NOVANEWS
لا يحتاج الفرد أن يكون عبقريا ليدرك أن خالد عمايرة، الفلسطيني المسلم السني “التقي الورع” يعمل علانية لتحقيق أجندات إسرائيلية أمريكية واضحة وذلك من خلال مهاجمته إيران الداعمة للمقاومة الفلسطينية واللبنانية، إيران التي تقف ضد المشاريع العدائية لكل العرب والمسلمين. عمايرة يكتب لإرضاء أسياده في قطر، ويعتبر إيران وحزب الله – لا إسرائيل – عدوتا العرب. عمايرة يناصر الإخوان المسلمين الذين سرقوا الثورة المصرية، وأصبحوا علانية أكثر عمالة للصهاينة والإمبرياليين من نظام مبارك.
الحرة لا تأكل من ثدييها، والصحافي الحر لا “يعمل عاهرا” من خلال قلمه. إقرأ التوصيات الصهيونية، وقارن ذلك بما كتب عمايرة أدناه ستعرف حقيقة العملاء الخونة الذين يبيعون ضمائرهم وأمتهم وأوطانهم من أجل حفنة من الدولارات النفطية
علي بغدادي
عرب جورنال – شيكاغو
التوصيات النهائية لمؤتمر هرتسليا: على إسرائيل تأجيج الصراع السني الشيعي في الوطن العربي
الناصرة ـ ‘القدس العربي’ من زهير أندراوس: يُعتبر مؤتمر هرتسليا، الذي يُعقد سنويا في المركز المتعدد المجالات في المدينة، الواقعة إلى الشمال من تل أبيب، أحد أهم المنابر في رسم وتوجيه السياسات المستقبلية للدولة العبرية، إذ يُشارك في أعماله أقطاب تل أبيب من المستويين السياسي والأمني، بالإضافة إلى الخبراء الإسرائيليين والمتخصصين في الصراع بالشرق الأوسط من جميع أصقاع العالم، وقد أصدر المؤتمر تقريرا يشمل خلاصة ما توصل إليه خلال المناقشات الطويلة، التي ترسم الخطوط العريضة للحكومة الإسرائيلية.
والملاحظ في التقرير عينه أن المسؤولين عن المؤتمر لم يخفوا توصيتهم بضرورة تكريس ما أسموه بالصراع السني – الشيعي من خلال السعي الى تشكيل محور سني من دول المنطقة أساسه دول الخليج ومصر وتركيا والأردن، ليكون حليفا لدولة الاحتلال والولايات المتحدة، ضد من أطلقوا عليه محور الشر، الذي تقوده إيران، ويضم سورية وحزب الله، والذي سيكون بحسب التقسيم الإسرائيلي، محوراً للشيعة.
وتطرق التقرير إلى مصر، زاعما أنها باتت على حافة الإفلاس الاقتصادي، لافتا إلى أن نهاية الأزمة الاقتصادية الكبيرة التي تشهدها مصر غير واضحة، خاصة بعد أنْ فقدت مصر معظم مصادر دخلها، مشددا على أن تأجيل الاتفاق على القرض الدولي، بسبب عدم قدرة مصر على الامتثال لشروط القرض القاسية، يضع مصر على حافة الإفلاس أمام احتياجاتها المتزايدة مقابل الاستهلاك المتزايد بسبب زيادة المواليد، وتوقع التقرير النهائي للمؤتمر أنْ تجد مصر نفسها على حافة المجاعة، إذا استمرت الأوضاع كذلك، كما أن استمرار الأزمة الاقتصادية سيُبعد أكثر احتمالات الوصول لاستقرار اقتصادي واجتماعي. وفي الشأن السوري، خلص التقرير إلى القول إن سورية هي المحور الاستراتيجي الأهم في هذه الأيام، مشيرا إلى أن الحرب الأهلية المتصاعدة فيها تفرض تحديا أمنيا، وسياسيا وإنسانيا لمواطنيها، ولكل جيرانها بمن فيهم إسرائيل، مؤكدا أن تفكك وانهيار بلاد الشام، البادي للعيان، والانقسام الطائفي والجغرافي الواضحين فيها، سيؤثر على الأمن الإقليمي لكل من لبنان والعراق، إنْ لم يكن أكثر من ذلك. علاوة على ذلك، أشار التقرير التلخيصي إلى أنه فيما تتزايد احتمالات تقسيم سورية وتتحول هذه الاحتمالات إلى حقيقة، فإن الدول العظمى الغربية وشركاءها الإقليميين، خاصة تركيا والأردن وإسرائيل، ينسقون فيما بينهم لمنع فقدان السيطرة على الأسلحة العسكرية السورية المتطورة، ومن الوارد جدا، أنْ تلزم ظروف معينة، تحدث على أرض الواقع، القيام بخطوات عسكرية دولية في سورية، كما جاء في التقرير. وانتقد المؤتمر، كما أكد التقرير، سياسة الاختفاء من أمام العاصفة، التي انتهجتها الدولة العبرية منذ بداية الاضطرابات في المنطقة قبل عامين، مؤكدا أن استمرار السلبية الإسرائيلية من شأنه أن يُعرض مستقبل إسرائيل للخطر في شرق أوسط يتشكل، وأن الدولة العبرية قادرة على إحداث تغيير، ويجب أنْ يكون هذا الأمر المهمة الأولى للحكومة الإسرائيلية الجديدة بقيادة
