestinian non-violence, although that is an issue. The Palestinian civil resistance is powerful, ennobling, and has real potential. That’s clear. The problem is +972, whose writers/editors simply cannot shake off the arrogance of the colonial racist culture into which they were born and which conditions them to publish this simply insulting non-sense from a hack American sociologist whose most important contribution to the intellectual culture would be to staple his fingers to his mouth. Oh and the symbolic violence of this prose troubles you? It troubles me to see the professor descending from Morningside Heights and lecturing people about how to resist the violence he pays for, and to see him given a platform by self-described leftists.

I want to like +972. I want their writers to stop screwing up. I want them to join fully their society’s radical left and jolt their insane society out of the path to regional destruction that it has set out before it. Which of those things are possible or impossible is not a choice for me to make. Insofar as it’s a choice at all, it’s a choice for them to make. Throw Gitlin in the trash bin. Stop pining for respectability from scoundrels. And make it.

Album by Circus Freak Lady Gaga barred from stores in Lebanon

NOVANEWS
 


 
Lady Gaga’s album Born This Way has caused controversy since it’s release last month.
But the 25-year-old singer’s record has now been banned in Lebanon after the government deemed it to be in ‘bad taste’.
They were so incensed by what they deemed to be an insult to Christianity that they are not allowing the record to be sold in their stores.

'Bad taste': Lady Gaga's album Born This Way has been banned by the government in Lebanon
Bad taste’: Lady Gaga’s album Born This Way has been banned by the government in Lebanon

The Lebanese government had already banned Gaga’s single Judas from the airwaves.
Thousands of copies of the album were impounded by the country’s authorities before it reached shelves.
Judas had caused complaints from religious groups in the U.S. too with members of the Catholic League protesting against the song’s lyrics and video.
‘This is a stunt… Lady Gaga tries to continue to shock Catholics and Christians in general,’ Catholic League President Bill Donohue said in a statement.

Protest: Her single Judas has also been banned from the airwaves in Malaysia due to religious sensitivity
Protest: Her single Judas has also been banned from the airwaves in Malaysia due to religious sensitivity

‘She dresses as a nun… she swallows the rosary. She has now morphed into a caricature of herself,’ he added.
Born This Way has also been banned from the radio by the Malaysian government, according the U.K. publication Metro.
Gaga responded to the ban saying: ‘What I would say is for all the young people in Malaysia that want those words to be played on the radio, it is your job and it is your duty as young people to have your voices heard.’
The album sold 1.1million copies in the U.S. alone on its first week of release.

 

Obama: Palestinians should avoid seeking UN recognition for statehood

NOVANEWS
 

U.S. president says ‘unilateral measures are not helping at all’ to bring about a two-state solution.

Reuters

U.S. President Barack Obama said on Tuesday he and German Chancellor Angela Merkel agreed that any Palestinian effort to seek UN recognition for statehood should be avoided.

Obama, who was reiterating his own position on the issue, was speaking at a news conference after White House talks with Merkel.

Obama has said in the past that a unilateral UN recognition of an independent Palestinian state would be a meaningless empty gesture.

During Tuesday’s news conference, Merkel stressed that “unilateral measures are not helping at all” to bring about a two-state solution.

Obama has repeatedly called on the Palestinians to enter negotiations with Israel and not appeal to the UN for statehood, calling the move a mistake.

“The United Nations can achieve a lot of important work, what it is not going to be able to do is deliver a Palestinian state,” Obama said last week in a joint conference with British Prime Minister David Cameron. “The only way to see a Palestinian state is if Palestinians and Israelis agree on a just peace.”

