Month: May 2010

NOVANEWS The Freedom Flotilla has embarked to Gaza. Among both internationals and Palestinians, we constantly are asked and discuss: Will the boats get in? For some odd reason they often think we have more insight […]

NOVANEWS Rose: Nakba was natural outcome of foundational messianic ideology of Jewish stateby Philip Weiss May 20, 2010 I’m thinking about the Nakba a lot today. The Nakba is the core event of Palestinian history, […]

NOVANEWS Martin Indyk’s references to Nakba represent denial of atrocitiesby Philip Weiss   May 20, 2010 Martin Indyk is a powerful man in the Israel lobby. He worked for Bill Clinton and George Bush and now […]

NOVANEWS Liberal Zionism debates what Judaism should be in the 21st century Published on 21 May 2010 in Israel. Tags: Australia, Britain, Gaza, Hamas, Hizbollah, Iran, Judaism, New Zealand, Palestine, settlements, United States, West Bank, […]

NOVANEWS May 08, 2010 Ralph Miliband on the British electoral system by lenin   An under-read component of Miliband’s oeuvre is his 1982 book Capitalist Democracy in Britain. It is a fusion of his previous […]

NOVANEWS May 09, 2010 There are no good options by lenin   The problem with the hung parliament is that any government arising from it will impose vicious public spending cuts. The Tories will just […]

NOVANEWS * May 10, 2010 Labourism and the working class by lenin   There’s an interesting post over at Socialist Unity. Did you just spew your tea over the computer screen after reading that? I […]

NOVANEWS  The Meaning of David Cameron  by lenin Hard copy: Labels: ‘progress’, class, democracy, meritocracy, neoliberalism, new labour, red toryism, the complete and utter works of richard seymour, the meaning of david cameron, tories, working […]

NOVANEWS May 13, 2010 What the coalition means. by lenin   I have been somewhat alarmed and depressed to see a number of perfectly sane liberals, by no means leaning to the right-wing of liberalism, […]

NOVANEWS Why neoliberalism persists  by lenin Obviously, the commentators are right. Spending cuts transfer the costs of economic failure from the agents principally responsible for it onto the majority who did nothing to cause it, […]