The former correspondent of Al-Jazirah who considers himself an Islamist, Khalid Amayreh, and was sacked from it, is attacking the Arab left, specified by Amayrah as the “Marxist-Leninists and the pan-Arab nationalists”. Pan-Arab nationalistsare the straightest forward Arab ideological parties andthe enemies of western colonialist powers and Zionism headed by the United States of America that leads Arab Gulf autocratic and reactionary states especially the “Great state of Qatar” owners of Al-Jazirah and the foul mouth of western colonialism.
Amayrah says: “The Arab left, with its two wings — Marxist-Leninist and the pan-Arab nationalist — seems to have found an unorthodox ally in Tehran, especially since the onset of the Arab Spring”… For the information of Amayrah: “An orthodox is the one adhering to what is commonly accepted, customary, or traditional: an orthodox view of world affairs”, Concerning Arabs who are the enemies of Zionism and colonialism are proud to find in Iran the Zionist enemy’s greatest enemy, which it fears most, and on the other hand they
want to stop their animosity with as per the orders of their great leader the United States to Zionism.
Arab nationalists are western colonialism and Zionist’s greatest enemy.
Amayrah added: “Indeed, a casual viewer of Hezbollah’s Al-Manar television, or the Iranian-funded Al-Mayadin TV, these days would probably think that the two Shea propaganda organs were becoming neo-Nasserite or even fully-fledged Marxist-Leninist, Pravda-style.” Is that is why the Zionist enemy considers Iran and Hezbollah as its greatest enemy and never stops its wars on them and ally itself with Arab reactionaries.
Arab Nationalist and Arab leftists and not at all sectarian, they are secularists and believers.
Those anti Arab Nationalism are inviting western colonialism to invade and occupy Syria and other nationalist groups and entities.
Those who differentiate between Moslem Sunnis and Shiias are not Moslems
Arab Nationalism is the protector of all Arabs irrespective of their religion whether Moslems or Christians of any sect they belong to, they are all
Arabs and cooperate in defending and supporting their Arab nation and fight their Zionist enemy and its colonialist supporters and allies whatever their nationality or faith is:
by:Khalid amayrea
The Arab left, with its two wings — Marxist-L
eninist and the pann-Arab nationalist — seems to have found an unorthodox ally in Tehran, especially since the onset of the Arab Spring
Khalid Amayreh , Saturday 13 Apr 2013
Source: Ahram-on-line
http://english.ahram.org.eg/
The convenient marriage between Iran and the Arab left would have been unthinkable only a few years ago, given the traditional ideological paradoxes between patriarchal Persian Shiism, on the one hand, and leftist orthodoxy on the other.
Indeed, a casual viewer of Hezbollah’s Al-Manar television, or the Iranian-funded Al-Mayadin TV, these days would probably think that the two Shia propaganda organs were becoming neo-Nasserite or even fully-fledged Marxist-Leninist, Pravda-style.
Nothing reveals this amicable but doomed alliance between the Mullahs of Tehran and the orphans of secular anti-Islam Arab nationalism more than the choice of guests hosted by these two outlets.
In fact, every conceivable enemy of Sunni Islam, especially that of the Muslim Brotherhood, has been given ample time on these TV stations to spout their venom and vent their frustration against Sunni Islamists whether in Syria, Egypt or even Turkey. !!!
