Articles

NOVANEWS GILAD ATZMON JERUSALEM (Ma'an) -- Undercover Israeli intelligence officers appeared on national television Saturday to talk about assassinating Palestinians ...Read more

NOVANEWS   Israel seeks to ban the Palestinian protest movement from iOS store Gazan fishermen recount narrow escape from Israeli ...Read more

NOVANEWS 22 June 2011 Nassar Ibrahim, Alternative Information Center (AIC) The Syrian people demand democratic change, but are western powers ...Read more

NOVANEWS March 12, 2007 By Gilad Atzmon The short piece that follows has very little to do with Palestine, it ...Read more

NOVANEWS   He was real Anti-War activist not the like of Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) freakery and tokenism. 'Shoah' by ...Read more

NOVANEWS “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If ...Read more

NOVANEWS Bill Conroy   Former CIA Asset Claims U.S. Special Forces Assisted Mexican Soldiers In Assault on Stash Site (June ...Read more

NOVANEWS The Rule of the Rulers Over the Resistance of the Ruled is Reality Politics never change. Domination is the ...Read more

USA
NOVANEWS   This Jockeying for Irrelevance By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor The recent interview of comedian Jon Stewart, perhaps America’s ...Read more

NOVANEWS   by Ed Mattson Group counseling to adjust to civilian society Last night on CBS’ 60 Minutes one of the ...Read more

USA
NOVANEWS The Revolution Will Not Be Deactualized Why can’t we have a Tahrir Square? Lord knows we need one. By Ted ...Read more

NOVANEWS An Open Letter to Secretary Shinseki General Eric K. Shinseki (US Army, Retired) Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs Washington, ...Read more

ISRAELI UNDERCOVER AGENTS BOAST OF KILLING PALESTINIANS ON TV*

NOVANEWS

JERUSALEM (Ma’an) — Undercover Israeli intelligence officers appeared on national television Saturday to talk about assassinating Palestinians in a program broadcast on Israel’s Channel 10.
Oren Beaton presented a photo album of Palestinians he killed during his time as a commander of an undercover Israeli unit operating in the northern West Bank city of Nablus.
Beaton explained that he kept photos of his victims.
“This is a photo of a Palestinian young man called Basim Subeih who I killed. This is another young man. I shredded his body, and the photo shows the remnants of his body,” he said.
The TV program also featured an undercover agent referred to as “D”, who openly admitted killing “wanted Palestinians.”
He complained of suffering from post traumatic stress disorder and said that the state had rejected his demands for compensation.
The Channel 10 presenter appealed to the Israeli government to meet the agent’s demands.
“Those are the Shin Bet agents we only hear about and never see, and thanks to them we live safely,” she said.
The report was filmed in the Palestinian territories, and showed agents wandering around the streets of Ar-Ram in occupied East Jerusalem with handguns under their shirts, illustrating that the agents were still operating in Palestinian cities.
The agents, who speak fluent Arabic, are shown surrounded by masked Palestinian collaborators secretly deployed to the area to protect them.
The program provided previously unconfirmed details about the operational methods of undercover agents.
The report explained that officers conducted surveillance before an assassination, investigating the target’s friends and classmates.
Agents would even ask about the target’s favorite meals and habits at home, the report said.
In this way, agents would put together an image of the target’s behavior and routine.
Agent “D” said officers would then “seize the target and wait until the commander arrives to confirm his identity. Then we shoot him.”
This confirms previous accounts from Palestinians who have said they witnessed Israeli agents shooting Palestinians at point-blank range.

Source: http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=397902

Mondoweiss Online Newsletter

NOVANEWS

 

Israel seeks to ban the Palestinian protest movement from iOS store

Jun 22, 2011

alec

Settler Squatter Censor Yuli Yoel Edelstein
Settler Squatter Censor
Yuli Yoel Edelstein

Not only is Israel killing protesters and banning any kind of pro-Palestinian demonstration, they are now trying to ban Palestinians from cyberspace.

Yesterday Israel’s “Public Diplomacy Minister”  wrote a letter to Steve Jobs demanding that an application “Third Intifada” be removed from the app store.

Reuters reports:

The application offers users a stream of news stories and editorials in Arabic, announces upcoming protests, and includes links to nationalistic Palestinian videos and songs.

Reuters quotes Minister Yuli-Yoel Edelstein (a settler/squatter in Neve Daniel):

I am convinced that you are aware of this type of application’s ability to unite many toward an objective that could be disastrous….

Companies like this that have a global reach also have a responsibility, and they are aware of this responsibility, and I am sure that Apple will act in the same way (as Facebook)

Apparently the Israelis are not content choking the breath out of Palestinians in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza. Now the Israeli government believe that it’s their right to muzzle the entire world.

There’s a good chance Apple will roll over, as did Facebook in May. Martin Niemöller’s famous words take on a new sinister slant:

First they came for the communists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a Jew.

Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.

Arab springtime is welcomed in Syria and Libya but not in Israel. Some animals are more equal than others. Israel’s determination to follow South Africa’s apartheid path seems relentless.

Gazan fishermen recount narrow escape from Israeli fire

Jun 21, 2011

Ruqaya Izzidien

At around 9.00 am on June 21, two fishing boats were attacked at about two and a half miles off the coast of the Gaza Strip.

Since 2008, Gazan fishermen have experienced a reduction in the areas in which they are permitted to fish. The 20 mile limit, which was agreed during the Oslo Accords was first reduced to six and later to the current three-mile limit. But yesterday seven fishermen and two children faced open fire while still within this limit, which is imposed by the Israeli Navy.

Yaser
Yaser Baker holding bullet shrapnel from inside the motor of his boat. (Photo: Ruqaya Izzidien)

Yaser Baker was aboard the first boat to come under fire, along with three other fishermen who had been at sea since about 6.30am. “We were at around two and a half miles out to sea when they shot at our motor and it broke. We stopped thehasaka boat and all moved to the front of it, away from the engine so that we wouldn’t get hit. Then they shot at the front, right at us, the bullets just missed our bodies and one landed right by my leg.” Baker added, “They shot to kill.”

Yaserboat
Baker on the bullet-riddled bow of his boat. (Photo: Ruqaya Izzidien)

Mohammed Bakri Sabir came to aid Baker’s boat but then came under fire himself. First his engine was shot and disabled, and then he and his crew came under fire, along with the two sons, aged nine and ten, who were also aboard.

Sabir explained, “One week ago they shot a hole in the boat, which I patched up. Two years ago they confiscated my fishing net. This boat is what brings us food. Fifteen of us live in one room in my house, six of them are sick. And now? I can’t work. This is how the siege kills people; I don’t know what else to tell you.”

Baker explained, “Eventually, about 20 fishing boats came to the rescue, they surrounded our two disabled boats and escorted them back to shore. We only escaped because one of the kids, a nine-year-old boy pretended to be dead, he saved the day. He had to play dead, it was the only way we could get them to stop firing.”

Mahfouz Kabariti, President of Palestine Association for Fishing and Marine Sports explained the intensity of the situation, “It sounds like a movie, but they have no choice. Those who fish inhasaka boats are the poorest fishermen here, they don’t have large or multiple boats. This is all they have to make their living.”

Baker pointed to a crate of fish and uttered, “These are the fish which we die for,” as Sabir recalled, “One year ago they shot and killed Mohammed Mansour Bakar, who was a 22-year-old fisherman. It was the same situation; same story.”

Sabir said, “I want the world to come to see how life is for Gazan fishermen, for Gazan children. I want you to put me on camera, come and see what it is like. It has been five years of this death-siege and now my boat is broken. How am I going to feed my family?”

Over 8,000 people work in the fishing sector in the Gaza Strip, with a total of around 50,000 people depending on the fishing industry as their main source of income.

Israel demolishes bedouin community in the Jordan Valley; 42 people homeless, including 21 children

Jun 21, 2011

Kate

Israel demolishes homes in Tubas district, displacing 27 Palestinian children, adults
[MAP] AIC 21 June — On Tuesday morning (21 June) the Israeli army demolished 29 structures in al-Hadidiya, Tubas Governorate, displacing 27 people from six households, including 11 children. A further 15 people were affected, including 10 children … Al-Hadidiya is a Bedouin community relying on herding. Some community members report having born in this location in the 1950s, but community members have been displaced multiple times. The community estimates that about 40 families have been permanently displaced from Al-Hadidiya since 1997 due to a combination of factors, primarily demolitions (1997, 2005-2007, 2008, and 2011), confiscations (2000) and access restrictions (increasing since 2000). In May 2009, the IDF placed large cement slabs throughout the Jordan Valley, including Al-Hadidiya, that have “Danger Firing Zone Entrance Forbidden” written on them in Arabic, English and Hebrew. The IDF distributed these signs throughout the area. However, the community has reported not noticing military activity in their immediate vicinity. All households displaced this morning live outside the closed military zone.
Big wave of demolitions in the northern Jordan Valley
JVS 21 June — Today, June the 21st, Israeli military demolished Palestinian homes in two communities in the Jordan Valley. At six am five military Jeeps, two Israeli Civil administration cars and two bulldozers entered the Bedouin community of Al Hadidya. They proceeded to demolish four homes and 12 animal shelters, leaving 32 people homeless. After the demolition of Al Hadidya, the bulldozers drove on to nearby Khirbet Yerza, where they demolished two homes and two animal shelters. As a result ten people were left homeless.

And more news from Today in Palestine:

Land, property, resources theft & destruction / Ethnic cleansing / Settlers
US activists visit exile-threatened Jerusalem officials
OCCUPIED JERUSALEM (PIC) 21 June — U.S. academics from various universities and rights activists paid a visit Monday to Palestinian public officials at their sit-in tent inside the Red Cross compound in Jerusalem. The group includes anti-racism activists who have been arrested seeking freedom and equality and supporting the oppressed … The Palestinian officials, who are threatened to be banished from their native Jerusalem by Israeli occupation authorities, include two legislators, Mohammed Toutah and Ahmed Attoun and former minister Khalid Abu Arafeh. They recently received another foreign delegation including activists from Norway, Switzerland, Hong Kong, and the United Kingdom.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2bcO
Patriarch prohibited from conducting Hebron visit
HEBRON (Ma‘an) 21 June — The Governor of Hebron Kamel Hmeid and the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem Fuad Twal were prevented from carrying out a tour of the city Monday, delegation members said. The officials visited areas affected by the presence of an estimated 700 Israeli settlers and 1,500 soldiers in the city center, but were prevented from walking down the former market hub Ash-Shuhada Street … Part of the tour involved visiting the city’s university, meeting with the Hebron University President Awni Al-Khatib and inspecting its facilities. Hmeid called the visit a show of national unity and Palestinian strength, while Twal expressed regret at the “lack of respect from the occupation forces to religious officials,” but said he was glad to meet the “sons and daughters of Hebron,” and said he would continue to support their struggle for rights and freedoms.
link to www.maannews.net
Israeli army begins dismantling the Wall in Bil‘in
Pop Struggle 21 June — This morning army bulldozers began work to dismantle the fence in Bil‘in. As early as 2007, after two years of weekly protests in the village and following a petition filed by the residents, Israeli high court declared the path of the Barrier illegal. The court ruled that the route was not devised according to security standards, but rather for the purpose of settlement expansion. Despite the high court’s ruling four more years of struggle had to elapse for the army to begin dismantlement. During these years two people were killed in the course of the weekly protests and many others injured. Yet even according to the new path, sanctioned by the high court, 435 acres of village land will remain on the “Israeli” side of the Barrier. [and presumably the land taken for the ‘old’ fence is already ruined, trees destroyed, etc., while more land will be ruined for the new one]
https://www.popularstruggle.org/content/israeli-army-begins-dismantling-wall-bilin
5 settlers released after ‘price tag’ allegations
Ynet 21 June — Two Jerusalem courts ordered the release Tuesday of five settlers police had arrested on suspicion of carrying out revenge acts against Palestinians, commonly dubbed ‘Price tag’ acts. Yaska Weiss, 20, was released along with a 17-year old girl. Both were suspected of torching Palestinian vehicles in Hebron. During the hearing police appealed for a remand of their arrest, though their representative had already admitted there may not be enough evidence to charge the two.Earlier three residents of the West Bank settlement of Yitzhar – suspected of torching the car of a police commander during the razing of Ali Ayin outpost – were also released. Yitzhar settlers were furious at police conduct in the case, and a source in the settlement accused officers of performing unnecessary arrests instead of properly investigating the vandalism. “It has become the norm to perform stupid and baseless arrests in the small hours of the night, frightening children and infants,” the source said.
link to www.ynetnews.com
Jewish settlers in West Bank nurture land to consolidate Palestinian territories
Bethlehem (PNN) 21 June — Victoria Delacroix — Jewish settlers that are living in the West Bank are opening their guarded gates to the world and to other Israelis, in an attempt to show the international community what is going in the West Bank, through their eyes. One day tours that are booked through a regional settler council attempt to illustrate how settlers are nurturing and cultivating the land that Palestinians want back in order to gain sovereignty and declare a Palestinian State … One should also not expect to meet with any of the local Palestinian farmers — or ‘local Arabs’ as the tour calls them — that own this land and more than likely were the ones cultivating it before the occupation. Most of the tour group members see themselves as ‘former Christians’ who firmly believe that Jesus Christ is the messiah and saviour, but many of them partake in Jewish traditions and abide by some of the Jewish law.
http://english.pnn.ps/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=10277&Itemid=49

Living and dying in the Golan Heights
Majdal Shams — PNN Exclusive — Victoria Delacroix — 21 June — Ameer Jabal was born and grew up in the town of Majdal Shams, in the Golan Heights.  He was born under occupation and died under it. When he was only four Ameer stepped on a mine, a mine that had been placed by the Israeli army in the town.  As one field ends, another one begins, except that this orchard is not full of cherries, olives or wild flowers. A small yellow signs hangs on the barbed wire fence, “Danger Mines.” This is the reality of the Golan under Israeli occupation. This is the reality that the people of Majdal Shams live in.
link to english.pnn.ps
IOF troops arrest five citizens in Majda Shams
RAMALLAH (PIC) 21 June– Israeli occupation forces (IOF) arrested five citizens in the Majdal Shams town in the occupied Syrian Golan Heights at dawn Tuesday, the Israeli radio said. It said that the IOF soldiers stormed the town after obtaining new information during interrogation of previously held youths from the town and detained the five young men at the pretext they participated in the Naksa Day protests.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2bcOd8
Israeli forces
Two fishing boats shot off Gaza coast
ISM 21 June — At around 9am on June 21, two fishing boats were attacked by the Israeli Navy, with bullets piercing both engines, rendering them unusable. The first boat was shot at in the motor, at the rear end and, when the 4-man crew took cover at the front of the boat, away from the shots directed at the motor, the front of the boat was fired upon. Yaser Baker is one of the four fishermen who were aboard the first boat which was shot. “We were at around two and a half miles out to sea when they shot at our engine and it broke. We stopped the boat and all moved to the front, away from the engine so that we wouldn’t get hit. Then they shot at the front, right at us, the bullets just missing our bodies and one landed right by my leg.” A second boat, manned by Mohammed Bakri Sabir came to assist the first, but was also attacked, both in the engine and the front of the boat, where the crew was taking cover. Aboard the second boat were three fishermen and two of their children, aged nine and ten years old.
http://palsolidarity.org/2011/06/19025/