Gaza Flotilla Massacre: Analysis of Israel’s many propaganda arms

NOVANEWS
 


source–http://unitedagainstzionism.wordpress.com

A detailed analysis of the Israeli terrorist attack against the Gaza Freedom Flotilla 1 year ago on 31 May 2010 in international waters, with a focus on the lies that Israel’s massive propaganda machine spewed after the massacre.
BACKGROUND ON GAZA
Israel maintains a land, air, and sea blockade of the Gaza Strip, supposedly to prevent the smuggling of arms into the hands of militant organizations based there. However, Israel also blocks food, construction material, fuel, toiletries, and a long etc, claiming that these items have a “dual-use”, i.e. that they can be used to make weapons.
Israel’s isolation of Gaza can be traced back to at least 1967, but it was after Hamas won a majority in transparent democratic elections in 2006 that Israel created a ruthless blockade of the Gaza Strip. When Hamas took power after clashes with Fatah in June 2007, Israel’s blockade was tightened further. A ceasefire agreement between Hamas and Israel in mid-2008, in which Hamas would prevent rocket attacks and Israel would lift the blockade, was dishonored by Israel while it prepared for its murderousOperation Cast Lead.
White Phosphorus vs. Gaza school children
On 27 December 2008, the Israeli military launchedOperation Cast Lead, which not only killed some 1400 defenseless Palestinians, but also destroyed vital infrastructure leaving the Gazans with critical water and sewage problems. Repair of the infrastructure has proved impossible as Israel has prevented the entry of construction materials and fuel.
With 1.5 million inhabitants and as one of the world’s most densely populated areas, Gaza is currently dealing with serious health issues due to the 80 million litres of sewage being released into the environment and Mediterranean Sea each day. The World Health Organization has warned of a possible cholera epidemic if nothing is done rapidly to resolve this sanitation crisis.
The sewage leakage has affected almost all clean water sources. According to Physicians for Human Rights-Israel: “Between 90% and 95% of the aquifers in the Gaza Strip are not safe for drinking.” The primary cause of the current problem originates from the destruction, during Operation Cast Lead, of “20 kilometers of water pipes, 7.5 kilometers of sewage pipes and 5,700 mobile water tanks”.
The Egyptian dictatorship of Hosni Mubarak was an accomplice in this malevolent, inhumane blockade, by closing the border between Gaza and Egypt, known as the Rafah crossing. This forced Palestinians to risk their lives digging long tunnels underneath the border to get into Egypt and bring supplies back into Gaza. The Mubarak government started constructing a steel wall deep into the ground to destroy Gaza’s tunnel economy. But the new military junta of Egypt, under heavy pressure by the Egyptian people who have so far seen little change after Mubarak’s ouster, announced on 25 May 2011 that Egypt will permanently open the Rafah crossing. But Palestinians are not holding their breath. It might not last for long.
Israel, of course, claims there is no ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. A humanitarian crisis documented by every human rights group to ever enter Gaza in the last few years since the blockade began.
BACKGROUND ON THE FLOTILLA
The Free Gaza Movement is a human rights group that has sailed several times to Gaza to try to break Israel’s criminal stranglehold on 1.5 million Palestinian civilians. They entered Gaza successfully five times in 2008, but ever since Israel’s slaughter of 1,400 Palestinians in Operation Cast Lead, the FGM were violently intercepted on its 3 voyages prior to the 31 May 2010 lethal attack on the Mavi Marmara.
The late May 2010 flotilla was the largest attempt to date, with 6 civilian boats carrying 700 human rights activists from over 40 nationalities along with some 30-40 journalists from around the world sent to report on the flotilla’s mission. The six-ship flotilla was carrying 10,000 tons of humanitarian aid for the artificially impoverished people of Gaza. The flotilla was a joint effort by the FGM and the IHH (Insani Yardim Vakfi, or Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief, an Islamic aid group based in Turkey), which sponsored a large passenger ship and two cargo ships.
The Mavi Marmara was the large passenger ship carrying hundreds of activists that was sponsored by the IHH. Israel has claimed for years that the IHH has ties to Hamas, implying that it “supports terrorism.” This is of course another lie, as Israel and the Israel-firsters in politics and the media always label any Arab or Muslim they attack as “terrorist” or “terrorist sympathizing”, and anyone else as the tired old canard of “anti-Semite”.
In response to the flotilla mission, the Israeli government threatened to send out “half” of its Naval forces to stop the flotilla, using force if necessary. Israel had already launched a disinformation campaign against the Gaza Freedom Flotilla long before the 31 May 2010 attack.
Among the activists on the Mavi Marmara was Joe Meadors, survivor of the Israeli terrorist attack on the USS Liberty on 8 June 1967, also in international waters, which killed 34 Americans in a false flag operation intended to get a war started between the US and Egypt. The parallels between the two attacks are many, but the most notable is that the US government and media refuse to condemn the killing of American citizens. For a personal eyewitness account of the attack on the USS Liberty, readWhat I Saw That Day, by USS Liberty survivor Phil Tourney.
THE RAID
Flotilla routes
Eastern Mediterranean Sea, Monday, May 31st, 2010, about 4.30am: about 15 speedboats with some 20 Shayetet 13 IDF commandos on each, began shooting paintball ammunition, followed by tear gas canisters into theMavi Marmara ship and proceeded to board the deck from three Black Hawk helicopters hovering above the ship. Aside from dropping soldiers down to the deck, they shot at passengers from the choppers (possibly as a response to slingshot hits, but possibly planned) killing at least two. The helicopters probably also served to provide intelligence to the commandos on the boats and on deck. The Israelis had also jammed the satellite communications, making all phones inoperable (there is no terrestrial coverage in international waters).
The official story remains that Israeli commandos responded initially with non-lethal weaponry before resorting to live fire, when in fact they started sniping out passengers from the choppers before most of the commandos had boarded the deck. The Israelis claimed that live fire was directed at them, but the most the activists had was a few slingshots (and guns taken from the commandos which they didn’t use).
Turkish autopsies would reveal on 4 June 2010 that the 9 victims on board the Mavi Marmara were shot a total of 30 times, and 5 were killed by gunshot wounds to the head. This meant that about half of the victims were executed with shots to the head, disproving Israel’s story that the commandos were only defending themselves. A United Nations fact-finding mission later confirmed in September 2010 that 6 of the 9 victims had been “summarily executed,” two after they had already been severely injured and were incapable of defending themselves. This should have shattered Israel’s cover story, but the media narrative remained unchanged (more on this later).
The Israelis handcuffed everyone on board and brought them out to the external decks, where the usual Israeli mistreatment of prisoners occurred. Most were forced to kneel for hours. Random kickings, verbal abuse and threats were commonplace throughout the ordeal. For example, one Malaysian man was pleading that his handcuffs were too tight and were causing him great pain, so an Israeli soldier tightened them further. For long periods, prisoners were deprived of food and refused to go to the toilet.
Ken O'Keefe beaten by IDF thugs AFTER the raid
Early during the raid, 3 commandos were overpowered and thrown from the roof onto a lower deck, causing heavy injuries. The Israelis got this on video and made good use of it as propaganda to “prove” the malevolent intention of the peace activists. Once rendered harmless without their guns, the captured commandos begged for mercy, thinking that the activists would apply the principle of “an eye for an eye.” Some of the angry activists beat up the commandos, understandably so after seeing the other commandos executing several of their shipmates, but did not kill them. They could easily have shot them, but instead they threw the weapons off the ship, and the activist medics on board subsequently treated the commandos for their wounds. In contrast, the IDF soldiers denied medical treatment to wounded activists who died shortly thereafter (presumably the 3 that were not summarily executed).
Former US Marine Ken O’Keefe was one of the activists who disarmed and then safeguarded the captured commandos. To show their appreciation, O’Keefe was later badly beaten while under IDF custody. In an article condemning the BBC’s criminal Zionist propaganda, O’Keefe explains with these powerful words:
IDF commando treated by Turkish doctor during raid

And yes the poor Israeli commandos were beaten, just as any invader in any capable persons home would be beaten. I take no issue with that fact.
But truth be told, the commandos we captured should thank us for their lives. I ask the Israeli’s, British and American people specifically, if your home was invaded, your family being murdered, would you be willing to disarm, completely control, and then set a murderer of your family free???
You can lie to yourself if you like, bury that head right down deep in the sand, but that ship was our home, and we were all brothers and sisters, aunties and uncles, united, a family, engaged in a most righteous cause, with the vast majority of the planet behind us. The primary beneficiary of our mission, over 800,000 innocent children.
For those lost in a pit of ignorance and indoctrination, those currently stripped of all reason, absent of conscience, duped and hoodwinked, I know you very well because I was once you, a US Marine robot volunteering to kill or be killed. I see my past self in the Zionist who has no capacity at this moment to think, for in that state it is all about regurgitation, independent thought is but a possibility. For you I maintain no hate, for nobody actually, rather it is pity, pity for you that you sacrifice the greatest gift of all, the gift of humanity.
And so it is that the BBC, absent of integrity, contemptuous of humanity, attempts in this [Panorama ‘Death on the Med’] program to turn disarmed, helpless Israeli commandos into heroic self-rescuing commandos who managed to Superman their way out of a circle of well over 100 very motivated men whose brothers lay murdered with multiple gunshot wounds. That is what we call a bald-faced lie. Big time lie, in your face lie, you in the audience are a bunch of drooling idiots lie.
Returning from the Zionist alternate universe, we held in our power the fate of three boy commandos who may well have been murderers on that night. Think about that, under these circumstances, we let them go. That is what we call preserving life.