Even Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic liberation movement, which ought to enjoy unanimous Arab and Islamic backing, given its impeccable record of resistance and steadfastness in the face of Israel, is shamelessly being castigated as part of “the Ikhwan (Brotherhood) of America.” Some Shias and Arab leftists have gone so far as accusing Hamas of having become a “Zionist movement.”
This, of course, is childish nonsense that doesn’t deserve the dignity of a reply.
Behind the alliance
There are certain reasons behind the present undeclared alliance between the worshipers of Ali Ibn Abu-Taleb and modern Arab Pagans, whether nationalist or Marxist-Leninist (secular Arab nationalists consider Islam as irrelevant and outdated).
For Iranian Shia clerics, any authentic political Sunni model is more than undesirable and unwanted. It actually constitutes a mortal threat to Iran’s ultimate strategy of spreading Shiism in the Arab world.
It is well known that the raison d’etre of Shiism, especially the Jaafari Ithnashari (the Twelvers) is to destroy or at least undermine Sunni Islam. Iran does, of course, deny any bad intentions to that effect, but actions speak louderthan words.
In Egypt, Iranian money is flowing unimpeded to fill the coffers of the Egyptian opposition, especially the Nasserist group headed by Hamdeen Sabbahi.
The Iranian goal is to weaken and topple the so-called “rule of the Ikhwan” in order to make it easier for the clerics of Qom and Najaf to spread Shia polytheism in the largest Arab country of 90 million.
In context, it is not really unthinkable to presume an Iranian role in triggering religious sectarianism between Muslims and Copts in Egypt, since this would create more trouble for Egyptian Islamists.
In Tunisia, Iranian money is channeled to secular and socialist parties and groups for the purpose of unseating and undermining the quasi-Islamist movement, An-Nahdha.
And in Bahrain, Iran-funded Shias seem hell-bent on turning the country into a Shia fiefdom, which would be used as a foothold for invading Saudi Arabia and taking over the Makki Haram, in order to transform the paramount Muslim sanctuary into a pagan temple where 12 mini gods called imams are worshipped instead of God Almighty.
But the main battlefield as far as Iran is concerned remains Syria. There, the traditional Iranian designs would convert Syria into a Safavi state orbiting Tehran or Qom in 30 or 40 years. However, the Syrian revolution seemed to have reversed or even turned these Iranian dreams upside down.
Now, the Iranian goals seem to have become more modest and realistic. Iran now wants to keep the arch-murderer of Damascus in power a few more years in order to enable the esoteric Alawite sect and other smaller Shia sects (the Jaafari, Ismaeli and Druze) a better bargaining position in order to ensure better power-sharing arrangements in the post-Assad Syria
The demise of the Alawite dynasty in Syria will (I won’t say would, because this demise seems to be a foregone conclusion) introduce a new strategic reality in the Middle East.
True, Syria will be busy for years rebuilding what has been destroyed (and what is yet to be destroyed) by the Assad machine of death and destruction. Nonetheless, the disappearance of the Alawite tyranny will ultimately shake Tehran to the ground and may very well make Iran adopt a new national policy based on isolation and introversion.
The naive Arab left
Arab nationalists (not all of them) and Arab leftists are too secular to understand Iranian designs and long-term ambitions in the Arab world. They are simply carried away by Iranian rhetoric about fighting Israel and America when in fact the true and central Iranian goal is to prepare the ground for spreading Shiism in the Arab world at the expense of Orthodox Islam.
Unfortunately, the fact that most Arab nationalists are quite disinterested in religion, especially Islam, and wouldn’t care whether Iranian clerics curse and vilify the symbols of Islam, such as Abu Bakr, Omar, and Aisha, the mother of the Believers, even in their presence (which really renders their Arab nationalist credentials quite dubious to say the least), allows the Iranians to pursue their venomous sectarianism unhindered, given the shocking apathy and gullibility of their Arab allies.
Indeed, with their startling naivety, Arab nationalists and leftists would be the first to be targeted and liquidated by the Shias should the latter succeed in having their way. We all remember how the late Ayatollah Khomeini dealt with the Todeh Party, the Mujahideen Khalq, Abu Al-Hasan Bani Sadr and Sadeqqutub Zadeh, just to name a few of Khomeini’s opponents.
Does any person with an iota of brainpower think the Iranian Shia establishment would be more merciful with its Arab foes than with its Persian foes?
Such would be the punishment of traitors who have chosen to betray their religion and their Umma in order to seize a moment of cheap opportunism that won’t last long.
Khalid Amayreh
Occupied Palestine