Video: Officer indicted for vandalizing Palestinian vehicles
B’Tselem 21 June — On 12 and 13 October, B’Tselem documented eight vehicles owned by Palestinians that had been vandalized, apparently by soldiers, near Jenbah in the southern Hebron hills … On 19 June 2011, the media reported that the military prosecutor had filed an indictment against a former infantry company commander. The officer, who has been discharged from the army in the meantime, was charged, inter alia, with intentionally damaging property, in that he and soldiers under his command vandalized a number of Palestinian vehicles, burning some of them, in the southern Hebron hills.
link to www.btselem.org
Gaza
UN: Israel approves Gaza housing projects
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 21 June — Israel has approved construction of two housing projects in the southern Gaza Strip, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees said Tuesday. UN Relief and Works Agency spokesman in Gaza Adnan Abu Hasnah said two major projects would be constructed to house families from Rafah and Khan Younis whose homes were demolished by Israel in 2001. The new buildings will also provide housing for families made homeless during Israel’s 2002 Operation Defensive Shield, Abu Hasnah said. Major Guy Inbar, spokesman for the defense ministry department responsible for liaison with the Palestinian territories, told AFP Israel had approved materials to build 1,200 homes and 18 schools. He said the materials would be consigned to UNRWA. The UN welcomed the decision. Abu Hasneh said UNRWA was waiting for authorities to take practical steps to allow thousands of truckloads of construction materials into the coastal enclave. He said the building would start with projects funded by Saudi Arabia and Japan, as well as the construction of eight schools. UNRWA spokesman Chris Gunness said the agency had learned of Israel’s decision “informally.” “We welcome this reported approval which follows lengthy negotiations with the Israeli authorities,” he said.
link to www.maannews.net
In Gaza, border opening brings little relief
RAFAH, Gaza Strip (AP) 21 June — The reopening of the Gaza Strip’s main border crossing with Egypt brought widespread relief to Palestinians suffering from a four-year blockade. But one month later, some 20,000 people are on a wait list and despair is growing in this crowded territory. Residents still must apply for travel permits, and the first available dates to cross are in late August. Frustrated travelers gather at the crossing each day, clutching medical reports, foreign residency permits and university registration documents in hopes of persuading the authorities to let them through. And after a brief period of goodwill, many are openly asking whether Egypt’s new government is truly committed to improving relations with the Palestinians.
link to www.cbsnews.com
Haniyeh applauds Miles of Smiles aid convoy
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 21 June – Prime Minister of the Hamas government in Gaza Ismail Haniyeh said Monday that he was proud and thankful for the support of international activists, who arrived in Gaza Sunday with the European aid convoy Miles of Smiles … For his part, the convoy’s coordinator, Isam Yousif, promised to continue organizing other aid convoys to support the Palestinian people.  “Miles of Smiles came to draw a smile on the faces of Gaza’s children,” he said. He highlighted that the convoy brought medicines worth half a million dollars in addition to milk and other food products.
link to www.maannews.net
300 truckloads of goods to enter Gaza
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 21 June — Palestinian officials were notified Tuesday morning that 300-310 truckloads of goods would be allowed into the Gaza Strip.
link to www.maannews.net
Goods – Needs vs. supply May 15 – June 11
link to www.gazagateway.org
Introducing the ‘Palestinian Gandhi Project’ / Yousef Munayyer
[with video] There is a consistent effort to portray Palestinians as violent individuals, and this effort is tied directly to attempts to justify any Israeli action against Palestinians in the name of “security” or “defense.” In reality, Palestinian resistance to the Israeli occupation and colonization of their land is diverse and overwhelmingly non-violent. Just because Palestinian non-violence doesn’t get the media attention violent conflict does, doesn’t mean it isn’t there. But how would anyone outside of Palestine know? (Image right: A Palestinian woman defies Israeli declared “buffer zone” in Gaza to harvest wheat.)
Pam Bailey, an American “corporate refugee” as she calls herself, traveled to Gaza to see for herself what was happening in the region. The product of her trips became “The Palestinian Gandhi Project” which Permission to Narrate is proud to feature here.
link to blog.thejerusalemfund.org
Videos: Palestinian Gandhis Part II: Blogging to resist / Yousef Munayyer
…This first video profile features two of many bloggers who have begun writing about the reality of life in the Gaza Strip. Although Gaza-based blogs date back to 2004, there has been a virtual boom since Israel launched its massive attack on the densely populated Strip in the winter of 2008/9. In a classic example of “blowback” (unintended consequences), Israel’s aggression served as a motivator for many young Palestinians in Gaza to find new, creative ways of speaking out. The first young blogger featured, Sameeha Elwan, speaks eloquently of being “shocked” into activism.
link to blog.thejerusalemfund.org
Flotillas
Letter from Athens: A city in chaos / Joseph Dana
I flew into this disorderly city this morning to cover the flotilla for the The Nation magazine along with journalist par excellence Mya Guarnieri. Over the next week, we will be observing the preparations and training of the American boat to Gaza, dubbed “The Audacity of Hope.” In the coming days, I will be observing the preparation of the ship, the nonviolence training of the passengers as well as the general climate in Athens, which is seeing historic riots about the Greek financial crisis. Stay tuned to +972 and my twitter feed over the next week for on-the ground coverage of what is certainly going to be one of the biggest stories of the summer in Israel/Palestine.
link to 972mag.com
American flotilla passengers set to challenge US support for Gaza blockade / Alex Kane
Mondo 21 June — The pressure is mounting on the second “Freedom Flotilla” to Gaza.  Anti-flotilla lawsuits in New Yorkand Toronto have been filed, the Israeli government is ramping up its propaganda efforts and the Turkish Mavi Marmara ship isno longer sailing following U.S. pressure. But the American passengers are still determined to sail on The Audacity of Hopelater this month, and they are now on their way to Greece to complete the initial leg of their journey before setting off to the Mediterranean from an undisclosed port. And if there was one important and unifying message the American flotilla passengers conveyed yesterday at a press conference where they took questions from reporters, it was this:  the U.S. Boat to Gaza effort is a direct challenge to American support for Israel and its crippling blockade of Gaza.
http://mondoweiss.net/2011/06/american-flotilla-passengers-set-to-challenge-u-s-support-for-gaza-blockade.html
IDF relieved by Turkish group’s pullout from Gaza flotilla but still goes ahead with preparations
Haaretz 20 June — Israel’s navy is going ahead with preparations to stymie a planned flotilla slated to attempt to break the blockade on Gaza in two weeks, despite the fact that the Turkish group IHH has pulled out of the effort. Israeli security experts believe that flotilla participants could violently oppose the navy’s effort to stop the ships and plan to bring photographers with them to document any resistance they face … Top navy officers were relieved yesterday by the announcement that the Marmara, the largest vessel slated for the flotilla, would not sail. “That saves a lot of work for us,” said one navy officer. “The Marmara would have carried 500 passengers; its exclusion scales down the operation.” Despite the IHH pullout, a coalition of 23 pro-Palestinian organizations have announced their intention to take part in this new flotilla.
link to www.haaretz.com
Parliamentary honour for Gaza activists sparks outrage
21 June — THE decision by Greens MP David Shoebridge to host a farewell function at Parliament House this week for activists preparing to set sail to break Israel’s blockade on Gaza has sparked outrage among Jewish leaders … NSW Jewish Board of Deputies acting president Jeremy Spinak questioned why a state MP would encourage people to break the law of a legitimate government. “It’s a sad state of affairs that the Greens are using Parliament House, with its proud history, to promote an event that will be in violation of international law,” Spinak said.”The organisers of the event know that the flotilla seeks to break a blockade, which is in place because of Hamas’ ongoing war on Israel.”
link to www.jewishnews.net.au
Refugees, World Refugee Day
Report: ‘30% of Palestinians in the W. Bank, 67% in Gaza, are refugees
IMEMC 21 June — The Palestinian Census Bureau reported that nearly half of the Palestinians in the occupied territories are internally displaced refugees, and that, since its creation in Palestine in 1948, Israel forcibly removed two-thirds of the Arab population … In 1948, nearly 957,000 Palestinians were removed and fled from their cities and villages due to the creation of Israel in the historic land of Palestine. This figure resembles nearly 66% of the total population back then, according to United Nations estimates in 1950 …  By mid-2010, the number of refugees registered by the UNRWA arrived to 4.8 million. 41.6% of the total population in Jordan are Palestinian refugees, 8.9% in Lebanon and 9.9% in Syria. Refugee camps in the Palestinian territories are the poorest among the total population as at least 32.1% of the refugees are below poverty levels.
link to www.imemc.org
UNRWA: “You can’t leave Palestine refugees behind”
972mag 21 June — There is no doubt in my mind that you cannot have a just and durable peace unless 4.8 million refugees are brought out of their 63-year exile, statelessness and dispossession — Chris Gunness, UNRWA Spokesman, 20 June 2011 — Roee Ruttenberg: There are critics who say the UN treats the Palestinians with some favoritism, that the Palestinians refugees have their own UN agency — your agency, UNRWA — dedicated specifically to their cause, something no other group has. And just this week, the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the international community treats the Palestinians like “spoiled children.” How do you respond to such criticisms? Chris Gunness, UNRWA Spokesman: It’s very vindictive and it’s political wishful thinking because if UNRWA went away and UNHCR took over the refugees, their inalienable rights would not disappear. So the right of return, which is enshrined in the “Universal Declaration (of Human Rights)” wouldn’t suddenly go away because UNRWA went away.
http://972mag.com/interview-chris-gunness-unrwa-spokesman-on-palestinian-refugees/

Jordanian PM: Continue funding for UN refugee agency
Jordan warns of instability if UN Palestine Refugee Agency’s funds cut UNRWA Commissioner General appeals for Arab funds — Jordan, 21 June 2011: The Prime Minister of Jordan, Marouf al-Bakheet, has warned of instability if the UN Agency for Palestine Refugees, UNRWA, is not properly funded and the Agency’s essential services to millions of Palestine refugees in the Middle East are cut. In a speech to UNRWA’s Advisory Commission delivered by the Deputy Prime Minister, Saed Hayel el-Sror, Mr. al-Bakheet said that in light of the transformations in the Middle East, Palestinian rights had to be maintained.
link to 972mag.com
Video: Gazans mark World Refugee Day
PressTV 20 June
link to www.youtube.com
Detention
Ministry asks UN to see release of Gazans held under ‘unlawful combatant law’
GAZA (PIC) 21 June — The Gaza prisoner affairs ministry has called on the UN to intervene as Israel has refused to release six Gazans whose prison terms have ended using an unlawful combatant law.  The Knesset, Israel’s legislative body, and the Israeli courts passed the law against Gaza prisoners after Israel pulled out of the Gaza Strip in 2005. The ministry considers the law an attempt to circumvent the Geneva Convention, which protects civilians.  Under the law, Israel has enabled itself to continue holding detainees from the Gaza Strip indefinitely without an indictment, evidence, or a fair trial.
In a separate development, the Israeli Prison Service has moved several leading prisoners into isolation, in a move considered to be “a declaration of open war” against Palestinian prison leadership.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2bcOd87
IOF storm home of liberated Hamas leader, question him
JENIN (PIC) 21 June — The Israeli military commander of Jenin area accompanied Israeli occupation forces (IOF) in storming the home of recently released Hamas leader Ali Abul Rub in Qabatiya village, south of Jenin city, at dawn Tuesday and questioned him. Sources close to the leader told the PIC that the pre dawn raid took place at 0200 am and that the commander asked for exchanging views with Abul Rub on a number of personal issues such as his plans for the near future and activities within Hamas in addition to his expectations on national reconciliation. Abul Rub was released on 6th March this year after 18 years imprisonment. He is a chemical engineer, married with a son and a daughter, and is well known for his Islamic propagation in Qabatiya mosque.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq
1500 sick Palestinian detainees refused to take medicine in protest step
RAMALLAH (PIC) 21 June — Palestinian human rights sources said that 1500 Palestinian sick detainees in Israeli occupation jails would not take their medication or go to clinics on Tuesday in solidarity with a comrade on hunger strike. The sources said that Atef Wreidat has been on hunger strike for two weeks in protest at moving him to Askalan jail where there is no appropriate medical care for his condition. He suffers from heart problems and breathing difficulty. They said that the Israeli prison services deliberately place sick prisoners under bad incarceration conditions and delay their treatment, and it is responsible for the life of Wrediat and all other sick internees.
http://www.palestine-info.co.uk/En/default.aspx?xyz=U6Qq7k%2bcO
Poll: Majority of Israelis support release of 1,000 Palestinian prisoners for Shalit
Haaretz 21 June — Sixty-three percent of Jewish Israelis support swapping captive soldier Gilad Shalit for 1,000 Palestinian prisoners, including 450 specifically requested by Hamas, some of whom are mass murderers, according to a survey carried out by the Rafi Smith polling company on behalf of the campaign for Shalit’s release.
link to www.haaretz.com
Racism / Discrimination
Yishai reinstates nationality on ID cards
Ynet 21 June — Interior Ministry Eli Yishai has signed a regulation that reinstates the nationality notation in the identification cards of all citizens who were eligible for the document before 2002. Yishai decision’s calls for the nationality section in ID cards issued to people who converted to Judaism through the Reform or Conservative movements to remain blank — a measure that defies a High Court of Justice ruling that officially recognizes the converts as Jews.
link to www.ynetnews.com
Israeli bus company advocates segregated seats despite court ruling
Haaretz 12 June — The Egged bus company has allegedly violated a Supreme Court ruling which forbids segregation on public transportation buses on the basis of gender. In an announcement with the company logo, published in early June in a local Haredi magazine, the arrangements for gender segregation on Egged buses in the city were detailed.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/israeli-bus-company-advocates-segregated-seats-despite-court-ruling-1.368789

Schools to bridge racial divide
Ynet 20 June —  The Education Ministry has decided to bridge the divide between Jews and Arabs with a new plan, entitled ‘Education for coexistence’. According to the new initiative, teachers of grades 1-12 will study about the culture, language and heritage of the other race[?!]. In addition, the ministry will encourage Arab teachers to teach at Jewish schools, and vice-versa.
link to www.ynetnews.com
International abduction
Ukraine exchanged Abu Sisi in return for Israeli trade pact and US lobbying aid / Richard Silverstein
A former high ranking Israeli minister has confirmed a line of thought I’ve developed regarding collusion between the Israeli and Ukrainian governments over the extraordinary rendition of Dirar Abusisi.  I’ve been reporting consistently the sneaking suspicion that the kidnapping involved various quid pro quos between the two countries.  Now, a former government official has confirmed that Israel said to Ukraine: “Give us Abu Sisi, and we’ll give you any trade agreement you ask for, plus lobbying services in Washington.” Over the past few months, I’ve noted visits by the Ukrainian prime minister to Israel (just after Abu Sisi’s kidnapping) at which major new trade deals were announced.  Yesterday, I pointed to a major new aviation agreement that would dramatically increase the number of Ukrainian and Israeli pilgrims visiting each others’ countries.
link to www.richardsilverstein.com
Political / Diplomatic / International news
Abbas: UN in place of no other options
RAMALLAH (Ma‘an) 21 June — The Palestinian leadership will continue its pursuit of support for an appeal to the UN for membership and the recognition of statehood, and Salam Fayyad will head the new unity government, President Mahmoud Abbas told the Lebanese satellite channel LBC on Monday night. In the absence of negotiations with Israel, Abbas said, a move at the UN would be the chosen course of action. If the United States, Israel and Europe have objections to a UN appeal, he continued “they must come up with an alternative.”
link to www.maannews.net
Abbas: Given options, we won’t go to UN
Ynet 21 June — Palestinian president says negotiations deadlocked due to two problems — borders and security — leading to planned September statehood declaration backed by 116 states. “But if US has another option, we won’t go to UN,” he says … “We have so far not discussed the core issues with Netanyahu. I only spoke with Netanyahu for altogether 15 hours and met with him three times over two years. We spoke only of security issues…”
link to www.ynetnews.com
Opinion poll shows Fayyad favored for PM
RAMALLAH (Ma‘an) 21 June — A poll conducted by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research found the majority of Palestinians would prefer Salam Fayyad as prime minister and Mahmoud Abbas as president. The results of the poll, released Monday, also showed that reconciliation talks had improved the public perception of Hamas more than Fatah. The poll was conducted in the West Bank and Gaza Strip by PCPSR between June 16-18 … A majority of 59 percent of Palestinians believe Fatah and Hamas will succeed in implementing the reconciliation agreement and unifying the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the survey revealed.
link to www.maannews.net
Fayyad to stay in place as Palestinian Authority premier
Bloomberg 21 June — Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad said he will resist pressure to resign and aims to continue in office while the rival Hamas and Fatah factions try to form a joint government. Fayyad, speaking to reporters today in the West Bank city of Ramallah, said he wants to at least complete his two-year plan to build the institutions for Palestinian statehood that are supposed to be ready in August. “There’s an action plan that needs to be implemented,” Fayyad said. At the same time, he said that he doesn’t want to be an “obstacle to unity.”
link to www.bloomberg.com
Hamas: Abbas does not have the power to appoint Fayyad
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 21 June — An admission by President Mahmoud Abbas on Monday that Salam Fayyad would be appointed Prime Minister of a unity government was slammed by Hamas as an “unjustified media escalation.” Abbas made the comments on Lebanese television
link to www.maannews.net
Obama: Israel, US stalwart allies
Ynet 21 June — “One inviolable principle will be that the United States and Israel will always be stalwart allies and friends, that that bond isn’t breakable and that Israel’s security will always be at the top tier of considerations in terms of how America manages its foreign policy – because it’s the right thing to do, because Israel is our closest ally and friend, it is a robust democracy, it shares our values and it shares our principles,” Obama said to roaring applause.
link to www.ynetnews.com
Netanyahu: Israel needs to separate from the Palestinians
Haaretz 21 June — The prime minister tells cabinet that it’s more important to ‘preserve a solid Jewish majority inside the State of Israel’ than holding land home to a Palestinian majority.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/netanyahu-israel-needs-to-separate-from-the-palestinians-1.368795

Senior US official: Israeli-Palestinian impasse is unsustainable
Haaretz 21 June — Official tells reporters Israel should not be expected to negotiate with Hamas, and that administration awaiting results of Palestinian negotiations.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/senior-u-s-official-israeli-palestinian-impasse-is-unsustainable-1.368927

Two months before UN vote on Palestinian state, Israel lacks ambassadors in key cities
Haaretz 21 June — As September nears, Israel still hasn’t filled important diplomatic postings in Berlin, Rome, Madrid, and Brussels … The source said the turnover of ambassadors at such a critical and sensitive time would make the battle against unilateral Palestinian moves at the UN more difficult.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/two-months-before-un-vote-on-palestinian-state-israel-lacks-ambassadors-in-key-cities-1.368797