The Israeli Navy also took over the other five, smaller, ships of the flotilla. Many of the passengers were beaten up, some of them requiring hospital treatment. The commandos used tasers, plastic bullets, and stun grenades, but at least they didn’t kill anyone.
The Israelis rerouted the ships, reaching Ashdod at about 8 p.m. the next day. When the Mavi Marmaraprisoners passed through the lower deck, they saw the Israelis had been busy ransacking all their belongings — “[c]lothes were everywhere, bags emptied, as if it were the aftermath of an earthquake,”recounted a British al-Jazeera journalist.
Not surprisingly, the Israelis confiscated every recording and communications device they could find, in addition to cash, credit cards, cameras and other personal belongings (soldiers were later arrested for selling laptops and using debit cards and cell phones stolen from the flotilla). But filmmaker and activist Iara Lee, one of the few Americans aboard the flotilla, managed to smuggle out a tiny camera memory card with little over 1 hour of footage. The raw 1-hour footage or a 15 min. version can be watched on Youtube. The 15 minute version is embedded below:
When they came off the ship they were searched again and then put on a bus and sent to Beer Sheva prison, where they spent the night. During their stay they were photographed, profiled, fingerprinted, DNA tested, interrogated, deprived of sleep, beaten (some several times), and made to sign off on deportation orders written in Hebrew (most of them involuntarily). For a meal they were given frozen slices of bread and potatoes. Over the next 7 days they were deported (“expelled” is another word used by some media outlets) to their respective countries. As one imprisoned American activist and co-founder of the Free Gaza Movement Dr Paul Larudee noted, “at no time did the prison authorities allow daily outdoor exercise, access to telephones, or access to a lawyer. This is illegal even under Israeli law.”
In all, 9 peace activists were murdered, and many more injured. Among those seriously injured, 54 passengers were admitted to Israeli hospitals. The patients’ families were not allowed any information about the status of their loved ones, and the hospital staff were presumably banned from talking about it to the outside world. One flotilla passenger is reportedly in a coma, and might die, bringing the total number of victims to 10.
For personal witness accounts and analyses by some of the English-speaking members on board the ship, read Midnight on the Mavi Marmara (2010), edited by Moustafa Bayoumi. Here is a description of the book:

As their testimonies indicate repeatedly, Israeli soldiers confiscated laptops, cameras, and other recording devices when they arrested and detained the activists for several days. This enabled Israeli public relations officials to fill a vacuum of information about the event and the parties involved with a media campaign described by filmmaker and flotilla activist Iara Lee as “aggressively dishonest.” Every eyewitness account in the book attests to several key facts. The activists carried no weapons. The Israeli soldiers boarded at night in international waters, which means that they were by definition aggressors who cannot claim to have acted in self-defense. They fired on the flotilla before boarding and without warning, and several of those killed were shot multiple times from close range in the back or back of the head.
Journalist Max Blumenthal and other contributors, however, illustrate how Israeli officials propagated false or misleading claims that “al-Qaeda mercenaries” were among those aboard the ships, that the passengers were carrying weapons (using photographs of kitchen knives and boating equipment as evidence), and that the activists were yelling anti-Semitic slurs (accompanying this claim with a doctored audio clip). Blumenthal describes drawing confessions from IDF officials that such claims were baseless, even while these and other reports have persisted without retraction in Israeli and Western media outlets. To this end, Midnight on the Mavi Marmara represents a critical re-litigation of the events that reclaims the activists’ humanitarian intentions.
Within hours, outrage at Israel’s action echoes around the world. Spontaneous demonstrations in Europe, the United States, Turkey, and Gaza itself denounce the attack. Turkey’s prime minister describes it as a “bloody massacre” and “state terrorism.” Lebanon’s prime minister calls it “a dangerous and crazy step that will exacerbate tensions in the region.”
In these pages, a range of activists, journalists, and analysts piece together the events that occurred that May night, unpicking their meanings for Israel’s illegal, three-year-long blockade of Gaza and the decades-long Israel/Palestine conflict more generally. Mixing together first-hand testimony, documentary record, and illustration, with hard-headed analysis and historical overview, Midnight on the Mavi Marmara reveals why the attack on Gaza Freedom Flotilla may just turn out to be Israel’s Selma, Alabama: the beginning of the end for an apartheid Palestine.

The attack was indeed condemned by all decent people in the world. But for some people, Israel can do no wrong, no matter what.
REACTIONS IN ISRAEL
The reaction in Israel seems to have been almost unanimous. A wave of chauvinistic fervor took over before the facts of the incident could be established. Jewish journalist Max Blumenthal documented the reactions in the Israeli street:
YouTube – Israelis Celebrate IDF Flotilla Attack
Somehow videos like these didn’t make it on CNN or BBC. What would the “corporate” owners of the MSM have to lose by airing videos like these?
But let’s give credit where credit is due: some “left-wing” Israelis, reportedly up to 6,000 citizens, gathered to protest in front of the Israeli Defence Ministry in Tel Aviv. Smaller protests took place in other cities like Jerusalem, where a 21-year-old Jewish-American peace activist lost an eye when she was hit in the face by an Israeli tear gas canister. Sadly, these voices were drowned by those shown in the video above.
As for the Israeli government, IDF chief Gabi Ashkenazi defended his troops’ use of lethal fire, as did the openly racist Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman and the arch-terrorists Defense Minister Ehud Barak and the elder President Shimon Peres. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu maintained that the terrorist attack on the humanitarian activists was “a clear case of self defense”, and that it complied with international law. On 26 Oct 2010, Netanyahu visited the Shayetet 13 headquarters to personally thank and praise the terrorists. “Gaza has turned into an Iranian terror base,” Netanyahu claimed, adding that the troops had acted “courageously, morally and with restraint” and that the raid had been “crucial, essential, important and legal”.
MK Haneen Zoabi, the only female Arab member of the Knesset (Israeli parliament) was on board theMavi Marmara. When a day or two after the massacre she tried to deliver a speech to the Knesset, she was almost eaten alive by the other MKs when trying to speak about the flotilla raid and the inhuman siege on Gaza.
YouTube – Knesset Members Attack Haneen Zoabi After Free Gaza
“The Only Democracy in the Middle East”!
At first, it looks like the chairman of the Knesset is in favor of letting her speak, by constantly calling out the many interrupting MKs who were calling her a terrorist, but it looks like he soon realizes that he is making too many enemies.
Soon after, the Knesset revoked “key priviledges” but retained her status as MK so that they can still hang on to the absurd claim that Israel is a democracy.
A Facebook group entitled “execute the MK Haneen Zoubi” appeared, and one Israeli was offering a reward of free groceries for killing Zoabi until he was arrested.
Most (all?) other Arab/Muslim MKs received an avalanche of death threats and hate mail, “extraordinary in both quantity and vitriol.”
Others wasted no time with trivial matters, thinking big. The J-Post reported on 16 June 2010 that:

A group of Israeli left-wing activists who were angry about the Turkish attacks on IDF soldiers aboard the Mavi Marmara two weeks ago decided Monday to cancel the flotilla that they were planning to Cyprus to protest the Turkish occupation of the island’s northern half.
The Jerusalem Post reported exclusively on June 5 about the planned flotilla, which was to be led by former MK Alex Goldfarb (Tzomet, Yi’ud) and Modi’in Meretz activist Pinhas Har-Zahav.
The story made headlines in Turkey, Cyprus, Greece and throughout Europe, and some 800 supporters of the flotilla joined its Facebook group.
But Israeli government officials persuaded the activists to cancel the voyage, because they were worried that the media attention would remind international media of the Gaza flotilla when most of the world’s attention had shifted to other issues like the British Petroleum spill and the World Cup.
“The publicity we already received did its part in reminding the world [that the Turks are occupiers],” one of the organizers of the flotilla said. “Personally it’s depressing for me that we didn’t get to go. But the government officials we spoke to were professionals, and they told us that doing it now was not right for the state, so we listened to them.”