Israeli Migdal Oz plan outlines response to Palestinian reactions to declarations of statehood
IMEMC 20 June — Israel is drawing up plans for a series of eventualities come September and a Palestinian declaration of statehood. The Migdal Oz plan, seen by YNet, is the Israeli document on how the army plans on maintaining order in the aftermath of the September state bid … The most likely scenario according to the commanders is a period of reflection by Palestinians where they compare reality with their expectations. However other scenarios include immediate protests and rioting or, according to some, all out war. The plan outlines a series of measures for dealing with these scenarios including the acquisition of extra crowd dispersion tools such as tear gas as well as newer methods such as the “Scream” acoustic system which emits a load noise that aids in crowd dispersion. The Israeli army has recently doubled its annual purchases of crowd dispersion weapons in preparation for September, according to YNet.  Military officials have stated that they would deal with any attempts to cross the Israeli separation barriers by the same means dealt with Palestinian refugees seeking to cross the border during Nakba and Naksa day protests.
link to www.imemc.org
Netanyahu woos Erdoğan with letter
Ynet 21 June — Ahead of second Gaza flotilla, PM sends letter to Turkish counterpart congratulating him on third term, describing wish to ‘renew cooperation, friendship that characterized relations between two peoples for so long’
link to www.ynetnews.com
Palestinian leader in Turkey for talks
ANKARA (AFP) 21 June — Palestinian leader Mahmud Abbas arrived here Tuesday for talks with Turkish leaders amid disagreements over the formation of a Palestinian unity government, officials said.
link to news.yahoo.com
Israel and weaponry
US: Israeli missile defense system can protect our Mideast bases
Haaretz 20 June — The Israeli missile defense system will be integrated into a regional defense array planned by the U.S., General Patrick O’reilly, head of the Pentagon’s Missile Defense Agency, said Monday.
link to www.haaretz.com
Paris Air Show: Israeli companies unveil defense systems
Ynet 21 June — The Israeli mission to the 2011 International Paris Air Show held in Le Bourget comprised of 15 companies representing Israel’s top defense systems manufactures, Yedioth Ahronoth reported Tuesday … In 2010, Israel’s defense exports amounted to $7.2 billion.
link to www.ynetnews.com
Israel reveals it has returned dozens of kilograms of nuclear waste to the US
Haaretz 20 June — Israel’s Nuclear Energy Commission head tells IAEA commission that Sorek reactor’s nuclear waste was returned to U.S. as part of agreement, while Dimona still stores nuclear waste.
link to www.haaretz.com
Israel to stress safety of its nuclear reactors at IAEA special session
VIENNA (Haaretz) 20 June – The Israeli Atomic Energy Commission will announce today that it is stepping up its supervision of two nuclear reactors in Israel and the handling of nuclear waste. The new measures will be mentioned in the speech which Dr. Shaul Horev, head of the commission, will make before a special session of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA ).
link to www.haaretz.com
Other news
NATO strike kills Palestinian family in Tripoli
RAMALLAH (Ma‘an) 21 June –The ministry explained in a statement published Tuesday on the government news agency Wafa, that the International Red Crescent Association had relayed the news. The family, according to Wafa’s report, had lived in the Yarmouk refugee camp in Damascus, before moving to Tripoli. Palestinian ambassador to Libya Atif Udah told Ma’an radio the family was in a three-story building targeted by a NATO air attack. He identified the victims as Abdullah Muhammad Ash-Shihab, his wife Karima and his 6-month-old twins Khalid and Jumanah.
link to www.maannews.net
Israel urges Apple to remove pro-Palestinian app
21 June — (CBS/AP) 21 June — The Israeli government on Tuesday appealed to Apple Inc. to remove an application called “ThirdIntifada” from its App Store, saying the program glorifies violence against the Jewish state.  Israel’s information minister, Yuli Edelstein, sent the request in an email to Steve Jobs, the chief executive of the American iPhone maker.
link to www.cbsnews.com
Analysis / Opinion
Analysis: Why Christians leave Bethlehem / Greg Wilkerson
Ma‘an 21 June – I spent a month last Autumn working with the Christian organization, Arab Educational Institute in Bethlehem, carrying out research and interviews, through which I spoke with dozens of Palestinian Christians, in part, about the temptations of leaving for a more comfortable and peaceful life abroad. As opposed to comments by the the Archbishop of Canterbury last week, who said Palestinian Christians were being marginalized and pushed out of Bethlehem by the Muslim majority, all of the reasons I was cited stemmed directly from the Israeli occupation. Chief among them were the day-to-day difficulties and humiliation of checkpoints, restrictions on access to Jerusalem, and the impact of Israeli occupation and border controls on business, travel and tourism.
link to www.maannews.net
groups.yahoo.com/group/f_shadi (listserv)
www.theheadlines.org (archive)

Israeli army begins dismantling the Wall in Bil’in

Jun 21, 2011

Popular Struggle Coordination Committee

Six years into the weekly protests and nearly four years after the high court declared the path of the Barrier illegal; the army began dismantling the Wall in the village of Bil’in. But even according to the new path 435 acres of village land will remain behind the fence.

This morning army bulldozers began work to dismantle the Barrier in Bil’in. As early as 2007, after two years of weekly protests in the village and following a petition filed by the residents, Israeli high court declared the path of the Barrier illegal. The court ruled that the route was not devised according to security standards, but rather for the purpose of settlement expansion. Despite the high court’s ruling four more years of struggle had to elapse for the army to begin dismantlement. During these years two people were killed in the course of the weekly protests and many others injured.

Yet even according to the new path, sanctioned by the high court, 435 acres of village land will remain on the “Israeli” side of the Barrier.

Mohammed Khatib of the village’s popular committee said in response “On the ground, nothing has changed yet. All we know is that although the Israeli court officially pronounced our claims to be just, the army continued to protect the original route shooting and arresting protesters, thereby completely ignoring the ruling. We will continue to struggle until all the land is returned to our people and until we see an end to the Israeli occupation.”

Although on 4 September, 2007, the high court ordered the state to come up with an alternative path for the existing Barrier in Bil’in within a reasonable period of time, many months elapsed and no new plan was offered. On the 29.05.08 the residents filed a petition to hold the state in contempt of the court due to this delay. In response to the petition, the state offered an alternative path. However, the plan failed to comply with the high court’s ruling as the proffered path left a large area designed for settlement expansion on the “Israeli” side of the Barrier. The only difference between the two paths being that the latter offered to award 40 acres of land back to the residents.

A second petition claiming the alternative path not in accordance with court ruling was then filed. On 3 August 2008 the court declared that the first alternative path indeed fails to adhere to the ruling. The court ordered the state to come up with another alternative path.

On 16 September 2008 the state offered a second alternative path. This path also left a large area designed for settlement expansion on the “Israeli” side, offering to return a100 acres of village land to the residents. A lawyer for the residents asked that the state be held in contempt of the court for violating a court ruling for the second time.

On 15 Decemebr 2008 the high court ruled that the second alternative path was not in accordance with the original court ruling.

In April 2009 the state offered a third alternative path which left most of the area destined for settlement expansion on the “Palestian” side of the Barrier, thereby returning to the village 150 acres of 490 acres annexed by the original path.

American flotilla passengers set to challenge U.S. support for Gaza blockade

Jun 21, 2011

Alex Kane

The pressure is mounting on the second “Freedom Flotilla” to Gaza.  Anti-flotilla lawsuits in New York and Toronto have been filed, the Israeli government is ramping up its propaganda efforts and the Turkish Mavi Marmara ship is no longer sailingfollowing U.S. pressure.

But the American passengers are still determined to sail on The Audacity of Hope later this month, and they are now on their way to Greece to complete the initial leg of their journey before setting off to the Mediterranean from an undisclosed port.

And if there was one important and unifying message the American flotilla passengers conveyed yesterday at a press conference where they took questions from reporters, it was this:  the U.S. Boat to Gaza effort is a direct challenge to American support for Israel and its crippling blockade of Gaza.

Gabriel Schivone, an Arizona resident and activist, said that he will be wearing a Star of David around his neck on his journey to Gaza to “symbolize the root meanings of Judaism that are not emphasized enough, namely welcoming a stranger as you were a stranger, helping free the slave as though you were once enslaved.  So rather than travel to contribute to more death and suffering, I choose to travel there to directly and nonviolently protest the support and participation of my own government in these crimes.”

Schivone is joining 36 other Americans who are off to Gaza.  Hundreds of people from some 20 countries are set to take part in the flotilla aiming to break Israel’s blockade.

“We have a special responsibility,” said Richard Levy, a labor and civil rights lawyer joining the boat.  “Our country is not supporting what [Bashar] Assad is doing.  It is not supporting what [Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad is doing…But the fact is, we are the main supporters of what Israel is doing in the Middle East.  And that support has been destructive not only to the Palestinian people but to this country in a very, very large way.”

Levy also reported details of a meeting U.S. flotilla activists had with the State Department in which they provided details about the mission and asked for protection.  The activists also wanted to “talk policy issues,” which the State Department declined to meet with them about.

A State Department spokesperson told reporters June 1 “that groups and individuals who seek to break Israel’s maritime blockade of Gaza are taking irresponsible and provocative actions that entail a risk to their safety.”

Shortly after the meeting, according to Levy, the State Department sent them a communique that “warned people not to go on the flotilla, that Israel could be expected to use force, and that Israel expected to enforce its blockade.”

“The State Department is on notice, the president is on notice,” said Levy. “Communications have been made with all levels of the State Department and the administration to let them know that this is a boat of U.S. citizens on a peaceful mission, and that we expect the United States government to speak to Israel or to do what it needs to do to protect its citizens.”

Alex Kane, a freelance journalist based in New York City, writes on Israel/Palestine and Islamophobia at alexbkane.wordpress.com.  Follow him on Twitter @alexbkane.

Gen’l Ashkenazi, architect of Gaza onslaught, joins Brookings Institution as ‘Visiting Fellow’

Jun 21, 2011

Philip Weiss

Tomorrow the Brookings Institution is having a panel on how Israel has defended itself from terrorism for the last 60 years. Triumphs and failures. And look who’s on the panel: Brookings Saban Center Visiting Fellow Gabi Ashkenazi, former chief of staff of the Israeli army, who helped direct the Gaza onslaughtof 2008-2009 that killed nearly 400 children and who is cited in the Goldstone Report.

This is a reflection of the power of the Israel lobby: how enmeshed it is in our discourse, and why it is that the U.S. invariably provides Israel impunity for its actions against Palestinians.

I asked Ken Pollack, head of the Saban Center (yes it’s backed by Haim Saban, an ardent Zionist by his own description) about Ashkenazi. He didn’t respond. I bet even he is embarrassed by this. But I got a note back from Gail Chalef, director of communications for Foreign Policy at Brookings Institution:

I understand you had a question about Saban Center Visiting Fellow Gabi Ashkenazi. General Ashkenazi joined the Saban Center at Brookings as a visiting fellow on June 1.

Saban Center visiting fellows are leading thinkers and practitioners within their fields who help the Center stay at the forefront of research trends and policy developments through a temporary period of residence within the Center.

Saban visiting fellowships are typically three-to-six months in duration. During their stay, the visiting fellows contribute to the Center’s diversity of thought and research. The fellows also contribute to the Center’s reach, educating and informing a wide audience of political, corporate, and civic leaders, as well as the general public.

Visiting fellows also may use their time at Brookings to write and to attend and participate in Center events. They are also asked to provide others in the Brookings community with insights on their area of expertise. One other point – visiting fellows are not considered employees of The Brookings Institution.

Thanks to Ali Gharib for pointing this out to me.

Peres awaits, Shakira

Jun 21, 2011

Eleanor Kilroy

Post image for Peres awaits, Shakira

Ynet’s article on Shakira’s visit to Israel used a photo of the singer with the caption, “Peres awaits”. The two will finally meet this afternoon during the press conference at the opening of the Presidential Conference. I imagine the president’s anticipation:

Shakira, my pop princess, I await you! I am as fresh and youthful (well, perhaps not so young anymore) as your new fragrance, S by Shakira – so simple, so lacking in discord. Here in Israel I have always promoted harmony, but it is not so easy as creating a perfume I assure you. We are a hated people, the Jews, and we have found sanctuary here on this small piece of land that we must constantly defend from the Arabs. Well, not all the Arabs – you are one of the few exceptions of course! There was the tiring war with Lebanon: the people are so stubborn there – it took some of our most sophisticated weaponry to repel Hezbollah and the people sheltering them.

They say I ordered innocent men and women and children to be killed with these flechettes, but they are just little arrows really, like those you shoot into my heart, pretty one! Oh, you are as sweet as nectar. Speaking of honey, we once had to set such a trap for a man – not a real man you understand: a traitor and a coward, Vanunu had revealed our secret – he had betrayed us; imagine how you would feel if that boy Gerard Piqué stabbed you in the heart like that.

Humanity and children are close to my heart too – this is why I like this Barefoot Foundation you have. You helped the Latino children who were victimized by poverty and displacement; it is terrible to think of, like in the darkest days of our Jewish history. Importantly we agree that education is the key: we start our little ones young, instilling in them pride in their country – we even teach them how to save the president from the Hamas!

Ah the vision of you surrounded, protected by our brave young soldiers in a united Jerusalem, and that boy Gerard, praying at our Wall (the Western one, I mean) gives me hope. Yes, hope that we shall overcome all these terrible things people are saying about our Jewish democracy: apartheid, war crimes! Forgive me, how can I even discuss such things in your company! Come, let’s talk about making the world a better place.

Hasta la vista!

Shimon (Peres)

Why am I organizing the Gaza boat? Because Jewish history commands me

Jun 21, 2011

Jane Hirschmann

People often ask me why I am part of a team to organize a U.S. Boat to Gaza that will be sailing this month with the next International Flotilla to break the siege of Gaza. They often make clear they are asking because I am an American Jew, whose family survived the Holocaust with some surviving family members ending up in Israel. And my only answer is: How could I not?

My parents raised me with stories about what happened in Germany and their family’s escape. I came to see that Israel represented for them a safe haven should there be another attempt at annihilating Jews. And yet, at the same time, they worried it was not so safe a haven given the animosity and physical threats and violence in the area.

But no one ever mentioned the displacement of 750,000 Arabs that was the result of the creation of Israel. I vaguely knew there were people living there, but I was never curious about who these “others” were. All I took away from my family’s history and the atrocities endured was that this should never happen again to anyone, anywhere.

Growing up in the ‘60s, I became active in opposition to the war in Vietnam, the anti-apartheid struggle and the women’s rights movement and later became involved in opposing the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. As a social worker, I was focused on social justice issues but never questioned the relationship between the U.S. and Israel and their policies regarding Palestinians.

Then came the war on Gaza and a real political awakening for me.

Operation Cast Lead and the Goldstone Report were the catalysts. In November 2008, the ceasefire ended: Israeli soldiers broke it in a cross-border raid killing six members of Hamas and, in response, rockets were launched into Israel. Israel, fortified with American weaponry, attacked the people of Gaza. Approximately 1,400 Palestinians, mostly civilians, were killed compared to 13 Israelis. Gaza was pulverized. Judge Richard Goldstone and his team did a thorough report of the causalities on both sides. There was no doubt that the people of Gaza were disproportionally affected.

Right after the invasion in Gaza I realized I could no longer remain silent. I became one of the organizers of a group called Jews Say No! in New York City. We wanted to speak out and to make clear that the Israeli government did not speak in our name as they claimed. I began reading about the occupation, settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, the building of the separation wall, Jewish-only streets for Israeli settlers, special identity papers for Palestinian citizens of Israel (one step away from wearing a yellow star) and the other indignities endured by the people of Palestine on a daily basis. And I saw the total collusion by the U.S. government – its unconditional support no matter what the Israeli government did, including giving them 30 billion dollars over a 10-year period for weaponry (F16s, Apache helicopters, white phosphorous, Caterpillar bulldozers used to destroy homes in Bedouin encampments) used ruthlessly against the Palestinians. This was intolerable for me.

I understand the fears and frustrations of Israelis being fired upon by rockets and the resultant deaths and injuries. But what about the thousands of Palestinians being killed and whose homes, schools, hospitals, farms, mills, factories and infrastructure are being destroyed? What about a people living under a brutal occupation who are being denied the right to live with dignity in their own homeland?

The siege and blockade of Gaza continue. The Israeli government controls the land, sea and air of this small area (25 miles long and roughly six miles wide) where 1.6 million people live. There has been no movement in recent years unless Israel allowed it. (Egypt’s partial opening of the Rafah gate to human traffic, though not to commerce, is a positive sign if it is allowed to grow). Most people cannot travel in or out of Gaza because of continuing restrictions, 61 percent of the population is food insecure, the unemployment rate is around 45 percent, one of the highest in the world, and exports remain banned with the exception of limited items like strawberries and carnations for European markets. Gaza is called an open-air prison even by England’s Prime Minister, David Cameron.

Given all this, I can remain silent no longer. Every day Palestinians are confronting the Israeli government at the wall, at check points, at demolition sites. They risk their lives. Like the Freedom Rides our boat is sailing to call attention to the illegal occupation and siege of Gaza.

My humanity and my Jewishness – Jewish history – demand my being part of an organizing effort to end the inhumane treatment of the Palestinians. The U.S. Boat, called The Audacity of Hope, will sail in late June to Gaza as part of the Freedom Flotilla 2-Stay Human. We will be approximately 50 individuals from across the U.S. committed to non-violence, human rights and freedom and justice for the Palestinian people.

To date, tens of thousands of individuals and over 80 organizations have endorsed this U.S. campaign and each day more sign on to travel with us in name. We travel in peace for justice, and I am proud to be part of this international effort.

Jane Hirschmann is a member of Jews Say No!, a psychotherapist from New York City, co-author of three books, and one of the organizers of the U.S. Boat to Gaza. More information about the The Audacity of Hope is available at www.ustogaza.org.

UPDATE: Original headline on this post said that Hirschmann is on the boat. She is not.

Don’t bother, Shakira

Jun 21, 2011

Lizzy Ratner

Colombian pop goddess, Shakira, confirmed late last week that she will be flying to Israel today to speak at Shimon Peres’s three-day hasbara extravaganza, the Israeli Presidential Conference: Facing Tomorrow. Shakira is not slated to sing but she will be holding a press conference with Peres and speaking at the opening plenary alongside girl-comedian Sarah Silverman and Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales about “My Recipe for a Better Tomorrow.”

Now the good folks of BOYCOTT! Supporting the Palestinian BDS Call from Within are asking her (and her soccer star beau, Gerard Pique, who may attend with her) to cancel her trip. Here is a text of their statement:

FROM ISRAELI CITIZENS – SHAKIRA AND GERARD PIQUÉ, PLEASE SING FREEDOM FOR PALESTINE INSTEAD OF ENDORSING SHIMON PERES AND ISRAELI APARTHEID!

Dear Shakira and Gerard Piqué
We are a group of Israeli citizens and residents, Jews and Palestinians; many of us have been fans of your music.
We recently learned that you have been invited to the Israeli Presidential Conference. We hope that you will allow us to explain why you should refuse to participate in international cultural events facilitated by the Israeli establishment and its most senior leaders.

The Israeli State has initiated a rebrand’ campaign in order to distract attention from Israel’s ongoing violations of Palestinian human rights and legitimize its senior politicians, like Shimon Peres. Your participation in the Israeli Presidential Conference will endorse this campaign.
We realize that cancelling at this late stage may seem drastic, but this should be understood in the context of Israel’s utilization of international cultural events to construct a facade of normalcy to a reality in which 1.6 million Palestinians (44% of which are children under the age of 14) are kept under siege in Gaza, 2.5 million are kept under martial-law in the West Bank with no civil rights, and millions more are subject to racially discriminating laws inside Israel.
If you attend the Presidential Conference, you will accept that that a Palestinian fan of your work living under Israeli occupation will not be allowed by law – and denied by an illegal wall built on annexed private Palestinian land, fences and military checkpoints – the chance to attend it.
Hundreds of artists, academics, filmmakers, and writers worldwide have expressed their support for the human rights based Boycott Divestment and Sanctions movement, and recognized its pivotal role in the process of bringing an end to Israel’s systematic human-rights violations.
Mobility in the West Bank is just one of the examples which illustrate the environment in which international cultural events in Israel take place. But Israel’s human-rights abuses against Palestinians go much further than this: violent nightly incursions into Palestinian villages, systematic arrests of children as young as 11, the killing of non-violent demonstrators – these are not single occurrences of atrocities, they are the infrastructure of a system of oppression, practically unaffected by any criticism or international rulings that demand changes.
Israel’s violations have been documented by the UN and respected human rights organizations such as Amnesty International and Oxfam, and recognized as unlawful by international judicial bodies. The necessity in steady substantial pressure on Israel has also been highlighted in a recent report by 21 human rights organizations in regard to ensuring “an immediate, unconditional, and complete lifting of the blockade” of Gaza, where Israel implements a policy of “deliberate reduction” for basic goods – using mathematical formulas to measure the amount of food sufficient to keep Gaza inhabitants alive at a near-malnutrition level; allowing in an average of less than a third of the needed goods.
Artists United Against Apartheid, who made it unfashionable for artists to play in South Africa, had a huge impact on the South Africa divestment movement; the financial pressure of that divestment movement was instrumental in bringing about the end of apartheid in South Africa. The Palestinian call for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against Israel until it complies with international law and universal principles of human rights, was launched in 2005 by over 170 civil society Palestinian organizations. Today, the BDS campaign, backed by almost the entire community of Palestinian cultural workers, is supported by Archbishop Desmond Tutu, the international alliance Artists Against Apartheid, South-African Artists Against Apartheid, Creative Workers Union of South Africa, 500 Montreal artists, 200 Irish artists, and many acclaimed cultural figures worldwide including director Ken Loach, musicians Roger Waters and Brian Eno, and UK duo Massive Attack. In the past year alone, dozens of artists, actors, and cultural figures have expressed their support for BDS and canceled their scheduled performances in Israel. Among them are Mike Leigh, Vanessa Paradis, Carlos Santana, Elvis Costello, Devendra Banhart, Gil Scott-Heron, The Pixies, Tindersticks, Leftfield, and Faithless.
The decision by Palestinian organizations to call for a cultural boycott campaign, as well as that of Israelis to support it, was not taken lightly. Civil society has stepped up its call for boycott because Israel has been utilizing cultural events to whitewash its crimes and render its system of oppression invisible.
In a radio program discussing a new law-proposal that would fine boycott supporters in Israel, an Israeli Foreign Ministry representative announced that their office endorses cultural events “so that people (abroad) will see the humane values of Israel”. Heeding the Palestinian call for boycott is instrumental to the attempts to bring an end to Israel’s human rights violations, because it first and foremost opposes Israel’s message of ‘business as usual’ facade.
In addition to the aforementioned reasons for supporting the BDS movement, we must add a few words about Israeli president, Mr. Shimon Peres, with whom you are about to cooperate. Mr. Peres has been a senior member or a propagandist for Israeli governments which have used cluster munitions, flechette artillery shells and white phosphorus bombs in densely populated civilian areas in Gaza and Lebanon, have built more settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories (oPt), and have imposed separate legal systems for Israeli settlers in the oPt and their Palestinian neighbors. Mr. Peres authorized the kidnapping and ill-treatment of an Israeli citizen in Rome (Mr. Mordechai Vanunu, September 1986), a clear violation of international law. He argues consistently that it is acceptable for (only) one state in the Middle East to acquire nuclear weapons, a situation which necessarily brings about a dangerous arms race in this volatile region. Mr. Peres he authorized, as Prime Minister in April 1996, the mass bombing of villages in Southern Lebanon, explicitly aimed at creating a wave of refugees flooding Beirut. We suspect that he has not learned that it is illegal to inflict lethal collective punishment on a civilian population. Dear Shakira and Gerard Piqué , is this your partner for global activism?

We urge you to heed the call by Palestinian civil society, and we ask that you not undermine the efforts of a rapidly growing human rights based international movement to bring a just solution to the oppressed in Israel/Palestine. We therefore urge you to cancel your participation in the conference!
Please feel free to respond and/or ask for additional information.
Sincerely,

Noa Abend
Oshar Bar
Neta Golan
Iris Hefets
Shir Hever
Liad Kantorowicz
Assaf Kintzer
Edo Medicks
Ofer Neiman
Dr. David Nir
Leehee Rothschild
Yonatan Shapira
Jonatan Stanczak
Elian Weizman
Michal Zak
on Behalf of
BOYCOTT! Supporting the Palestinian BDS Call from Within
http://boycottisrael.info/

‘Move over AIPAC’ protester assaulted by police during peaceful demonstration

Jun 21, 2011

Radio Rahim

Police brutality is a daily occurrence; it is not weird, nor unusual. Unarmed, non-violent citizens are victimized by officers of law who use physical force as a means of communication. Contrary to what some may believe, this is not the exception, but the rule. Since the horrific attacks on 9-11, police policy has institutionalized racial and ethnic profiling, especially against Muslims. This human rights violation targets minorities, either because of their faith, ethnicity, political views and/or activism. Under the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act passed by Congress, local police departments are not required to maintain records of police brutality nor does the Act criminalize police brutality as a human rights violation.

And so, on Sunday May 22nd when I was aggressively choked by a Washington DC metropolitan police officer on a public sidewalk, without any provocation, it really didn’t surprise me.

It was the annual AIPAC convention in Washington DC and I was focused on informing those attending that Americans of conscience would not be silent in light of the conference’s anti-American agenda. Some may be surprised that I am describing AIPAC as anti-American, but I believe that it is anti-American to pressure policy makers to use taxpayers’ money for the funding of the ethnic cleansing of the native people of Palestine.

It was approximately 9:30 AM and the convention was finally beginning- and so did we. We crossed the street towards the convention center and began marching slowly towards 7th Street on the sidewalk. At this point I began leading the chants with my large boom box. I noticed three undercover Caucasian police officers directing the main security individuals (who all happened to be of African-American descent) around our group. There was a few times where one of these officers brushed passed me, almost whispering something. I completely ignored these incidences and continued to participate in the protest. Our loud chants of “Freedom for Palestine!” were further amplified between the towering buildings, and convention attendees were peering through windows at us. Here, I have to express my gratitude for the organization and leadership ofCodePink. By the time we made it back to the main protest location, we were unified and cohesive in our march, without any confrontation with the security personnel.

At this point, I was exhausted and thirsty and took shade under one of the tents that we had put up earlier in the morning. I sat there for a short while, reflecting on the purpose of attending such a protest. We were protesting a convention that symbolized a continued ethnic cleansing, no different to that which occurred on American soil against the indigenous population, my ancestors. I felt slightly exhilarated that I was, at the very least, trying to do something to fulfill my responsibility towards humanity and to the souls of my ancestors, even if this was through a simple protest.

It was then announced that President Obama’s motorcade was approaching. I picked up a sign and walked towards the sidewalk, and sure enough, his secret service SUVs began rolling by and the President’s limousine soon followed. I felt a nudge and noticed one of the African-American police officers standing next to me. First, I thought that it was strange for the officer to be so far away from the main protest and secondly, that he was touching me, as if trying to instigate a response. I stepped away from him and confidently told him with a respectful tone that he did not have the right to touch me. Needless to say, he did not like that. In the matter of a few seconds, he grabbed me aggressively by the throat and began squeezing intensely. I could feel his thumb pushing against my jugular vein and my throat began burning. From the moment that he gripped my throat, I did not resist, and simply stared at his face. It really seemed like an attempt to force me to react in self-defense, in order to “escalate” the situation, which of course would have lead to more force on his behalf and inevitably, my arrest. Therefore, I did not scream, touch, kick, or even breathe. After several seconds of this assault, the officer let go and immediately turned and walked away towards the main protest. He had an arrogant swag to his walk, as though he knew he could get away with such brutal force and aggression against a non-violent pedestrian. Unfortunately, I knew that there was little I could do without getting arrested. I did not defend myself which prevented me from getting arrested but it also meant that my throat was burning intensely and that my neck was in pain. The whole debacle made me recall various friends and family members who had also been assaulted and attacked by law enforcement for no apparent reason. They too, had not received justice. It makes me think of the final Radio Raheem scene from Do The Right Thing when the white cops choke Raheem to death. This resembled that scene except in this case; it was an African-American choking a Native American.

After the assault, I was thinking to go to a nearby clinic, but then decided to obtain the officer’s information and let him know that he did not have the right to touch me, nor choke me. I found him speaking with a group of other officers in the middle of Mass. Avenue. When they saw that I was approaching, they rushed towards me and began to yell aggressively. I did not respond, but put my hands in the air showing that I was unarmed and simply wanted to talk. I looked at the officer who choked me and inquired if I could ask a question. After ranting for a minute, he finally asked what I wanted. I asked him, “Did you find it necessary to choke me a few minutes ago?” He did not respond immediately but then said “You were standing in the road”. I knew it was pointless to argue with such an arrogant and power hungry individual. To say I was standing in the road was completely absurd – at the time, there were several secret service SUVs covering the entire road, making it impossible for me to be standing on the road. I did not ask the officer anything further but told him “Today is a great day, a black cop choking a minority”.

I turned and walked back to the tent to pick up my boom box. At the tent, I met a kind, young Jewish woman who informed me that she had witnessed the entire incident and that my neck was extremely red. I then noticed the pain that my body was in, especially my neck and head. After obtaining the young lady’s information for a witness report, I gathered my belongings and went to the clinic on Connecticut Avenue. After two hours of waiting with other injured people the doctor took a look at me and noted extreme strain and swelling to my neck muscles. He prescribed some pain-killers and anti-swelling medicine for the remainder of the week.

I headed home and until today, I’ve been reflecting on the day’s events, and the bitter situation of the world. While our economy is suffering, and many Americans suffer in poverty, billions of US tax dollars are being sent across the globe to a small country in the Middle East to ensure that it continues its policy of colonialism. The native inhabitants of Palestine live under tyranny, and this only increases the hatred that I feel for the foreign policies of my own country. Being of native descent and a person of conscience, who cares for the peace and security of all people on earth, I cannot be silent on the great injustices against the natives of Palestine. The pain that I felt was only a sample of the pain that Palestinians feel under a life of occupation. It was a fraction of the humiliation that those living in apartheid in the West Bank have to go through when passing through hundreds of illegal Israeli checkpoints. There were numerous other cases of brute force against the protestors – most notably, Rae Abileah, who ended up in the hospital with a neck brace after being assaulted by AIPAC members. And yet again, nobody has been charged with assault.

If it takes being assaulted in my own country on a public sidewalk to object to anti-American appeal to consume my tax dollars to continue crimes against humanity and freedom, then so be it. I have learned from the civil rights movement that those with truth and justice on their side will be victorious and more importantly, that I should not fear standing up for it. The continued criminalization of pro-Palestinian activism in the United States is becoming a stark reality. The anti-boycott legislation, the lawsuit against the Irvine 11, and increased police brutality are only a few signs of a reality that becomes clear as each day passes. Americans must educate themselves, not only of the human rights abuses it sponsors across the globe, but of the ones it inflicts on its own population.

Written by Radio Rahim, Edited by Fatemah Meghji

Born in Washington DC in 1985, Radio Rahim grew up in a multi-cultural home. Rahim’s mixed ancestry includes Native American leader Osceola and Persian mystical poet Sayyid Razi ad-Din Artimoni. By the time he graduated high school he had published his first book, “Necessary and Proper” and his first album “Borne Phoenix”. In addition he starred in an indie film, and was featured on Turner South “My South Speaks” poetry TV series. After a brief hiatus from performing to acquire higher knowledge and travel around the globe, his second album “Let the People Know” produced by Chicago’s legendary PANIK (Molemen Records) is set to be released Summer 2011.

Syria: Internal Popular Demands, External Political Agendas

NOVANEWS

22 June 2011

Nassar Ibrahim,

Alternative Information Center (AIC)

The Syrian people demand democratic change, but are western powers intervening to promote such a change? The context of Syrian policies supporting Arab resistance must be understood as the framework and motivation of current western intervention, and not a true desire to promote Syrian democracy. Nassar Ibrahim explains.
douma_protest
Popular protest in the Syrian town of Douma


What is going on in Syria requires a clear-headed analysis. Naive or evasive approaches which play on emotions, words, blood and tears are not useful when the danger of a breakdown of Syria is imminent. What is needed now by the western powers is the head of Syria, nothing less!
 
When seeking to understand what is going on in this country, one should be aware that there is no one single player on the field, and that trying to match the Syrian with the Egyptian experience is a mistake, if not an attempt to exploit an ambiguous moment in order to gain legitimacy and create more confusion.
 
And the confusion here may be authentic or supposed. It is authentic because the Syrian people’s aspirations for freedom and democracy are authentic and real, just like the similar aspirations and demands of hundreds of millions of Arabs. In this sense the intersection of the Syrian people`s movement with the Arabs’ one becomes both logical and positive.
 
The problem starts, however, when the confusion becomes “supposed”, a planned policy laden with hidden agendas, goals and purposes in order to step over or to go beyond the goals or purposes of the Syrian popular movement.
 
The Syrian movement certainly has real and serious internal motivations. The people are calling for democracy, political and social freedom. Yet this should not be manipulated for the goals of external intervention. To exploit the slogan of “freedom and democracy” to justify external intervention is a way to punish Syria for its role and steadfast policies, as in the past decades Syria has represented the cornerstone of Arab resistance.
 