So killing Turkish peace activists in international waters is OK because the Turkish military “occupies” Northern Cyprus. That Israel’s occupation of Palestine is far worse than the Turkish role in Northern Cyprus is not even considered in this propaganda stunt. Somehow, the hypocrisy escapes them.
The Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974 was a response to a Greek military coup planned by the brutal CIA-supported military junta that had staged a coup after Gladio false flag bombings caused chaos and increased anti-Communist sentiment in Greece. Had Turkey not intervened, Greece would probably have declared the annexation of Cyprus, and its citizens, especially the Turkish Cypriots, would have been subject to the repressive regime that had killed thousands and its infamous CIA-trained intelligence service, KYP, known for its extensive use of torture. Unfortunately, Turkey used the opportunity to further its pan-Turkish Kemalist (faux nationalist) ambitions, displacing some 150,000 Greek Cypriots, and continues to this day to be the only nation to recognize Northern Cyprus as a sovereign nation. However, the Turkish military presence in Northern Cyprus is, comparatively speaking, not very repressive in nature. The invasion and military occupation of Palestine by the Jews, in contrast, was and continues to be an absolute disaster for the Muslim and Christian people of Palestine.
Similarly, the Israeli National Student Union announced their intention to set sail toward Turkey, supposedly in an effort to bring humanitarian aid to the “oppressed people of Turkish Kurdistan” and to members of the “Turkish Armenian minority.”
Prior to the flotilla massacre, Israeli propagandists like “StandWithUs” had boats departing from the port of Ashdod to “counter” the ships of the Gaza Freedom Flotilla. Each of the boats had journalists from major international media outlets. The Zionist activists carried signs and shirts saying “Free Gaza from Hamas”, booklets with the outdated (and probably edited) Hamas charter, and other Zionist nonsense of that nature.
REACTIONS IN THE WEST
Protests were held in capitals and major cities around the world. Some 800 angry protesters in the UKattacked the BBC’s Manchester offices for their shameless pro-Israel reporting.
With (relatively) few exceptions like B’TselemJews for Justice for PalestiniansJewish Voices for a Just Peace (who announced they would send a boat with school supplies and humanitarian aid to Gaza), andNeturei Karta, the overwhelming majority of Jewish groups worldwide supported the Israeli position unconditionally. Would it be unfair, therefore, to say that the majority of Jews support terrorism? If it were Muslims supporting a Hamas operation, surely this question would be raised by much of the media, or at least the “right-wing” media.
In several major American cities, fanatical Zionist Jews held pro-Israel demonstrations, showing their unconditional support for a foreign country which most of them have never even visited.
In a few cities such as San Francisco, a smaller number of Jewish peace activists held protests condemning Israel, receiving death threats from the pro-Israel crowds. “We will sink the next flotilla with you on it”, rambled one of the Jewish fanatics.
Here is a photo that summarizes the typical Zionist demonstrations:
Zionist demonstrators
Let’s blow up that anti-Turkey sign:
Turkey = Murder Inc. Stop your terror armada. Admit Armenian Holocaust
“Turkey = Murder Inc. Stop your terror armada. Admit Armenian Holocaust.” And a bomb has been added to the Turkish flag for good measure.
These foolish Zionists should have done a bit of research to discover that Murder Inc. was about 0% Turkish and about 95% Jewish, and that the Armenian Holocaust, masterminded by the Young Turks and members of the Committee of Union and Progress, were as much Jewish as they were Turkish, if not moreso. Of course, pointing out these facts is anti-Semitic, but making false statements about Turks and Turkey is OK — at least if you’re Jewish.
Also notice the black woman to the left of the sign. The poor brainwashed goy does not realize that half of the people there (and that’s being generous) dislike her merely because it is visually observable that she cannot possibly be of Jewish extraction.
Aside from the Jewish Zionists, some of the American Christian Zionist leaders called for war on Turkey and the Muslims. To paraphrase John Hagee’s apocalyptic, delusory speeches: “Israel is being attacked while Iran and Hamas and now Turkey plot the destruction of the Jewish people, we must take action now!”
ISRAELI PROPAGANDA MACHINE – ISRAELI GOVERNMENT DIVISION
Within a few hours of the raid, the IDF started posting videos on Youtube, trying to portray the peace activists as “rioters” and terrorists. Some of the videos were apparently fake. The Israelis expected that no footage would make its way out of the sea, having destroyed all SD cards they could find and thrown the cameras into the sea. For example, one video that shows a stun grenade thrown into one of the speedboats looks like computer-generated graphics. Another one showing activists preparing for a confrontation appears to have been recorded not on the Mavi Marmara but during an IDF ship raid training session. The most famous of the videos, broadcast by all media outlets, which appears to show the activists beating soldiers with metal bars and other weapons, lacks the Mavi Marmara name at the top and the various flags on the side.
On June 4th, 5 days after the attack, the IDF posted on Youtube a fake audio recording which has the flotilla activists saying “go back to Auschwitz” and “don’t forget 9/11″. The IDF titled the tape Flotilla Ship to Israeli Navy: “We’re Helping Arabs Go Against the US, Don’t Forget 9/11 Guys”. The tape is so inequivocally doctored that it is probably a “deliberate mistake”, perhaps an attempt to make Israel seem incompetent at propaganda.
The doubtful video of the activists beating soldiers with metal pipes helped Israel’s image more than anything else. The next step was to claim activists had “links to terrorism.”
Israel and its many mouthpieces claimed that the IHH is connected to Hamas and is therefore a connected to a “terrorist organization”. The only source for this claim is a 2006 paper on IHH from the Danish Institute for International Studies. But that report was penned by a young, mysterious American named Evan F. Kohlman, a supposed “terrorism expert” but in fact a Zionist Jewish supremacist who hates all Arabs and Muslims the same. He cites a former French judge who also seems to find terrorists under every rock. But no matter how tenuous the claim, it was sufficient for much of the media to parrot the claim.
Not content with lying about the IHH, the IDF posted a blog on 6 June 2010 titled “Specific Flotilla Passengers Linked to Al-Qaeda, Hamas and Other Terror Organizations”. Of the 5 people they list — Fatimah Mahmadi, Ken O’Keefe, Hassan Iynasi, Hussein Urosh, and Ahmad Umimon — only 1 or 2 are from the IHH.
According to the IDF, Ken O’Keefe is “a radical anti-Israel activist and operative of the Hamas Terror organization”, despite his solid, even heroic, track record as a campaigner for peace. And Hussein Urosh of the IHH was not there to bring aid to the people of Gaza either, no, he was there to “assist in smuggling Al-Qaeda operatives via Turkey into the Strip”.
The conclusion we can draw from this is that the IDF and the Likud government no longer care about trying to make their lies credible. But why should they, when their fellow Zionist Jews have a “stranglehold” on the media, as Billy Graham put it in 1972. They can point to the aforementioned Danish intelligence report as a tangible IHH link to Hamas, but to accuse non-Muslim peace activist Ken O’Keefe of being an “operative of the Hamas Terror organization”, and claim that IHH member Hussein Urosh was involved in smuggling “Al-Qaeda” operatives into Gaza, is beyond ridiculous to anyone but the most ardent supporter of the terrorist state of Israel.
ISRAELI PROPAGANDA MACHINE – US GOVERNMENT DIVISION
While the Turkish government rightfully called the act a brutal crime and the perpetrator a terrorist state, not so much a word of serious condemnation was uttered by the top brass of American politicians.
President Barack Obama made some vague remarks that he “deeply regrets the loss of life” (without condemning “the use of violence”, which would’ve been one step up), before reiterating “Israel’s right to defend itself.” Netanyahu told Obama to veto any UN Security Council condemnation, but he stood up to him and said no. But the US did block demands for an international inquiry. Vice President Joe Biden was even more supportive than Obama, showing an incredible level of shameless ignorance. No mention was made of the American citizen killed by the White House.
Imagine that! An American citizen, a young humanitarian activist, is assassinated by the military of a foreign state, and the American government and media do not even condemn the act! What foreign state could get away with this? Could Britain? France? Canada? Probably not.
As would be expected, US Congresscritters were quick to show their unwavering support for the terrorist act. “Israel has the right to defend itself from unprovoked attacks,” yadda yadda yadda. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell co-authored a letter signed by 85 other senators arguing for the legality of the blockade and the raid and calling on the President to support Israel. Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY) said those on the flotilla should be banned from entering the United States.
The ADL (American Defamation League) sent a letter to Hillary Clinton pointing to both the IHH and a coalition of which it is a part, the Union of Good, as groups that should be viewed as terrorist entities alongside Hamas, Hezbollah and Al-Qaeda. Congresscritters followed the orders and tried their best to get the IHH listed as a terrorist organization, but failed because the claim is ludicrous. Only Israel added IHH to its “terror watch” list.
Needless to say, had the Mavi Marmara been an Israeli ship attacked by Hamas or Iran, the screams for blood in the US Congress would’ve been unrelenting.
ISRAELI PROPAGANDA MACHINE – ISRAELI MEDIA DIVISION
The Israeli media prepared the public for the event well in advance. As peace activist Gilad Atzmon wroteas it was happening: “For days the Israeli government prepared the Israeli society for the massacre at sea. It said that the Flotilla carried weapons, it had ‘terrorists’ on board. Only yesterday evening it occurred to me that this Israeli malicious media spin was there to prepare the Israeli public for a full scale Israeli deadly military operation in international waters.”
Another indication of pre-planning was this report by Yedioth Ahronoth, the biggest newspaper in Israel:

Turkish authorities are accusing Israel of “ordering” a terror attack carried out by Kurdish rebels on the same day the Israeli Navy raided a Turkish-owned Gaza-bound ship last week in revenge for Ankara’s involvement in the incident, Turkish newspaper Zaman reported Sunday.
Seven Turkish soldiers were killed in Monday’s attack, which took place at a Turkish navy base in the southern city of Iskenderun. It occurred several hours after the Israel Defense Forces’ raid on the Marmara vessel left nine activists killed.
According to the report, published by one of Turkey’s most important newspapers, Ankara’s intelligence services are looking into the possibility that the Kurdish PKK attack was “ordered by Israel’s secret services, which sought to convey a message to the Turkish leadership.
[…]
“The same terrorists were trained by Israeli intelligence officers and trained to infiltrate the cities in the best way possible. The Israeli government is trying to present the Turkish leadership as radical and close to Hamas in order to influence the global public opinion. The Kurdish rebels are Israel’s sub-contractors.”

So in addition to 8 Turkish citizens and 1 American citizen, Israel may have had its PKK proxy kill 7 Turkish soldiers.
The early Israeli media coverage, including “left-wing self-hating” media like Haaretz, took the official IDF line as always, praising the soldiers as “noble” and “restrained” and calling the aid workers “brutal activists” or even “mercenaries” who had pre-planned a confrontation.
The narrative quickly became that the peace activists were nothing but, that they were really terrorists and terrorist sympathisers hoping for a confrontation to paint Israel in a bad light. The heroic Israeli commandos were only carrying paintball guns, and the evil militants/mercenaries pretending to be peaceful activists were armed with metal bars, bats, knives, glass bottles, and chairs — and even axes, stun grenades, and high-tech communications devices by some accounts. The highly-trained commandos stood no chance against such weapons once the terrorists realized that their opponents were armed with nothing but paintball guns.
The (“far-right”, Murdoch-owned) Jerusalem Post quoted “a top Navy commander” saying “Next time we’ll use more force”, and quoted one Shayetet 13 commando saying he singlehandedly killed six men. This highly-trained lying criminal, identified only as “S.”, the J-Post says, “is being considered for a medal of valor”. Here is his (and the IDF’s early official) version of events:

“When I hit the deck, I was immediately attacked by people with bats, metal pipes and axes,” S. told the Post. “These were without a doubt terrorists. I could see the murderous rage in their eyes and that they were coming to kill us.”
S. does not look like a hero. Well-built, like all commandos in the Shayetet, he is also soft-spoken and stingy with words, but his commander Lt.-Col. T. fills in the blanks.
“S. did a remarkable job,” T. said. “He stabilized the situation and succeeded in hitting six of the terrorists.”
Based on preliminary results of its investigation into the navy’s takeover of the Mavi Marmara, which ended with nine dead passengers and more than 30 wounded, the IDF said on Thursday that the commandos were attacked by a well-trained group of mercenaries, most of whom were found without IDs but with thousands of dollars in their pockets.
The group was well trained and was split into a number of squads of about 20 mercenaries each distributed throughout the upper deck, the IDF said. All of the mercenaries wore gas masks and ceramic bulletproof vests and were armed with either bats, slingshots, metal bars, knives or stun grenades.
The IDF’s understanding is that the mercenaries mainly chose dual-purpose items of this sort rather than guns, since opening fire would have made it blatantly clear that they were terrorists and not so-called peace activists.
Nevertheless, the IDF suspects that the group did have some guns of its own. Israeli forensic experts who examined the ship found casings belonging to a weapon that was not used by the commandos, and the Turkish captain of the ship later told the IDF that the “mercenaries” threw their weapons overboard after the commandos took control of the vessel.
T. said he realized the group they were facing was well-trained and likely ex-military after the commandos threw a number of stun grenades and fired warning shots before rappelling down onto the deck. “They didn’t even flinch,” he said. “Regular people would move.”
Each squad of the “mercenaries” was equipped with a Motorola communication device, the IDF said, so they could pass information to one another. Assessments in the defense establishment are that members of the group were affiliated with international global jihad elements and had undergone training in places like Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The “left-wing” Israeli media were 100% supportive of the IDF raid, but the “right-wing” media was just plain delusional, trying to mantain the “paintball guns” fable even after the IDF stopped promoting that lie.
ISRAELI PROPAGANDA MACHINE – WESTERN MEDIA DIVISION
The Western media was not interested in covering the Gaza Freedom Flotilla at all. They were avoiding the event entirely until the massacre occured.
CNN = ZNN
While the activists were held prisoners unable to make themselves heard, Israeli spokespeople like Mark Regev were given free reign over the airwaves by the English-language Western media, but especially the US media. Not as much a peep of criticism or questioning was heard by the US media talking heads of CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, Fox News, and most of the smaller networks. They were every bit as supportive of the “raid” or “intervention” as the Israeli media.
Jewish journalist Glenn Greenwald eloquently pointed this out to Zionist Jew Eliot Spitzer in an MSNBC interview:
Glenn Greenwald Destroys MSNBC’s Eliot Spitzer
The distortions in the print media were no less astounding. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting provides a few specific case examples from the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and the Associated Press.
What could possibly motivate the top American journalists and TV news anchors to avoid any criticism of Israel even after a deadly attack on courageous peace activists trying to bring food and supplies to people in need? Is it that they are all heartless monsters? Or is it that they are careerists who want to keep their million-dollar annual salary jobs? Sure that for most of the TV talking heads it may be a much of the former also, but even these heartless crooks care about their public image, which would improve if they showed some humanity when the chance presents itself.
And yet some people who voiced their outrage, mainly liberal types but also some conservative types of good conscience, still insist that the media problem is best defined as “corporate”, and that the Jewish domination of the US media (and to a lesser extent the British media) has nothing to do with it. No, that would be anti-Semitic to even point out!
An American citizen is executed by soldiers under the orders of the Israeli government, and the American government doesn’t say a peep. But worse yet, the “American” media doesn’t even report the UN findings (that the American citizen and 5 others were “summarily executed”). Are we supposed to believe that “corporate interests”, and not Zionist Jewish interests, are behind this censorship?
And the fact that they were able to do the same in 1967, when they tried to sink the USS Liberty to get a war started, doesn’t seem to concern the “left independent media” either, spineless cowards that they are.
The result of the US media’s unapologetic support for Israel was 49% of Americans believing the peace activists were entirely to blame, and only 19% blamed Israel, according to a Rasmussen poll.
The BBC — which along with CNN is broadcast all around the world — was no less criminally complicit, with its appalling Panorama programme (broadcast 16 Aug 2010) showcasing the extent of its Zionist deception:
BBC Bias: The Gaza Freedom Flotilla
This BBC Panorama programme was such an outrageous case of Zionist propaganda that some peoplegathered outside the BBC HQ to protest, but turnout was low as it was months after the massacre. The BBC had previously refused to run a humanitarian commercial for helping the people of Gaza after Israel’sOperation Cast Lead bloodbath.
ISRAELI PROPAGANDA MACHINE – INTERNET DIVISION
The single most influential source on the Internet on most subjects, particularly in the long term, is Wikipedia. The Wikipedia talk page on the flotilla raid is/was full of editors complaining that they found themselves powerless when trying to make the article more neutral (to comply with Wikipedia’s NPOV policy). An anonymous Wikipedia editor wrote:
“There is a reason why many of these articles are pro-Israel. Zionist movements are learning their people how to play the system that is wikipedia: [1] They are getting courses about how to fight their ‘zionist war’ on wikipedia, what the rules are and how to find the loopgholes. There is no solution to this until their force is neutralized by people in Gaza doing the same thing. But of course those people have nothing, let alone a computer.”
Indeed, large numbers of Israeli settlers and other Jewish extremists have been taking part in Wikipedia“Zionist editing” courses. This barely made the news, whereas a “Jihadist editing course” would be 24/7 news for a week. One of the organizers, Naftali Bennett, who represents Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank, said: “if someone searches [for] ‘the Gaza flotilla,’ we want to be there; to influence what is written there, how it’s written and to ensure that it is balanced and Zionist in nature.” To motivate the volunteers, the organizers are offering a prize for the “Best Zionist Editor” — “the person who over the next four years incorporates the most “Zionist” changes in the encyclopedia,” Haaretz wrote. A participant is quoted as saying that the first subjects she will edit are the Turkish flotilla, MK Haneen Zoabi, and the settlements.
Worse yet, some of the most active Wikipedia administrators, such as “Jayjg”, spend inordinate amounts of time policing the Israel-related articles to make sure they reflect the Zionist view. “Jayjg” is known for always having his way, and banning persistent editors who try to revert his edits. You can find his name on almost every talk page for articles related to Israeli and “anti-Semitic” topics.
Hasbara groups also got busy telling their volunteers to post pro-Israel messages on news sites, blogs and forums, and to flag Youtube videos complaining that they are — you guessed it — “anti-Semitic” and “hateful”.
The Palestinians have no such representatives. Most don’t even have reliable electricity, let alone a computer with an Internet connection.
Other influential sources in the early days after an event are news wires of commonly used services, such as Google and Yahoo. Documenting censorship in these areas is difficult, but Google News was reported to have ignored coverage of the flotilla raid. The AFP and AP news wire services are sympathetic to Israel and their short headlines reflected that.
AFTERMATH
Aside from being an act of terrorism in international waters, it was a crime against Turkish and American citizens. Most of the victims were Turkish, but one victim, 19-year-old activist Furkan Dogan (whose murder was apparently caught on tape), was an American-born US citizen of Turkish descent and not a member of the IHH.
After asking the US to open an investigation to no avail, the father of Furkan Dogan is suing the Israeli government. Imagine the press coverage this would get if the plaintiff was an Israeli-American rather than a Turkish-American and the defendants were Hamas or Iran rather than Israel.
Turkish-Israeli relations soured very quickly. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey has been uncomfortably close to Israel in the view of most Turks, but he was quick to demonstrate that he is not a total puppet like Obama and Bush.
“Nine Turkish martyrs on the ship received 21 bullets from Israeli soldiers in their bodies, we provided post mortem reports and even the pictures to the EU and U.S. but Washington is not ready to condemn the state terrorism of Israel against Turkey which means that the U.S. is supporting an international terrorist who killed our citizens in international waters,” Erdogan said.
Reportedly, the intelligence agency of Turkey (National Intelligence Organization) and Israel’s Mossad, which once enjoyed close cooperation, stopped exchanging intelligence and conducting joint operations.
Feeling the pressure from angry Egyptians, Zionist puppet dictator Mubarak ordered the Rafah Border Crossing with the Gaza Strip opened for a while. Humanitarian and medical aid was allowed through, but no construction materials.
As mentioned, the US didn’t even condemn Israel, much less consider any punishment. But not only did the US take absolutely no action against Israel — neither did NATO. Turkey, a member of NATO, is attacked by a non-member, and NATO does nothing, demonstrating once again that NATO is controlled by Israel’s obedient puppet, the USA. Former British ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray explained:

What I was being told last night was very interesting indeed. NATO HQ in Brussels is today a very unhappy place. There is a strong understanding among the various national militaries that an attack by Israel on a NATO member flagged ship in international waters is an event to which NATO is obliged – legally obliged, as a matter of treaty – to react.
I must be plain – nobody wants or expects military action against Israel. But there is an uneasy recognition that in theory that ought to be on the table, and that NATO is obliged to do something robust to defend Turkey.
Mutual military support of each other is the entire raison d’etre of NATO. You must also remember that to the NATO military the freedom of the high seas guaranteed by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea is a vital alliance interest which officers have been conditioned to uphold their whole career.