Syria backed the opposition toward American and Israeli interventions in Lebanese internal affairs and opposed the Saudi Arabia-supported Al Hariri government, and in this context the use of the international trial on the Hariri assassination gains a new meaning. Assad supported the Lebanese resistance during the 2006 Lebanon war, playing a central role in defeating the Israeli army. The Syrian government also supported the Palestinian organizations (Hamas, Al Jihad, PFLP, DFLP and others) that reject the peace process based on the American – Israeli conditions and contradict the political performances of the Ramallah-based PA; concerning the question of the occupied Syrian Golan, Syria is unshakable in its position: No peace without full Israeli withdraw to the 1967 borders. More recently, Syria opposed the 2003 war against Iraq and supported the Iraqi resistance. Even if some people may have short memories in this regard, the memory of the United States, Israel and other colonial forces is still sharp.
 
The approach here is not to defend the mistakes of the Syrian regime or to justify its internal policies. On the contrary, Assad`s regime can be criticized from various aspects. The goal here is to determine the limits and nature of the current developments such that the real, authentic, politically and socially popular demands do not become an instrument for colonial forces to settle accounts with Syria. One who does not see this equation with all of its consequences will, whether consciously or not, send Syria to the guillotine. All speeches and slogans about freedom, democracy and human rights would then become meaningless.
 
Is this fear reasonable or is it an attempt to escape from the challenges? Following a quick look at evolutions in Libya, we will realize how serious the “game” is, and will recognize that the colonial powers are not joking. It is under the legitimacy of “freedom, democracy and human rights” that Libya has been bombed by missiles and aircraft. Yet intervention under these slogans has nothing to do with freedom, democracy and human rights as they are in the minds of the Arab peoples, best expressed in Cairo’s Tahrir Square, in Damascus and other Arab cities.
 
The Libyan people, for example, paid a high price to escape the Italian colonial yoke after their defeat under the leadership of the heroic fighter for the Libyan independence Omar Al-Mukhtar. The tragedy nowadays is to see the colonial flags raised in Benghazi squares while destruction and military intervention are going on, aimed at subjugating and re-colonising the country and its resources. The comic thing is that this happens by demand of the “Libyan revolution”! Does the Gaddafi regime bear responsibility for this? Certainly, but this does not diminish the horror of the tragedy, which becomes even more complicated and frightening when the popular revolts become a tool and means to plunder the nation and people’s freedom and dignity, relying on the colonial powers’ intervention. So if the dictatorship and its repression are the expression of a social dilemma, then the foreign intervention pretending to face this dilemma on behalf of anyone else will reveal itself as an historical catastrophe. The Libyan people, sooner or later, will pay its high price for many long decades.
 
Freedom and democracy are not just words or intellectual discourses on the margins of western societies or universities; we saw their authentic manifestations in the awareness of the Arab peoples, as freedom and democracy are linked with the rejection of dependency, subservience and politics dictated by external forces.  The freedom and the democracy the people in the Arab streets are asking for are first and foremost a request of freedom and national self determination from the colonial forces. It should not be forgotten that these colonial forces are the ones which divided the Arab world and then supported, protected, armed and trained most of the Arab dictatorship regimes; and they are still backing the same regimes who looted the wealth of the Arab peoples and subsidizing with all means the Zionist occupation in Palestine.
 
Awareness of these dimensions is necessary for any deep analysis of what is currently happening in Syria. This of course does not exempt anyone from responsibility: The Syrian regime certainly bears its share, as does President Bashar Al-Asad, as much as the Arab people might remember and respect his steadfastness in the past years, while Syria was standing almost alone in the “battle field”, representing the strongest voice to back the Arab resistance movements in Lebanon, Palestine and Iraq.  In those difficult years no one dared to raise a voice against the external invasions and colonial destructive wars, and in those years the majority of the Arab regimes and media were besieging Syria and the Arab resistance movements. Whoever does not want recognize this context,is simply supporting the external and internal forces trying to spread confusion in order to destroy that experience and liquidate its positive results, and ultimately punish Syria for its positions.
 
With these premises, describing the confusion created around the developments in Syria as a conspiracy is not a matter of propaganda, since the external interventions in Syria are de facto pushing the country to the edge of the abyss. The risk of a breakdown is serious and real, as the Syrian popular anger that moves spontaneously and is connected to the revolutions in the Arab world has been used brilliantly to push it far away from its original objectives. We can say that the popular movement in Syria is now facing a piracy process run by many pirates from near and far, supplied with all means including arms, money and media in order to play their role. The objective seems to be very clear: Not to seize the ship but to capsize it.
The collapse of Syria would weaken Syrian-Iranian relations, perceived as a threat to American regional strategy and would prevent a strong alliance between Egypt and Syria following the Egyptian revolution. It will not be strange,therefore, if Barack Obama will stand in the White House – as he did some days ago with regard to Bin Laden – to demonstrate with a smile: We told you! Who is not with us will, sooner or later, pay the price!
 
What is happening in Syria is sad and painful, and it is a tragic paradox that while the Arab people are happy about having gained back Egypt, they are now fearful of losing its twin Syria. It has to be clear that one who does not want the wellbeing and strength of Syria as a country contradicts the interests of the Arab people. One who does not want freedom and dignity for the Syrian people is not on our line, exactly like those who do not protect and appreciate the national role of Syria, begging Washington, Paris, London, Rome, and NATO to intervene and help the Syrian people to achieve the so-called “democratic change”, thus covering the political agenda of these colonial powers.
 
This clear warning should not be understood as a green light to continue the oppression of the Syrian people, nor does it mean to bypass or ignore the demands of the Syrian people for freedom and democracy. It is all the more necessary to understand the threats to Syria by the piracy of the colonial powers, as well as to clearly push the Syrian regime to meet the demands of Syrian people and to force it to surrender without any compromises to their demands. This includes real political and social reforms and to fight corruption, which are the preconditions to immunize Syria from external colonial interventions and to gain the trust of millions of Syrians who will be ready to struggle in order to protect Syria, once the respect of their dignity and freedom in all aspects of their life has been acknowledged.
 
We conclude by finding that there are reasons to have confidence in the awareness of the Syrian people. Through its historical experience, the people learned to be prepared to pay a high price to protect their principles, independence and freedom. Therefore, it is not easy to deceive or to drag the people into a trap of self-destruction, as they certainly understand what is behind this scramble coming from every direction. Surely it is not love for Syria, nor the willingness of the Western colonial forces and the Arab reactionary regimes to see a free, democratic and strong Syria. The final goal is clear: what they want now is the head of Syria and the country to be weakened, to no longer have a substantial role or influence. One not aware of this fact should look to the East to see what is happening in Iraq and then have a look to the West to see Libya under the Western bombs. After all, who cares about the Syrian or Libyan people!

Enough is Enough

NOVANEWS

March 12, 2007

By Gilad Atzmon


The short piece that follows has very little to do with Palestine, it is not about the starvation in Gaza, it tells nothing about Israeli road blocks, it is not about the right of return. It will have zero effect on Palestine or the enormous Palestinian suffering. It is about a tiny group of Jewish activists who made solidarity into an ongoing nightmare. This piece is written with some severe pangs of conscience. I wanted to believe that we would never have to get there.

This small piece is dedicated in particular to Mr. Tony Greenstein, a Palestinian Solidarity activist who is engaged solely in smearing and throwing mud on other activists, especially intellectuals with some continental appetite.

Two years ago, I had come across his name for the first time. It happened after I performed in a very moving event in remembrance of the Deir Yassin massacre. The event was organized by DYR and it was by far the biggest Palestinian event and gathering of Palestinians I have ever come across in the UK. I was shocked to find out a few days later that a group of Jewish activists who call themselves ‘anti-Zionists’, for some peculiar reason, were investing some enormous energy in destroying DYR.

Bewildered by their viciousness, I then started to monitor what is known as the Palestinian solidarity activity of the Jewish people in the UK. For the first time in my life I confronted the real meaning of Diaspora Jewish identity, for the first time I learned what segregation and Goy hating is all about. For the first time in my life I realized how devastating Jewish lobbying is. I summarized my impression in a satirical piece that was comprised of genuine quotes made by those very few JAZ (Jewish anti-Zionists). I called it ‘The Protocols of The Elders of London’. The piece was circulated vastly. I was convinced at the time that the piece would have a positive impact in increasing some self-awareness amongst those activists. Indeed, some left the group known as Just Peace UK, where the quotes themselves came from, some admitted to being Zionists and joined Engage, some just disappeared but a very few were left to retaliate. This was indeed a beginning of a world war.

It didn’t take long before Tony Greenstein, one of those quoted, found an opportunity to hit back. The next time I learned about him was when he organized a picket against me outside a London Marxist bookshop (Bookmarks). As a result of my circulating a piece written by Paul Eisen, whom he regards as a NASHD&M (‘Nazi’, ‘Anti-Semite’, ‘Holocaust Denier’ and a ‘maggot’), Greenstein tried to stop one of my readings, blaming the SWP for ‘giving a platform’ to guess what: an ‘Anti-Semite’, ‘Racist’, a ‘Nazi’ and a ‘holocaust denier’. Yes Greenstein and his friends are not economical with expressions. Needless to say, that the SWP ignored them completely.

As time went by, I saw Greenstein tossing accusations in almost every possible direction, but then something rather unusual happened. A week ago Greenstein published a piece on the Guardian’s CIF, once again he was campaigning against DYR, blaming its Directors for nothing else but being Holocaust Deniers and Anti-Semites. This time Greenstein & Co wanted the UK Palestinian Solidarity campaign (PSC) to shun DYR. He did it in spite of the fact that DYR memorials are probably the biggest and most successful Palestinian gatherings in Britain.

Within the first few hours after publication, the Guardian blog filled up with the usual meaningless Zio-centric comments, yet one was made by an unknown character with the nickname of Sachman who was referring to Greenstein’s past: “Is this the same Tony Greenstein who was banned from National Union Of Students Conferences in the 1980’s for hitting a Jewish student?” (CIF) Some red lights started to flash. I asked myself whether it was possible that the same Greenstein who picketed against me, calling me an anti-Semite was himself involved in some violent acts against Jews. I may admit that I myself have never been involved in any violent incident, either against Jews or anyone else and this includes the 3 years I had wasted in the IDF. I asked myself, is it the same Greenstein who accuses my friend, activist Paul Eisen, the most peaceful person I have ever come across, of being a racist?

At that stage I was totally convinced that the accusations against Greenstein were nothing but trash from a Zionist plant. I raised the question at the Peacepalestine blog. It didn’t take too long before some devastating information about Greenstein’s past started to flood in.

Apparently, Greenstein has a lot to hide, his personal history is tainted with some unsavory unlawful activity. Yet, this is not the issue here. I do not care much about people’s past. Nevertheless, Greenstein is famous for passing ethical judgments on others. I tend to believe that people who are engaged in righteous preaching should themselves stand as an example of moral clarity. Moreover, though I do not hold Greenstein’s past against his present activity, I do believe that a politician who runs some deadly defamation campaigns and motions against an international Palestinian solidarity group and solidarity activists should be prepared to have his own past exposed.

David Cameron, the Tory leader, had to confront the resurfacing of his juvenile affair with cannabis. Blair and Clinton had to face the music (both on guitar and on saxophone) of their old crimes that were exposed to the public in their first electoral campaigns. In case you decide to live a political life, you have to bear in mind that your past becomes public property.

Greenstein couldn’t agree less. Once he realized that more than a few of us were starting to learn about his rather serious unlawful past, a new measure of threatening tactics were put into place.

Indeed, the British law allows convicted criminals to lie about their past after the period of spent conviction. The law is indeed morally correct. It allows the convicted person to open a new page. The British law allows Mr Greenstein to lie about his past, yet it doesn’t necessarily mean that the rest of the world should do the same.

However, whether people do or do not lie about their past is neither my concern nor my business. Nevertheless, when a politician tries to impose a lie on me I have to stand up against that. When a person with such a past insists upon dictating the ethical ground of the Palestinian solidarity agenda, I just go for a war.

But there are some wider ethical and ideological implications that should be explored. Interestingly enough, Greenstein presents himself as a Shoah historian. Not that he has written any book or produced any body of substantial work about the subject. However, he is obsessed with the issue of Holocaust denial and historical revisionism. Thus, it is rather amusing that Greenstein has such little respect for historicity when it comes to his own past.

One categorical question to do with Greenstein’s double standards is left open. If Greenstein is indeed convinced that he is legally entitled to lie about his past due to his ‘spent convictions’, what exactly gives him the right to confront the Israelis about their 1948 crimes? If that is the case, wouldn’t it be better to just forget it all? Is there some point where law takes priority over truth, where the loopholes that exist should be taken advantage of to promote a personal cause or even to cover up something unpleasant or even criminal? Using that reasoning, if Greenstein adopts the rehabilitation law so enthusiastically, would he have something to say by analogy and about just how much one can mention the Nazi crimes. Wouldn’t the Nazis deserve the same measures of spent convictions, if we are taking the ethical stance of Greenstein at face value? Or is there a mobile moral compass that he is aware of that the rest of us still haven’t grasped?

Actually, I am not interested in Greenstein’s answer to those questions. I believe in forgiveness, in grace and in love. I believe that to understand the Holocaust is to understand its meaning rather than its historicity. I believe that to understand the Nakba is to understand its meaning. If Greenstein would understand the meaning of his own past in terms of abuse of others, he may stop being a bully and a self-appointed inquisitor. I can easily live with Greenstein’s past as long as he presents me with an image of an empathic future.

I do feel guilty for writing this piece. I do feel guilty for being personal and referring to the conduct of an old man who may as well be a good man with a genuine positive will. But I am afraid that by avoiding it I would betray my beliefs. The smearing and the defamation must be stopped. I believe that Solidarity with Palestine must be based on an ethical thinking, on empathy and on love between people. I am tired of those hateful campaigns run by Greenstein and his friends, I am tired of people being labeled Nazis, anti-Semites and Holocaust deniers. Enough is enough.

I would never suggest banning Greenstein and his friends, though this is exactly what they suggest doing to others. All I ask for is a free discourse. A dialogue that allows different people to think differently. I have written this piece with regret. I was always hoping that we would never have to get there. The solidarity movement should move forward, it is all about Palestine rather than about the four or five UK Marxist Jews who care solely about anti-Semitism. Palestine solidarity is about Palestine. It is not about Jews being anti-Zionists. It is about people who protest against the inhuman crimes committed by the Jewish state.

An Israeli born Jew who served in the Israeli army, currently living in London. He is a top professional jazz musician playing saxophone and clarinet.

 
Source: www.miftah.org 
 

 

Remembering Brian Haw

NOVANEWS

 
He was real Anti-War activist not the like of Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) freakery and tokenism. ‘Shoah’

by Stephen Lendman

 

 

Early morning June 18, lung cancer claimed 62 year old UK anti-war activist Haw after a long battle, a man London Independent contributor Mark Wallinger called “the conscience of the nation grown quiescent.”

His family left a message, saying: “He left us in his sleep and in no pain, after a long, hard fight,” ending three months of treatment in Germany. His long vigil, in fact, contributed to his poor heath. It also led to a divorce and largely separated him from his seven children.

After others stopped protesting America’s Afghan and Iraq wars, Brian was steadfast against his own government’s complicity. In fact, from June 2001, months before 9/11, he camped out in London’s Parliament Square against the UN’s appalling economic sanctions. They got former UN representative for Iraq’s Oil and Food program Denis Halliday to resign for being asked to commit the equivalent of genocide, killing 5,000 children monthly.

Haw, in fact, documented horrific Gulf War depleted uranium birth defects, repeated lies and evasions of US and UK leaders, and imperial lawlessness waging unconscionable wars. Resolutely he remained tenacious against injustice, championing peace and love.

On his own, his decade-long presence pressured his government relentlessly. In return, authorities hounded, arrested, and assaulted him. In 2002, the Westminster City Council petitioned Britain’s High Court for an injunction to remove him, claiming he blocked the pavement. The Court, however, declined, ruling his presence wasn’t unreasonable.

In 2003, the House of Commons Procedure Committee recommended a law change, prohibiting unlicensed protests on security grounds. He never left.

In 2005, after Tony Blair called him a nuisance to get rid of, the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act (SOCPA) passed, legislation enacted against him, making it illegal to protest within a one km radius of Parliament without police permission.

Nonetheless, he successfully argued that his vigil predated parliamentary terrorism, winning the right to continue protesting against Britain’s lawless participation in Washington’s imperial wars.

Preaching “Love….peace….justice….for all,” he camped out night and day every day, in good and bad weather, in spite of everything authorities tried to harass, deter, and banish him.

Using a megaphone, banners, placards, homemade signs, peace flags, photos, and slogans, his message resonated in Westminster and worldwide, a testimony to his heroic spirit, dogged presence against war, and refusal to quit until illness forced him.

Wallinger called him “a unique and remarkable man,” citing his “tenacity, integrity and dignity,” then asking: “What are we going to do now there is no (Brian) there?”

A lead Independent article called him a “Rebel with a cause….(a) one-man peace camp….a mighty irritant slap in front of the seat of national government,” challenging the illegal war-making of three prime ministers.