The flotilla massacre serves as undeniable proof that NATO is an obsolete institution utilized to drag smaller member nations into wars started by the Zionist warmongers.
INVESTIGATIONS
The International Fact-Finding Mission to Investigate the Israeli attacks on the Flotilla, established by the UN Human Rights Council and chaired by Karl Hudson-Phillips, concluded in September 2010 that “six of the deceased were victims of summary executions”, that “the Israeli security forces demonstrated levels of totally unnecessary violence”, and, not surprisingly, that “two requests for cooperation information from the Israeli government proved fruitless.”
Rejecting calls from the United Nations and governments all around the world for an independent investigation of the events, the Israeli leaders opted instead to investigate themselves. Around January 2011, its Turkel Committee released its 245-page report whitewashing the crime. The conclusions reached by the Turkel Committee completely contradict international law and the findings of the UN Human Rights Council mission.
The Turkel investigation, as expected, was a complete sham that “cleared the government and military of wrongdoing” and claimed that the “passengers were to blame for the violence.” Judge Jacob Turkel himself said during proceedings that “the people of Gaza have brought this hardship on themselves”. Another panelist repeated the ludicrous lie that “there is no humanitarian crisis in Gaza”. They had 2 non-Jewish but “Israel friendly” military law experts who acted as “international observers” to give the whole charade a semblance of legitimacy.
The only place where the Turkel report was taken seriously, aside from Israel, were the Zionist occupied territories known as the US Congress, the White House, and the US media studios.
SUBSEQUENT AID FLOTILLAS
Just 6 days after the Mavi Marmara massacre, Israel boarded yet another aid ship, the MV Rachel Corrie, which was part of the Gaza Freedom Flotilla but was unable to join the other six ships in the flotilla because of mechanical problems (probably due to Israeli sabotage) that forced it to undergo repairs. Named after the young American activist who was crushed to death by an American-made bulldozer when trying to prevent it from demolishing a Palestinian home, the Rachel Corrie set sail from Ireland, flew a Cambodian flag, and was sponsored by money raised by the great Mahathir Mohammed of Malaysia. Among the passengers were two well known Irish citizens, Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Maguire and Denis Halliday, a former UN assistant Secretary-General.
Israeli commandos boarded the ship from speedboats at around noon on 5 June 2010, again in international waters. The Israeli commandos seized control, and the ship and its passengers were again diverted towards the Israeli port of Ashdod. After an inspection, Israel reportedly delivered the entire cargo to Gaza, but there is no way to know if they really did.
On 14 July, a Libyan charity organization headed by Saif al-Islam, the son of Muammar Gaddafi, chartered the MV Amalthea to deliver humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip through Egypt’s Rafah crossing. The ship carried food, medical supplies and pre-fabricated houses.
On 16 May 2011, Israel prevented another humanitarian ship from reaching Gaza. The MV Finch, nicknamed the Spirit of Rachel Corrie, left Greece on May 11th, carrying plastic sewage pipes (unsuitable for weapons, so Israel has no excuse) to help restore the devastated sewerage system in Gaza (which is increasingly causing diseases such as typhoid and hepatitis A). The mission was sponsored by the Perdana Global Peace Foundation (PGPF), chaired by the former Prime Minister of Malaysia, Mahathir Mohamad.
Once Spirit of Rachel Corrie entered Gaza territorial waters, an Israeli Navy ship circled the humanitarian ship twice while firing warning shots. One of the 12 crew members was almost hit by a bullet, causing a panic and heightened fear. In addition, the vessel developed engine trouble and lost its steering capability. This was apparently due to a fishing net and not due to Israeli sabotage.
After calling the Egyptian army for help, an Egyptian naval vessel came to the scene, causing the Israeli boats to leave, but not before warning that “next time, we will land on your ship.” The ship was then escorted to Egyptian waters and anchored off the Egyptian port of Al Arish. Matthias Chang, spokesman for the mission, said that “the Egyptian foreign minister has given his assurance that we will be allowed to unload our humanitarian cargo and that it will be taken by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency into Gaza.” This was the original intention, but Egypt didn’t answer the original request, so the humanitarian activists decided to try to enter Gaza by sea, even knowing the savagery the Israelis are capable of.
In 2011, 25 vessels are set to sail to Gaza carrying 1,500 activists, up from 6 vessels and 700 activists last year. The IHH will be represented by only 100 activists.
The latest aid flotillas are scheduled for the third week of June 2011. The AP reports that “Israeli military officials have confirmed that preparations are under way to stop any new flotilla while avoiding casualties, and that they would use different tactics this time around.”
How nice of them to try to avoid casualties. The only decent thing to do, of course, is to let them through, and lift the blockade completely. Now that Egypt is opening the Rafah crossing, it’s the only logical thing for Israel to do.
Will Israel do the logical (and moral) thing? Don’t count on it.

 

Qaddafi Compound Pounded by Nato in Day Raid

NOVANEWS
 

Most of Gadhafi Compound Destroyed in Latest Escalation

TRIPOLI, Libya — In a sudden, sharp escalation of NATO’s air campaign over Libya, warplanes dropped more than 80 bombs on targets in Tripoli in an assault that began Tuesday morning and continued into the predawn hours of Wednesday, obliterating large areas of Colonel Muammar el-Qaddafi’s Bab al-Aziziya command compound and what NATO identified as other military targets around the capital.
In response, Colonel Qaddafi posted an audio recording on Libyan state television vowing never to surrender or accept defeat. “We welcome death,” he said. “Martyrdom is a million times better.”
The unusual daylight raids, the most intense on the Libyan capital since the aerial campaign started more than 11 weeks ago, began in midmorning and continued well past midnight — fulfilling NATO commanders’ recent warnings of an impending rise in the intensity of attacks. What appeared to be bunker-busting bombs laid waste to an area of about two acres in one corner of the compound, destroying six or seven major buildings and leaving a smoking mass of steel and concrete.
A Libyan official said Tuesday night that the attacks had killed 31 people and wounded dozens more, many of them security guards and “totally innocent civilians.” That number could not be confirmed.
Earlier, officials said that 10 to 15 people lay buried in the ruins of one building alone, though the only casualty seen by Western reporters who were bused to the scene was a man who was pulled from the rubble while they were there, identified by officials as a cleaner.
In the absence of any visible rescue operations, the man’s body had been spotted by an American television crew, then laid out beneath a green sheet on a rubble-strewn roadway while an ambulance was summoned. Officials said the extent of the devastation made it impossible for the heavy machinery needed to search for bodies to reach the area.
In a city grown accustomed to the NATO raids, the attacks caused a heightened level of alarm, partly because they began so early in the day, when this capital of 2.5 million people was busy with its daily routines. Most of the nearly 4,000 strike sorties flown by NATO since the air war began in March have been carried out deep into the night, partly, NATO officials have said, to minimize the risk of civilian casualties. But Tuesday’s daylight raids emptied much of the city of traffic, with stores in large areas of the city shuttered and the few people out hurrying to complete their business and find shelter.
Colonel Qaddafi’s nine-minute audio message was his first public pronouncement in nearly four weeks, when he spoke after an earlier NATO attack on the Tripoli command compound. That message, also delivered in a recorded radio address, struck a defiant posture, telling NATO that he was “in a place where you can’t reach me — in the hearts of my people.”
On Tuesday, the words seemed to aim at the morale-boosting tone of Winston Churchill’s speeches when Britain faced the threat of German invasion in 1940. “The Libyan people right now are living hours of glory of which future generations will be proud,” Colonel Qaddafi said. “Our children and our grandchildren will be proud of us and of our resilience and courage today. We shall defeat the enemy; our fate does not matter.”
Addressing NATO, he went on: “You are setting fire to the sea, you are setting fire to the desert, you are chasing a mirage. What do you want? What do you want? Did we cross the sea and attack you? Why this consistent bombing? Are you trying to force us into submission? You will not; we will never submit.”
With the repeated bombing of his Tripoli compound, Colonel Qaddafi has become a fugitive in his own capital, so NATO and people in the rebel underground in Tripoli have said, forced to stay constantly on the move.
His isolation has been compounded by signs that support for him has ebbed in wide areas of Tripoli, and growing numbers of high-level defections, from the top ranks of the government and the army. On Tuesday, Libya’s labor minister, Al-Amin Manfur, added his name to the growing exodus, declaring at a meeting in Geneva of the International Labor Organization that he was now supporting the rebel government, the National Transitional Council, Agence France-Presse reported.
But Western leaders have been cautious, renewing warnings in recent days that it could still take weeks or months to topple the Libyan leader. The warnings have come with vows to intensify the airstrikes and to assist the rebels in breaking a stalemate in eastern Libya.
A senior NATO diplomat said on Tuesday that the daytime barrage was consistent with the steady escalation of attacks in and around Tripoli by allied warplanes, missile-firing drones and, more recently, armed helicopters, with the majority of the strikes carried out by British and French aircraft.
“It’s a continuing sign that the pressure is increasing all the time,” said the diplomat. “There’s a psychological aspect to the campaign, and we’re sending a clear message: There is only one way out, and that is to go.”
The intensified campaign comes in advance of a NATO ministerial meeting in Brussels on Wednesday, where NATO officials are hoping to get more countries involved in Libya.
In Washington, President Obama promised an increase in the punishing NATO effort against the Libyan leader’s government until Colonel Qaddafi left office. “I think it is just a matter of time before Qaddafi goes,” Mr. Obama said. “What you’re seeing across the country is an inexorable trend of the regime forces being pushed back, being incapacitated.”
Mr. Obama’s comments, delivered in a news conference with Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, came as Mrs. Merkel joined the growing chorus calling for Colonel Qaddafi to step down. While Germany is not part of the NATO bombing mission, Mrs. Merkel said that her country would try to help once Colonel Qaddafi left.
On the evidence seen by Western reporters who went to the Qaddafi command compound on Tuesday, it is unlikely that he or his top political and military associates could still be operating there.
Officials led reporters through a landscape of total destruction, pointing to a couple of buildings they said were for administration, one of them a three-story structure where the cleaner’s body was found. Beside it was a building said to have provided emergency power to the compound.
A few hundred feet away, more vast rubble piles were all that remained of buildings that the officials said had included a reception center and conference hall, and a V.I.P. guesthouse. Amid the rubble, all was still, the only sound that of water pumping from fractured hydrants and garden hoses.

U.K., France to put forward UN resolution condemning Syria

NOVANEWS
 

British Prime Minister David Cameron warns anyone who would vote against the resolution, which condemns Syria for its violent crackdown on anti-government protesters.

Reuters

Britain and France will put forward a United Nations Security Council resolution on Wednesday condemning Syria’s crackdown on protesters, British Prime Minister David Cameron said.

“Today in New York, Britain and France will be tabling a resolution at the Security Council condemning the repression and demanding accountability and humanitarian access.

“And if anyone votes against that resolution or tries to veto it, that should be on their conscience,” Cameron told parliament.

Britain, France, Germany and Portugal circulated a draft resolution condemning Syria at the UN Security Council last month, but diplomats say Britain has been working on a version with tougher language. Veto powers Russia and China have made clear they dislike the idea of council involvement.

Also on Wednesday, Turkey called on Syria to rein in violence against civilians and promised not to turn away refugees as some residents of a Syrian border town headed for the Turkish frontier in fear of a military assault.

“Syria should change its attitude towards civilians and should take its attitude to a more tolerant level as soon as possible,” said Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan, who has had warm relations with Syrian President Bashar Assad.

Assad’s government has accused armed bands of killing scores of its security men in Jisr al-Shughour and has vowed to send in the army to carry out their “national duty to restore security”.

Accounts of the violence that began in the hilly town of Jisr al-Shughour on Friday vary, with officials saying gunmen ambushed troops and residents reporting an army mutiny.

The bloodshed has triggered international alarm that Syria may be entering an even more violent phase after three months of popular unrest that has cost more than 1,000 lives.

At Jisr al-Shughour, home to tens of thousands of people, residents said they were taking cover and bracing for attacks. Some 120 men, women and children fled into Turkey overnight to seek refuge, the Anatolian news agency said.

Erdogan, who has distanced himself from Assad since the Syrian uprising began, said Turkey would not “close its doors” to refugees fleeing Syria.

Rami Abdulrahman of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said troops had deployed in villages around Jisr al-Shughour, including Ariha to the east and on the main Latakia highway to the southwest.

Residents said about 40 tanks and armored vehicles were about 7 km from Jisr al-Shughour, which was now mostly empty, save for youth protesters.

Ali Haj Abrahim said his son Bilal, who had volunteered to help the wounded at the weekend, was shot by security forces on Sunday on the outskirts of Jisr al-Shoughour.

“Two machinegun rounds tore through his chest and his left shoulder. He was 26 with a geography degree, married four months ago. His wife is pregnant,” Haj Ibrahim said.

“We are not taking condolences. We consider his martyrdom a wedding for the defense of freedom,” he told Reuters.

Abdulrahman said there were protests against Assad on Tuesday in suburbs of Damascus, including Harasta and Douma, and in Deir Al-Zor and Qamishli in the northeast. Pro-Assad rallies were also held in some of the capital’s suburbs.

The government has expelled independent journalists, making it hard to determine clearly what is happening in the country.

Despite enthusiasm for pro-democracy movements that have unseated presidents in Tunisia and Egypt, few Western leaders — let alone their autocratic Arab partners — have shown a willingness to intervene in Syria, an Iranian ally whose volatile mix of ethnic and religious groups sits astride a web of regional conflicts.