He survived numerous arrests, dozens of eviction attempts, and the mayor of London’s failed effort to clear his pavement space for Britain’s royal wedding. His resilience made him a hero for many.

In 2007, Channel 4′s Political Awards voted him the Most Politically Inspiring Figure of the Year. By then, in fact, he was internationally recognized. In Britain, tour guides included him on their itineraries, and documentaries and docudramas on Britain’s involvement in America’s wars featured him.

On June 19, a message from supporters on his web site said:

“Brian showed great determination and courage during the many long hard years he led his peace campaign. (He) showed the same courage and determination is his battle with cancer. He was keenly aware of and deeply concerned that so many civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine did not have access to the same treatments that were made available to him.”

On June 2, 2001, police asked him how long he’d be there. He replied, “As long as it takes.” He kept his word until his deteriorating health demanded treatment in Germany.

He’s survived by his wife former Kay, seven children, and legions of global admirers, perhaps inspired enough by his courage to pursue peace in his absence.

A Final Comment

On June 20, anti-war activist former UK MP Tony Benn headlined a London Guardian op-ed, “Brian Haw gave his life for peace,” saying:

He stood for principle against lawless wars. “Every MP on the way to work would pass Brian and know he was always there and underst(ood) what he was saying.”

His activism “frightened the establishment” enough to try stopping him legislatively, mindless of his dogged determination to resist.

“The remarkable thing about Brian was not only his principle, but his determination, alone, to be effective as indeed he was; for millions of people must have seen him there or on television, and came to know of his campaign.”

Some called him “the man of peace in Westminster,” a different message from warmongering MPs, Benn never one of them.

“Brian did not stop the Iraq war” or others, “but he will be remembered as a man who stood” for peace and gave his life championing it.

“He will be sadly missed and his death marks the end of a historic enterprise by a man who gave everything to support his beliefs” – honorable ones against Washington and UK war criminals, reigning terror and destruction he valiantly tried to stop.

Palestine, IsraHell and America: The Strategic Void

NOVANEWS

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle” — Sun Tzu (The Art of War, Special Edition)

by Dr. Alan Sabrosky

Let us admit it to ourselves, once and for all. The battle of Palestine for the Palestinians has been lost.

The odds against them and their scattered network of supporters have been great. The last possible chance to at least stave off defeat was stillborn last year, when the Goldstone Report on Gaza was endorsed by the UN Human Rights Commission and the UN General Assembly, and then — simply stopped.

Only if some country or countries had fought to bring UNGA 377A (the Uniting for Peace Resolution) before the General Assembly then to force a vote censuring Israel and, if necessary, the US and activating the punitive aspects of that resolution, did the Palestinians have some hope.

That didn’t happen, and while it may take a while yet for the remnants of the Goldstone Report and its aftermath to wither away, all that is finished. Goldstone’s recent rejection of his own report in an attempt to reconcile himself with his Zionist community affirms that reality. All that remains is the terms Israel will give the conquered people there – terms that may well simply be a second Nakba (catastrophe) resulting in their ethnic cleansing from their ancestral homeland.

Underscoring this dismal situation is abundant evidence of the continued expansion of Zionist influence and control in so many areas. The growth in settlements and numbers of settlers in East Jerusalem and the West Bank continues. Gaza remains embattled and all but isolated, even with the opening of its border crossing with Egypt.

Israeli military power continues to grow, thanks to the American military and financial support. Israeli leverage in key democracies, especially Canada, Great Britain and Australia, continues to expand, as does Zionist influence in the mainstream media (MSM).

And the Zionist capture of the US Government is for all intents and purposes complete. The Obama White House now speaks as Israel dictates, and not a person of consequence remains in the US Congress who will stand up and speak out against it. Anyone doubting this has only to reflect on the humiliating (to me) image of US Senators and Representatives unanimously giving Binyamin Netanyahu 29 standing ovations at his recent appearance before the Congress. Even former President Carter, once an “Elder” condemning Israeli apartheid in the Occupied Territories, made a public written obeisance and apology in print for having given offense to Israel, all in support of the political ambitions of a young relative.

The Ongoing Struggle

I can imagine that many in the anti-Zionist movement around the world will refuse to acknowledge this state of affairs. After all, it could be said, what about the growth of the alternative media? What about the BDS (Boycott, Disinvestment and Sanctions) campaign? What about the reconciliation of Fatah and Hamas, and the move in the UN to recognize Palestine as an independent state? And Gaza, what about the ships and truck convoys going to Gaza, and the efforts in many countries to increase awareness of the plight of the people there?

Each of these positions has some transitory merit, but no significant strategic effect on the outcome. So much of the discussion in the alternative media consists of the same relative handful of people on different websites and from different organizations talking to and about one another. But it rarely is covered in the mainstream media, and it is literally unknown to at least 99% of the voting public in industrial democracies, and even fewer in other countries, and is therefore at best incidental to the outcome of the struggle.

The BDS campaign is theoretically more significant, and in fact I do support it (as I participate in discussions in the alternative media), if only because it sometimes causes Israel and its supporters some public embarrassment and some little hardship. And it did have an effect on apartheid in South Africa. But Israel is a different matter entirely. Its leverage in Europe and the US ensures that neither the European Union (EU) nor the US will impose embargoes and sanctions on Israel, and without them, nothing of consequence is likely to happen.

But say it did, and in some convoluted way, the BDS campaign managed to force Israel to the economic wall without the EU and the US. Reflecting on Israel’s effective control of the US Government and the US media, does anyone seriously doubt that at least the US Congress – with the concurrence of pundits, evangelical pastors and the President himself – would vote Israel whatever bailout monies it needed, for as long as it needed them, to maintain itself, no matter what other countries did?

As for Palestinian factions and the proposed recognition of Palestine as an independent state, it is hard to take any of it seriously, even without President Obama’s avowed determination to veto that independence in the UN Security Council – something anticipated, and a reason it is supposed to proceed in the General Assembly afterward. Now, I understand the emotional need for Palestinians to be recognized by the UN as an independent state, but in its current situation, “independent” is the last term I would apply to it in practice.

It all comes down to one point. If there is to be a Palestinian state, Israel demands that it be defenseless and demilitarized, and the US now concurs. But no independent state can be defenseless, and no Palestinian state in the aftermath of “Operation Cast Lead” can accept being demilitarized. Call Palestine an independent country and give it UN membership or not, but without US support it will mean less than one of the old South African Bantustans except to a handful of Palestinian leaders – the political equivalent of putting a lion’s head on a donkey and calling it a lion, which still leaves it as lunch if it happens to run across a real lion.

But it is Gaza, or rather the focus on Gaza since its blockade by Israel and especially since its savaging by Israel in 2008-2009, that holds pride of place in the anti-Zionist movement’s attention and actions. The plight of the Palestinians in general is real and deplorable. The plight of those in Gaza is heartbreaking, and the sense without that it is critical to do something to relieve their suffering is understandable, with truck convoys of assorted size making runs there with mixed success, and both individual boats and a flotilla, followed now by a second flotilla in at least two parts, attempting the approach by sea.

None of it matters. I expect the Israelis will intercept this flotilla in international waters as they did the first one, and that the chaotic mismanagement of the flotilla coupled with the unbelievable failure of its leadership to enlist the support of any major government or any part of the mainstream media, means that interception will succeed, protected as always from condemnation or sanctions by a US veto in the Security Council.

But even if the Israelis stood aside and let every ship and boat in the second flotilla deliver every scrap of their cargos to Gaza, including those utterly useless letters with which the Americans on the Audacity of Hope have squandered their opportunity to make a real difference, it would have no strategic effect whatsoever. The Wall would still stand. The settlements would persist and expand. Israel’s dominance of the US Government would continue, and with it Israel’s absolute ability to continue pursuing its own “Final Solution of the Palestinian Question” and its march to at least regional hegemony.

In this context, Gaza has thus served the Israelis well. They do not care greatly about it, although they will assuredly remove its people into the Sinai when they remove the remaining Palestinians from East Jerusalem and the West Bank into Jordan and perhaps Syria as well.

But Gaza has captured the attention of the anti-Zionist movement, thereby functioning as a combination of distraction and decoy, a “Judas goat” of sorts that allows the Israelis to proceed with their primary plans in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, to extend their influence in the industrial democracies, and especially to consolidate their position in and around the US Government, with little or no interference from outside.

Pathology of Failure

It has been said that victory has many fathers but defeat is an orphan. Here, however, there are more than a few reasons for our failure. A key problem with the whole anti-Zionist effort (9/11 more than Palestine in the US, Palestine more than 9/11 elsewhere), is that all of us (myself included) have been like duck hunters standing in a circle blasting birdshot outward and upward in a thousand different directions on a thousand or more issues in so much detail that not one of us can possibly understand it all, while the general public — in America and elsewhere — who knows little or nothing of this is hopelessly confused at best, and totally turned off at worst.

It doesn’t help that a lot of us indulge in rhetorical overkill that makes that general public say, “oh, yeah, the kooks are at it again,” and gives the Zionists firm grounds for ridicule (as I’ve heard on BBC and CNN commentaries, for instance).

Three visible examples of this phenomenon: (1) the attack on the USS Liberty was NOT a “Holocaust,” it was intended to be a massacre that didn’t work out that way; (2) the attack on the Turkish MV Mavi Marmara was NOT a massacre, although it was certainly a brutal attack; and (3) the Israelis are NOT Nazis resurrected in a coat of different colors, “only” traditional fascists with an especially ruthless streak. All this sort of hyperbole does is give our opponents an arsenal of ammunition to mock us (no great problem for us, apparently); AND to so discredit the anti-Zionist movement that reasonable and thinking people won’t bother considering the substantive merits of our arguments, even if they came across them in the first place (and this is a HUGE problem for us).

Second, every effort of consequence needs a strategy, a repertoire of tactics compatible with that strategy, and organizational skills to bring people and resources together when and where they are needed. Now, I am a strategy and plans person with a decent sense of tactics, but not much in the way of organizational skills. For their part, the leadership of the anti-Zionist movement, and especially of the assorted land and sea convoys (whatever name one chooses to use for them), do have organizational skills and a full measure of enthusiasm and perseverance. But beyond that they fail, and fail miserably.

Arrogance, ignorance, incompetence, private agendas and in some instances duplicity war with one another for pride of place, to the detriment of their avowed goals and the welfare of Palestine. Just look at where assertions of “We don’t retreat” and “We know we are right” have taken us all today.

The whole exercise reminds me of a criticism by Lenin in the 1920′s called “Left-Wing Communism: An Infantile Disorder” (that his successors ruined everything does not invalidate his analysis). The “leadership” <sic.> of these “anti-Zionist”outfits would also be dismissed by that of the US antiwar movement of the 1960s in even more disparaging terms. They have tactics that do not fit their opponent, plans but no strategy to fulfill them, believe slogans constitute action, focus on symptoms and not causes, and play to their enemy’s strengths. And they lose. Surprise!

Remember this, and remember it wellSlogans, street theater and stubbornness do not constitute a strategy, nor does squandering resources like political lemmings rushing for the nearest cliff define one. One’s strategy must focus on the enemy’s weaknesses, and the tactics must match both the situation and the character of the adversary, or they are doomed.

Examples abound. What made the first flotilla newsworthy, for instance, and made it a center of UN interest and a source of public concern to Israel, was that some people did resist and that there was overt Israeli violence resulting in some deaths on the high seas. Affirmations of non-violence and avowals of one’s defenselessness mean absolutely nothing to the Israelis, except to make them laugh and assure them of an easy win – had (e.g.) Gandhi tried to do to the Israelis what he did so successfully to the British, he and his followers would have been shot down in droves.

I do not advocate offensive weaponry – civilians are not trained or mentally equipped to use them effectively. But self-defense is an inherent right of everyone anywhere, and the only thing that will matter to Israel is if Israelis die in their attack on a flotilla or a convoy. Internationals who do not understand this elementary fact of political life should either stay away or acknowledge that they are only there for the show.

Doing Better

Looking ahead, it is important to remember certain essentials. Gaza is both victim and symbol. Other Arab states are not your friends. Turkey is the one state that has actually tried to help, and it behooves us not to insult her and her government – we do not have an abundance of allies out there. Neither the EU nor NATO nor the Arab League nor the UN can be counted on to help, although the latter may be of some limited assistance, at least if Israeli and American bribes and blackmail of its membership fail. And Israel is the enemy.

Moreover, the source and the solution to the issue is in the United States, and secondarily other Western capitals. If you must take ships or trucks somewhere, go there, or at least to US embassies, and also to Westminster, which helps the US by legitimizing many of its actions. Protest there. Spend the same time outside of the gates of (e.g.) the White House that it took to assemble a convoy in the UK and go to Egypt, parking vehicles and dumping goods at the gates, calling on Obama to honor his words in Cairo, and people who matter WILL have no choice but to notice, the mainstream US media WILL hatefully and unhappily take note of it, and you may make a difference.

Or take your boats up the Thames or the Seine or the St. Lawrence or the Rhine or the Potomac, have your demonstrations along the waterfront of their cities, and you may likewise make a difference. Otherwise the occasional convoy or ship or busload or truck of people and goods getting to Gaza means less than putting a band-aid on a sucking chest wound, except perhaps to a few egos who like being the center of attention even in a very small media pond.

The Zionists have a much better sense of how to do these things. They know that it is essential to focus on one or two key targets and issues, and pile on those issues from every direction without getting distracted by peripheral matters. To use my hunter analogy above, they are also standing in a circle, but they are facing inward from the high ground and firing rifled slugs downward at a wounded target. And remember as I wrote in the beginning that they are winning, and winning big time – or has no one looked at the change in the remnants of Palestine over the last five years (more settlements, more settlers, miserable Gaza) or the total lack of opposition to Israel now in the US Congress?

We need to adopt their approach to strategy, stop fighting them where they are strongest, and take a more indirect approach – Sun Tzu rather than Clausewitz, if you will. In the US, their strength is at the national level, and in some selected state level offices; their weakness is at most local levels. I doubt if there is a national office of anything, especially if it is based in Washington or New York City, that is not in their pocket, and I include the national offices of veterans organizations as much as the Congress.

I would not be at all surprised if the national officers of (e.g.) the VFW (Veterans of Foreign Wars) or the Navy League are regularly visited and entertained by AIPAC, for instance; but I’d bet the bank that the local VFW chapters here have never even heard of AIPAC. And the same with the rest – for instance, politicians who cozy up to AIPAC (or vice versa) in Washington are in their center of comfort and power, but when they come back to their home states and districts, the local media and the local chapters of their parties do not care about Washington, and that is where they can be cornered and hammered. And similarly in other countries.

Most importantly of all, we need to understand in our minds and believe in our hearts that this is not merely a civil protest against a misguided government or even a political struggle with the Zionists, but a war with Israel. Israel sees it in those terms – this is for them an all-or-nothing struggle, and it should be the same for the rest of us, and not just because of Palestine. The Israelis have won their battle in and for Palestine, but the war is not over, any more than WWII ended with the Nazi conquest of much of Western Europe in 1940. Contemplating that catastrophe, then British Prime Minister Winston Churchill stated that “the Battle of France is over. I expect that the Battle of Britain is about to begin.”

So it is with those of us who truly care, not only about justice for the Palestinians, but also about defeating the extensive and embedded network of Zionism that is producing a new catastrophe. The Battle of Palestine is over. The Battle of America needs to begin. And like WWII, properly done it can lead to victory in this war as well, rolling back Zionism from its high-water marks of success much the way Nazism was rolled back from its high-water marks of conquest.

My take is that we generally spend way too much time looking at Palestine when searching for ways to combat Zionism. The American people would not care greatly about a distant issue like the Palestinians, or an abstraction (however significant) like Zionist domination of the mainstream media, even if they knew the cold, hard facts about those things. They do care about things that hurt them, or make them afraid, or enrage them. Therefore, we in America and elsewhere should hit the Zionists on what they do to us — because if we take them down on that, especially in the US, then Palestine wins by default, BUT the converse does not hold.

The way I see it, the gate to first containing and then rolling back Israel, and thus helping Palestine, is not over there, it is in the US. The lock to that gate is not in Washington, it is in the heartland of America where the Zionists have as of yet remarkably little influence. And the key to that lock is the open wound today which is 9/11 and the wars it spawned. Nail them on 9/11 and the cover-up of it, nail them for the wars they contrived and the wars they want the US to wage on Israel’s behalf, nail them for the lives and treasure America has spent and the lives it has taken waging America’s Jewish Wars, nail them often and hard, and the Zionists may end up wishing Germany had won WWII. How to define 9/11 for the American public and to bring them its message is the subject of the next article: Demystifying 9/11: Israel and the Tactics of Mistake.

Raided Mexican Ranch Linked to U.S. Drug War Corruption

NOVANEWS
Bill Conroy


 

Former CIA Asset Claims U.S. Special Forces Assisted Mexican Soldiers In Assault on Stash Site

(June 19, 2011- Columbus, NM) – The recent raid of a stash site on the Mexican side of the border suspected of containing a cache of guns and/or drugs is drawing attention once again to the U.S. border town of Columbus, N.M. — where 11 people, including the mayor, police chief and a village trustee, were recently indicted on gun-running charges.

The Mexican stash site was raided this past Wednesday evening, June 15, according to former CIA contract pilot and New Mexico resident Tosh Plumlee, who was present at the scene taking photos.

The stash site — actually two warehouse buildings on a ranch just south of the border and some 20 miles east of Palomas, Mexico, which borders Columbus — was allegedly raided by the Mexican military in cooperation with a U.S. military special-operations task force, Plumlee asserts. That Pentagon task force has been activeinside Mexico and along the border region for several years and provided intelligence and other unspecified support for the recent raid, according to Plumlee.

Mexican Helicopter, Photo by Tosh Plumlee

In addition, U.S. Border Patrol agents assisted the operation by providing back-up support along the U.S. side of the border, along with Mexican soldiers on their side of the border, to close down possible escape routes for suspects fleeing the raid site.

As evidence of the operation, Plumlee provided to Narco News date-stamped photos of Mexican soldiers and Border Patrol agents conversing with each other at the border fence shortly after the raid of the ranch location was launched less than a mile behind them inside Mexico. He also provided a photo of a Mexican helicopter that assisted with the raid. See The Narcosphere, Reporter’s Notebook: Bill Conroy for the rest of the story.

Slavery: The NWO Plan For Your Family

NOVANEWS

The Rule of the Rulers Over the Resistance of the Ruled is Reality


Politics never change. Domination is the name of the game. Government is not your friend, nor is it a benefit to your existence


by Sartre Batr


The enslavement of humanity is replete throughout history. The reason is simple. The nature of societies allows corrupt sociopaths and malicious methods of domination to rule. The chronicles of any era clearly documents that liberty is rare. Inherent Autonomy is the intrinsic nature of the human condition. However, in the eternal struggle to achieve individual freedom, governments operate as overseers in invented schemes to herd human beasts into inhuman subjugation. The rule of the rulers over the resistance of the ruled is reality.

Nevertheless, not all people are aware of this conflict. In today’s America, a huge majority actually believes it is sensible that governments have the ability to bestow rights and privileges. Dedicated readers of Breaking All The Rules are familiar with the arguments that challenge the legitimacy of the federal government. However, how many really understand that the political practice of extortion is universal among ruling regimes and based upon a common axiom of plunder.

This maxim accepts that the fallen nature of man is a truth of our nature and that the instinctive motivation for an individual to overcome this condition is the source of innate opposition to repressive governments. Once in awhile a learning tool emerges that explains the big picture succinctly. One such video is from Freedom RadioThe Handbook of Human Ownership – A Manual for New Tax Farmers, is an exceptional overview that deserves your perusal. It is long and detailed, but the reward for investing your attention is huge. Are you willing to give up the time to watch a movie or a sports event to expand the consciousness of your own mind? BATR strongly urges you to make the effort to view this YouTube.

What makes up your political ideology? Are you a product of the views of your family? Has your school education influenced your outlook? What role do religious teachings and beliefs influence? Surely, the media you rely upon must shape your political opinions.

In order to appreciate better all the factors that mold your positions, the context of the Handbook of Human Ownership is essential.

“Hey –

seriously – congratulations on your new political post! If you are reading this, it means that you have ascended to the highest levels of government, so it’s really, really important that you don’t do or say anything stupid, and screw things up for the rest of us. The first thing to remember is that you are a figurehead, about as relevant to the direction of the state as a hood ornament is to the direction of a car — but you are a very important distraction, the “smiling face” of the fist of power. So hold your nose, kiss the babies, and just think how good you would look on a stamp. Now, before we go into your media responsibilities, you must understand the true history of political power, so you don’t accidentally act on the naive idealism you are required to project to the general public. The reality of political power is very simple: bad farmers own crops and livestock — good farmers own human beings…”

Now apply ten subjects in light of your own viewpoints. Ask yourself if the political establishment operates under the precepts that they are your servant and you are the boss. If you are content to be a serf, your response may well object to the substance of this list.

1)        The American Empire of global military bases and perpetual war.

2)        The axis of Wall Street and the private Federal Reserve monopoly.

3)        The globalization of the economy and the fraud of free trade benefits.

4)        The inability of servicing the debt bubble and the collapse of the currency.

5)        The destruction of civil liberties and the expansion of a despotic police state.

6)        The excessive tax burden and the government dependency society.

7)        The global warming hysteria, energy scams and the cap and trade hoax.

8)        The government school system to maintain an uneducated population.

9)        The abandonment of traditional values and moral standards.

10)    The celebrity culture and the bread and circus sports distraction.

Politics never change. Domination is the name of the game. Government is not your friend, nor is it a benefit to your existence. On the contrary, the structure of the state is used as cover for the underlying criminal syndicate that really controls the apparatus that passes as a government. If one forgets that political officeholders are mere tools of the shadow elites who manipulate the fiat money system, you are condemning yourself to the useless debate of Who’s On First. Abbott and Costello may entertain, but fixed elections are no laughing matter.

The delusion of a Republic based upon democratic principles is an illness that afflicts most Americans. The illusion of a country based upon the rule of law is the definition of insanity. What actually exists is a global prison of internationalist’s herders that farm the sheeple. When the usefulness to the elites ceases, the extermination of the animal is processed. The swine are the pigs doing the slaughter. Endless mind control from nauseous venues of unintelligent media serves as a seductive drug to medicate the dullards that refuse to face the plunderer’s reality.

If you decided not to invest the time to view the Handbook of Human Ownership, this next video, The Philosophy of Liberty: Plunder appeals to your entertainment side.

The Strappado Wrack is written to expose the macrocosm of the political agony used by regimes to enslave the human spirit. The subtle techniques now used by the New World Order, seldom need to break bones on the rack of physical torture. A tremendous resource, Mind Control The Ultimate Terror provides links to numerous sources on the sinister practice of creating prisoners in the recesses of their own minds. A perceptive warning follows.

“The topic of mind control is elaborate, multifaceted, and multi layered. For the casual reader, it can quickly become numbing, overwhelming the senses and creating a desire to exit the topic, but avoiding this subject is the most foolish thing you could possibly do since your only chance of surviving this hideous and insidious enslavement agenda, which today threatens virtually all of humanity, is to understand how it functions and take steps to reduce your vulnerability.”

The correct response to the list of ten topics offers a way out of the malaise.

1)    Adopt a true America First foreign policy. Reject internationalist involvements and alliances. Provide for a real defense of our domestic borders and end the empire. Abolish the unlawful treaties and leave the UN. Dismantle the military-security-industrial complex. Eliminate foreign aid and tame the excesses of the intelligence community.

2)    Abolish the Federal Reserve, legal tender laws and outlaw fractional reserve banking. Ban all financial trading instruments that foster gambling at the expense of capital formation. Re-establish Glass-Steagall. End all financial bailouts. Enhance accountability and serious regulation. Demand open disclosure in accounting and reporting.

3)    End free trade and enact tariffs. Re-industrialize domestic manufacturing. Close open borders and curtail immigration. End “personhood” legal protection for corporations.

4)    Issue a new treasury government “specie” currency. Repudiate the fraudulent central bank debt. Legislate a merchant based economy, local banking and low taxes.

5)    Abolish most federal agencies, ban executive directives and repeal most regulations. Return effective sovereignty to the states, enact strict term limits and sunset laws, abolish government pensions, state appointment of U.S Senators, and demand public official accountability and criminal justice for treasonous conduct.

6)    Eliminate the FDR and Great Society collectivism. No direct tax to the central government, individual state legislatures approve funding for federal operations.

7)    Create an independent domestic energy power industry. Enhance real conservation, pollution abatement and break corporate energy monopoly. Reject global energy tax.

8)    Abolish government schools. Eliminate government indoctrination in curriculum. Encourage local community private schools. Eliminate tenure, and public unions.

9)    Restore America as a Christian nation. Abolish court authority to rule on moral issues. Liberate churches from 501 C3 tyranny. Demand moral leadership in all officials.

10) Boycott media depravity and encourage true speech as a means to guarantee free speech. Relegate entertainment to amusement after the serious political work is done.

Human ownership is repugnant. All elites are self-appointed despots. The incessant plot to keep people stupid on virtual reservations and now even restrict their ability to travel, just illustrates that the use of oppressive technology to stamp out – Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free. The docile acceptance of brainwashing compliance is the hallmark of the current Y and Z generations. All too many people are barely functional idiots or worthless zombies.

That is exactly what the autocrats want. As long as the peasants till the farms of the globalists and do not raise their pitchforks against the landlords, they can struggle to ‘Qu’ils mangent de la brioche’, or more popularly known as ‘Let them eat brioche’ (brioche is a form of cake made of flour, butter and eggs). The future of the world is forged in the atrocities of the past. As long as human ownership is tolerated, even more, accepted, as a way of life; the hope of a liberated planet is a mere aspiration.

SARTRE – June 19, 2011

Jon Stewart and Chris Wallace, Much Ado

NOVANEWS

 

This Jockeying for Irrelevance

By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor

The recent interview of comedian Jon Stewart, perhaps America’s most respected news commentator, and Chris Wallace of Fox News, has become more news than the news.  I have to start by saying I am a fan of Stewart and, in the interviews below, he performed well.

Performed.  It was a performance and Stewart isn’t only good, he is intelligent, something Chris Wallace isn’t.  Stewart says that Fox News brought Wallace on for credibility.  Mike Wallace, Chris’ father, was credible.  He was at CBS during the Cronkite years when that meant something.

Chris is a lightweight at best, never more.

Stewart, he is a bird of a different feather.


YouTube – Veterans Today –

The discussions, of bias in the news, both claiming they aren’t “mainstream,” belong on the Comedy Channel for sure.  Fox has always been where America’s reactionary “unwashed,” the uneducated or poorly educated, get their “fix” of race hatred, Islamophobia and rabid Zionism.

Fox is also where Judge Napolitano broke the 9/11 conspiracy wide open along with Geraldo Rivera.

Fox, owned by Israeli ultra-nationalist Rupert Murdoch, has had its hands dirty for a long time, little question about that, at least with anyone sane.  Calling much of their reporting “wild conspiracy theory” is reasonable.  That their theories are labeled “conservative” is misleading.  Fox has generally been little more than a propaganda outlet, a professional “disinformation” service crafted to serve a globalist agenda.  Their purpose has been to run interference for financial criminals and political extremists, totalitarian oligarchs in the US and to provide cover for Israeli war crimes.

They do little else.  This is the heart of Fox News and always has been.


YouTube – Veterans Today –

Stewart, someone I share ethnicity with, as we are both Scots is at times brilliant.  What he also does is ignore the 900 pound gorilla in the room, 9/11.  Fox broke the 9/11 story, put it in the mainstream and has, ever since, tried to put it back.  Stewart could have had a field day with that one.  He chose not to.  Stewart seems to choose “not to do” a lot of things.  This makes Stewart a bigger hypocrite than Wallace.

When Stewart and Wallace talk about “marching orders” at Fox, perhaps Stewart gets “marching orders” too?  Did Wallace fail to mention it because they make come from the same place?  Ever hear Stewart talk about Gaza or Fox New’s continual persecution of the Palestinians?  Are Wallace and Stewart cut from that different a cloth?


YouTube – Veterans Today –

This, and subsequent shows, opened a door.  That Fox had done more to provide cover for the real 9/11 criminals, more to support the attack on Iraq, more to push the Patriot Acts and provide cover for the bankster scams under Bush than any organization other than the United States Department of Justice, is incidental.

A cursory examination easily shows Fox to be little more than an outlet for, not the GOP, but the CIA and Mossad, same as the Wall Street Journal, Guardian, BBC, New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, CBS, Wikileaks and so many others.

Is this an extreme statement?  Perhaps.  Is it true?  Of course.  Can I prove it?  Probably.  Do I need to?  You answer that.  Are you satisfied watching these groups pretend they are covering both sides of a story where, on every really key issue, they either cover nothing or say the exact same thing?

This circus is for folks who buy in on “left” and “right” controversy and don’t understand that global organized crime is the “super-government” and has been all along.

Stewart is an enigma.  He gets the crime part, we know that, but ignores and covers for much also.

This is what scared me.  Stewart is a smart guy.  I saw this.  He could have eaten Chris Wallace alive at any time.  Wallace is deeply flawed, anti-charismatic and hokey.  He is there, at Fox, to play for the “angry white guy” group, guys who played jump rope on the playground and spent too much time wearing an apron and baking cookies with mom.

Women don’t like men who like Fox.  It’s time we got that one out, no big secret to women, and it isn’t their ideas.

This is what it is all supposed to be about, “chatting up the babes” and bullying on the playground.

American culture has gotten no further and those addicted to news, be it “left” or “right” are obviously looking for a “fix” of some kind, something to replace something lacking in their “real world” selves.  As with the internet, watching TV news provides an alternative reality, an imaginary world where a rich life filled with delusion and paranoid fantasies can replace the nasty real world of crooked bankers and lawyers, of cowards and buffoons who make up the real political leaders of the world.

In real life, heroes might well be the Taliban.  Osama bin Laden might well be a George Washington.  (both have been dead for a very long time)

In real life, America is probably “the bad guys.”

We were in Vietnam, we are again.

In real life, buildings down dissolve and hundreds of firefighters don’t die of radiation sickness from drywall dust.  Oh, you haven’t heard that?

Were we to have too much “real life,” rigging elections might be impossible and what goes on in Washington and New York might be brought to a crashing halt.  Real people, living a real life, might just act, not just sit on the couch and whine.

On the couch, Muslims and Mexicans and “evil Negroes” seem a daunting enemy.  For so many, perhaps it is best, safest, to stay on the couch.

Adrenaline and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

NOVANEWS

 

by Ed Mattson

Group counseling to adjust to civilian society

Last night on CBS’ 60 Minutes one of the segments was devoted to Adrenaline. This was a repeat of a previous show and the second time I watched it. The program showed how laboratory rats, when placed in a tub of water kept swimming close to the edge of the tub. There was a safety platform in the center of the tub where there would be no fear of drowning, yet the rats didn’t immediately swim to the safety of the platform. Once shown the platform, they willingly sought the middle of the tub on their next encounter with the water.

The learning experience became re-enforced because of the high level of adrenaline that the rat produced showing that adrenaline is a key to long-term memory of life-threatening or shocking experiences. From this brief experiment one can say that adrenaline may be the most powerful mind altering drug known to man and when frightened this chemical reaction runs its super powerful course in pursuing “survival reaction”. The worst effect of adrenaline may be that one’s brain may become addicted to that same rush of adrenaline creating a dependency effect. In this manner it is easy to see how post traumatic stress disorder, with its flashbacks, hyper tension, and sometimes feeling of invincibility can take complete control over the body. As stress builds the body unconsciously and automatically produces more adrenaline which each subsequent experience.

Many of those in the military who have experienced combat can relate to the feeling of adrenaline production that fear can produce, and understand the feeling of an almost euphoric state as the body goes into survival mode. The high level of intensity created by traumatic events may then become a “need” that almost has to be fed. I can now understand how, back in the Vietnam era, we saw many of our fellow warriors volunteer for multiple tours of duty in the combat zone. They became addicted to the action. While adrenaline may be the one element that instills survival, it can also destroy the lives of those warriors when they have to return to the mundane world of civilian life.

As more and more is learned about PTSD, we are developing ways to best treat it. I believe the jury is still out when it comes to actually “completely cure” a patient with post traumatic stress disorder, so the goal seems to be to provide continued support and guidance so the individual can become a functioning member of society.

Psychotherapy has as its purpose to help the individual handle and deal with the overwhelming stimuli generated by the traumatic event. One very effective method is counseling that helps a patient re-live the event(s) causing the adrenaline stimulation, in a non-threatening environment. To treat a patient with PTSD, the place to start is to understand the source of the demons. This therapy part of the treatment may be required for a period lasting from six months to several years, depending on severity.

Another aspect to the counseling is educating the patient what he or she is likely to expect in the days, weeks and months ahead, so that those adrenaline related reactions can be anticipated and not further traumatize the victim. This part of the therapy can be accomplished in either individual or group debriefing session which should be lead by a therapist who is experienced both in conducting PTSD debriefings and in treating people with the condition.

As most PTSD victims experience sleep disorders caused by excessive anxiety, restlessness, anger and other symptoms that defy relaxation, the use of anti-anxiety medication like alprazolam or lorazapram, which are in a class of medications called benzodiazepines. They work by slowing activity in the brain to allow for relaxation. Sleep disorders can be managed with the short term use sleeping pills such as flurazepam or tamazepam. All these medications have the potential for abuse and addiction, so they must be used with caution.

A patient with PTSD can and most often will display significant depression when his or her mind re-lives the traumatic event(s). This is especially true if the patient feels responsibility for the event, or that there is a feeling of guilt that accompanies the feeling, such as, “why did I survive and others didn’t”. These can be very dangerous times for the patient and may lead to suicide or other self-destructive behavior, indicating more intensive treatment may be required. However, the mood altering drugs listed below also carry warnings that they may intensify the suicidal urge, so they need to be prescribed only with close supervision by the attending physician. Prozac, Zoloft, Wellbutrin, or Paxil may be very helpful in rapidly relieving depressive symptoms, reducing anxiety and restoring normal sleep. They are in a class of drugs known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and while anti-depressant medications are all non-addictive, they should only be used with close supervision.

Oct. 6th: Will Tahrir Square Come to Washington?

NOVANEWS

The Revolution Will Not Be Deactualized

Why can’t we have a Tahrir Square?

Lord knows we need one.


By Ted Rall


I used to work for Democratic candidates. I was a campus activist. I marched in protests.

But, in the 1980s, I quit politics. I was fed up. The Left was impotent and inept. They didn’t want to change things. They were content with theater. Bad theater at that: dorks on stilts, boring speakers, stupid slogans, the same old chants. “The people, united, will never be defeated!”

Except—we were defeated. We didn’t even fight.

Our protests were poorly attended. The media ignored us. And we always lost. Even the Democrats didn’t care about us or our opinions. By the time Bill Clinton won in 1992, the progressive wing of the party was good for one thing: voting Democratic.

Along with millions of others, I drifted away.

Now, finally, for the first time in decades, I am excited.

We can change everything. Here. In America. Now.

People are rising up in Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan and Syria. Patriotic Afghans, Iraqis and Yemenis are fighting puppet dictators propped by U.S. military occupation. They demand an end to violent, corrupt governments that serve themselves but not their citizens. People in the Middle East and European countries such as Greece refuse to accept systemic poverty and unemployment so that a tiny slice of corrupt, well-connected elites can continue to amass wealth.

Why just in other countries? Why not here?

Why can’t we have a Tahrir Square?

Lord knows we need one.

Here in the United States, corrupt politicians and their corporate overlords have raped the wealthiest nation in the history of civilization, reducing one out of five Americans to unemployment as the income of the rich skyrockets. They tell us our schoolchildren must do with less, that we cannot afford to see doctors when we are ill; meanwhile they start prolonged, seemingly endless wars of aggression against nations that posed no threat whatsoever: Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and now Yemen.

Did you know that Egypt and Tunisia had lower unemployment and disparity of income than the United States?

Organizers are calling a demonstration planned for October 6, 2011 in Washington’s Freedom Square “the biggest story on the progressive sphere of the Internet tomorrow.” October 6th marks the tenth anniversary of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan.

This, they say, will not be the usual sad protest demonstration in which people show up, chant slogans, march around, then pack up their signs and go home.

[Full disclosure: I have endorsed October 6th and will attend.]

The idea behind October 6th is simple: to recreate Tahrir Square two blocks away from the White House.

“We are not packing up and leaving this time,” says Tarak Kauff, one of the October 6th organizers. “We are preparing to stay as long as we possibly can or until some basic demands are met. If we are driven out, we will return.”

In other words, clear your calendar for the 6th, the 7th, the 8th…however long it takes for the Obama Administration to yield to key demands, including immediate withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan and the other wars. Participants are being asked to sign a pledge to attend at october2011.org.

“Previous demonstrations were one-day events which were simple for the Administration and Congress to ignore,” Margaret Flowers, another organizer, told me. “The large demonstrations usually happened on weekends when there was little going on in Washington. “This is different because it is an occupation that begins on a Thursday, a day of business, and will continue.”

They will keep the heat on. “We intend to stay and to have waves of nonviolent civil resistance. The time for symbolic actions has ended. Too many people are suffering and dying here and around the world because of the policies of this nation. The planet is suffering because of the policies of this nation. This government has demonstrated that it is incapable of acting in the best interests of the people and planet. We say that this is unacceptable and we will stay and resist until this changes,” Flowers said.

All the participating groups have pledged to remain nonviolent. However, it is not hard to imagine the Washington police or other state security apparatus reacting brutally to the occupation of part of downtown Washington by tens or even hundreds of thousands of people. Hoover crushed the Bonus Army. Antiwar demonstrators at the 1968 Democratic National Convention were beaten. Chinese authorities refused to tolerate the occupation of Tiananmen Square. We have seen dissent crushed in Iran, Bahrain and Syria.

A real demand for real change? The system will view that as a threat.

Flowers: “If the police respond violently, we will do our best to maintain a nonviolent response. If we responded with violence, it would reinforce the police violence and they have weapons, so more people would be hurt. We do not want that. It will be very unfortunate if the police and others working for the security state choose violence. But that is a possibility as we are seeing in this country and around the world. Empires have a history of violence. We want a different kind of society—one that is peaceful, just and sustainable. That is the kind of society we intend to model during our occupation.”

Unlike previous demonstrations, which tended to center around one issue like globalization or gay rights, October 6th is an attempt to unify the American Left into a holistic attack upon the main cause of most of the problems we face: the hegemony of big business that is the inevitable culmination of late-stage capitalism.

Tarak Kauff: “October 6 is…a call for people to stand up to, and resist the root cause not only of our global war-making for profit, but of near catastrophic ecological disaster, pollution, an austerity budget cuts that will devastate the poor and working class, lack of adequate health care and just about every social ill you can think of. What’s the root cause? You got it before I can say it. That’s right, the corporate state.”

October 6th has lit up the leftie blogosphere. If things come together, it could be The Big One: the major event that marks the beginning of the end of the two-party trap and a political system that extracts wealth from the poor and middle-class for the benefit of the wealthy.

Organizer Kevin Zeese adds: “I expect that we will be staying, and not just for the 7th and 8th. We will be working through various scenarios on what will happen depending on how the government responds. In similar events around the world there have been a range of actions and protesters have had to adjust depending on them. Our intent is to stay until we are satisfied with the response.”

“History is not a fairy tale you read to your children at night,” reads the mission statement. “It is not something someone else did in another place. History is right here and right now, in front of you.”


Regime Change at the Largest VA in the Nation

NOVANEWS

An Open Letter to Secretary Shinseki

General Eric K. Shinseki (US Army, Retired)
Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs
Washington, D.C.

Dear Mr. Secretary:

For two-and-a-half years, fellow Veterans in Los Angeles and around the country have repeatedly written you and respectfully requested that you make major changes at the Los Angeles National Veterans Home.

You have completely ignored us and matters continue to get worse on your “watch.”

Lest you’ve forgotten, President Obama was elected on a campaign pledge of “change.” It was presumed that he meant for the betterment and not the worst.

We have consistently and respectfully requested that you make a regime change at the largest VA in the nation and terminate the following government employees under your supervision:

  • Donna Beiter, executive director

  • Ralph Tillman, director of asset management and public affairs

  • Ronald Mathis, chief of police

  • William Daniels, chief of mental health and homeless Veterans

  • Jenelle Happy, director of the VA’s Freedom of Information Act

Accordingly, we have respectfully requested that you bring in a retired Military Officer who had a successful career in running large Military Posts or Bases to be the executive director of the Los Angeles National Veterans Home. He or she shall appoint their own competent staff to professionally manage this sacred land and restore respect of our Military Veterans.

Last year you came to Los Angeles but refused to meet with us, or any Veterans that were not affiliated with Sue Young’s bogus Veterans Park Conservancy homeowner group.

We also respectfully requested that the public park agreement the VA has with this wealthy and politically powerful homeowner group be terminated in its entirety.

You completely ignored us and refused to cooperate, and you continue to ignore us and refuse to cooperate.

While you were here, you met with Donna Beiter and her incompetent staff. We forewarned you over and over that this was a corrupt regime that did not have the best interests of Veterans in mind. But you listened to them instead of us.

What kind of General would listen to the enemy instead of his own soldiers?

Sir, you’re a West Point graduate and had the envied privilege to personally listen to General MacArthur’s famed “Duty, Honor, Country” speech in 1962.

Every time I read his speech, I am deeply moved. Thus, I cannot imagine what it must have been like for those present to have listened firsthand from the lips of this legendary warrior and recipient of the Congressional Medal of Honor.

Accordingly, it seems that there would be an enormous sense of pride and responsibility to make sure that the message of “those three hallowed words” remained revered and upheld to the fullest.

In brief, our nation’s safety and defense of the U.S. Constitution rests upon the uncompromising execution of “Duty, Honor, Country” by the men and women of our United States Armed Forces.

Nonetheless, the VA bureaucrats and wealthy homeowners conspired and plagiarized the noble creed of “Duty, Honor, Country,” then desecrated “those three hallowed words” by engraving “Beauty, Honor, Country” in stone on Veterans sacred property, because it was the mission of Sue Young’s cabal to “beautify the entryway into Brentwood” and to take over Veterans property for a public park.

How incredibly insensitive and insulting to the men and women who courageously uphold this revered creed, regardless of the branch of Military they serve under. Shameful and criminal!

Sir, did you know there are 20,000 homeless and hungry Veterans in Los Angeles because they have been exiled from their rightful Home while Sue Young builds a rose garden for afternoon high teas?

Apparently not, because some were sleeping outside the front gates and entryway to the VA when you were here, until the VA bureaucrats ordered them away so that you would not see them. Had you met with us, we would have introduced you to them and perhaps you would have been moved by compassion to get them inside where they belong.

But by your refusing to cancel Sue Young’s rent-free agreement for a public park, you join Senator Dianne Feinstein, Congressman Henry Waxman, and others, as supporters of this egregious breach of public trust that has forced thousands of disabled and disadvantaged Veterans to live on the dangerous streets of Los Angeles … alone and hungry.

Let’s cut to the chase Mr. Secretary: You are all supposed to be public servants of We the People and not private slaves to Sue Young and her wealthy homeowner group.

None of the aforementioned so-called VA civil servants have served our Military Veterans as required, but have irreverently served Sue Young and violated their fiduciary duty to the Congressional Act of 1887 and the Deed of 1888.

And you sir, have aided and abetted in this horrific land heist by kowtowing to them and remaining silent.

During your “watch,” three more large parcels of Veterans property have been given away to special-interest, non-profit, organizations while the homeless Veteran population in Los Angeles continues to increase.

And one of those parcels was “MacArthur Field,” named in honor of General Douglas MacArthur, the same General who delivered the message of reverence to “Duty, Honor, Country.”

The foregoing notwithstanding, when elderly members of the Old Veterans Guard protested the mismanagement, malfeasance and misappropriation of Veterans land at the Los Angeles National Veterans Home, the VA bureaucrats ordered armed VA police to intervene and issued six trumped-up citations that included “unauthorized demonstration or service in a national cemetery or on other VA property.”

The Old Veterans Guard holds their peaceful demonstration “outside” the VA property.

Moreover, these Veterans in their 60′s, 70′s and 80′s were incredulously ordered to remove a “We Support Our Troops” banner while America was engaged in two brutal wars with thug terrorists.

They were also ordered to remove a “Vietnam War – Our Cause Was Just” banner, while over half of America’s homeless Veterans are of the Vietnam War era.

The VA bureaucrats also ordered armed federal police to forcefully remove the American Flag when it was hanging Union down … a symbol of distress that life and property are in extreme danger … and in full compliance with the U.S. Flag Code … even though the VA police had already approved Veterans to hang this same American Flag with the Union up for nearly a year and-a-half without incident.

Mr. Secretary, your employees didn’t just forcefully remove the American Flag. No, they forcefully removed our freedom of speech when they removed our distress message officially signaling that the lives of our fellow Veterans and our legal property are in extreme danger.

When the VA bureaucrats forcefully removed the American Flag from our peaceful demonstration, they also removed the U.S. Constitution from our Citizenship.

That’s an unforgivable crime against the very men and women who pledge their lives to defend the U.S. Constitution.

Criminals Are Running the Largest VA in the Nation

Responding to a federal lawsuit filed by the ACLU of Southern California, U.S. District Judge S. James Otero has ruled that VA Defendants Donna Beiter and Ronald Mathis violated the free speech rights of a Veteran who protested the VA’s failure to use part of its property for the benefit and care of Veterans, particularly those who are homeless.

Judge Otero ruled that Plaintiff Robert Rosebrock’s “First Amendment right was violated as a matter of law when Defendants committed impermissible viewpoint discrimination. Therefore, Defendants’ selective enforcement was an effort to suppress the Plaintiff’s activity due to disagreement with his view.”

”The VA has shown a basic misunderstanding of the meaning of the First Amendment of the Constitution, the very document that Mr. Rosebrock and other veterans have served in the military to protect” said Peter Eliasberg, managing attorney and Manheim Family Attorney for First Amendment Rights at the ACLU/SC.

“The VA has turned the U.S. Constitution upside down,” Eliasberg further declared.

In summary, top-level federal VA employees under your supervision engaged in deliberate censorship that seriously violated a citizen’s Constitutional Right to legally protest and exercise his Right to “Freedom of Speech.”

Mr. Secretary, two of your top-level employees at the largest VA in the nation have been adjudicated in U.S. Court of committing a federal crime!

While in the process of committing this serious federal crime, your employees were attempting to cover up the very crimes, malfeasance and corruption that Veterans were protesting against.

A Full FBI Investigation is Needed

The United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) firmly declares: “It’s a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law” willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law. “Color of law” simply means that the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency.”

The FBI is the lead federal agency for investigating color of law abuses, which include acts carried out by government officials operating both within and beyond the limits of their lawful authority.

Accordingly, the FBI needs to fully investigate the criminal activities of the aforementioned Defendants, as well as into the mismanagement of the VA Greater West Los Angeles Healthcare System, including actions and dealings of manipulative and coercive neighborhood leaders and the politicians who have aided and abetted in the misappropriation of Veterans sacred land that has forced thousands of disabled and disadvantaged Veterans to be exiled from their rightful Home and thereby become homeless.

These are very serious crimes and they must be thoroughly investigated by the FBI, and the culprits need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the Law.

Department of Justice Needs to Investigate Its Own

It’s important to note that the VA bureaucrats that criminally violated a Veteran’s right to free speech are federal employees and were therefore defended by the Department of Justice’s U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles.

Thus, federal employees paid with our tax dollars committed a crime against a Citizen of the United States and they were defended with our tax dollars.

In a featured article in the “Los Angeles Times” on June 12, 2010, headlined “U.S. Attorney to Target Corruption,” it declared: “U.S. Attorney Andrew Birotte, Jr., announced that he was creating a specialized unit to prosecute public corruption, such as those involving politicians or police officers accused of crimes. It’s mission will be “to bring to justice those public officials and public employees who violate the public trust.”

Well, Mr. Birotte’s clients violated the public trust and committed a serious crime under the color of law as federal employees.

Mr. Birotte needs to “walk his talk” and fully prosecute Defendants and VA employees Donna Beiter and Ronald Mathis.

Let the Congressional Investigation Begin

The greatest land fraud in American history has taken place in U.S. Congressman Henry Waxman’s 30th District, of which he has been the elected public servant for 36 years.

Along with being one of the most powerful members of Congress, he’s also the entrusted steward to safeguard the largest National Veterans Home in the nation. Instead, he has allowed disabled and disadvantaged Veterans to be exiled and dispossessed from their legally deeded Home, while accommodating his wealthy constituents with sweetheart land deals and turning Los Angeles County into the homeless Veteran capital of the nation.

Under Congressman Waxman’s failed stewardship, the lives of 20,000 homeless Veterans and their sacred property have been, and remain in extreme danger.

On behalf of America’s 24 million Military Veterans, including the 1.5 million men and women who are presently on Active Duty, it is imperative that the U.S. Congress begin immediate investigations of Congressman Waxman and the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System regarding the flagrant abuse and misappropriation of Veterans property.

Regime Change at the Largest VA in the Nation

The Old Veterans Guard has consistently called for the immediate resignation of the aforementioned VA bureaucrats who have facilitated the downfall and desecration of these sacred grounds, or for their immediate termination by you, their government boss.

The Old Veterans Guard has also called for the voluntary surrender of all leases and agreements by those who entered into these invalid contracts with the VA that violate the Congressional Act of 1887 and the Land Grant Deed of 1888. Otherwise, immediately evict each and every entity that has any kind of agreement to misuse Veterans property.

Over the past, the U.S. Government and local politicians have all failed miserably in their entrusted responsibility and fiduciary duty to protect and preserve this sacred land for Veterans use only, even though you have been warned repeatedly.

West Los Angeles VA executive director Donna Beiter and her chief of police Ronald Mathis were defendants in a Federal lawsuit filed by the ACLU of Southern California, and on May 26, 2011, U.S. Federal Judge S. James Ortero entered a Judgment against both for violating the Constitutional Rights of an individual, which is a federal crime.

This was nearly a month ago, yet you still have two federal criminals drawing full salary and benefits from U.S. taxpayers, while 20,000 of our fellow Veterans remain homeless and hungry here in Los Angeles. This is reprehensible!

In summary, you need to immediately terminate Ms. Bieter and Chief Mathis, et al, or immediately tender your own resignation for the greater good of America’s Military Veterans.

Sincerely,

Robert L. Rosebrock
Director, Old Veterans Guard
Director, Veterans Revolution
www.VeteransRevolution.com